Startseite Subordinate and interrogative clause negation in Iquito
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Subordinate and interrogative clause negation in Iquito

  • Cynthia Hansen EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. April 2018

Abstract

This paper describes a specific non-standard negation strategy in Iquito, a moribund Zaparoan language spoken in northern Peruvian Amazonia. This strategy is used in finite subordinate clauses (namely adverbial dependent clauses and relative clauses), as well as information questions, and it utilizes two negative markers: a negative particle which is also found in standard negation, and a verbal affix which does not function as a negator in any other context. Using existing typological characterizations of subordinate clause negation, we see that Iquito exhibits the following attested traits: it uses the standard negator in a different position, it also utilizes a distinct negator, and it employs more negators in the subordinate clause than in the main clause. But unlike the languages presented in the literature, Iquito utilizes these parameters simultaneously. Additionally, the position of the standard negator changes within the subordinate clause, depending on the reality status of the clause. Using Iquito as a case study, I propose a set of parameters for comparing subordinate clause and interrogative negation strategies to standard negation strategies, which include the type of negator used, its position, the overall number of negators, the potential for interaction with other grammatical categories, such as reality status, and the resulting word order of the clause. This set of parameters expands the initial typological characterizations of subordinate clause negation strategies.

Abbreviations

1

first person

2

second person

3

third person

abl

ablative (motion away from speaker or another orientation point)

abs

absolutive

an

animate

ben

benefactive

cl.end

marker that indicates the end of a (dependent) clause

cond

conditional

cop

copula

counter

counter-expectational

cvant

anterior

cvirr

irrealis

cvsim

simultaneous

dat

dative

dei.perf

deictic perfective

dem

demonstrative

dep

suffix for verbs in dependent clauses

der

derivational root

det

determiner

dgen

gender prefix

dir

directional

dpst

distant past

ds

dative subject

dur

durative for habitual/progressive action

erg

ergative

evid

evidential

excl

exclusive

foc

focus

gem

focus gemination

gen

general number

ido

internal direct object

imp

imperative

impf

imperfective

inan

inanimate

inch

inchoative

incl

inclusive

incp

inceptive

ind

indicative

inf

infinitive

infl

inflectional root

inst

instrumental

ivn

instrumental verbal noun

jgen

gender prefix

loc

locative

mmt.prf

momentary perfective

nass

non-assertive hypothetical

neg

negation

nom

nominative case

npst

non-past

nrld

non-realized

ns

non-singular

nz

nominalizer

perf

perfective

pl

plural

poss

possessive

pro

pronoun

pro.cl

pro-clause

pro.indef

indefinite pronoun

prs

present

pst

past tense

refl

reflexive

rel

relative pronoun

rep

reportative evidential

rpst

recent past

sbj

subject case

sbj.rel

subject relative

sg

singular

sim.cvb

simultaneous converb

stat

stative

svn

subjective verbal noun

temp.cvb

temporal converb

vgen

gender prefix

wp

witnessed past.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are in order to the Iquito speakers that I have worked with: Hermenegildo Díaz Cuyasa, Ligia Inuma Inuma, Jaime Pacaya Inuma, and Ema Llona Yareja. I also thank my student researchers Braden Brown, Lauren McLoughlin, Maria Richardson, Emily Sue Tomac, and Briannah Wilson for their work organizing, analyzing, questioning, and re-analyzing the negation data. I am extremely grateful to Chris Beier for carefully reviewing my examples and text to make sure that I am representing the Iquito language data accurately, following the most recent analyses and orthographic conventions, especially with regards to tone. All remaining errors are my own. I also thank Lev Michael and Judy Hunter for their comments and advice, and Debi Fleischauer, Emilia Edmonson, Shannon Audley, Lori Czerwionka, Tabitha Hart, Gayle Robinson, Vetria Byrd, and Angelo Mercado for their support through the writing process.

References

Banjo, Ayo. 1974. Sentence negation in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics Supplement 5. 35–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Beier, Christine, Cynthia Hansen, I-wen Lai & Lev Michael. 2011. Exploiting word order to express an inflectional category: Reality status in Iquito. Linguistic Typology 15(1). 65–99.10.1515/lity.2011.004Suche in Google Scholar

Beier, Christine & Lev. Michael 2018. Language revalorization in Peruvian Amazonia, through the lens of Iquito. In Hinton, Leanne, Huss Leena & Roche Gerald (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language revitalization. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315561271-51Suche in Google Scholar

Beyer, Klaus. 2005. Focus and negation in Pana: A common source for different functions? Afrika und Übersee 86. 5–21.Suche in Google Scholar

Bond, Oliver. 2011. Negation in clause linkages. In Sallabank, Julia (ed.), Language documentation and description, Volume 9, 77–120. London: SOAS.Suche in Google Scholar

Borsley, Robert D., Maggie Tallerman & David. Willis 2007. The syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486227Suche in Google Scholar

Budd, Peter. 2010. Negation in Bierebo and the other languages of Epi, Central Vanuatu. Oceanic Linguistics 49(2). 511–542.Suche in Google Scholar

