Light heads and predicate formation: on two scopes of discontinuity

References

Adger, David & Gillian Ramchand. 2005. Merge and move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2). 161–193. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710729.Search in Google Scholar

Arsenijević, Boban & Wolfram Hinzen. 2012. On the absence of x-within-x recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 423–440.10.1162/LING_a_00095Search in Google Scholar

Asher, Nicholas. 2011. Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511793936Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barrie, Michael & Audrey Li. 2015. The semantics of (pseudo) incorporation and case. In Olga Borik & Berit Gehrke (eds.), The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation, 159–188. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004291089_006Search in Google Scholar

Bierwisch, Manfred. 2014. The role of arbitrariness from a minimalist point of view. In Susi Wurmbrand, Peter Kosta, Lilia Schürcks, Steven Franks & Teodora Radev-Bork (eds.), Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 392–415. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.11.16bieSearch in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. Why edges are needed. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds.), Edges, heads, and projections: Interface properties, 11–22. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.156.04boeSearch in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structuring sense volume III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Boškovič, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 27–89.10.1162/LING_a_00148Search in Google Scholar

Boškovič, Željko. 2016. What is sent to spell-out is phases, not phasal complements. Linguistica 56(1). 25–66.10.4312/linguistica.56.1.25-66Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. Ditransitive asymmetries and a theory of idiom formation. Linguistic Inquiry 41(4). 519–562. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00012.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2015. Idioms, anaphora, and movement diagnostics Unpublished MS.University of Delaware.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki & Michael Diercks. 2013. Agreeing how? Implications for theories of agreement and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 44(2). 179–237. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00125.Search in Google Scholar

Cheung, Lawrence Y.-L. 2015. Uttering the unutterable with wh-placeholders. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24(3). 271–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-014-9130-x.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In Carlson Gregory & Pelletier Francis Jeffrey (eds.), The generic book, 176–223. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.10.1017/S0140525X00001515Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995a. Bare phrase structure. In Campos Héctor & Kempchinsky Paula (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory, 51–109. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995b. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015a. A discussion with Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi. Sophia Linguistica 64. 70–97.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015b. Problems of projection: Extensions. In Matteini Simona, Di Domenico Elisa & Hamann Cornelia (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 1–16. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.223.01choSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2016a. A dialogue with Noam Chomsky. In Paper presented at Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2016b. What kind of creatures are we. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/chom17596Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics. 229–261. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1960. The morphophonemics of English. MIT RLE Quarterly Progress Report 58. 275–281.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66. 764–805. https://doi.org/10.2307/414729.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris & Edward Stabler. 2016. A formalization of minimalist syntax. Syntax 19(1). 43–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12117.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. 2005. Records and record types in semantic theory. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(2). 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exi004.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. 2012. Type theory and semantics in flux. In Kempson Ruth, Tim Fernando & Nicholas Asher (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science, philosophy of linguistics, 271–323. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-444-51747-0.50009-3Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. 2016. Frames as records. In Foret Annie, Morrill Glyn, Muskens Reinhard, Osswald Rainer & Sylvain Pogodalla (eds.), Formal grammar, 3–18. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-53042-9_1Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robin. 2018. Coercion in languages in flux. Oslo Studies in Language 10(2). 83–96. https://doi.org/10.5617/osla.6677.Search in Google Scholar

De Vries, Mark. 2012. Notes on the syntax of quotation. In Paper presented at the conference quotation: Perspectives from philosophy and linguistics. Bochum: Ruhr University.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Claire Beyssade. 2012. Redefining indefinites. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-3002-1Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph E. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure- preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fenger, Paula. 2019. Size matters: Auxiliary formation in the morpho-syntax and morpho- phonology. In Paper presented at NELS 49. Ithaca, New York. Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2016. Lexical items and feature bundling: Consequences for micropara- metric approaches to variation. In Eguren Luis, Fernández-Soriano Olga & Mendikoetxea Amaya (eds.), Rethinking parameters, 133–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190461737.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Gehrke, Berit & Louise McNally. 2019. Idioms and the syntax/semantics interface of descriptive content versus reference. Linguistics 57(4). 769–814. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Robin Cooper. 2014. Quotation via dialogical interaction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(3). 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-014-9200-5.Search in Google Scholar

Gotham, Matthew. 2018. Making logical form type-logical: Glue semantics for minimalist syntax. Linguistics and Philosophy 41(5). 511–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-018-9229-z.Search in Google Scholar

Goto, Nobu. 2019. When and how does search take place Unpublished MS. Toyo University.Search in Google Scholar

Hallman, Peter. 2015. Syntactic neutralization in double object constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 46(3). 389–424. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00187.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, Jason D. & Siddiqi Daniel. 2013. Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3). 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00136.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hirose, Tomio. 2003. Origins of predicates: Evidence from plains cree. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203509036Search in Google Scholar

Hulsey, Sarah & Uli Sauerland. 2006. Sorting out relative clauses. Natural Language Semantics 14(2). 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-3799-3.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 2012. Towards deriving differences in how wh movement and qr are pronounced. Lingua 122(6). 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.11.010.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Justin Robert. 2013. The syntax-semantics interface in distributed morphology. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Koev, Todor. 2017. Quotational indefinites. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35(2). 367396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9344-x.Search in Google Scholar

Koster, Jan. 1996. Saussure meets the brain. In Roel Jonkers, Edith Kaan & J. Anko Wiegel (eds.), Language and cognition 5. Yearbook 1992 of the research group for linguistic theory and knowledge representation of the University of Groningen, 115–120. Groningen: University of Groningen.Search in Google Scholar

Kotek, Hadas. 2019. Composing questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Kremers, Joost. 2015. Morphology is in the eye of the beholder. Linguistische Berichte 243. 245–294.10.46771/2366077500243_3Search in Google Scholar

Kucerová, Ivona. 2018a. ϕ-features at the syntax-semantics interface: Evidence from nominal inflection. Linguistic Inquiry 49(4). 813–845.10.1162/ling_a_00290Search in Google Scholar

Kucerová, Ivona. 2018b. What’s in a phase label: Toward a formal theory of syntax features at the syntax-semantics interface Unpublished MS. McMaster University.Search in Google Scholar

Labelle, Marie. 2014. Roots in models of grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4). 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2014-0020.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K. 2017. On dative idioms in English. Linguistic Inquiry 48(3). 389–426. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00248.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610479Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2014. Mixed quotation: The grammar of apparently transparent opacity. Semantics and Pragmatics 7. 1–67. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.7.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2020a. Mixed quotation. In Gutzmann Daniel, Matthewson Lisa, Meier Cécile, Hotze Rullman & Thomas E. Zimmerman (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics, 1–29. Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118788516.sem080Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2020b. Quotes as complements: A Kratzerian approach. In Ilaria Frana, Paula Menéndez-Benito & Rajesh Bhatt (eds.), Making worlds accessible: Essays in honor of Angelika Kratzer, 91–100.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1995. A late note on late insertion. In Young-Sun Kim, Byung-Choon Lee, Kyoung-Jae Lee, Kyun-Kwon Yang & Jong-Kuri Yoon (eds.), Explorations in generative grammar, 396–413. Seoul: Hankuk.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1996. “Cat” as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in distributed morphology Unpublished MS. MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 201–225.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2007. Phases and words. In Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), Phases in the theory of grammar, 191–222. Seoul: Dong.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 2013. Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 95–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Martinovic, Martina. 2020. Feature geometry and head-splitting in the Wolof clausal periphery Unpublished MS. McGill University.10.1162/ling_a_00447Search in Google Scholar

Mateu, Jaume & M. Teresa Espinal. 2007. Argument structure and compositionality in idiomatic constructions. The Linguistic Review 24(1). 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr.2007.002.Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2008. On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(5). 573–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9050-1.Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2015. The other Francis Bacon: On non-bare proper names. Erkenntnis 80(2). 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9703-0.Search in Google Scholar

McGinnis-Archibald, Martha. 2016. Distributed morphology. In Hippisley Andrew & Stump Gregory (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 390–423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139814720.015Search in Google Scholar

Munakata, Takashi. 2017. Why is labeling important? Unpublished MS. Yokohama National University.Search in Google Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan A. Sag & Thomas Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70. 491–538. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1994.0007.Search in Google Scholar

Obata, Miki. 2017. Is transfer strong enough to affect labels? In Bauke Leah & Blümel Andreas (eds.), Labels and roots, 117–126. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501502118-006Search in Google Scholar

Pafel, Jürgen. 2011. Two dogmas on quotation. In Brendel Elke, Meibauer Jörg & Steinbach Markus (eds.), Understanding quotation, 249–276. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240085.249Search in Google Scholar

Pagin, Peter & Dag Westerståhl. 2010. Pure quotation and general compositionality. Linguistics and Philosophy 33(5). 381–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-011-9083-8.Search in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara. 1973. The syntax and semantics of quotation. In Stephen Anderson & Kiparsky Paul (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Hale, 410–418. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Piggott, Glyne & Lisa deMena Travis. 2017. Wordhood and word internal domains. In Heather Newell, Márie Noonan, Glyne Piggott & Lisa Travis (eds.), The Structure of words at the interfaces, 41–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198778264.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Potts, Christopher. 2007. The dimensions of quotation. In Chris Barker & Pauline I. Jacobson (eds.), Direct compositionality, 405–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199204373.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2006a. Grafts follow from merge. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 17–44. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197723.2.17Search in Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2006b. Towards a unified theory of wh-and non-wh-amalgams. In Yubun Suzuki, Mizuho Keizo & Takami Ken-ichi (eds.), In search of the essence of language science: Festschrift for professor Heizo Nakajima on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 43–59. Tokyo: Hitsuji shobo.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 1991. Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1). 209–218. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v1i0.2738.Search in Google Scholar

Roßdeutscher, Antje. 2014. When roots license and when they respect semantico-syntactic structure in verbs. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 282–309. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Safir, Ken. 2019. The A/A’-distinction as an epiphenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 50(2). 285–336. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00305.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Thomas Wasow & Emily M. Bender. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Yagmur. 2016. Complex predication via phrasal adjunction to a head category. In Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th West Coast conference on formal linguistics, 431–438. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 2012. Sentence types and the Japanese right periphery. In Günther Grewen-dorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories, 147–175. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614511601.147Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru & Tomoko Haraguchi. 2012. Deriving the cartography of the Japanese right periphery: The case of sentence-final discourse particles. Iberia 4(2). 104–123.Search in Google Scholar

Salzmann, Martin. 2017. Reconstruction and resumption in indirect A’-dependencies: On the syntax of prolepsis and relativization in (Swiss) German and beyond. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614512202Search in Google Scholar

Šimik, Radek. 2011. Modal existential wh-constructions. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Sudo, Yasutada. 2013. Metalinguistic quantification: Evidence from Japanese wh-doublets Unpublished MS. Institut Jean Nicod.Search in Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2005. Extending the extension condition to discontinuous idioms. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5(1). 227–263. https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.5.08sve.Search in Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2016. Spans and words. In Harley Heidi & Siddiqi Daniel (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 201–222. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.229.07sveSearch in Google Scholar

Szczegielniak, Adam. 2006. Vp ellipsis and topicalization. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of NELS, vol. 35, 603–615. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Tajtelbaum, Al. 1957. It is impossible to be told anyone’s name. Analysis 10. 52–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/17.3.52.Search in Google Scholar

Takita, Kensuke, Nobu Goto & Yoshiyuki Shibata. 2016. Labeling through spell-out. The Linguistic Review 33(1). 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0018.Search in Google Scholar

Tarski, Alfred. 1964. A simplified formalization of predicate logic with identity. Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung 7(1). 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01972461.Search in Google Scholar

Tarski, Alfred. 1983. The concept of truth in formalized languages. In John Corcoran (ed.), Logic, semantics, metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, 152–278. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas, Sag Ivan & Geoffrey Nunberg. 1983. Idioms: An interim report. In Shiro Hattori & Kazuko Inoue (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th congress of linguistics, 87–96. The Hague: CIPL.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 2003. Representation theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wiślicki, Jan. 2019. Quotation as a challenge for feature-driven phases: An argument for Zwart’s merge. The Linguistic Review 36. 689–732.10.1515/tlr-2018-2014Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2018. The cost of raising quantifiers. Glossa 3(1). 1–40. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.329.Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2009. Prospects for top-down derivation. Catalan Journal of Linguisitcs 8. 161–187. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.146.Search in Google Scholar