Tensed evidentials: A typological study
-
Eline Visser
Abstract
To gain more insight into evidentiality, the grammatical marking of information source, it is worth studying the category in its relation to other grammatical categories. This study explores tensed evidentials, morphemes in which tense and evidentiality are fused, in 36 languages from four macro-areas (North America, South America, Eurasia, and Papunesia). The study reveals several interactions between tense values and evidential values. As opposed to what has been claimed, firsthand future evidentials seem to exist. Visual and non-visual evidentials occur equally with present and past, whereas mental activity evidentials and reportative evidentials are much more limited to the past. These findings conform to the logic of tense: every type of evidentiality can be gathered in the past, whereas some are less suited for present or future. As a result, we find exceptionless implicational hierarchies of the form future ⊃ present ⊃ past for several evidential values.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Frank Seifart, Kees Hengeveld, and Matt Coler for their input.
Abbreviations: 1/2/3=1st/2nd/3rd person; 1>2=1st person subject, 2nd person object; ii=gender marker (gender II); abl=ablative; abs=absolutive; appl=applicative; asrt=assertive; ass=assumption evidence; aug=augmentative; bfr=buffer; cop=copula; decl=declarative; disj=disjunctive; em=emphatic; erg=ergative; exc=exclusive; f=feminine; firsth=firsthand evidence; fns=final nominal suffix; foc=focus; fut=future; inf=inferential (evidential); ipfv= imperfective; lat=lative; m=masculine; mom=momentaneous; neg= negative; neut=neutral; nonf=non-firsthand evidence; nonsbj=non-subject; nonvis=non-visual evidence; obj=object; part=participle; pcp=participatory evidence; pl=plural; pnct=punctual; poss=possessive; prog=progressive; prs=present; pst=past; quot=quotative; recpst=recent past; refl=reflexive; rempst=remote past; rep=reportative (evidential); sbj=subject; seq=sequential; sg=singular; sim=simple tense; spc=specifier; sub=subordinator; top=topic(alizer); top.non.sbj=topical non-subject case; vis=visual evidence; vs=verbal suffix.
Appendix: Sources for the sample languages
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003a. Evidentiality in Tariana. In Aikhenvald & Dixon (eds.) 2003, 131–164.Suche in Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003b. A grammar of Tariana, from northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107050952Suche in Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003c. Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: New morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics 39. 1–29.10.1017/S0022226702001937Suche in Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R. M. W. Dixon. 1998. Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74. 56–80.10.1353/lan.1998.0165Suche in Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.). 2003. Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54Suche in Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan. 2000. Some aspects of the acquisition of evidentials in Turkish. In Johanson & Utas (eds.) 2000, 15–43.Suche in Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & Dan Slobin. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.) 1986, 159–167.Suche in Google Scholar
Barnes, Janet. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 50. 255–271.10.1086/465835Suche in Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena. 1988. Topics in Kalasha syntax: An areal and typological perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena. 2006. Evidentiality in South Asian Languages. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Universität Konstanz, 30–50. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/11/lfg06.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Blain, Eleanor M. & Rose-Marie Déchaine. 2007. Evidential types: Evidence from Cree dialects. International Journal of American Linguistics 73. 257–291.10.1086/521728Suche in Google Scholar
Borgman, Donald M. 1990. Sanuma. In Desmond Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 2, 15–248. Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Briggs, Lucy T. 1976. Dialectal variation in Aymara. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Bruil, Martine. 2014. Clause-typing and evidentiality in Ecuadorian Siona. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden doctoral dissertation. http://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/350_fulltext.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar
Coler, Matt. 2014. A grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004284005Suche in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165815Suche in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Maria Polinsky. 2007. Evidentials in Tsez. In Guentchéva & Landaburu (eds.) 2007, 335–350.Suche in Google Scholar
Cook, William H. 1979. A grammar of North Carolina Cherokee. New Haven, CT: Yale University doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Dall’Aglio Hattnher, Marize Mattos. 2013. The interaction between tense and evidentials of event perception and deduction in Brazilian native languages. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (ed.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, 39–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.137.03hatSuche in Google Scholar
de Araujo, Gabriel A. 2004. A grammar of Sabanê, a Nambikwaran language. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam doctoral dissertation. http://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/94_fulltext.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18. 83–101.Suche in Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alan R. Vogel. 2004. The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max-Planck-Institut für evolutionäre Anthropologie. http://wals.info/Suche in Google Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne M. 2000. Direct and indirect experience in Salar. In Johanson & Utas (eds.) 2000, 45–59.Suche in Google Scholar
Eberhard, David. 2012. The Mamaindê tense/evidentiality system. Word Structure 5. 129–164.10.3366/word.2012.0024Suche in Google Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2005. Areal diffusion and the development of evidentiality: Evidence from Hup. Studies in Language 29. 617–650.10.1075/sl.29.3.04eppSuche in Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Helle Metslang & Karl Pajusalu. 2006. Tense and evidentiality in Estonian. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 20. 125–136.10.1075/bjl.20.09ereSuche in Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford, CA: Stanford University doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2004. The deictic core of ‘non-experienced past’ in Cuzco Quechua. Journal of Semantics 21. 45–85.10.1093/jos/21.1.45Suche in Google Scholar
Fleck, David W. 2007. Evidentiality and double tense in Matses. Language 83. 589–614.10.1353/lan.2007.0113Suche in Google Scholar
Foster, Michael K. 1985. The language of tense, mood, and aspect in Northern Iroquoian descriptions. International Journal of American Linguistics 51. 403–405.10.1086/465910Suche in Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203340769Suche in Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka (ed.). 1996. L’énonciation médiatisée. Leuven: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka & Jon Landaburu (eds.). 2007. L’énonciation médiatisée II. Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: Illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes. Leuven: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 1986. Data-source marking in the Jaqi languages. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.) 1986, 136–158.Suche in Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J., Juana Vásquez & Juan de Dios Yapita. 2001. Aymara: Compendio de estructura fonológica y gramatical. La Paz: Instituto de Lengua y Cultura Aymara.Suche in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53. 479–52.10.1515/ling-2015-0010Suche in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional discourse grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel M. 2007. Past tense forms and their functions in South Conchucos Quechua: Time, evidentiality, discourse structure, and affect. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California (Santa Barbara) doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Howard-Malverde, Rosaleen. 1988. Talking about the past: Tense and testimonials in Quechua narrative discourse. Amerindia 13. 125–155.Suche in Google Scholar
James, Deborah, Sandra Clarke & Marguerite MacKenzie. 2001. The encoding of information source in Algonquian: Evidentials in Cree/Montagnais/Naskapi. International Journal of American Linguistics 67. 229–263.10.1086/466459Suche in Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Bo Utas (eds.). 2000. Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110805284Suche in Google Scholar
Jones, Wendell & Paula Jones. 1991. Barasano syntax. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics; Arlington, TX: University of Texas at Arlington.Suche in Google Scholar
Kehayov, Petar. 2002. Typology of grammaticalized evidentiality in Bulgarian and Estonian. Linguistica Uralica 38. 126–144.10.3176/lu.2002.2.06Suche in Google Scholar
Khalilova, Zaira. 2011. Evidentiality in Tsezic languages. Linguistic Discovery 9. 30–48.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.393Suche in Google Scholar
Kroeker, Menno. 2001. A descriptive grammar of Nambikuara. International Journal of American Linguistics 67. 1–87.10.1086/466446Suche in Google Scholar
Lomas, Gabriel C. J. 1989. The Huli language of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: Macquarie University doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Loughnane, Robin. 2009. A grammar of Oksapmin. Melbourne: University of Melbourne doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Lowe, Ivan. 1999. Nambiquara. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The Amazonian languages, 269–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Marion. 1999. Desano grammar. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics; Arlington, TX: University of Texas at Arlington.Suche in Google Scholar
Molochieva, Zarina. 2010. Tense, aspect, and mood in Chechen. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Montgomery-Anderson, Brad. 2008. A reference grammar of Oklahoma Cherokee. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Müller, Neele. 2013. Tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality marking in South American indigenous languages. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen doctoral dissertation. http://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/324_fulltext.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.87Suche in Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina. 1999. The semantics of Northern Ostyak evidentials. Journal de la Societé Finno-Ougrienne 88. 131–159.Suche in Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. & Eve Sweetser. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30. 401–450.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62Suche in Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2006. Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In William Frawly (ed.), The expression of modality, 1–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197570.1Suche in Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L. 1986. The evidential system of Kashaya. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.) 1986, 29–45.Suche in Google Scholar
Pajusalu, Karl, Helle Metslang & Petar Kehayov. 2012. Evidentiality in Livonian. Linguistica Uralica 48. 41–54.10.3176/lu.2012.1.04Suche in Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler R. G. 2010. Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Gitksan at the semanticspragmatics interface. Vancouver: University of British Columbia doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: an overview. In Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, 15–58. Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Pulte, William. 1985. The experienced and nonexperienced past in Cherokee. International Journal of American Linguistics 51. 543–544.10.1086/465966Suche in Google Scholar
Ramirez, Henri. 1997. A fala tukano dos Ye’pâ-masa. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia.Suche in Google Scholar
Rule, W. Murray. 1977. A comparative study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.Suche in Google Scholar
Rule, W. Murray. & Joan E. Rule. 1970. Statement of the phonology and grammar of the Huli language. Tari: Asia Pacific Christian Mission.Suche in Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila & Robin Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16. 111–167.10.1515/lity-2012-0003Suche in Google Scholar
Schwarz, Anne. 2013. Predicate-centered focus, epistemicity and assertion in Secoya. Presentation at the 10th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Leipzig.Suche in Google Scholar
Sillitoe, Paul. 2010. Trust in development: Some implications of knowing in indigenous knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16. 12–30.10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01594.xSuche in Google Scholar
Smothermon, Jeffrey R., Josephine H. Smothermon & Paul S. Frank. 1995. Bosquejo del macuna: Aspectos de la cultura material de los macunas: Fonología, gramática. Bogotá: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. http://www-01.sil.org/americas/colombia/pubs/36066.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley & Alan Dench. 2012. Tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality in Australian languages: Foreword. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32. 1–6.10.1080/07268602.2012.662888Suche in Google Scholar
Straughn, Christopher A. 2011. Evidentiality in Uzbek and Kazakh. Chicago: University of Chicago doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo. In Aikhenvald & Dixon (eds.) 2003, 33–61.Suche in Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2. 79–124.10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79Suche in Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51–97.10.1075/sl.12.1.04wilSuche in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
