Abstract
Public libraries hold an increasing number of events, where they face the very important, but often neglected, challenge of evaluation. This paper presents various studies performed to evaluate events for adults at the largest public library in Slovenia, Mestna knjižnica Ljubljana (Ljubljana City Library). A combination of methods was used: content analysis of library website and promotional brochures, interviews with both attendees and librarians, observation of events and a relatively large survey. Additionally, based on this research, seven personas representing typical user groups of events for adults were developed. While attendees were generally highly satisfied with the existing events, our research found room for improvement, especially regarding planning for particular user groups, scheduling and topical diversity of events and promotion aimed at both existing and potential visitors. Based on this research, Ljubljana City Library prepared guidelines for their future events for adults. Additionally, the general outline of the evaluation should be of benefit to any library regardless of type, size or location.
Funding source: Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Award Identifier / Grant number: P5-0361(B)
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P5-0361(B)).
References
Aabø, S., R. Audunson, and A. Vårheim. 2010. “How Do Public Libraries Function as Meeting Places?” Library & Information Science Research 32 (1): 16–26.10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.008Suche in Google Scholar
American Library Association. 2014. National Impact of Library Public Programs Assessment: White Paper. American Library Association. https://nilppa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/NILPPA_White_Paper_FINAL_web.pdf (accessed July 1, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
Bibsist online. 2018. Statistični Podatki O Knjižnicah [Statistical Data on Libraries]. https://bibsist.nuk.uni-lj.si/statistika/index.php (accessed June 10, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
De la Peña McCook, K., and J. S. Bossaller. 2018. Introduction to Public Librarianship. Chicago: American Library Association.Suche in Google Scholar
Demeter, M., and H. K. Holmes. 2019. Library Programming Made Easy: A Practical Guide for Librarians. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 2016. “The Library Card.” The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/03/the-library-card/426888/ (accessed May 31, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
Goodman, V. D. 2011. “Applying Ethnographic Research Methods in Library and Information Settings.” Libri 61 (1): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.2011.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Hassenzahl, M. 2007. “The Hedonic/pragmatic Model of User Experience.” In Towards a UX Manifesto - Proceedings of a Cost294-Affiliated Workshop on HCI 2008, edited by E. Law, A. Vermeeren, M. Hassenzahl, and M. Blythe, 10–4.Suche in Google Scholar
Koontz, C., and B. Gubbin, eds. 2010. IFLA Public Library Service Guidelines. Berlin/Munich: De Gruyter Saur.Suche in Google Scholar
Lear, B. W. 2013. Adult Programs in the Library. Chicago: ALA Editions.Suche in Google Scholar
Leckie, G. J., and J. Hopkins. 2002. “The Public Place of Central Libraries: Findings from Toronto and Vancouver.” The Library Quarterly 72 (3): 326–72, https://doi.org/10.1086/lq.72.3.40039762.Suche in Google Scholar
Lenstra, N. 2017. “Let’s Move! Fitness Programming in Public Libraries.” Public Library Quarterly 37 (1): 61–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1316150.Suche in Google Scholar
Luo, L. 2018. “Health Information Programming in Public Libraries: A Content Analysis.” Public Library Quarterly 37 (3): 233–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1498704.Suche in Google Scholar
MacKellar, P. H. 2016. Meeting Community Needs: A Practical Guide for Librarians. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar
Mainka, A., S. Hartmann, L. Orszullok, I. Peters, A. Stallmann, and W. G. Stock. 2013. “Public Libraries in the Knowledge Society: Core Services of Libraries in Informational World Cities.” Libri 63 (4): 295–319, https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0024.Suche in Google Scholar
Massis, B. 2018. “The User Experience (UX) in Libraries.” Information and Learning Science 119 (3–4): 241–4, https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-12-2017-0132.Suche in Google Scholar
Matthews, J. R. 2013. Research-based Planning for Public Libraries: Increasing Relevance in the Digital Age. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.10.5040/9798216007890Suche in Google Scholar
Merčun, T., and M. Žumer. 2014. “Dimensions of User Experience and Reaction Cards.” In The Emergence of Digital Libraries – Research and Practices: 16th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2014; Proceedings, edited by K. Tuamsuk, 365–70. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-12823-8_38Suche in Google Scholar
Merčun, T., and M. Žumer. 2017. “Exploring the Influences on Pragmatic and Hedonic Aspects of User Experience.” Information Research 22 (1): 1–8. http://informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1621.html (accessed June 16, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar
Merčun-Kariž, T. 2018. “Obiskovalci Prireditev Za Odrasle in Njihova Izkušnja: Analiza Anket, April 2018 [Visitors of Events for Adults and Their User Experience: a Survey Analysis, April 2018].” https://www.mklj.si/images/dokumenti/splosno/o_nas/informacije_javnega_znacaja/Obiskovalci_prireditev_za_odrasle_in_njihova_izkusnja_-_analiza_anket.pdf (accessed June 16, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar
Mulholland, J. 2011. “Libraries Now Offering Books and workouts.” Governing: The States and Localities. http://www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/Libraries-Now-Offering-Books-and-Workouts.html (accessed May 3, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
OCLC and American Library Association. 2018. From Awareness to Funding: Voter Perceptions and Support of Public Libraries in 2018. https://doi.org/10.25333/C3M92X (accessed May 21, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
Pisanski, J., and K. Švab. 2018. “The Curious Case of Travel-Related Events in Public Libraries.” Libellarium 1 (1), https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v1i1.314.Suche in Google Scholar
Powell, R. R., and L. S. Connaway. 2004. Basic Research Methods for Librarians. Westport, London: Libraries Unlimited.Suche in Google Scholar
Roberts, A. 2018. Designing Adult Services: Strategies for Better Serving Your Community. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.10.5040/9798400639388Suche in Google Scholar
Robertson, D. A. 2005. Cultural Programming for Libraries: Linking Libraries, Communities, and Culture. Chicago: ALA Editions.Suche in Google Scholar
Rohr, L. 2016. “Zumba, 3-D Printers, Fishing Pole Rentals Among Unique Library offerings.” Daily Herald, http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20160710/news/160719943/ (accessed May 23, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
Sabo, R. M. 2017. “Lifelong Learning and Library Programming for the Third Agers.” Library Review 66 (1–2): 39–48, https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-08-2016-0065.Suche in Google Scholar
Smernice. 2019. Smernice Za Prireditve Za Odrasle V MKL [Guidelines for Events for Adults at MKL]. https://www.mklj.si/images/dokumenti/splosno/o_nas/informacije_javnega_znacaja/SMERNICE_ZA_PRIREDITVE_ZA_ODRASLE.pdf (accessed May 13, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
Smernice. 2020. Smernice Za Evalvacijo Prireditev in Izkušnje Obiskovalcev [Guidelines for Evaluation of Events and User Experience]. https://www.mklj.si/images/dokumenti/splosno/o_nas/informacije_javnega_znacaja/Smernice_evalvacija_prireditev_izkusenj_obiskovalcev.pdf (accessed June 10, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar
Stevenson, S. C. 2012. Fundraising for Libraries: How to Plan Profitable Special Events. Sioux City: Author.10.1002/9781118703786Suche in Google Scholar
Wildemuth, B. M. 2017. “Existing Documents and Artefacts as Data.” In Application of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, edited by B. M. Wildemuth, 165–72. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, L. 2014. “Library Programming: Don’t Just Follow the Crowd.” Illinois Library Association Reporter 32: 18–20. https://www.ila.org/content/documents/Reporter_1014.pdf (accessed May 10, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Re-thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era
- User Expectations and Acceptance of Library Services at the African Union Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
- Health and Safety Information Behaviour of Coal Miners in Pakistan
- Recounting the Empowerment of Women in Rural Areas of KwaZulu-Natal from Information and Knowledge in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era
- Engaging Children’s Reading with Reflective Augmented Reality
- Evaluating Public Library Events using a Combination of Methods
- Individual Social Capital of Librarians: Results of Research Conducted in 20 Countries
- Announcement
- Best Student Research Paper Award 2021
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Re-thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era
- User Expectations and Acceptance of Library Services at the African Union Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
- Health and Safety Information Behaviour of Coal Miners in Pakistan
- Recounting the Empowerment of Women in Rural Areas of KwaZulu-Natal from Information and Knowledge in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era
- Engaging Children’s Reading with Reflective Augmented Reality
- Evaluating Public Library Events using a Combination of Methods
- Individual Social Capital of Librarians: Results of Research Conducted in 20 Countries
- Announcement
- Best Student Research Paper Award 2021