Monitoring and evaluating body knowledge: metaphors and metonymies of body position in children’s music instrument instruction

References

Aigen, Kenneth. 2005. Music-centered music therapy. Gilsum: Barcelona Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson White, Kevin. 2018. A case for metaphor and metonymy in the classroom. In Anthony Brian Gallagher (ed.), The 2017 PanSIG Journal. 196–202. Akita, Japan: Japan Association for Language Teaching (JALT).Suche in Google Scholar

Barnden, John A. 2010. Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics 21(1). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Böger, Claudia. 2012. Metaphorical instruction and body memory. In Sabine C. Koch, Tomas Fuchs, Michela Summa & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Body memory, metaphor and movement, 187–199. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/aicr.84.15bogSuche in Google Scholar

Borbely, Antal F. 2008. Metaphor and psychoanalysis. In Raymond W. GibbsJr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 412–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.025Suche in Google Scholar

Carlgren, Ingrid. 2009. CA‐studies of learning—from an educational perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53(2). 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757618.Suche in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 2016. Cognitive linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0063.Suche in Google Scholar

Clayton, Martin & Laura Leante. 2013. Embodiment in music performance. In Martin Clayton, Byron Dueck & Laura Leante (eds.), Experience and meaning in music performance, 261–287. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199811328.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar

Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2009. Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.25croSuche in Google Scholar

Croft, William & Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2017. Introduction. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316339732.001Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, Sharon G. 2010. Metaphorical process and the birth of meaningful musical rationality in beginning instrumentalists. Research Studies in Music Education 32(1). 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x10373055.Suche in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf. 2012. How does “cognition” matter to the analysis of talk-in-interaction. Language Sciences 34. 746–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.013.Suche in Google Scholar

Depperman, Arnulf. 2018. Changes in turn design over interactional histories: The case of instructions in driving school lessons. In Arnulf Deppermann & Jürgen Streeck (eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources, 293–324. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.293.09depSuche in Google Scholar

De Stefani, Elwys & Anne-Danièle Gazin. 2014. Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics 6. 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020.Suche in Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar, Natalia Levshina & Klavan Jane. 2016. Cognitive linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0095.Suche in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & John Heritage. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In Drew Paul & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Feyaerts, Kurt, Geert Brône & Bert Oben. 2017. Multimodality in interaction. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 135–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316339732.010Suche in Google Scholar

Finnish National Agency for Education. 2017. Taiteen perusopetuksen laajan oppimäärän opetussuunnitelman perusteet [Bases for the curriculum for extensive basic art education]. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/186920_taiteen_perusopetuksen_laajan_oppimaaran_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2017-1_0.pdf (accessed 3 July 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2009. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 19–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.1.19Suche in Google Scholar

Ganis, Venus & Susan Paterson. 2011. Imagination in early childhood education. Australian Art Education 34(2). 79–97.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W.Jr. 2011. Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48(8). 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2011.606103.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W.Jr. 2014. Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action. In Mark Landau, Michael D. Robinson & Brian P. Meier (eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life, 17–40. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/14278-002Suche in Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam. 2008. How metaphors create categories – quickly. In Raymond W. GibbsJr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.006Suche in Google Scholar

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco, M. Sandra Peña Cervel & Lorena Pérez Hernández. 2013. Introduction to the volume. In Francisco Gonzálvez-García, M. Sandra Peña Cervel & Lorena Pérez Hernández (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the contemporary theory of metaphor: Recent developments and applications, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.56.01gonSuche in Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate. 2017. Embodiment and discourse: Dimensions and dynamics of contemporary metaphor theory. In Beate Hampe (ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse, 3–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108182324.002Suche in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216059Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2013. Epistemics in conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis, 370–394. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch18Suche in Google Scholar

Ishino, Mika. 2018. Micro-longitudinal conversation analysis in examining co-teachers’ reflection-in-action. System 78. 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.013.Suche in Google Scholar

Kopp, Richard R. & Michael J. Craw. 1998. Metaphoric language, metaphoric cognition, and cognitive therapy. Psychotherapy 35(3). 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087795.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Landau, Mark J., Michael J. Robinson & Brian P. Meier. 2013. Introduction. In Mark Landau, Michael D. Robinson & Brian P. Meier (eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life, 1–16. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/14278-001Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2016. Working toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0004.Suche in Google Scholar

Larson, Steve. 2012. Musical forces: Motion, metaphor, and meaning in music. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene H. 1995. Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19(1). 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544907.Suche in Google Scholar

Littlemore, Jeannette. 2017. Metonymy. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 407–422. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316339732.026Suche in Google Scholar

Maass, Anne, Caterina Suitner & Luciano Arcuri. 2014. The role of metaphors in intergroup relations. In Mark Landau, Michael D. Robinson & Brian P. Meier (eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life, 153–177. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/14278-008Suche in Google Scholar

Macbeth, Douglas H. 1991. Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics and Education 3. 281–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(91)90012-8.Suche in Google Scholar

McHoul, Alec. 1978. The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7. 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500005522.Suche in Google Scholar

McMullen, Linda M. 2008. Putting it in context: Metaphor and psychotherapy. In Raymond W. GibbsJr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 397–411. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.024Suche in Google Scholar

Merlino, Sara. 2014. Singing in ‘another’ language: How pronunciation matters in the organisation of choral rehearsals. Social Semiotics 24(4). 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.929390.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies 16(2). 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515325.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3). 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia & Silva H. Ladewig. 2013. Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons. In Barbara Dancygier, Mike Borkent, Jennifer Hinnel & Michael Borkent (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 295–324. Stanford: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nishizaka, Aug. 2006. What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(2). 119–154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3902_1.Suche in Google Scholar

Parton, Katharine. 2014. Epistemic stance in orchestral interaction. Social Semiotics 24(4). 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.929389.Suche in Google Scholar

Priestley, Mary. 1994. Essays on analytical music therapy. Phoenixville, PA: Barcelona.Suche in Google Scholar

Rai, Sunny, Devendra K. Tayal, Divyanshu Sharma & Ayush Garg. 2019. Understanding metaphors using emotions. New Generation Computing 37. 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-018-0045-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Reed, Darren & Beatrice Szczepek Reed. 2014. The emergence of learnables in music masterclasses. Social Semiotics 24(4). 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.929391.Suche in Google Scholar

Rose, Avi. 1995. Metaphor with an attitude: The use of the mighty morphin’ Power Rangers television series as a therapeutic metaphor. International Journal of Play Therapy 4(2). 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0089030.Suche in Google Scholar

Ryle, Anthony, Amanda M. Poynton & Bee J. Brockman. 1990. Cognitive-analytic therapy: Active participation in change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Sahlström, Fritjof. 2009. Conversation analysis as a way of studying learning: An introduction to a special issue of SJER. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53(2). 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757543.Suche in Google Scholar

Sahlström, Fritjof. 2011. Learning as social action. In Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellermann & Simona Pekarek Doehler (eds.), L2 interactional competence and development, 43–62. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847694072-005Suche in Google Scholar

Sambre, Paul & Kurt Feyaerts. 2017. Embodied musical meaning-making and multimodal viewpoints in a trumpet master class. Journal of Pragmatics 122. 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Sarpavaara, Harri & Anja Koski-Jännes. 2013. Change as a journey: Clients’ metaphoric change talk as an outcome predictor in initial motivational sessions with probationers. Qualitative Research in Psychology 10(1). 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.586256.Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0048.Suche in Google Scholar

Seedhouse, Paul. 2004. The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation analysis: An introduction. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.10.21832/9781847692849-020Suche in Google Scholar

Smeijsters, Henk. 2012. Analogy and metaphor in music therapy: Theory and practice. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 21(3). 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2011.649299.Suche in Google Scholar

Stevanovic, Melisa. 2017. Managing compliance in violin instruction: The case of the Finnish clitic particles -pA and -pAs in imperatives and hortatives. In Sorjonen Marja-Leena, Raevaara Liisa & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Imperative turns at talk: The design of directives in action, 357–380. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.30.12steSuche in Google Scholar

Stevanovic, Melisa. 2020. Student compliance and action priority: On the directive use of Finnish second-person declaratives and interrogatives during violin instruction. In Emma M. Betz, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm & Peter S. Golato (eds.), Mobilizing others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities, 115–145. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.33.05steSuche in Google Scholar

Stevanovic, Melisa & Arniika Kuusisto. 2019. Teacher directives in children’s musical instrument instruction: Activity context, student cooperation, and institutional priority. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 63(7). 1022–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1476405.Suche in Google Scholar

Stollak, Mary Alice. 1998. The use of analogy in the rehearsal. Music Educators Journal 84(6). 17–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399096.Suche in Google Scholar

Stukenbrock, Anja. 2015. Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics 65. 80–102.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017Suche in Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, Beatrice, Darren Reed & Elizabeth Haddon. 2013. NOW or NOT NOW: Coordinating restarts in the pursuits of learnables in vocal masterclasses. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(1). 22–46.10.1080/08351813.2013.753714Suche in Google Scholar

Tay, Dennis. 2013. Metaphor in psychotherapy: A descriptive and prescriptive analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/milcc.1Suche in Google Scholar

Tay, Dennis. 2018. Metaphors of movement in psychotherapy talk. Journal of Pragmatics 125. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2009. Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53(2). 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757592.Suche in Google Scholar

Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2012. Question-prefaced advice in feedback sequences of Finnish academic supervisions. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 31–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.221.04vehSuche in Google Scholar

Veronesi, Daniela. 2014. Correction sequences and semiotic resources in ensemble music workshops: The case of Conduction®. Social Semiotics 24(4). 468–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.929393.Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Johannes, Simona Pekarek Doehler & Esther González-Martínez. 2018. Longitudinal research on the organization of social interaction: Current developments and methodological challenges. In Simona Pekarek Doehler, Johannes Wagner & Ja Esther González-Martínez (eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction, 3–35. New York: Springer.10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_1Suche in Google Scholar

Weeks, Peter. 1985. Error-correction techniques and sequences in instructional settings: Toward a comparative framework. Human Studies 8(3). 195–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00142993.Suche in Google Scholar

Weeks, Peter. 1996. A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3). 247–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_3.Suche in Google Scholar

Zbikowski, Lawrence M. 2009. Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 359–381. Berlin:  Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366.6.359Suche in Google Scholar

Zbikowski, Lawrence M. 2018. Conceptual blending, creativity, and music. Musicae Scientiae 22(1). 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864917712783.Suche in Google Scholar

Zbikowski, Lawrence M. 2020. Music, metaphor, and creativity. In Laura Hidalgo-Downing & Blanca Kraljevic Mujic (eds.), Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts, 43–70. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/ftl.7.03zbiSuche in Google Scholar