Abstract
While research into the interaction of language and sexuality is becoming increasingly widespread, there is still little sociophonetic sexuality work that considers female speakers and much of the previous research focuses on a binary distinction of gay women compared to straight women. This study instead considers a distinct identity that distinguishes female speakers based on their participation in local football. This analysis shows that participants who are part of their local football team have significantly different /s/ productions than those who were not part of the team. This article suggests that this difference may connect to aspects of gender identity and sexuality and discusses the societal factors that may influence this relation between identity and football.
1 Introduction
There is now an abundance of sociophonetic research that focuses on the linguistic practices of gay men and there is some phonetic evidence to substantiate media claims and popular beliefs that there exists a ‘gay (male) voice’ (see Crist 1997; Gaudio 1994; Levon 2006; Mack and Munson 2012; Podesva 2007; Smyth and Rogers 2003). While there is some research which focuses on the phonetic and linguistic correlates of sexuality among women (see Kachel et al. 2017; Moonwomon-Baird 1997; Saigusa 2016; Van Borsel et al. 2013), it is a far smaller body of work than that devoted to men. From previous work, it is unclear whether this is due to there simply not being the same level of linguistic indexicality for gay women, or whether we have not been looking in the right places.
The present study considers the need to further investigate the phonetic profile of gay women within society, but also considers that it may need to be approached in a more nuanced way than the binary sexuality distinctions that have been utilized in the majority of previous work. It is possible that gay women are indexing aspects of their sexuality through phonetic features, but these identities intersect with other categories in a way that is fundamentally different to those discussed in previous research on the linguistic practices of gay men. This research centers on a loose community of practice (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet 1992) and explores the role of group membership on their patterns of /s/ production.
The community selected for this study is a local, amateur women’s association football team based in Yorkshire, England. As will be discussed in more depth below, football in the United Kingdom is frequently associated with men and there has been a long history of women being banned from participating in the sport (Williams 2003). There is also a common stereotype of female football players being gay. At the close of the 2019 Women’s World Cup, ITV News ran an article titled “Why are more female professional footballers openly gay or bisexual than male players?” (Binley 2019). Together, these societal expectations and stereotypes form a salient indexical field surrounding female footballers and women’s sport more generally.
This article continues the call from Willis and Youssef (2023) that forefronts the intersectionality of sexuality, gender, and other aspects of identity. The work by Calder and King (2020) and Willis and Youssef (2023) considers this intersection based on gender, sexuality, and race. In the present study, this intersection will be based on a community of practice that considers the importance of personal hobbies, in this case participating in a specific sport. While there are some limitations to this analysis, which will be explained below, there is some evidence that participation in certain sports may interact with gender identity and sexuality. This interaction may be partially realized through /s/ production.
In order to fully contextualize this work, the first section will present a brief history of women’s football in the UK. This allows not only context for the reader, but demonstrates the reality that most of the participants were raised in. The second section will consider some of the key theoretical concepts utilized in this paper and consider how previous work has approached sexuality in sociophonetic research. Finally, I will discuss /s/ in more detail and demonstrate why it is a particularly fruitful feature to consider when researching gender and sexuality.
1.1 Women’s football in the UK
Women’s football is currently breaking records in viewership in the UK. In 2019, the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) vowed to air more women’s sport on their channels than ever before through their “Change the Game” initiative (BBC 2019). As part of this line up, the highest level of professional women’s association football in England, the Women’s Super League (WSL), is regularly aired across the BBC channels during the season. The 2022 UEFA European Women’s Football Championship had the top level of viewing for any women’s Euros previously held, regularly doubling viewership from the previous 2017 tournament (UEFA 2022). The 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup also broke several records, with a 29 % increase in attendance compared to the previous World Cup, as well breaking women’s football viewing figures in several countries around the world (FIFA 2023). However, this upsurge in female football is relatively new and still gaining its traction both globally and within the UK specifically.
In what may be surprising for a country that is so captivated by football, women’s football in England has had a difficult and ill-supported history (Williams 2003). In 1921, the Football Association, the governing body of association football in England, banned all women’s teams from any clubs that were affiliated with them. This had an unfortunate influence over the sport more globally and many countries followed suit and banned women’s football. The ban in England was not lifted until November 1971. These decades of banning women’s football not only made the game virtually inaccessible for women in those years, but left a devastating social association with women in football for decades after. Williams (2003: 113) writes, “[w]hat has never been satisfactorily explained is a peculiarly English expression of contempt for women who play association football”. The banning of women’s football for so long cemented the sport as being viewed as almost exclusively masculine in England. Caudwell (2007: 184) writes, “[a]nalyses demonstrate that football in England is gendered as masculine and racialised as white”.
Though women’s football was more widely accessible after 1971, it did not regain the popularity it once had before the ban. It also still faced societal stereotypes for those women who did play, since participation was intrinsically seen as a challenge to hegemonic femininity. As Sauntson and Morrish (2012: 153) argue in their study of a university women’s football team, by playing a sport almost exclusively associated with men due to the historic Football Association ban, the team members are inherently challenging gender norms. They write, “[p]articipants in women’s football are likely to be women who are less concerned than some others about observing the norms of hegemonic femininity in this age group, including heteronormativity”. This correlation between football and masculinity, therefore, means that women playing football are inherently challenging gender norms to some extent.
As noted above, there is also an assumption that female football players are more likely to be gay. In an interview with Sky Sports (2022), Beth Mead, a professional football player for the WSL club Arsenal and forward for the English national team, discusses how common being gay is in the sport. She says, “especially in the women’s game it [being gay or bisexual] is more the norm”. It was also reported that a record number of openly LGBTQ + players would be participating in the 2023 World Cup (Billson 2023). This high proportion of openly gay and bisexual players, as well as the concerted effort of fostering a more inclusive sport (Binley 2019), can be viewed as a further challenge to heteronormativity.
These understandings of gender norms and the incompatibility with football was not just a theoretical concept for the participants of this study, but something they were keenly aware of. The views of the participants around football will be discussed further in the discussion section below.
1.2 Theoretical frameworks
The current paper utilizes a third-wave (Eckert 2012) approach to variationist research and considers how the use of linguistic variation, in this case /s/ production, can construct identity based on the social meaning of a variant. When a specific language form is regularly linked to a certain social meaning, then sociolinguists would describe this process as indexicality (Hall-Lew et al. 2021: 5). The social meaning that a linguistic feature can index may be associated with a certain group of people who also use that feature. However, some linguistic features may also index a stance being taken, that may relate to a group of people. To give another example, a linguistic form such as the word “like” being used a lot as a discourse marker, can be associated with a group of people – maybe young women. But it can also be connected to an attitude or behavior, like being youthful, that has also been connected to that same group of people.
To illustrate this description of indexicality, we will consider research conducted by Moore and Podesva (2009) on the use of tag-questions by female students from a school in the northwest of England. In the study, four different groups of students were recorded through ethnographic work. These groups each use tag-questions differently, and in different manners to index unique aspects of themselves. For example, the Geek group used tags in a way to signal knowledge and that they had an understanding of the topic being discussed. However, the Populars frequently used tag-questions when talking about other groups of girls, particularly in evaluative ways. This shows us that specific use of tag-questions could be used to index either association with a particular group, Geeks or Populars, or could be used to indicate a stance, being knowledgeable or evaluative. This broad overview is to give an example of the framework used in the present paper. For more detailed discussions of indexicality consider Eckert (2008) or Hall-Lew et al. (2021).
Another important aspect of third-wave linguistic research to consider is construction of identity, and in turn how variationist research uses categories for participants. In previous sociolinguistic work, participants were placed into categories with the assumption that the differences between these categories was stable. If, for example, a speaker was part of the working-class category, then their productions of a certain feature would consistently pattern in an expected way. However, third-wave research argues language users are more active, though not always consciously, creating their identity through different manners, including language. When discussing queer theory, Motschenbacher (2011: 153) summarizes this elegantly by stating, “The relationship between language and identity is here rather considered as constructive, i.e. identities are seen as constructed in the very moment of language use”.
This view of fluid identity construction has helped push researchers away from a strict binary comparison within language and sexuality work. In his research on a speaker referred to as Heath, Podesva (2007) demonstrates that the use of falsetto in different contexts and with different audiences is employed to construct a diva persona. This diva persona is actively used by the speaker when in a social setting with friends, but is not used when talking to patients at work or when speaking to his father because this particular identity is not relevant in those contexts. This work demonstrates that the same person can perform different identities that are constructed in the moment based on the specific context, and we can use linguistic features as one way to perform these identities.
It is not just research on intraspeaker variation that can demonstrate identity construction, but also looking at in-group variation. Work by Calder and King (2020); Hazenberg (2016); Podesva and Van Hofwegen (2014), Willis and Youssef (2023); Zimman (2017) all demonstrate that intersecting identities play an important role in /s/ productions. In these studies aspects like gender identity, ethnicity, and orientation to the country or city show variation within speakers who may all fall under similar categories in previous first-wave variationist research. These studies will be considered in more detail in the literature review of /s/ below.
What the studies listed above do, and what the present study does, is attempt to find locally significant categories that develop our understanding of participant identity. Instead of presupposed, large-scale categories, third-wave research attempts to focus on locally significant categories based on speaker identity. Eckert and Podesva (2011: 8) write, “Our point here is not that categories should be avoided, since the quantitative variationist enterprise centers on the identification and explanation of correlations between social categories and linguistic practice. Rather, we suggest first that categories be ethnographically significant and second that they be viewed as products of, rather than explanations for, variation patterns”. By considering ethnographically motivated categories, researchers can access a more accurate sense of the social meaning behind the variation being researched.
The present research will consider how different groups of female speakers in England use /s/ realizations to index specific social meaning, which contributes to the creation of a distinct identity. In order to understand why /s/ has been chosen for the current research, the next section will highlight the key literature on /s/ , gender, and sexuality.
1.3 /s/, gender, and sexuality
Having considered how football is placed within the UK and some of the overarching themes of third-wave sexuality research, the next step is to understand the linguistic feature that this paper focuses on. As will be evidenced below, /s/ has been a thoroughly researched feature when considering both gender and sexuality. This long history provides ample data for comparison with the current study.
One of the first studies regularly cited when researching /s/ is Schwartz (1968), where it was determined that the gender of an English speaker could be accurately distinguished based on isolated voiceless alveolar fricatives (i.e., tokens of /s/) and that women tend to have higher peak frequency in /s/ than men. With the consistency in production differences based on gender, as well as consistent gendered perceptions, one could believe that gendered /s/ productions can partially be predicted by physiological factors. One of the main physiological features credited with this difference is oral cavity size (Fuchs and Toda 2010).
To produce /s/, there is a constriction near the front of the mouth, between the tongue and the alveolar ridge, though the exact placement of the tongue may be slightly more forward or back (Ladefoged and Johnson 2011), which will be discussed further below. Due to the nature of where the constriction is, and the lack of voicing in /s/, the front of the oral cavity is the main influence on the frequency of /s/ production. It is therefore important to consider if female and male oral cavities differ significantly in such a way that would consistently influence /s/ production. Fuchs and Toda (2010) attempted to test this physiological variability by measuring the palates of 24 participants (12 male and 12 female speakers) and comparing their /s/ realizations. They found a trend of male participants generally having longer palates than the female English participants. However, they conclude that these physiological differences are not great enough to explain the difference in /s/ realizations alone, and it is the combination of physical and social factors that produce these differences. The social side that this study demonstrates is significant in gender identity and we can see that /s/ realizations can index gender (among other identities discussed further below). Many studies have demonstrated the importance of socially motivated productions, in particular, gender.
Holmes-Elliott and Turner (2019) demonstrate that the change of center of gravity measures over time for adolescent speakers also cannot be based on physiology alone. The young people in the study, and particularly the young women, show variability within their average center of gravity measures as they are recorded across four years. Some participants increased in center of gravity measures, associated with a more fronted /s/. But other female participants had lower center of gravity measures over the four-year span. We would also expect the oral cavity to change in these speakers as they age from 9 to 11 years old to 13–15 years old and presumably grow in that time. Despite the likely potential growth, which would predict a lower center of gravity measure for all participants regardless of gender, several female participants had a rise in center of gravity. If participants have higher center of gravity measures despite growing, then we can clearly say that /s/ realizations are doing social work. And this understanding of social significance in /s/ can be seen in speakers as young as 13 years old. The variability within the gender groups also demonstrates that center of gravity is not based on physiological differences alone and further confirms that social factors play a part in the production of /s/.
This complexity within gender identity and /s/ can be seen in Stuart-Smith et al. (2003). They discovered that of the variables they considered, only /s/ showed a clear and consistent gender distinction, with women having overall higher mean and peak measurements. The mean refers to the central point where all the energy is equal and peak measures were taken as “the frequency at which the highest amplitude peak occurred in the spectrum” (Stuart-Smith et al. 2003: 1852). However, there was also significant variation between groups of female speakers and their /s/ productions. They found that social class played a significant role in particular for the younger working-class women. These findings show that not only is /s/ being used to index gender, as the previously discussed studies have also shown, but how /s/ is realized can also distinguish groups of female speakers. While the group of younger working-class women do identify as female, they are also using /s/ realizations to distance themselves from other groups of women, in this case middle-class women or older women. We can see that /s/ does not only index gender, but through this study we can see that /s/ can index a certain gender identity.
Zimman (2017) also shows the importance not just of gender distinctions, but of gender identity distinctions of /s/ realizations among transgender speakers. In this data, there is significant variation within gender groups, and they point to other aspects of identity, that interact with gender, which may be influencing /s/ realizations. Zimman (2017: 1,016) writes, “this dynamic interplay between self and other demands a consideration not just of biology or gender assignment, but also the gender identities that individuals’ claim for themselves and the semiotic expression of those identities in everyday life”. The present study furthers this understanding that /s/ realizations are not simply defined by gender or biology alone, but through specific gender identities that are relevant to a given context.
The study of /s/ has also been a cornerstone of sexuality research in linguistics due in large part to the stereotype of the ‘gay lisp’. Munson and Babel (2007) discuss the prevalence of the gay lisp in popular culture, from television shows to books and stand-up comedy. This stereotype has in itself led to a considerable amount of linguistic research investigating /s/, in both production and perception, in connection with sexual orientation. The stereotype of the gay lisp is associated specifically with gay men, and it is partly for this reason that much of the previous linguistic work on /s/ and sexual orientation has focused on male speech. While these same stereotypes do not exist for gay women, the prevalence of this early male sexuality research, as well as the gendered productions of /s/, has led to further investigations of how female speakers may index their sexuality through /s/ realizations.
In a study based in Northern California, Podesva and Van Hofwegen (2014) analyzed the center of gravity of /s/ in relation to several factors: gender, sexual orientation, and whether the participant was more country- or town-oriented. They found that straight country men had the lowest average center of gravity and straight town men had the second lowest average. Straight town women had the highest average center of gravity, with straight country women having the second highest. In Podesva and Van Hofwegen’s study, straight speakers set the poles of the continuum for center of gravity in productions of /s/ and LGBTQ speakers made up the middle. A similar continuum is found by Hazenberg (2016) with participants from Ottawa, Canada. In the study, straight women and straight men create the poles of the continuum, with straight women having the highest average center of gravity measurements and straight men having the lowest. Queer women, trans women, queer men, and trans men fall within these poles, respectively from highest measurements to lowest. Importantly, Hazenberg (2016: 285) writes, this data “also reinforces the idea that the distribution is socially orientated, rather than biologically determined”. These studies demonstrate that it is possible that the LGBTQ speakers in the community were indexing their sexual orientation or gender identity through their pronunciation of /s/. As with Stuart-Smith et al. (2003) and Zimman (2017), these studies show that /s/ does not simply index gender, but can be used to demonstrate specific gender identities that interact with other factors, such as sexuality.
A final study of /s/ to consider is work done by Saigusa (2016). This study examines the effect the addressee has on the speaker and the center of gravity of the speaker’s /s/ production. In the study, two interviews with Jane Lynch, an openly gay actress, were analyzed. The first interview was by an openly gay news reporter and the second was with two female TV hosts considered not to be gay. The other hosts may not identify as straight, but as they are married to men it is unlikely they identify as gay. Saigusa found that Lynch had a lower center of gravity in /s/ when speaking with the openly gay news reporter than when speaking to the non-gay TV hosts. It was also found that when Lynch was discussing LGBTQ issues, she had a lower center of gravity than when she was discussing other topics, such as beginning her acting career. As with the previous research, gender is not the only factor that can influence /s/, but it is the specific interaction between gender and sexuality that can impact /s/ production. In this example, this variability between relevant identities is seen to fluctuate within the same speaker, but it provides evidence that /s/ is a fruitful area to consider the importance of gender identity, particularly how it intersects with sexuality.
By considering a group of participants that vary both in their sexuality, but also in their participation in sport, we can further see that /s/ is doing complex, social work that is more than simply making a binary gender distinction. Previous research on Northern California nerd girls by Bucholtz (1999), Chicana gang girls by Fought (1999); Mendoza-Denton (2011), and young, Glaswegian working-class women by Stuart-Smith et al. (2003) have shown that speakers, and in these cases particularly female speakers, make great use of the symbolic potential of linguistic variation to distinguish themselves from other groups of their same gender. In the present study, where gender, and in particular gender typicality, is highly salient and relevant, we can closely examine how /s/ is used in a unique way to distinguish a specific gender identity that interacts with both sexuality and sport.
The consideration of women’s football in the UK, as well as previous work on sexuality, demonstrate that a women’s football team presents a unique area to consider how sexuality may be indexed through language. There has been previous work that considered female sexuality using conversational analysis (see Jones 2018 for a thorough discussion of the previous conversational analysis), but less sexuality research focused on sociophonetic features with female speakers. This data therefore allows for a novel consideration of not only a particular group of speakers, but a less considered sociophonetic variationist approach. Not only will this work explore a broad idea of language and sexuality, but it also allows for a more nuanced view of how gay women may differ from each other, in this case through participation in sport.
2 Methodology
This study followed a local, non-professional women’s football team I refer to as the Yorkshire Town Ladies (YTL). The players from this team formed a community of practice, as they came together to engage in weekly training and play matches. Along with their commitment to the team, many of the players were friends outside of the team and spent time together socially. Owing to circumstances outside of the researcher’s control, the team disbanded shortly after data collection began. This is why I label the team as a “loose” community of practice, as they were already starting to spend less time together by the point of recording.
To allow for comparisons between the team members and non-team members, speakers were also recorded outside of the football team. These participants that are not part of the team are not considered part of the community of practice. Instead, they were found through the friends-of-friends technique (Tagliamonte 2006) to match some of the key demographics of the team members.
2.1 Participant profile
In the present study, there are 12 participants who identified as gay and 10 who identified as straight, based on a questionnaire completed during the time of interview. The majority of the participants that identified as gay were also part of the Yorkshire Town Ladies. The age span was from 21 to 46, though most participants were aged between 27 and 35 at the time of recording. All the participants identified as White-British and they were all born and raised in Yorkshire, England. Each participant was given a pseudonym to protect her anonymity. Table 1 provides a summary of the participants, their age, sexuality, and team membership.
Description of participants, YTL team members in bold.
Participant | Age | Sexuality | Team member |
---|---|---|---|
Abigail | 31 | Gay | Yes |
Elizabeth | 46 | Gay | Yes |
Ella | 30 | Gay | Yes |
Grace | 21 | Gay | Yes |
Michelle | 31 | Gay | Yes |
Natalie | 31 | Gay | Yes |
Olivia | 29 | Gay | Yes |
Ruby | 35 | Gay | Yes |
Taylor | 29 | Straight | Yes |
Ava | 33 | Straight | No |
Emily | 32 | Straight | No |
Heather | 34 | Gay | No |
Isabella | 23 | Straight | No |
Jessica | 34 | Straight | No |
Julia | 34 | Straight | No |
Laura | 31 | Gay | No |
Lily | 34 | Straight | No |
Lucy | 27 | Straight | No |
Maria | 27 | Straight | No |
Rebecca | 31 | Gay | No |
Sarah | 27 | Gay | No |
Scarlett | 34 | Straight | No |
2.2 Data collection
Data were collected using traditional sociolinguistic interviews (Tagliamonte 2006), lasting on average 30–45 min, and carried out by the author. They were held either in the participant’s home or another neutral, quiet meeting space, such as a university classroom. These sessions included discussions around their childhood, personal interests, memories of the football team if they were members, and more general discussions of gender and sexuality.
The recordings were captured on a Zoom H4n solid-state recorder (sampling rate 44.1 kHz; bit depth 16 bit). Time-aligned, orthographic transcriptions were completed using ELAN (The Language Archive 2018) and forced-aligned using the software package FAVE (Rosenfelder et al. 2014) resulting in a Praat (Boersma and Weenink 2023) TextGrid time aligned at a phonemic level.
All files were then manually checked to ensure the /s/ tokens were correctly identified and the boundaries precise. Observations of /s/ were collected for the entire duration of the recording. All /s/ tokens that were adjacent to another sibilant were removed, as distinct boundaries could not be drawn. Tokens were also removed if there was interference from ambient noise or overlapping speech. Finally, /s/ tokens in which voicing was present were removed. Using a Praat script adapted from Fecher (2011), /s/ tokens were measured for center of gravity. Each token was first bandpass filtered to a 1,000–22,050 Hz bandwidth, following Podesva and Van Hofwegen (2016). This filter was used in order to decrease the influence of ambient sounds coinciding with the fricative by deleting any acoustic data with a frequency of less than 1,000 Hz. A spectrum was created from the full duration of each token and the mid-point was measured to determine the center of gravity.
Each /s/ token was coded for linguistic factors to control for them in the analysis. These factors include: syllable position, phrasal position, prosodic prominence, preceding sound, and following sound. The final corpus, at 18 h, 10 min length, yielded 12,368 /s/ tokens from 22 participants.
Data were statistically analyzed in R (R Core Team 2008) using Linear Mixed Effects Regressions (lmer) using the lme4 package (Bates et al. 2015). Fully saturated models were developed using Sexuality and Team Membership as fixed social factors, with Duration, Previous Phonetic Context, Following Phonetic Context, Syllable Position, Phrase Position, and Stress as fixed linguistic factors, and Speaker and Word as random factors. Therefore, reported values from social factors are based on model estimates which control for phonetic and random factors. Fully saturated models were stepped using “LmerTest” (Kuznetsova et al. 2017). This stepping process would indicate if any of the fixed factors should be removed if they were not significantly impacting /s/ realizations.
3 Results
The center of gravity measurements for each speaker can be seen in Figure 1. This figure summarizes all the /s/ observations for each speaker. Participants to the left identify as gay and participants to the right identify as straight. Their team membership has been highlighted.

Center of gravity measurement for each speaker.
From this data set, there are indications that gay speakers may produce a lower center of gravity in /s/ than straight speakers. However, it is not sexuality alone that impacts this difference, but also membership in the team. With the inclusion of the gay participants that are not on the team, we can see that still the majority of the gay team players have a lower center of gravity measure than gay non-players. This difference in sexuality as well as team membership can be seen even more clearly in Figure 2.

Center of gravity measurements based on team membership and sexuality.
While there is a slight difference in center of gravity between the gay and straight non-players, this difference is much more stark for the gay team players. They have the lowest center of gravity measurements for all the subgroups. It is important to note that there is only one straight player to compare to the gay players, but the overall trends of the data still demonstrate that the participants who are both gay and part of the team have the most retracted /s/ realizations of the subgroups. These data tell us that these participants may be using /s/ as a way to mark not only sexual orientation, but a specific understanding of identity that coincides with their sexuality.
Results from the statistical modeling support this claim. Table 2 presents the best-fit model from the backwards stepwise regression of the mixed effect model. The phonetic features considered (duration, previous phoneme, following phoneme, syllable position, phrase position, and stress) match previous sociophonetic work (see Bailey et al. 2022; Holmes-Elliott and Levon 2017; Holmes-Elliott and Turner 2019; Podesva and Van Hofwegen 2016) and show that the phonetic environment significantly impacts the quality of the /s/ realization. As these results match the previous work, the phonetic factors are not considered in further detail and instead the focus will be on the social factors of sexuality and team membership.
Best-fit model for the social and linguistic factors.
Factor group | SumSq | df | F | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sexuality | 3,618,773 | 19 | 4.5209 | 0.046789 |
Team | 5,969,786 | 19 | 7.458 | 0.013264 |
Duration | 39,772,762 | 12,310.1 | 49.688 | <0.0001 |
Previous phoneme | 19,790,909 | 4,420.6 | 2.7472 | 0.003352 |
Following phoneme | 259,890,048 | 2,690.9 | 32.468 | <0.0001 |
Syllable position | 27,503,580 | 1,449.8 | 34.3602 | <0.0001 |
Phrase position | 7,145,183 | 12,197.7 | 4.4632 | 0.011544 |
Stress | 21,686,887 | 8,742.9 | 27.0934 | <0.0001 |
Focusing more specifically on the social factors, the model estimates for the straight speakers showed a significant increase of 783 Hz (p = 0.046789) in center of gravity, and for team players a significant decrease of 1,018 Hz (p = 0.013264) in center of gravity. These estimates for the social factors can be seen in Table 3. Sexuality and team membership were both treated as fixed factors, instead of considering an interaction between them. This is due to there being only one speaker who was straight and part of the team. Further research may allow for further testing on the interaction of sexuality and team membership.
Model estimates for social factors.
Fixed effects | Estimate | Std. Error | t | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 7,834.68 | 331.83 | 23.611 | <0.0001 |
Sexuality: Straight | 782.50 | 368.02 | 2.126 | 0.046789 |
Team: Player | −1,017.69 | 372.65 | −2.731 | 0.013264 |
Though the interaction of sexuality and team membership could not be statistically tested, based on the data presented, there are potential indications that there is an interaction of sexuality and team membership. Gay team members not only have lower center of gravity measurements than the straight team player, but many have lower center of gravity measurements than other gay speakers who do not play football. This interaction will be discussed more below.
4 Discussion
This study does match previous research conducted by Hazenberg (2016), Podesva and Van Hofwegen (2016), and Willis and Youssef (2023) which shows that the average center of gravity is lower for gay women than straight women. Another similarity to Hazenberg’s (2016) work is the variability. He found that queer women had the second highest standard deviation in center of gravity measurements. This tells us that there was more variability within this group than some of the other demographic groups that he researched. While these studies may be giving some indication that /s/ is a phonetic area that could index sexuality in women, these studies show that it may not be categorical.
This research further answers Zimman’s (2017) call for a socially grounded account of /s/, based on different aspects of gender presentation. While all the speakers identify as the same gender, what it means to be a woman may be slightly different for each speaker. This study shows that the understanding of their gender is not only influenced by their sexuality, but also further aspects, such as interests and activities. While all these participants would generally fall in the same category for a broad sociophonetic study, it can be seen that the nuance of their individual understanding of their gender and sexuality greatly impacts their /s/ productions and their gender identity is not all the same.
This matches previous research by Bucholtz (1999); Fought (1999); Mendoza-Denton (2011); Stuart-Smith et al. (2003) that demonstrate how female speakers can use highly variable phonetic features to distinguish and possibly distance themselves from other female speakers. This study further exemplifies why large-scale categorical distinctions do not tell the full story when considering identity and production. With a more ethnographic approach to variationist research into female sexuality, we may find that there are in fact more phonetic features indexing female sexuality than previously thought. I propose that some of the participants in this current study are performing a unique gender identity I have labeled “sporty”.
4.1 Sporty identity
As established, football is stereotypically associated with masculinity within the UK and there is an assumption that the majority of female players are gay. The participants in the present study, and in particular the participants that were part of the Yorkshire Town Ladies, were very aware of the societal expectations around women’s football. During the interviews I collected, we discussed how their gender identity and sexuality were part of how they viewed themselves as footballers, and how they believed others viewed them.
One of the founding team members, Michelle, discusses how she may be considered butch based on her activities, which all revolved around the sports she participants in. But in aspects like fashion and personal presentation, she believes she is quite feminine. She says in her interview:
Again I I think I can I can go both ways, um. In one sense you’d probably say I’m butch in the sense I do boxin’ and I play football and I can wear guys’ clothes, so that is more butch than my sister. So, she would never do anythin’ like that. In a sense I’m hittin’ like some male kind of things. But in another sense I wear make-up. I like my hair [laughing], yeah I like my hair done nice. I like perfumes. I like my clothes to look good like when I’m wearin’ the girls’ clothes. I like, if I’m wearin’ a dress, I like the handbag and shoes and nail varnish to go to go with it. I can go go either way.
With these words Michelle encapsulates the complexity of her identity and clearly demonstrates that she falls within the boundaries of different stereotypes. Many of the gay members of the football team discussed this idea of having qualities that they see as feminine, while also having qualities that they see as masculine, and therefore cannot just be butch or femme. The particularly masculine qualities appear to be based more on activities they participate in, and this can focus on sport. For these reasons, I argue the gay football players are demonstrating a ‘sporty’ persona, as they are performing a specific female identity that connects not only their gender identity, but their sexuality and participation in sport, particularly football. As discussed above, the participation in football opposed to many other sports, has certain social expectations and this is folded in with the rest of their social identity. With the current group of participants, I use the ‘sporty’ label to acknowledge a specifically lesbian identity. However, with further researcher, this label may need to be expanded to other sexualities.
The connection between gender and participation in football is something that many have been aware of from a young age. Three members of the team, the three that established the Yorkshire Town Ladies originally, all discussed playing football when they were younger, when the teams were mixed gender. However, once they reached a certain age, the teams were divided, and boys and girls could not play together. For one participant, this meant her parents telling her she was no longer allowed to play. Elizabeth says:
When I was a kid, um, I used to play left of defense, um, up until I sorta twelve years old, uh, and then at twelve, girls didn’t play football when I was kid. So I hung, my dad said, right time to hang your boots up lady. So I did and then just me being me found other sports to play and but I’ve always, uh, regretted not continuin’ or being able to continue playin’ football through my teens and into my early twenties.
Two other members also discuss the frustration they felt when they were in school and football was not a sport girls were allowed to play. Each shared that they pressured their teachers to let them play until they were allowed to practice with a football on their own while the other girls participated in different sports. This gatekeeping around who could play football at a young age intrinsically linked football and gender with these participants. To play football as a girl would therefore be going against gender norms, and this precedent was established by an imposing institution in most young people’s lives: school.
In line with previous research by Sauntson and Morrish (2012: 153), those who are part of the football team appear not to fulfill hegemonic gender norms. This is then taken a step further when it is considered that their sexuality also does not fit within hegemonic femininity. This shift away from hegemonic femininity, at least in certain contexts, creates a unique intersection around gender identity, sexuality, and sport.
To further exemplify the complexities around their intersectional identities, it is interesting to consider Taylor, the only participant from the Yorkshire Town Ladies who identified as straight. When discussing playing football previously at university, Taylor says:
Uni, when I was at uni, it was very like my group of friends at uni was very gay, like all gay nearly, to be fair, uh, there was only a couple a straight ones during my time at uni, but. Now it’s more straight people I’d say [laughing].
(Interviewer: Was it because of all the sports that you played?)
Yeah, just ’cause the football side of things, and it was like, well people on my course was they were straight and, um, some of the people that I lived with, they were straight as well, um, but. As to go out it was always with the football lot, which obviously it was about two straight people, that was about it.
This study provides initial indications that participants may be indexing a sporty identity through their /s/ realizations. From the discussions highlighted above, it is clear that members of the Yorkshire Town Ladies see themselves as diverging from at least some norms of hegemonic femininity, though not all of them. It is possible that part of this diversion is indexed through their use of language, and in the case of this study, through their realizations of /s/.
I believe this /s/ realization may be a resource for gay female football players who feel they do not fall into stereotypical femininity and who are of a certain age. There is previous evidence that gay female speakers have lower center of gravity measures, but there is also evidence that more rural female speakers have lower center of gravity measures than their urban counterparts (Podesva and Van Hofwegen 2016). What these studies tell us is that /s/ retraction may be a way for female speakers to demonstrate their divergences from hegemonic femininity.
As women’s football continues to develop in mainstream society, it is possible that many younger players, both gay and straight, no longer feel that they are challenging gender norms simply by participating. As reported by the English Football Association (FA 2023), 75 % of schools in England are delivering equal access to football in PE (physical education) lessons. Therefore, the resource described above may prove to be in the unique space of not only sexuality and sport participation, but also age. However, any shifts in stereotypes associated with women’s football will take time to manifest.
4.2 Sporty as flexible
Based on the data presented, I argue that the gay team members of Yorkshire Town Ladies are active in a sporty identity that the other gay participants are not necessarily part of. It is important to note that this does not mean that every woman who plays football is inherently sporty, or that every gay woman that plays football is sporty. It is possible that gay women who do not actively participate in a sport, but have an interest in them, could also be sporty. Since the core of the YTL was created through word of mouth and friend-of-friend soliciting, it is likely that this group of women have more in common than a more randomly created team. Their friendships, particularly off the pitch, could be connected to this shared sporty identity and common interests. They would form a loose community of practice, as defined by Eckert and McConnell-Ginet (1992). At the time of recording, this community was starting to disperse and may not be as directly comparable to communities of practice that others have studied.
As the eventual disbandment of the team demonstrates, this concept of sporty can be fluid and changing. The interviews with the YTLs were always in the context of football. I got to know them through attending some of their matches and they knew I was interested in interviewing them specifically because they were part of the team. During the interviews we discussed football at length, including their history in playing, as well as their enjoyment in viewing the sport as fans. Football was at the forefront of our relationship and therefore the forefront of the recordings this data captures. The patterns seen within the group of speakers is unique to this time and context and could shift with other speakers from a different aspect of their life. When sport, or even sexuality, are not relevant, it may be likely that /s/ realizations may alter, as that indexical field may not be recognized.
However, the fact that this data only gives a small sample of who these women are in no way downgrades its importance. This adds to the body of research that demonstrates the fluidity of people and the ever-shifting nature of our identities. While Ruby may sound and look quite different off the pitch, which she discusses in her interview, it does not mean that who she is on the pitch is any less her. Though these recordings only showcase one specific context, the content of the discussion shows that similar findings may be present in a more ethnographic study with a similar group of speakers.
