Desired Affordances of Scholarly E-Articles: Views from Scholars Based on Open-Ended Answers

References

Arminen, I., and S. Raudaskoski. 2003. ““Tarjoumat ja tietotekniikan tutkimus” [Affordances and the Study of Information Technology].” Sosiologia 40 (4): 279–96.Suche in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, B. P., Y. Latham, and T. Vurdubakis. 2010. “Bodies, Technologies and Action Possibilities: When is an Affordance?” Sociology 44 (3): 415–33, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510362469.Suche in Google Scholar

Bold, M. R., and K. L. Wagstaff. 2017. “Marginalia in the Digital Age: Are Digital Reading Devices Meeting the Needs of Today’s Readers?” Library & Information Science Research 39 (1): 16–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, A., and D. Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58 (1): 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00096.Suche in Google Scholar

Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cronin, B. 2005. The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and its Rewards. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, P. N., S. J. Jackson, G. C. Bowker, and C. P. Knobel. 2007. Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design: Report of an NSF Workshop on History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/49353/UnderstandingInfrastructure2007.pdf (accessed June 10, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Gaver, W. W. 1991. “Technology Affordances.” In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 91 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference April 28–June 5, 1991, edited by S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson, and J. S. Olson, 79–84. New York: ACM. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/108844.108856 (accessed June 10, 2021).10.1145/108844.108856Suche in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Harper, R., and A. Sellen. 2002. The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayles, N. K. 2003. “Deeper into the Machine: The Future of Electronic Literature.” Culture Machine 5, https://culturemachine.net/the-e-issue/ (accessed June 10, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Hayles, N. K. 2010. “How We Read: Close, Hyper, Machine.” ADE Bulletin Number 150: 62–79.10.1632/ade.150.62Suche in Google Scholar

Hillesund, T. 2010. “Digital Reading Spaces: How Expert Readers Handle Books, the Web and Electronic Paper.” First Monday 15 (4), https://firstmonday.org/article/view/2762/2504 (accessed June 10, 2021).10.5210/fm.v15i4.2762Suche in Google Scholar

Hinton, A. 2015. Understanding Context: Environment, Language and Information Architecture. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.Suche in Google Scholar

Hutchby, I. 2001. “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology 35 (2): 441–56, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000219.Suche in Google Scholar

Kurata, K., E. Ishita, Y. Miyata, and Y. Minami. 2017. “Print or Digital? Reading Behavior and Preferences in Japan.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68 (4): 884–94, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23712.Suche in Google Scholar

Late, E., C. Tenopir, S. Talja, and L. Christian. 2019. “Reading Practices in Scholarly Work: From Articles and Books to Blogs.” Journal of Documentation 75 (3): 478–99, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2018-0178.Suche in Google Scholar

Late, E., S. Kumpulainen, S. Talja, L. Christian, and C. Tenopir. 2018. ““Suomalaisten tutkijoiden sosiaalisen median käyttö: sosiaalisen median merkitys työssä, tiedonhankinnassa ja tieteellisen tiedon jakamisessa.” [The Use of Social Media by Finnish Researchers: The Meaning of Social Media for Work, Information Seeking and Sharing Scholarly Information].” Informaatiotutkimus 37 (4): 75–93, https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.77416.Suche in Google Scholar

Mangen, A. 2008. “Hypertext Fiction Reading: Haptics and Immersion.” Journal of Research in Reading 31 (4): 404–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00380.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Nicholas, D., A. Watkinson, R. Volentine, S. Allard, K. Levine, C. Tenopir, and E. Herman. 2014. “Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: Setting the Scene for a Major Study.” Learned Publishing 27 (2): 121–34, https://doi.org/10.1087/20140206.Suche in Google Scholar

Nicholas, D., and D. Clark. 2012. “‘Reading’ in the Digital Environment.” Learned Publishing 25 (2): 93–8, https://doi.org/10.1087/20120203.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Hara, K. P., A. Taylor, W. Newman, and A. J. Sellen. 2002. “Understanding the Materiality of Writing from Multiple Sources.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56 (3): 269–305, https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0525.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, T. 2005. Web 2.0: Compact Definition? O'Reilly Radar Blog. Sebastopol: O'Reilly. http://radar.oreilly.com/2005/10/web-20-compact-definition.html (accessed June 10, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Pearson, J., G. Buchanan, H. Thimbleby, and M. Jones. 2012. “The Digital Reading Desk: A Lightweight Approach to Digital Note-Taking.” Interacting with Computers 24 (5): 327–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Revelle, A., K. Messner, A. Shrimplin, and S. Hurst. 2012. “Book Lovers, Technophiles, Pragmatists, and Printers: The Social and Demographic Structure of User Attitudes Toward E-Books.” College & Research Libraries 73 (5): 420–9, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-288.Suche in Google Scholar

Shrimplin, A. K., A. Revelle, S. Hurst, and K. Messner. 2011. “Contradictions and Consensus – Clusters of Opinions on E-Books.” College & Research Libraries 72 (2): 181–90, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-108rl.Suche in Google Scholar

Tenopir, C., S. Allard, B. J. Bates, K. J. Levine, D. W. King, B. Birch, R. Mays, and C. Caldwell. 2011. “Perceived Value of Scholarly Articles.” Learned Publishing 24 (2): 123–32, https://doi.org/10.1087/20110207.Suche in Google Scholar

Tenopir, C., L. Christian, and J. Kaufman. 2019. “Seeking, Reading, and Use of Scholarly Articles: An International Study of Perceptions and Behavior of Researchers.” Publications 7 (1): 18, https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010018.Suche in Google Scholar

Tenopir, C., D. W. King, S. Edwards, and L. Wu. 2009. “Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns.” Aslib Proceedings 61 (1): 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910932267.Suche in Google Scholar

Tenopir, C., E. Late, S. Talja, and L. Christian. 2019a. “Changes in Scholarly Reading in Finland Over a Decade: Influences of E-Journals and Social Media.” Libri 69 (3): 169–87, https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2018-0120.Suche in Google Scholar

Tenopir, C., S. Talja, E. Late, and L. Christian. 2019b. “Benefits and Outcomes of Library Collections on Scholarly Reading in Finland.” Libri 69 (2): 153–68, https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2018-0139.Suche in Google Scholar

Tenopir, C., R. Volentine, and D. W. King. 2012. “Article and Book Reading Patterns of Scholars: Findings for Publishers.” Learned Publishing 25 (4): 279–91, https://doi.org/10.1087/20120407.Suche in Google Scholar

Vipunen Education Statistics, Finland. 2016. Helsinki: Ministry of Culture and Education. https://vipunen.fi/en-gb/ (accessed June 10, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Watkinson, A., D. Nicholas, T. Clare, E. Herman, H. R. Jamali, R. Volentine, S. Allard, K. Levine, and C. Tenopir. 2016. “Changes in the Digital Scholarly Environment and Issues of Trust: An Exploratory, Qualitative Analysis.” Information Processing & Management 52 (3): 446–58, https://doi.org/10.1087/20120407.Suche in Google Scholar