Startseite Contrast relations in the early aber-clauses of German-speaking infants
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Contrast relations in the early aber-clauses of German-speaking infants

  • Damaris Bartz EMAIL logo und Dagmar Bittner
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. November 2017

Abstract

The paper focusses on the early production of aber- (‘but’-) clauses in German L1-acquisition. It aims to explain the delay in the realization of finite clause structure in aber-clauses reported in a previous study. Delayed realization of finite clause structure was also reported for clauses containing the additive particle auch (‘also/too’) by other researchers. It has been attributed to the information-structural properties of auch-clauses. Following this approach, we investigated the information-structural properties of the aber-clauses documented in the longitudinal data of five monolingual children (age range: 1;11–2;10) from the first documented aber-production to the emergence of finite clause structure in aber-clauses. Information-structural complexity is measured in terms of number and quality of the information-structural patterns of contrastive information in the aber-clause and the explicitness of the contrast realization. Analyses reveal a change in preference from topic-including contrasts to non-topic-including ones, that is, comment-located contrasts as well as a change from explicit to implicit contrast realization. We argue that the delayed realization of finite clause structure in aber-clauses is caused by an initial concentration on the complex content relations raised by the requirement of information-structural alignment of at least two different constituents as well as the anticipating of an implicit proposition.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (Grant Nr. 01UG1411) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant BI 482/4-2). We thank an anonymous reviewer and Christine Dimroth for helpful comments on a previous version of this article.

References

Bittner, Dagmar. 2003. The emergence of verb inflection in two German-speaking children. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition. A cross-linguistic perspective, 53–88. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110899832Suche in Google Scholar

Bittner, Dagmar & Damaris Bartz. Forthcoming. Finiteness in early but-clauses in German L1-acquisition. First Language.10.1177/0142723717747470Suche in Google Scholar

Behrens, Heike. German Leo Corpus (Data set). TalkBank, 2010. DOI: 10.21415/T5N01B.Suche in Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and linguistic meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486456Suche in Google Scholar

Brauße, Ursula. 1998. Was ist Adversativität? Aber oder Und? In Siegfried Grosse, Hans-Werner Eroms, Gisela Harras & Gerhard Stickel (eds.), Deutsche Sprache, 138–157. Berlin, Germany: Erich Schmidt-Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Dietrich, Rainer & Patrick Grommes. 1998. ‘nicht’, Reflexe seiner Bedeutung und Syntax im Zweitspracherwerb. In Heide Wegener (eds.), Eine zweite Sprache lernen. Empirische Untersuchungen zum Zweitspracherwerb, 173–202. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Dimroth, Christine. 2009. Stepping stones and stumbling blocks. Why negation accelerates and additive particles delay the acquisition of finiteness in German. In Christine Dimroth & Peter Jordens (eds.), Functional categories in learner language, 137–170. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216172Suche in Google Scholar

Dimroth, Christine, Petra Gretsch, Peter Jordens, Clive Perdue & Marianne Starren. 2003. Finiteness in Germanic languages: A stage-model for first and second language development. In Christine Dimroth & Marianne Starren (eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition, 65–94. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.26.05dimSuche in Google Scholar

Dimroth, Christine, Cecilia Andorno, Sandra Benazzo & Josje Verhagen. 2010. Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 3328–3344.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.009Suche in Google Scholar

Jordens, Peter. 2012. Language acquisition and the functional category system. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216219Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 1998. Assertion and finiteness. In Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition: Essays in honor of Jürgen Weissenborn, 225–245. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Lang, Ewald. 2000. Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 235–256. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219043-010Suche in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project. Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, Max. German Miller Corpus (Data set). TalkBank, 2004. DOI: 10.21415/T56592.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Anja, Barbara Höhle, Michaela Schmitz & Jürgen Weissenborn. 2009. Information structural constraints on children’s early language production: The acquisition of the focus particle auch (also) in German learning 12-to-36-month olds. First Language 29. 373–399.10.1177/0142723709105314Suche in Google Scholar

Nederstigt, Ulrike. 2001. The acquisition of additive “focus particles” in German. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez & Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 554–565. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Penner, Zvi, Rosemarie Tracy & Jürgen Weissenborn. 2000. Where scrambling begins: Triggering object scrambling at the early stage in German and Bernese Swiss German. In Cornelia Hamann & Susan Powers (eds.), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization, 127–164. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3232-1_6Suche in Google Scholar

Preacher, Kristopher J. 2001. Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.Suche in Google Scholar

Rigol, Rosemarie. German Rigol Corpus (Data set). TalkBank, 2007. DOI: 10.21415/T50S34.Suche in Google Scholar

RStudio Team. 2016. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. URL http://www.rstudio.com/.Suche in Google Scholar

Sæbø, Kjell Johann. 2003. Presupposition and contrast: German aber as a topic particle. In Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7, 257–271. Constance: University of Constance.Suche in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841.Suche in Google Scholar

Schimke, Sarah, Josje Verhagen & Christine Dimroth. 2008. Particules additives et finitude en Néerlandais et Allemand L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 26. 191–210.10.4000/aile.3622Suche in Google Scholar

Spooren, Wilbert & Liesbeth Degand. 2010. Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2). 241–266.10.1515/cllt.2010.009Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Suche in Google Scholar

Umbach, Carla. 2001. Contrast and contrastive topic. In Alessandro Lenci, Simonetta Montemagni & Vito Pirrelli (eds.), Proceedings of the European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics, 175–188. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Suche in Google Scholar

Winkler, Steffi. 2009. The acquisition of syntactic finiteness in German L1. A structure-building approach. In Christine Dimroth & Peter Jordens (eds.), Functional categories in learner language, 97–134. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216172.97Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-21
Accepted: 2017-10-26
Published Online: 2017-11-03

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0102/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen