(Non)culmination by abduction

References

Abusch, Dorit. 2010. Presupposition triggering from alternatives. Journal of Semantics 27(1). 37–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp009.Search in Google Scholar

Altshuler, Daniel. 2013. There is no neutral aspect. In Todd Snider (ed.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT), vol. 23, 40–62. Washington, DC: LSA Publications.10.3765/salt.v23i0.2681Search in Google Scholar

Altshuler, Daniel. 2014. A typology of partitive aspectual operators. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(3). 735–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9232-1.Search in Google Scholar

Altshuler, Daniel. 2016. Events, states and times. An essay on narrative discourse in English. Warsaw & Berlin: De Gruyter Open.10.1515/9783110485912Search in Google Scholar

Altshuler, Daniel & Károly Varasdi. 2015. A proof of definitional adequacy of RESULT and NARRATION. In Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney & Carol Rose Little (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT), vol. 25, 38–56. Washington, DC: LSA Publications.10.3765/salt.v25i0.3049Search in Google Scholar

Arche, María J. 2014. The construction of viewpoint aspect: the imperfective revisited. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(3). 791–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9209-5.Search in Google Scholar

Arunachalam, Sudha & Anubha Kothari. 2010. Telicity and event culmination in Hindi perfectives. In Pier Marco Bertinetto, Anna Korhonen, Alessandro Lenci, Alissa Melinger, Sabine Schulte im Walde & Aline Villavicencio (eds.), Proceedings of verb 2010, interdisciplinary workshop on verbs: The identification and representation of verb features, 16–19. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore & Università di Pisa. https://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/institut/mitarbeiter/schulte/publications/proceedings/verbs-10.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Arunachalam, Sudha & Anubha Kothari. 2011. An experimental study of Hindi and English perfective interpretation. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 4(1). 27–42.Search in Google Scholar

Asher, Nicholas. 1992. A default, truth conditional semantics for the progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(5). 469–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00630628.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-El, Leora, Henry Davis & Lisa Matthewson. 2005. On non-culminating accomplishments. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the north east linguistics society (NELS), 87–102. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Mary Swift. 2004. Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3). 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ling.0000023371.15460.43.10.1023/B:LING.0000023371.15460.43Search in Google Scholar

Bonawitz, Elizabeth Baraff & Tania Lombrozo. 2012. Occam’s rattle: Children’s use of simplicity and probability to constrain inference. Developmental Psychology 48(4). 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026471.Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Emma. forthcoming. Implicatures. In Daniel Altshuler (ed.), Linguistics meets philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108766401.024Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini & Luisa Meroni. 2001. The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In Anna H. J. Do, Laura Domínguez & Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Boston University conference on language development, 157–168. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox & Benjamin Spector. 2012. The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 2297–2332. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Keith L. 1978. Negation as failure. In Hervé Gallaire & Jack Minker (eds.), Logic and data bases, 293–322. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4684-3384-5_11Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Eystein. 2010. Time, tense and aspect in early vedic grammar: Exploring inflectional semantics in the rigveda. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.10.1163/ej.9789004178144.i-475Search in Google Scholar

Dascal, Marcelo. 1977. Conversational relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 1(4). 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(77)90026-1.Search in Google Scholar

Demirdache, Hamida & Fabienne Martin. 2015. Agent control over non culminating events. In Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia & Susana Rodríguez Rosique (eds.), Verb classes and aspect, 185–217. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ivitra.9.09demSearch in Google Scholar

Douven, Igor. 2011. Abduction. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2011 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/.10.7551/mitpress/14179.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Search in Google Scholar

Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, eventuality types, and nominal reference. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Filip, Hana. 2000. The quantization puzzle. In Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as grammatical objects, from the combined perspectives of lexical semantics, logical semantics and syntax, 39–91. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Filip, Hana. 2003. Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1). 55–101.Search in Google Scholar

Filip, Hana. 2008. Events and maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity. In Susan D. Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 217–256. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.110.10filSearch in Google Scholar

Forsyth, James. 1970. A grammar of aspect: Usage and meaning in the Russian verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Glovinskaja, Marina Jakovlevna. 1982. Semantičeskije tipy vidovych protivopostavlenij russkogo glagola [Semantic types of russian verbal aspect opposition]. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Glovinskaja, Marina Jakovlevna. 1989. Semantika, pragmatika i stilistika vido-vremennyx form [Semantics, pragmatics and stylistics of aspect-tense forms]. In Dmitrij N. Šmelev (ed.), Grammatičeskie issledovanija: Funkcional’no-stilističeskij aspekt, [Grammatical research: Functional–stylistic aspect], 74–143. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Studies in syntax and semantics III: Speech acts, 183–198. New York, NY: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grønn, Atle. 2003. The semantics and pragmatics of the Russian factual imperfective. Oslo: University of Oslo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Grønn, Atle. 2007. Horn strategies and optimization in Russian aspect. In Anton Benz, Christian Ebert & Rob van Rooij (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on Language, games, and evolution, https://homepage.univie.ac.at/josef.hofbauer/07hutt.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Grønn, Atle. 2008. Russian aspect as bidirectional optimization. In Franc Marusic (ed.), Studies in formal Slavic linguistics, 121–137. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Gyarmathy, Zsófia. 2015a. Achievements, durativity and scales. Berlin: Logos Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Gyarmathy, Zsófia. 2015b. Culminations and presuppositions. In Thomas Brochhagen, Floris Roelofsen & Nadine Theiler (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam colloquium, 167–176. Amsterdam: ILLC, Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Hirschberg, Julia. 1985. A theory of scalar implicature. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hobbs, Jerry R. 2004. Abduction in natural language understanding. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 724–741. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch32Search in Google Scholar

Hobbs, Jerry R., Mark E. Stickel, Douglas E. Appelt & Paul Martin. 1993. Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63(1-2). 69–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90015-4.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1991. Given as new: When redundant affirmation isn’t. Journal of Pragmatics 15(4). 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90034-u.Search in Google Scholar

Hulanicki, Leo. 1973. The actional perfect in Russian. Slavic and East European Journal 17(2). 174–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/306105.Search in Google Scholar

Josephson, John R. & Susan G. Josephson. 1996. Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, Olga. 2016. Scalarity in the verbal domain: The case of verbal prefixation in Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316136195Search in Google Scholar

Kazanina, Nina & Colin Phillips. 2007. A developmental perspective on the imperfective paradox. Cognition 105(1). 65–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Anthony R. Davis. 2001. Sublexical modality and the structure of lexical semantic representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(1). 71–124. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005616002948.10.1023/A:1005616002948Search in Google Scholar

Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Nuttannart Muansuwan. 2000. How to end without ever finishing: Thai semi-perfectivity. Journal of Semantics 17(2). 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/17.2.147.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2013. Creating a family: Constructing transfer of possession verbs. Paper presented at the Little v workshop, Leiden.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter von Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110877335-005Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 29–53. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Landman, Fred. 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02342615.Search in Google Scholar

Lepore, Ernie & Matthew Stone. 2015. Imagination and convention: Distinguishing grammar and inference in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717188.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Malink, Markoa. 2008. Right boundary achievements under conative negation. In Anita Steube (ed.), The discourse potential of underspecified structures Language, Context and Cognition, vol. 8, 145–162. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110209303.2.145Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Fabienne. 2015. Explaining the link between agentivity and non-culminating causation. In Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney & Carol Rose Little (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 25, 246–266. Washington, DC: LSA Publications.10.3765/salt.v25i0.3060Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Fabienne & Zsófia Gyarmathy. 2017. A finer-grained typology of perfective operators. In Paper presented at the conference of syntax and semantics in Paris (CSSP 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Fabienne & Florian Schäfer. 2012. The modality of ‘offer’ and other defeasible causative verbs. In Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds.), Proceedings of west coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL), vol. 30, 248–258. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Fabienne & Florian Schäfer. 2017. Sublexical modality in defeasible causative verbs. In Ana Arregui, María Luisa Rivero & Andrés Salanova (eds.), Modality across syntactic categories, chap. 6, 87–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718208.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Fabienne, Hamida Demirdache, Isabel García del Real, Angeliek van Hout & Nina Kazanina. 2018. Children’s non-adultike interpretations of telic predicates across languages. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

McIlraith, Sheila A. 1998. Logic-based abductive inference. Tech. Rep. KSL-98-19. https://ksl-web.stanford.edu/people/sam/abduction.ps.Search in Google Scholar

Oehrle, Richard Thomas. 1976. The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Paducheva, Elena V. 1995. Taxonomic categories and semantics of aspectual opposition. In Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (eds.), Temporal reference, aspect and actionality: Semantic and syntactic perspectives, 71–89. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Search in Google Scholar

Pancheva, Roumyana. 2003. The aspectual makeup of perfect participles and the interpretations of the perfect. In Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Perfect explorations, 277–306. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110902358.277Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric. 2008. Event realization in Tamil. In Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, 331–355. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 1997. Achievements in an event semantics. In Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT), vol. 7, 273–296. Washington, DC: LSA Publications.10.3765/salt.v7i0.2781Search in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 2009. Another look at the actuality entailment of certain modal verbs. In Paper presented at genericity: Interpretation and uses, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 2011. The pragmatics of actuality entailments. In Paper presented at aspect and modality in lexical semantics, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 2014. Reconsidering defeasible causative verbs. In Paper presented at the 11th international conference on actionality, tense, aspect, modality/evidentiality Chronos, vol. 11, Pisa, 16–18 June.Search in Google Scholar

Potts, Christopher. 2015. Presupposition and implicature. In Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118882139.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. & Kit Fine. 1977. Worlds, times and selves. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Craige, Mandy Simons, David Beaver & Judith Tonhauser. 2009. Presupposition, conventional implicature, and beyond: A unified account of projection. In Nathan Klinedist & Daniel Rothschild (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on new directions in the theory of presupposition. Toulouse: ESSLLI.Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics: Pragmatics, 281–297. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368873_011Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Mona. 1991. The perfective paradox: Or how to eat your cake and have it too. In Laurel Sutton, Christopher Johnson & Ruth Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 469–479. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguisitcs Society.10.3765/bls.v17i0.1639Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Mona. 1998. On the semantics of the perfective aspect. Natural Language Semantics 6(2). 171–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008208311200.10.1023/A:1008208311200Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.10.1007/978-94-015-7911-7Search in Google Scholar

Tatevosov, Sergei. 2008. Subevental structure and non-culmination. In Olivier, Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 7, 393–422. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Search in Google Scholar

Tonhauser, Judith. 2012. Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content. In Elizabeth Bogal-Allbritten (ed.), Proceedings of semantics of under-represented languages of the Americas (SULA), vol. 6, 239–254. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Tonhauser, Judith, David Beaver, Craige Roberts & Mandy Simons. 2013. Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language 89(1). 66–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0001.Search in Google Scholar

Varasdi, Károly. 2010. A higher order extensional framework for the progressive. Journal of Semantics 27(2). 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq002.Search in Google Scholar

Varasdi, Károly. 2014. Making progressives: Necessary conditions are sufficient. Journal of Semantics 31(2). 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/fft004.Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371.Search in Google Scholar

Verbuk, Anna & Thomas Shultz. 2010. Acquisition of relevance implicatures: A case against a rationality-based account of conversational implicatures. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8). 2297–2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Zinova, Julia. 2017. Russian verbal prefixation: A frame semantic analysis. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zucchi, Sandro. 1999. Incomplete events, intensionality and imperfective aspect. Natural Language Semantics 7(2). 179–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008310800632.10.1023/A:1008310800632Search in Google Scholar