4.3 Future work
It is clear through this study that there is significant scope for future research. Work that includes more straight football players would allow for closer analysis of the interaction between sexuality and team membership, to understand if a sporty identity may be unique to gay players.
To widen our understanding of a sporty identity, it would be worth researching female athletes that participate in sports that are frequently associated with femininity (e.g., gymnastics, netball). If participants in these sports do not feel that they are challenging femininity norms in the same way as the football players described above, how they index their gender identity may significantly differ from the participants in this current study.
This research may also benefit from more explicit questionnaires on gender identity. Kachel et al. (2017) utilized two different questionnaires to gain a deeper understanding of participants’ gender identity: the Traditional Masculinity-Femininity Scale and the Extended Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Questionnaires like these, along with ethnographic data, may provide valuable insight into complex gender identities interacting with sport and sexuality.
5 Conclusions
This work has contributed to our understanding of language, gender, and sexuality in two distinct ways. First, this research attempts to fill a void in the scholarship around female gay voices. Compared to the plethora of sociophonetic research based in the UK, and for all the sociophonetic research that focuses on gay male speech, there is remarkably little work that focuses on gay women.
It is likely that this lack of work is partly due to the lack of stereotypes of a ‘gay voice’ for women. Even when interviewing my participants and asking them if a woman could sound gay, many thought that it was unlikely you could tell by voice alone and that it was more based on dress, hairstyle, body language, and other aesthetic features. I would argue that this attitude matches wider societal expectations that women are judged on their looks more than men in many aspects of life, including sexuality. While this discussion is not within the scope of the current paper, it should be considered further within the idea of a female ‘gay voice’, or the lack thereof.
While there is an increase in research that considers listener perception of female sexuality (see Munson et al. 2006; Sulpizio et al. 2020), there is minimal research to see if gay women are in fact producing anything different to straight counterparts. While it is important to know what people may perceive, it also is important to know what people do. This study begins to answer that question, within the UK.
The second aspect this paper addresses is the nuanced way we consider some of the larger categories of sexuality and gender. The results show that the distinction between the speakers is not just about their sexuality, but the combination of their sexuality and social practices. This contributes to the growing body of work that considers an interactional approach to /s/ analysis such as Calder (2019); Calder and King (2020); Willis and Youssef (2023); Zimman (2017).
The discussion around women’s football is timely and worth considering as the market for the sport expands globally. While this expansion of female representation is changing the options for young girls today, it is worth considering the unique time these participants were raised in and what it meant to play football as a girl both when they were young, but also later in life as adults. This initial study only begins to scratch the surface of what, if any, phonetic markers could be used to index a gay identity among gay British English speakers. While /s/ does appear to be a significant feature, particularly for certain demographics of gay speakers, it may be that there are other features that are being utilized that have not yet been considered.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank all the people who have provided insightful feedback during the development of this paper, and particularly Sophie Holmes-Elliott, who was very generous with her support and time. I am also grateful to the reviewers and editor of Linguistics who provided detailed and incisive comments on earlier versions of this article. All remaining shortcomings are my own.
-
Data availability statement: The Supplementary Materials for this study (R-script and R-Markdown Report) are available at https://zenodo.org/records/15630135.
References
Bailey, George, Stephen Nichols, Danielle Turton & Baranowski Maciej. 2022. Affrication as the cause of/s/-retraction: Evidence from Manchester English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 7(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.8026.Suche in Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker & Steven C. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Suche in Google Scholar
BBC. 2019. Change the game. https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/mediapacks/change-the-game (accessed 4 October 2022).Suche in Google Scholar
Billson, Chantelle. 2023. Record number of out LGBTQ+ footballers will compete in 2023 Women’s world cup. https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/07/12/fifa-womens-world-cup-2023-record-lgbtq-players/(accessed 9 November 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Binley, Alex. 2019. Why are more female professional footballers openly gay or bisexual than Male players? https://www.itv.com/news/2019-07-07/womens-world-cup-why-are-more-female-professional-footballers-gay-or-bisexual-than-their-male-counterparts (accessed 9 November 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2023. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.3.18, retrieved 8 October 2023 from. http://www.praat.org/.Suche in Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2). 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404599002043.Suche in Google Scholar
Calder, Jeremy. 2019. The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society 48(1). 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740451800115x.Suche in Google Scholar
Calder, Jeremy & Sharese King. 2020. Intersections between race, place, and gender in the production of /s/. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 26(2). Article 5.Suche in Google Scholar
Caudwell, Jayne. 2007. Queering the field? The complexities of sexuality within a lesbian- identified football team in England. Gender, Place & Culture 14(2). 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690701213750.Suche in Google Scholar
Crist, Sean. 1997. Duration of onset consonants in gay Male stereotyped speech. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(3). 53–70.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1). 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1). 461–490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.21.1.461.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Robert J. Podesva. 2011. Sociophonetics and sexuality: Toward a symbiosis of sociolinguistics and laboratory phonology. American Speech 86(1). 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277465.Suche in Google Scholar
FA. 2023. Women’s and girls’ football in England sees record growth after historic 18 months. https://www.thefa.com/news/2023/dec/20/inspiring-positive-change-update-20232012 (accessed 6 August 2024).Suche in Google Scholar
Fecher, Natalie. 2011. MeasureSpectralMomentsCreateTableExcel_Nat2. Department of language and linguistics. York: University of York.Suche in Google Scholar
FIFA. 2023. Staggering statistics demonstrate FIFA Women’s world cup™ growth. https://www.fifa.com/tournaments/womens/womensworldcup/australia-new-zealand2023/media-releases/staggering-statistics-demonstrate-fifa-womens-world-cup-tm-growth (accessed 2 October 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Fought, Carmen. 1999. A majority sound change in a minority community:/u/‐fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(1). 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.t01-1-00060.Suche in Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne & Martine Toda. 2010. Do differences in Male versus female/s/reflect biological or sociophonetic factors? In Susanne Fuchs, Martine Toda & Marzena Zygis (eds.), An interdisciplinary guide to turbulent sounds, 281–302. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226584.281Suche in Google Scholar
