Sharing innovative methods, data and knowledge across sociophonetics and forensic speech science

References

Alzqhoul, Esam, Balamurali Nair & Bernard Guillemin. 2015. Impact of dynamic rate coding aspects of mobile phone networks on forensic voice comparison. Science and Justice 55(5). 363–374.10.1016/j.scijus.2015.04.006Suche in Google Scholar

Boyd, Zac, Zuzana Elliott, Josef Fruehwald, Lauren Hall-Lew & Daniel Lawrence. 2015. An evaluation of sociolinguistic elicitation methods. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, 10–14 August.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Georgina & Jessica Wormald. 2017. Automatic sociophonetics: Exploring corpora with a forensic accent recognition system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(1). 422–433.10.1121/1.4991330Suche in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle & Ghada Khattab. 2013. Population samples. In Robert Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 74–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139013734.006Suche in Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Sue Fox, Paul Kerswill & Eivind Torgersen. 2008. Ethnicity, friendship network and social practices as the motor of dialect change: Linguistic innovation in London. Sociolinguistica 22. 1–23.10.1515/9783484605299.1Suche in Google Scholar

Decker, Paul de & Jennifer Nycz. 2011. For the record: Which digital media can be used for sociophonetic analysis? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(2). 51–59.Suche in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 14. 87–100.10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Stanley. 1994. The Yorkshire Ripper enquiry: Part I. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 1(2). 197–206.10.1558/ijsll.v1i2.197Suche in Google Scholar

Feagin, Crawford. 2013. Entering the community: Fieldwork. In Jack Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.) The handbook of language variation and change,19–37. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118335598.ch1Suche in Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul & Gerard Docherty. 1999a. Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.10.4324/9781315832470Suche in Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul & Gerard Docherty. 1999b. Urban voices – overview. In Paul Foulkes & Gerard Docherty (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 1–24. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul, James Scobbie & Dominic Watt. 2010. Sociophonetics. In William J. Hardcastle, John Laver & Fiona E. Gibbon (eds.) Handbook of phonetic sciences (2^ndedn.), 703–754. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444317251.ch19Suche in Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul & Peter French. 2012. Forensic speaker comparison: The linguistic-acoustic perspective. In Lawrence Solan & Peter Tiersma (eds.), Oxford handbook of language and law, 557–572. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0041Suche in Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul, Gerard Docherty, Stefanie Shattuck Hufnagel & Vincent Hughes. 2018. Three steps towards predictability: Considerations of methodological robustness, indexical and prosodic factors, and replication in the laboratory. Linguistics Vanguard 4(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0032.10.1515/lingvan-2017-0032Suche in Google Scholar

Franco-Pedroso, Javier & Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez. 2016. Linguistically-constrained formant-based i-vectors for automatic speaker recognition. Speech Communication 76. 61–81.10.1016/j.specom.2015.11.002Suche in Google Scholar

French, Peter. 2017. A developmental history of forensic speaker comparison in the UK. English Phonetics 21. 271–286.Suche in Google Scholar

French, Peter, Francis Nolan, Paul Foulkes, Philip Harrison & Kirsty McDougall. 2010. The UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison: a rejoinder to Rose and Morrison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 17(1). 138–163.10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.143Suche in Google Scholar

French, Peter & Louisa Stevens. 2013. Forensic speech science. In Mark Jones & Rachael Knight (eds.), Bloomsbury companion to phonetics, 183–197. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Fromont, Robert & Jennifer Hay. 2012. LaBB-CAT: An annotation store. In Proceedings of Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop, 113–117. Otago University, 4–6 December.Suche in Google Scholar

Gold, Erica & Peter French. 2011. International practices in forensic speaker comparison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 18(2). 293–307.10.1558/ijsll.v18i2.293Suche in Google Scholar

Gold, Erica, Sula Ross & Katherine Earnshaw. 2018. ‘The West Yorkshire Regional English Database’: Investigations into the generalisability of reference populations for forensic speaker comparison casework. In Proceedings of Interspeech, 2748–2752. Hyderabad, 2–6 September.10.21437/Interspeech.2018-65Suche in Google Scholar

González-Rodríguez, Joaquín, Juana Gil, Rubén Pérez & Javier Franco-Pedroso. 2014. What are we missing with i-vectors? A perceptual analysis of i-vector-based falsely accepted trials. In Proceedings of Odyssey: The speaker and language recognition workshop, 33–40. Joensuu, 16–19 June.10.21437/Odyssey.2014-6Suche in Google Scholar

Harrison, Philip. 2013. Making accurate formant measurements: An empirical investigation of the influence of the measurement tool, analysis settings and speaker on formant measurements. York: University of York, PhD Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill & Dominic Watt. 2012. English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles (5^thedn.). London: Hodder Arnold.10.4324/9780203784440Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, Vincent & Paul Foulkes. 2016. Speaker- and group-specific information in formant dynamics: A forensic perspective. Paper presented at LabPhon 15 Satellite Workshop: Speech dynamics, social meaning and phonological categories. Cornell University, 13–16 July.Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, Vincent, Philip Harrison, Paul Foulkes, Peter French, Colleen Kavanagh & Eugenia San Segundo. 2017. Mapping across feature spaces in forensic voice comparison: The contribution of auditory-based voice quality to (semi-)automatic system testing. In Proceedings of Interspeech, 3892–3896. Stockholm University, 20–24 August.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1508Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, Vincent & Jessica Wormald. 2017. WikiDialects: A resource for assessing typicality in forensic voice comparison. Paper presented at the International Association of Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics Conference. Split, 9–12 July.Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, Vincent, Philip Harrison, Paul Foulkes, Peter French, Colleen Kavanagh & Eugenia San Segundo. 2018. The individual and the system: Assessing the stability of the output of a semi-automatic forensic voice comparison system. In Proceedings of Interspeech, 227–231. Hyderabad, 2–6 September.10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1649Suche in Google Scholar

Kendall, Tyler. 2007. Enhancing sociolinguistic data collections: The North Carolina sociolinguistic archive and analysis project. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13( 2). 15–26.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendall, Tyler. 2008. On the history and future of sociolinguistic data. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(2). 332–351.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00051.xSuche in Google Scholar

Künzel, Herman. 2001. Beware of the ‘telephone effect’: The influence of telephone transmission on the measurement of formant frequencies. Forensic Linguistics 8(1). 80–99.10.1558/ijsll.v8i1.80Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonology and phonetics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110167467Suche in Google Scholar

Loakes, Deborah. 2006. A forensic phonetic investigation into the speech patterns of identical and non-identical twins. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, PhD Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Mielke, Jeff, Morgan Sonderegger & Jane Stuart-Smith. 2017. SPeech Across Dialects Of English (SPADE): Large-scale digital analysis of a spoken language across space and time. https://diggingintodata.org/awards/2016/project/speech-across-dialects-english-spade-large-scale-digital-analysis-spoken (15 February, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Morrison, Geoffrey, Farhan Hyder Sahito, Gaëlle Jardine, Djordje Djokic, Sophie Clavet, Sabine Berghs & Caroline Goemans Dorny. 2016. INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies. Forensic Science International 263. 92–100.10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.044Suche in Google Scholar

Nolan, Francis, Kirsty McDougall, Gea de Jong & Toby Hudson. 2009. The DyViS database: Style-controlled recordings of 100 homogeneous speakers for forensic phonetic research. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 16(1). 31–57.10.1558/ijsll.v16i1.31Suche in Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4). 478–504.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.xSuche in Google Scholar

Rathcke, Tamara, Jane Stuart-Smith, Bernard Torsney & Jonathan Harrington. 2016. The beauty in a beast: Minimising the effects of diverse recording quality on vowel formant measurements in sociophonetic real-time studies. Speech Communication 86. 24–41.10.1016/j.specom.2016.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

Rhodes, Richard. 2012. Assessing the strength of non-contemporaneous forensic speech evidence. York: University of York, PhD Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Lisa. 2012. A forensic phonetic study of the vocal responses of individuals in distress. York: University of York, PhD Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Sula, Peter French & Paul Foulkes. 2016. UK practitioners’ estimations of the distribution of speech variants. Paper presented at the International Association of Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics Conference. University of York, 24–27 July.Suche in Google Scholar

Saks, Michael & Jonathan Koehler. 2005. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science 309. 892–895.10.1126/science.1111565Suche in Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. 2004. Adolescents, young adults and the critical period: Two case studies from ‘Seven Up’. In Ronald Macaulay & Carmen Fought (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections, 121–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195170399.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani. 2011. Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 464–493.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00503.xSuche in Google Scholar

Wells, John. 1982. Accents of English (3 volumes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611759Suche in Google Scholar