Lessons learned: the long view
-
Katie Carmichael
,
Lynn Clark
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially altered the fabric of life around the globe, raising crucial questions about the nature of language usage in person and online. But as researchers embark on new studies (or continuations of pre-COVID research), just as essential are considerations of what our responsibilities as researchers are to our participants now. In this article, we share our reflections upon the experience of conducting research in two different post-disaster contexts: after Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, Louisiana, and after the Christchurch earthquakes in New Zealand. We describe the issues faced by researchers and participants alike in these locales and we recount the decisions that we made, as many of the same decision processes are being faced by researchers currently navigating data collection due to COVID-19 and its aftermath. These decisions are of course contextually dependent, though our examples draw from two very different situations, comparing and contrasting how various forces, timelines, and regionally specific issues may come into play for researchers in a context of upheaval. In this “long view” essay, we provide a retrospective account of practical tips and ethical considerations for researchers embarking on a similar track.
References
Brunkard, Joan, Gonza Namulanda & Raoult Ratard. 2008. Hurricane Katrina deaths, Louisiana, 2005. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2(4). 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1097/dmp.0b013e31818aaf55.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Elizabeth Frazer, Penelope Harvey, M. B. H. Rampton & Kay Richardson. 1992. Researching language: Issues of power and method. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Charity, Anne H. 2008. Linguists as agents for social change. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5). 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00081.x.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Lynn. 2018. Priming as a motivating factor in sociophonetic variation and change. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(4). 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12338.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Lynn, Helen MacGougan, Jennifer Hay & Liam Walsh. 2016. “Kia ora. This is my earthquake story”: Multiple applications of a sociolinguistic corpus. Ampersand 3. 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2016.01.001.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Tom. 2008. “We’re over-researched here!”: Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology 42(5). 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094573.Search in Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 2009. Research models, community engagement, and linguistic fieldwork: Reflections on working within Canadian Indigenous communities. Language Documentation and Conservation 3(1). 15–50.Search in Google Scholar
Gabe, Thomas, Gene Falk, Maggie McCarty & W. Virginia Mason. 2005. Hurricane Katrina: Social-demographic characteristics of impacted areas. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1. 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500006576.Search in Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. & Erin Haynes. 2010. Making “collaboration” collaborative: An examination of perspectives that frame linguistic field research. Language Documentation & Conservation 4. 268–293.Search in Google Scholar
Levitt, Jeremy I. & Matthew C. Whitaker (eds.). 2009. Hurricane Katrina: America’s unnatural disaster. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1dfnv3bSearch in Google Scholar
Rickford, John. 1997. Unequal partnership: Sociolinguistics and the African American speech community. Language in Society 26(2). 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500020893.Search in Google Scholar
Stats, NZ. 2018. Canterbury: The rebuild by the numbers. https://www.stats.govt.nz (accessed 24 December 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Townsend, Frances Frago. 2006. The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned. Official report to President George W. Bush on 23 February 2006. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/reports/katrina-lessons-learned/index.html (accessed 12 October 2013).Search in Google Scholar
Trechter, Sara. 2013. Social ethics for sociolinguistics. In Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs & Gerard Van Herk (eds.), Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications, 33–45. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315535258-8Search in Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Jeffrey Reaser & Charlotte Vaughn. 2008. Operationalizing linguistic gratuity: From principle to practice. Language and Linguistics Compass 2. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00092.x.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- COVID-era sociolinguistics: introduction to the special issue
- MI Diaries: ethical and practical challenges
- The Lothian Diary Project: sociolinguistic methods during the COVID-19 lockdown
- Disruptions due to COVID-19: using mixed methods to identify factors influencing language maintenance and shift
- Socially distanced but virtually connected: pandemic fieldwork with Black Bostonians
- Lessons learned: the long view
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- COVID-era sociolinguistics: introduction to the special issue
- MI Diaries: ethical and practical challenges
- The Lothian Diary Project: sociolinguistic methods during the COVID-19 lockdown
- Disruptions due to COVID-19: using mixed methods to identify factors influencing language maintenance and shift
- Socially distanced but virtually connected: pandemic fieldwork with Black Bostonians
- Lessons learned: the long view