Gaudio, Rudolf P. 1994. Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech 69(1). 30–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/455948.Suche in Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren, Emma Moore & Robert J. Podesva (eds.). 2021. Social meaning and linguistic variation: Theorizing the third wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108578684Suche in Google Scholar
Hazenberg, Evan. 2016. Walking the straight and narrow: Linguistic choice and gendered presentation. Gender and Language 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i2.19812.Suche in Google Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie & Erez Levon. 2017. The substance of style: Gender, social class and interactional stance in/s/-fronting in southeast England. Linguistics 55(5). 1045–1072. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0020.Suche in Google Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie & James Turner. 2019. The emergence of gendered production between childhood and adolescence: A real time analysis of/s/in southern British English. In Proceedings from the XVIV international congress of phonetic sciences. Melbourne, Australia.Suche in Google Scholar
Jones, Lucy. 2018. Lesbian identity construction. In Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and sexuality, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.28Suche in Google Scholar
Kachel, Sven, Adrian P. Simpson & Melanie C. Steffens. 2017. Acoustic correlates of sexual orientation and gender-role self-concept in women’s speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141(6). 4793–4809. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4988684.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.Suche in Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Keith Johnson. 2011. A course in phonetics, 6th edn. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Suche in Google Scholar
Levon, Erez. 2006. Hearing “gay”: Prosody, interpretation, and the affective judgments of men’s speech. American Speech 81(1). 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2006-003.Suche in Google Scholar
Mack, Sara & Benjamin Munson. 2012. The influence of /s/ quality on ratings of men’s sexual orientation: Explicit and implicit measures of the “gay lisp” stereotype. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Mendoza‐Denton, Norma. 2011. The semiotic hitchhiker’s guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(2). 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2011.01110.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Moonwomon-Baird, Birch. 1997. Towards a study of Lesbian speech. In Anna Livia & Kira Hall (eds.), Queerly Phrased, 202–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0012Suche in Google Scholar
Moore, Emma & Robert J. Podesva. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38(4). 447–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990224.Suche in Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2011. Taking queer linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2011(212). 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2011.050.Suche in Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin & Molly Babel. 2007. Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5). 416–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00028.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin, Sarah V. Jefferson & Elizabeth C. McDonald. 2006. The influence of perceived sexual orientation on fricative identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4). 2427–2437. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2173521.Suche in Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4). 478–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. & Janneke Van Hofwegen. 2014. How conservatism and normative gender constrain variation in inland California: The case of /s/: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 20, 128–137. http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1820&context=pwpl.2Suche in Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. & Janneke Van Hofwegen. 2016. /s/exuality in smalltown California: Gender normativity and the acoustic realization of/s. In Erez Levon & Ronald Beline Mendes (eds.), Language, sexuality, and power: Studies in intersectional sociolinguistics, 168–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210366.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Available at: https://www.r-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Josef Fruehwald, Keelan Evanini, Scott Seyfarth, Kyle Gorman, Hilary Prichard & Jiahong Yuan. 2014. FAVE (forced alignment and vowel extraction) suite version 1.1.3. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.9846.Suche in Google Scholar
Saigusa, Julie. 2016. Jane lynch and /s/: The effect of Addressee sexuality on fricative realization. Lifespans and Styles 2(1). 10–16. https://doi.org/10.2218/ls.v2i1.2016.1426.Suche in Google Scholar
Sauntson, Helen & Liz Morrish. 2012. How gay is football this year? Identity and intersubjectivity in a women’s sports team. Journal of Language and Sexuality 1(2). 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.1.2.02sau.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwartz, Martin F. 1968. Identification of speaker sex from isolated, voiceless fricatives. JASA 43(5). 1178–1179. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1910954.Suche in Google Scholar
Sky Sports. 2022. Arsenal and England forward beth mead opens up on sexuality: “I’ve tried to make it the norm rather than a statement”. https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12697833/arsenal-and-england-forward-beth-mead-opens-up-on-sexuality-ive-tried-to-make-it-the-norm-rather-than-a-statement (accessed 9 November 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Smyth, Ron & Henry Rogers. 2003. Phonetics, gender, and sexual orientation. In The 2000 meeting of the Canadian linguistic association. Toronto, 299–311.Suche in Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Claire Timmins & Alan Wrench. 2003. Sex and gender differences in glaswegian/s/. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, 1851–1854, Barcelona. Available at: http://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/2252/.Suche in Google Scholar
Sulpizio, Simone, Fabio Fasoli, Raquel Antonio, Friederike Eyssel, Maria Paola Paladino & Charlotte Diehl. 2020. Auditory gaydar: Perception of sexual orientation based on female voice. Language and Speech 63(1). 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919828201.Suche in Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2006. Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801624Suche in Google Scholar
The Language Archive. 2018. Elan. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Suche in Google Scholar
UEFA. 2022. Women’s EURO watched by over 365 million people globally. https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/news/0278-15ff73f066e1-c729b5099cbb-1000--365-million-people-watch-euro-2022/(accessed 4 October 2022).Suche in Google Scholar
Van Borsel, John, Jana Vandaele & Corthals Paul. 2013. Pitch and pitch variation in Lesbian women. Journal of Voice 27(5). 656.e13–656.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.04.008.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Jean. 2003. The fastest growing sport? women’s football in England. Soccer and Society 4(2–3). 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970512331390865.Suche in Google Scholar
Willis, Chloe & Chadi Ben Youssef. 2023. Random bisexual forests: Intersections between gender, sexuality, and race in /s/ production. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 8(1). 5504. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v8i1.5504.Suche in Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal. 2017. Variability in /s/ among transgender speakers: Evidence for a socially grounded account of gender and sibilants. Linguistics 55(5). 993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0018.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2023-0244).
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.