Crevels, Mily. 2012. Language endangerment in South America: The clock is ticking. In Campbell, Lyle & Verónica Grondona (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, 166–233. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110258035.167Suche in Google Scholar

de Cuypere, Ludovic, Johan van der Auwera & Klaas Willems. 2007. Double negation and iconicity. In Tabakowska, Elżbieta, Christina Ljungberg & Olga Fischer (eds.), Insistent Images [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 5], 301–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.5.25cuySuche in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. 1982. Linguistic models and language death evidence. In Obler, L. & L. Menn (eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics, 31–48. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013a. Negative morphemes. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, chapter 112. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/112 (accessed 1 March 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013b. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, chapter 143. Available online at http://wals/info/chapter/143 (accessed 1 March 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013c. Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, chapter 144. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/144 (accessed 1 March 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Elliott, Jennifer. 2000. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology 4. 55–90.10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55Suche in Google Scholar

Eriksen, Pål Kristian. 2011. ‘To not be’ or not ‘to be’: The typology of negation of non-verbal predicates. Studies in Language 35(2). 275–310.10.1075/sl.35.2.02eriSuche in Google Scholar

Good, Jeff. 2003. Clause combining in Chechen. Studies in Language 27(1). 113–170.10.1075/sl.27.1.05gooSuche in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, Lauri. 1961. Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys [The structure and development of Finnish], 2nd, revised edn. Helsinki: Otava.Suche in Google Scholar

Hansen, Cynthia I. A. 2011. Expressing reality status through word order: Iquito irrealis constructions in typological perspective. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin doctoral dissertation. Available online at https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2011-05-3447.Suche in Google Scholar

Kahrel, Pieter. 1996. Aspects of negation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2005. Las cláusulas relativas en textos. In Beier, Christine & Lev Michael (eds.), Estudios del Idioma Iquito 2005, Tomo II: Módulos de la Gramática Iquito. Módulo 23. Unpublished manuscript of the Iquito Language Documentation Project.Suche in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2009. Clause linking in Iquito. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald Alexandra (eds.), The semantics of clause linking: A cross-linguistic typology, 145–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2014a. The Nanti reality status system: Implications for the typological validity of the realis/irrealis contrast. Linguistic Typology 18(1). 251–288.10.1515/lingty-2014-0011Suche in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2014b. Negation in Nanti. In Michael, Lev & Granadillo Tania (eds.), Negation in Arawak languages, 184–215. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004257023_010Suche in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2007. Negation – An overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1/5. 552–570.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00026.xSuche in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2009. Negative interrogatives. Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology. University of California, Berkeley.Suche in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2013. Symmetric and asymmetric standard negation. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, chapter 113. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/113 (accessed 1 March 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2014. Partitives and negation: A cross-linguistic survey. In Luraghi, Silvia & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54), 63–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346060.63Suche in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti, Anne Tamm & Beáta Wagner-Nagy (eds.). 2015. Negation in Uralic languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.108Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, Amy. 2001. A grammar of Jamul Tiipay. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110864823Suche in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1995. On the relativity of irreality. In Bybee, Joan L. & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 367–388. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32.16mitSuche in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Volume I: Clause structure (1st ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Peeke, Catherine. 1954. Shimigae, idioma que se extingue. Perú Ind&ígena V, 170–178.Suche in Google Scholar

Simons, Gary F. & M. Paul Lewis. 2013. The world’s languages in crisis: A 20-year update. In Mihas, Elena, Bernard Perley, Gabriel Rei-Doval & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Responses to language endangerment: In honor of Mickey Noonan, 3–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.142.01simSuche in Google Scholar

Smeets, Ineke. 2008. A grammar of Mapuche. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. 2013. How to avoid pitfalls in documenting endangered languages. In Mihas, Elena, Bernard Perley, Gabriel Rei-Doval & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Responses to language endangerment: In honor of Mickey Noonan, 79–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.142.05thoSuche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A., Joseph Sung-Yul Park & Charles N. Li. 2006. A reference grammar of Wappo. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2009. The Jespersen cycles. In van Gelderen, Elly (ed.), Cyclical change, 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.146.05auwSuche in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2010. Prohibition: Constructions and markers. In Shu, D. & K. Turner (eds.), Contrasting meaning in languages of the East and West, 443–475. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, Frens Vossen & Maud Devos. 2013. Le cycle de Jespersen à trois et quatre négations. In Jacques François, Larrivée Pierre, Dominique Legallois & Franck Neveu (eds.), La linguistique de la contradiction, 19–30. Brussels: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan & Ludo Lejeune (with Valentin Goussev). 2013. The prohibitive. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, chapter 71. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/71 (accessed 1 March 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan & Lauren Van Alsenoy. 2016. On the typology of negative concord. Studies in Language 40(3). 473–512.10.1075/sl.40.3.01vanSuche in Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2013. Negative existentials: A cross-linguistic study. Rivista di Linguistica 25(1). 107–45.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-04-30
Revised: 2017-02-17
Revised: 2017-08-17
Published Online: 2018-04-25
Published in Print: 2018-04-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingty-2018-0004/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen