Abstract
The paper focusses on the early production of aber- (‘but’-) clauses in German L1-acquisition. It aims to explain the delay in the realization of finite clause structure in aber-clauses reported in a previous study. Delayed realization of finite clause structure was also reported for clauses containing the additive particle auch (‘also/too’) by other researchers. It has been attributed to the information-structural properties of auch-clauses. Following this approach, we investigated the information-structural properties of the aber-clauses documented in the longitudinal data of five monolingual children (age range: 1;11–2;10) from the first documented aber-production to the emergence of finite clause structure in aber-clauses. Information-structural complexity is measured in terms of number and quality of the information-structural patterns of contrastive information in the aber-clause and the explicitness of the contrast realization. Analyses reveal a change in preference from topic-including contrasts to non-topic-including ones, that is, comment-located contrasts as well as a change from explicit to implicit contrast realization. We argue that the delayed realization of finite clause structure in aber-clauses is caused by an initial concentration on the complex content relations raised by the requirement of information-structural alignment of at least two different constituents as well as the anticipating of an implicit proposition.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (Grant Nr. 01UG1411) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant BI 482/4-2). We thank an anonymous reviewer and Christine Dimroth for helpful comments on a previous version of this article.
References
Bittner, Dagmar. 2003. The emergence of verb inflection in two German-speaking children. In Dagmar Bittner, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Marianne Kilani-Schoch (eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition. A cross-linguistic perspective, 53–88. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110899832Suche in Google Scholar
Bittner, Dagmar & Damaris Bartz. Forthcoming. Finiteness in early but-clauses in German L1-acquisition. First Language.10.1177/0142723717747470Suche in Google Scholar
Behrens, Heike. German Leo Corpus (Data set). TalkBank, 2010. DOI: 10.21415/T5N01B.Suche in Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and linguistic meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486456Suche in Google Scholar
Brauße, Ursula. 1998. Was ist Adversativität? Aber oder Und? In Siegfried Grosse, Hans-Werner Eroms, Gisela Harras & Gerhard Stickel (eds.), Deutsche Sprache, 138–157. Berlin, Germany: Erich Schmidt-Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Dietrich, Rainer & Patrick Grommes. 1998. ‘nicht’, Reflexe seiner Bedeutung und Syntax im Zweitspracherwerb. In Heide Wegener (eds.), Eine zweite Sprache lernen. Empirische Untersuchungen zum Zweitspracherwerb, 173–202. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar
Dimroth, Christine. 2009. Stepping stones and stumbling blocks. Why negation accelerates and additive particles delay the acquisition of finiteness in German. In Christine Dimroth & Peter Jordens (eds.), Functional categories in learner language, 137–170. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216172Suche in Google Scholar
Dimroth, Christine, Petra Gretsch, Peter Jordens, Clive Perdue & Marianne Starren. 2003. Finiteness in Germanic languages: A stage-model for first and second language development. In Christine Dimroth & Marianne Starren (eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition, 65–94. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.26.05dimSuche in Google Scholar
Dimroth, Christine, Cecilia Andorno, Sandra Benazzo & Josje Verhagen. 2010. Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 3328–3344.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.009Suche in Google Scholar
Jordens, Peter. 2012. Language acquisition and the functional category system. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216219Suche in Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1998. Assertion and finiteness. In Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds.), Issues in the theory of language acquisition: Essays in honor of Jürgen Weissenborn, 225–245. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald. 2000. Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 235–256. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219043-010Suche in Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project. Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Max. German Miller Corpus (Data set). TalkBank, 2004. DOI: 10.21415/T56592.Suche in Google Scholar
Müller, Anja, Barbara Höhle, Michaela Schmitz & Jürgen Weissenborn. 2009. Information structural constraints on children’s early language production: The acquisition of the focus particle auch (also) in German learning 12-to-36-month olds. First Language 29. 373–399.10.1177/0142723709105314Suche in Google Scholar
Nederstigt, Ulrike. 2001. The acquisition of additive “focus particles” in German. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez & Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 554–565. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Penner, Zvi, Rosemarie Tracy & Jürgen Weissenborn. 2000. Where scrambling begins: Triggering object scrambling at the early stage in German and Bernese Swiss German. In Cornelia Hamann & Susan Powers (eds.), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization, 127–164. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3232-1_6Suche in Google Scholar
Preacher, Kristopher J. 2001. Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.Suche in Google Scholar
Rigol, Rosemarie. German Rigol Corpus (Data set). TalkBank, 2007. DOI: 10.21415/T50S34.Suche in Google Scholar
RStudio Team. 2016. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. URL http://www.rstudio.com/.Suche in Google Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johann. 2003. Presupposition and contrast: German aber as a topic particle. In Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7, 257–271. Constance: University of Constance.Suche in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841.Suche in Google Scholar
Schimke, Sarah, Josje Verhagen & Christine Dimroth. 2008. Particules additives et finitude en Néerlandais et Allemand L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 26. 191–210.10.4000/aile.3622Suche in Google Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert & Liesbeth Degand. 2010. Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2). 241–266.10.1515/cllt.2010.009Suche in Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Suche in Google Scholar
Umbach, Carla. 2001. Contrast and contrastive topic. In Alessandro Lenci, Simonetta Montemagni & Vito Pirrelli (eds.), Proceedings of the European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics, 175–188. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Suche in Google Scholar
Winkler, Steffi. 2009. The acquisition of syntactic finiteness in German L1. A structure-building approach. In Christine Dimroth & Peter Jordens (eds.), Functional categories in learner language, 97–134. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216172.97Suche in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Contrast relations in the early aber-clauses of German-speaking infants
- Four- to five-year-olds’ use of word order and prosody in focus marking in Dutch
- Effects of exposure and information structure in native and non-native pronoun resolution in French
- Special Collection in Linguistics Vanguard: “The acquisition of information structure”
- The influence of discourse context on children’s ordering of “new” and “old” information
- Information structure in canonical and scrambled dative orders in L2 Korean
- The roles of givenness and type of referring expression in the comprehension of word order in Russian-speaking children
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Contrast relations in the early aber-clauses of German-speaking infants
- Four- to five-year-olds’ use of word order and prosody in focus marking in Dutch
- Effects of exposure and information structure in native and non-native pronoun resolution in French
- Special Collection in Linguistics Vanguard: “The acquisition of information structure”
- The influence of discourse context on children’s ordering of “new” and “old” information
- Information structure in canonical and scrambled dative orders in L2 Korean
- The roles of givenness and type of referring expression in the comprehension of word order in Russian-speaking children