Pidgin Metadata Framework as a Mediator for Metadata Interoperability

References

ALCTS CC:DA 2000. Task Force on Metadata: Final Report. Association for Library Collections & Technical Services (ALCTS). Chicago, IL: American Library Association. http://www.libraries.psu.edu/tas/jca/ccda/tf-meta6.html (accessed April 8, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Baca, M., ed. 2016. Introduction to Metadata, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute. https://www.getty.edu/publications/intrometadata/setting-the-stage/ (accessed May 22, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, T. 1998. “Languages for Dublin Core.” D-Lib Magazine 4 (12). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december98/12baker.html (accessed April 2, 2019).10.1045/december98-bakerSuche in Google Scholar

Chan, L. M., and M. L. Zeng. 2006. “Metadata Interoperability and Standardization: A Study of Methodology Part I.” D-Lib Magazine 12 (6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html (accessed April 9, 2019).10.1045/june2006-chanSuche in Google Scholar

Clarke, R. I., J. H. Lee, and A. Perti. 2015. “Empirical Evaluation of Metadata for Video Games and Interactive Media.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (12): 2609–25.10.1002/asi.23357Suche in Google Scholar

Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2011. “Dumb Down Principle.” In Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Glossary. http://www.dublincore.org/resources/glossary/dumb-down_principle/ (accessed April 9, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Graybeal, J. B., S. Watson, and P. S. Bogden. 2005. “Marine Metadata Interoperability: A Community Framework.” In Proceedings of International Marine Data and Information Systems Conference IMDIS-2005. Brest, France. http://www.ifremer.fr/imdis/topics.htm (accessed April 8, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Haslhofer, B., and W. Klas. 2010. “A Survey of Techniques for Achieving Metadata Interoperability.” ACM Computing Surveys 42 (2): 1–37.10.1145/1667062.1667064Suche in Google Scholar

Heery, R., and M. Patel. 2000. “Application Profiles: Mixing and Matching Metadata Schemas.” Ariadne 25. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue25/app-profiles/ (accessed April 8, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) 2003. Guidance on the Structure, Content, and Application of Metadata Records for Digital Resources and Collections. Report of the IFLA Cataloguing Section Working Group on the Use of Metadata Schemas. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/guide/metaguide03.pdf (accessed March 25, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Johnston, P. 2003. “Metadata and Interoperability in a Complex World.” Ariadne 37. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/dc-2003-rpt (accessed April 8, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Kenney, A. R., and O. Y. Rieger. 1998. Using Kodak Photo CD Technology for Preservation and Access: A Guide for Librarians, Archivists, and Curators. New York: Department of Preservation and Conservation, Cornell University Library. http://www.library.cornell.edu/preservation/kodak/cover.htm (accessed December 12, 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, S. 2010. Building Bridges: An Integrated Approach to Metadata Interoperability Using Concept Meta-Framework Interoperability Schema (CMF). PhD dissertation. Indiana University at Bloomington.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, S. 2013. “Construction of Framework for Metadata Integration Using Master Data Approach.” Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 44 (1): 201–25.10.16981/kliss.44.1.201303.201Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, J. 2007. Metadata and its Applications in the Digital Library: Approaches and Practices. Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited.Suche in Google Scholar

Loutas, N., S. Goedertier, V. Peristeras, and S. Szekacs, 2014. “Building Cross-Border Public Services in Europe through Sharing and Reuse of Interoperability Solutions.” In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on eGovernment (ECEG 2014), 170–9. Brasov, Romania: Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Legal and Administrative Sciences.Suche in Google Scholar

Maron, D., and M. Feinberg. 2018. “What Does It Mean to Adopt a Metadata Standard? A Case Study of Omeka and the Dublin Core.” Journal of Documentation 74 (4): 674–91.10.1108/JD-06-2017-0095Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, E. 1999. Using Web Metadata. Brisbane, Australia: WWW-7 Tutorial Track. http://www.w3.org/People/EM/talks/www7/tutorial/part1/sld030.htm (accessed April 1, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, P. 2000. “Interoperability: What Is It and Why Should I Want It?” Ariadne 24. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability (accessed April 8, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Nagamori, M., and S. Sugimoto. 2007. “Using Metadata Schema Registry as a Core Function to Enhance Usability and Reusability of Metadata Schemas.” In Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Singapore, 85–95. http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/869/865 (accessed April 8, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Nam, T., and S. Lee. 2018. Resource Description and Metadata, Revised ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.Suche in Google Scholar

National Information Standards Organization (NISO) 2004. Understanding Metadata. https://www.lter.uaf.edu/metadata_files/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf (accessed April 7, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Park, J.-R., and Y. Tosaka. 2010. “Metadata Quality Control in Digital Repositories and Collections: Criteria, Semantics, and Mechanisms.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 48 (8): 696–715.10.1080/01639374.2010.508711Suche in Google Scholar

Riley, J. 2017. Understanding Metadata: What Is Metadata, and What Is It for? Baltimore, MD: National Information Standards Organization (NISO).Suche in Google Scholar

Tennant, R. 2002. “MARC must die.” Library Journal 127 (17): 26–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Weagley, J., E. Gelches, and J.-R. Park. 2010. “Interoperability and Metadata Quality in Digital Video Repositories: A Study of Dublin Core.” Journal of Library Metadata 10 (1): 37–57.10.1080/19386380903546984Suche in Google Scholar

Weibel, S. 1997. Dublin Core Metadata. http://www.kansalliskirjasto.fi/extra/muut/meta/oclc/tsld001.htm (accessed April 3, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Wittenburg, P., and D. Broeder. 2002. “Metadata Overview and the Semantic Web.” In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resources and Tools in Field Linguistics, Las Palmas. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_59748_2/component/file_59749/content (accessed April 9, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, L. 2016. “Metadata Effectiveness in Internet Discovery: An Analysis of Digital Collection Metadata Elements and Internet Search Engine Keywords.” College & Research Libraries 77 (1): 7–19.10.5860/crl.77.1.7Suche in Google Scholar

Yousefi, A., and S. Yousefi. 2007. “Metadata: A New Word for an Old Concept.” Library Philosophy and Practice. http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/∼mbolin/yousefi.htm (accessed November 9, 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Zeng, M. L., and J. Qin. 2008. Metadata. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeng, M. L., and L. M. Chan. 2006. “Metadata Interoperability and Standardization: A Study of Methodology Part II.” D-Lib Magazine 12 (6). http://dlib.org/dlib/june06/zeng/06zeng.html (accessed April 9, 2019).10.1045/june2006-zengSuche in Google Scholar