Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns

References

Andrén, Mats. 2010. Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund: Centre for Languages and Literatures, Lund University.Suche in Google Scholar

Andrén, Mats. 2014. Multimodal constructions in children: Is the headshake part of language? Gesture 14(2). 141–170.10.1075/gest.14.2.02andSuche in Google Scholar

Auer, Peter & Stefan Pfänder (eds.). 2011. Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229080Suche in Google Scholar

Bavelas, Janet, Nicole Chovil, Jan L. Coates & Lori Roe. 1995. Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21. 394–405.10.1177/0146167295214010Suche in Google Scholar

Benazzo, Sandra & Aliyah Morgenstern. 2014. A bilingual child’s multimodal path into negation. Gesture 14(2). 171–202.10.1075/gest.14.2.03benSuche in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin & Nancy Chang. 2005. Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and cross-language dimensions. 147–190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/cal.3.08berSuche in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Le sens pratique. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Suche in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana. 2012. Repetitions in gesture: Structures, functions, and cognitive aspects. Frankfurt (Oder): European University Viadrina Ph.D. dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana. 2013. A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Theßendorf (eds.), Body– language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.1.), 1079–1098. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261318.1079Suche in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller. 2014. The family of AWAY-gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body– language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.2.), 1592–1604. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004Suche in Google Scholar

Calbris, Geneviève. 2011. Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.5Suche in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 2013. Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Theßendorf (eds.), Body– language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.1.), 182–201. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261318.182Suche in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 2015. Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition 7(4). 499–514.10.1017/langcog.2015.20Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 1978. Discovering what words can do. Papers from the parasession on the lexicon, Chicago Linguistic Society, 34–57.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2013. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0012Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Eve E. Sweetser. 2014. Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf. 2011. Konstruktionsgrammatik und interaktionale Linguistik: Affinitäten, Komplementaritäten und Diskrepanzen. In Alexander Lasch & Alexander Ziem (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze, 205–238. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Suche in Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2002. Gestures in signing: The presentation gesture in Danish Sign Language. In Rolf Schulmeister & Heimo Reinitzer (eds.), Progress in sign language research /Fortschritte in der Gebärdenensprachforschung: In honor of Siegmund Prillwitz /Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz, 143–162. Hamburg: Signum.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Antonio Zampolli (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, vol. 4, 55–81. Amsterdam, NY & Oxford: North Holland.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. The mechanisms of construction grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. 35–55.10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Catherine M. O’Conner. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Kerstin & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2007. Konstruktionsgrammatik I: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (Stauffenburg Linguistik). Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Suche in Google Scholar

Fricke, Ellen. 2012. Grammatik multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218893Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805844Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1985. Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 187–219. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.6.10givSuche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1998. Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 203–219. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.10.4324/9781315085678-8Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Grady, Joe & Christopher Johnson. 2002. Converging evidence for the notions of subscene and primary scene. In René Dirven & Ralph Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 533–554. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219197.4.533Suche in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.07haiSuche in Google Scholar

Hinnell, Jennifer. 2013. The iconicity of aspect in co-speech gesture: A multimodal corpus study of catenative auxiliaries in North American English. Manuscript. University of Alberta Department of Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinnell, Jennifer. 2014. Multimodal aspectual constructions in North American English: A corpus analysis of aspect in co-speech gesture using Little Red Hen. International Society of Gesture Studies (ISGS), San Diego, USA, July 8-11, 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 1998. Emergent grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.10.4324/9781315085678-6Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56. 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Suche in Google Scholar

Hostetter, Autumn. B. & Martha W. Alibali. 2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(3). 495–514.10.3758/PBR.15.3.495Suche in Google Scholar

Imo, Wolfgang. 2013. Sprache-in-Interaktion: Analysemethoden und Untersuchungsfelder. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110306323Suche in Google Scholar

Imo, Wolfgang. 2015. Interactional construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 69–77.10.1515/lingvan-2015-0008Suche in Google Scholar

Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer. 2002. Gesture as substrate in the process of ASL grammaticalization. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier & D. Quintos-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken language, 199–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kay, Paul & Charles J. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The ‘What’s X doing Y?’ Construction. Language 75. 1–33.10.2307/417472Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2008. Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture 8(3). 348–366.10.1075/gest.8.3.05kenSuche in Google Scholar

Kok, Kasper. 2016. The grammatical potential of co-speech gesture: A Functional Discourse grammar perspective. Functions of Language 23(2). 149–178.10.1075/fol.23.2.01kokSuche in Google Scholar

Kok, Kasper & Alan Cienki. 2016. Cognitive Grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 67–100.10.1515/cog-2015-0087Suche in Google Scholar

Ladewig, Silva H. 2012. Syntactic and semantic integration of gestures into speech – Structural, cognitive, and conceptual aspects. European University Viadrina Ph.D. dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Ladewig, Silva H. 2014. Recurrent gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body– language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.2.), 1558–1574. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Descriptive Application, vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lenz, Alexandra N. 2007. The grammaticalization of geben ‘to give’ in German and Luxembourgish. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000), 163–178. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110925463.163Suche in Google Scholar

Mandler, Jean M. 1996. Preverbal representation and language. In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 365–384. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4107.003.0011Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2006. Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discourse evidence for multimodal models of grammar. Cornell University. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Ph.D. dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2008. Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 115–154. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.3.08mitSuche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2010. Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions, 351–385. London: Equinox.10.3138/9781845535032-016Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2013. The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Theßendorf (eds.), Body– language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.1.), 750–779. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261318.755Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2014a. Multimodal existential constructions in German and English. Presentation at the 6th Conference of the German Association for Cognitive Linguistics, University of Nürnberg-Erlangen.Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2014b. Gestures and metonymy. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cineki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.2.), 1717–1732. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2017. Embodied frames, metonymy, and pragmatic inferencing in gesture. In Elisabeth Wehling & Eve Sweetser (guest ed.), special issue ‘Gesture pragmatics’. Gesture 716(2).Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene & Gina Joue. 2017. Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy: Towards a frame-based account of gestural action in multimodal discourse. In Beate Hampe (ed.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, 119–137. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108182324.008Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene & Tanja Mortelmans. 2013. Grammaticalized manual actions of giving and holding: From ditransitive to existential constructions in language and gesture. Conference presentation, ICLC 12, University of Alberta, Edmonton, 23–28 June 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene & Linn-Marlen Rekittke. in press. Kognitiv-aktionale Strukturen und Praktiken multimodaler Bedeutungskonstitution. Frames und Diagramme im dialogischen Aushandeln von Reiserouten. In Alexander Ziem & Robert Mroczynski (guest eds.), Special issue ’Bedeutungskonstitution in Gesprächen: Interaktionale und kognitive Aspekte’. Zeitschrift für Gesprächsforschung.Suche in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene & Linda R. Waugh. 2014. Gestures and metonymy. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body– language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.2.), 1747–1766. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110302028.1747Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 1998. Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Spitz Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 2004. Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family?. In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gesture: The Berlin Conference, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 2010. Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. In Irene Mittelberg (guest ed.), Special issue on ‘Language and Gesture’. Sprache und Literatur 41. 37–68.10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000004Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.). 2014. Body– language– communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.2). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Theßendorf (eds.). 2013. Body– language– communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (38.1). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, John. 1998. The origin of the German es gibt construction. In John Newman (ed.), The linguistics of giving, 307–325. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.36.11newSuche in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey. 2008. Form, meaning, and convention: A comparison of a metaphoric gesture with an emblem. In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 195–217. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.3.11parSuche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1960. Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (1931–1958). Vol. I.: Principles of philosophy, Vol. II: Elements of logic. Cambridge: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). 2012. Sign Language: An international handbook. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261325Suche in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Modalpartikel als multimodale Konstruktionen. Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Leuven: KU Unpublished dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2015. Multimodalität in der Konstruktionsgrammatik: Eine kritische Betrachtung illustriert anhand einer Gestikanalyse der Partikel einfach. In Jörg Bücker, Wolfgang Imo & Susanne Günthner (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V, 291–308. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Suche in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven, Paul Sambre, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2016. Vers une analyse multimodale du sens. Perspectives constructionnelles sur la gestualité co-grammaticale. Langages 201. 33–50.10.3917/lang.201.0033Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan. 1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Dan Slobin (ed.), A crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues, 1157–1256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Steen, Francis & Mark Turner. 2013. Multimodal construction grammar. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 255–274. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen. 1994. “Speech-handling”: The metaphorical representation of speech in gestures. A cross-cultural study. Manuscript. University of Texas at Austin.Suche in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen. 2009. Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.2Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve E. 2007. Looking at space to study mental spaces: Co-speech gesture as a crucial data source in cognitive linguistics. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson & Michael Spivey (eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics, 201–224. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.18.15sweSuche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve E. 2009. What does it mean to compare language and gesture? Modalities and contrasts. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Özçaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Studies in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 357–366. New York: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 2004. Gesture and language: Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture 4. 43–73.10.1075/gest.4.1.04wilSuche in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander & Alexander Lasch. 2015. Konstruktionsgrammatik: Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsbasierter Ansätze. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Zima, Elisabeth. 2014. Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V(motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. Zeitschrift für Gesprächsforschung 15. 1–48.Suche in Google Scholar