Language and creativity: a Construction Grammar approach to linguistic creativity

References

Bencini, Giulia M. L. 2013. Psycholinguistics. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 379–396. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0021Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. & Nancy Chang. 2005. Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 147–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.3.08berSearch in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. & Nancy Chang. 2013. Embodied Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 168–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander. 2018. Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 277–293.10.1515/zaa-2018-0025Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C. 2013. Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0013Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C. & Ivan Sag (eds.). 2012. Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Bolhuis, John J., Ian Tattersall, Noam Chomsky & Robert C. Berwick. 2014. How could language have evolved? PLOS Biology 12(8): e1001934. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934 (accessed 20 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Ronald M. Kaplan. 1982. Introduction: Grammars as mental representations of language. In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. (MIT Press Series on Cognitive Theory and Mental Representation), xvii–lii. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. (Janua Linguarum/Series Minor 4). The Hague/Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811937Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 1999. The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 543–571.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2013. Construction Grammar and first language acquisition. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 347–378. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0019Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. 2013. Construction Grammar and second language acquisition. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 365–378. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0020Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual Blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 2013. Berkeley Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 111–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0007Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay. 1993. Construction Grammar coursebook. Ms, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay. 1995. Construction Grammar. Ms, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? Construction. Language 75(1). 1–33.10.2307/417472Search in Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey K. Pullum & Ivan A. Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5). 219–224.10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc772nnSearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Elkhonon. 2018. Creativity: The human brain in the age of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203(3). 88–96.10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017a. From Constructions to Construction Grammars. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 284–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316339732.019Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017b. Construction Grammars. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 310–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316339732.020Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017c. Multimodal Constructs – Multimodal Constructions? The role of Constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 1–10.10.1515/lingvan-2016-0042Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2018a. Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. [Special Issue: Linguistic creativity]. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 259–276.10.1515/zaa-2018-0024Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2018b (ed.). Construction Grammar and creativity. Special Issue of Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3).10.1515/zaa-2018-0024Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Mark Turner. In prep. Construction in progress: The way we combine constructions is the way we combine thoughts.Search in Google Scholar

Kandler, Christian, Rainer Riemann, Alois Angleitner, Frank M. Spinath, Peter Borkenau & Lars Penke. 2016. The nature of creativity: The roles of genetic factors, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and environmental sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 111. 230–249.10.1037/pspp0000087Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, James C. 2016. Creativity 101. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company.10.1891/9780826129536Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1974. Syntactic Amalgams. Chicago Linguistic Society 10. 321–344.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1969. A linguistic guide to English poetry. London/New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. 2010. Sign-based Construction Grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 155–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. 2013. Sign-based Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 133–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0008Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. & Knud Lambrecht. 1996. Toward a construction-based model of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72(2). 215–247.10.2307/416650Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2006. Phrasal or lexical constructions? Language 82(4). 850–83.10.1353/lan.2006.0213Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2018. Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. 2nd revised and extended edn. (Textbooks in Language Sciences 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl J. & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Bert Cappelle & Yury Shtyrov. 2013. Brain basis of meaning, words, constructions, and grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 396–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0022Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Thomas Wasow, & Emily M. Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. 2nd edn. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Hans C. Boas, & Paul Kay. 2012. Introducing Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, 1–30. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sampson, Geoffrey. 2016. Two ideas of creativity. In Martin Hinton (ed.), Evidence, experiment and argument in linguistics and philosophy of language, 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Shieber, Stuart M. 1986. An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. (CSLI Lecture Notes 4). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Steels, Luc. 2013. Fluid Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 153–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0009Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, Robert, ed. 1999. Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trousdale, Graeme. 2015. On schemas and word types in English from the perspective of constructionalization and constructional change. Revista Linguíʃtica 9(2). 20–25.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 2014. The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity, and the human spark. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 2018. The role of creativity in multimodal Construction Grammar. [Special issue: Linguistic creativity]. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 357–370.10.1515/zaa-2018-0030Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier. 1999. A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today 20(3). 397–418.Search in Google Scholar

Van Eecke, Paul & Kathrin Beuls. 2018. Exploring the creative potential of computational Construction Grammar. [Special issue: Linguistic creativity]. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 341–355.10.1515/zaa-2018-0029Search in Google Scholar