Startseite The Prospects for Vietnamese Academic Library Consortia: Results of a Survey
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Prospects for Vietnamese Academic Library Consortia: Results of a Survey

  • Thuc Thi Hoang EMAIL logo und Paul Genoni
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. März 2017
Libri
Aus der Zeitschrift Libri Band 67 Heft 1

Abstract

Consortia are widely used by academic libraries worldwide to support the most cost-effective means of acquiring digital content and services. Some developing countries, however, have been slow to benefit from consortia due to a range of obstacles and challenges faced by their academic libraries and higher education sectors more broadly. This paper investigates the current state, and future prospects, for consortia in one developing country, Vietnam. A questionnaire survey was distributed to all academic libraries in Vietnam. Valid surveys were received from 99 respondents (34.37 % response rate). The survey results address a number of issues, including current levels of engagement in consortia; identification of drivers for, and obstacles to, the use of consortia; the support required by libraries for future participation; and the need for a supportive legal and administrative framework. The paper concludes that there is a willingness by Vietnamese academic librarians to engage with consortia, but there are also considerable obstacles to be overcome to make this possible. The conclusions are presented as a series of 11 recommendations aimed at improving the operating conditions for consortia in Vietnam.

Appendix: Survey on Library Cooperation and Consortia in Vietnam (English Version)

SURVEY ON LIBRARY COOPERATION AND CONSORTIA IN VIETNAM

As a part of my research, this survey is seeking facts and data on the current state of cooperative arrangements for libraries in Vietnam as well as obtaining opinions from my respected colleagues who are concerned about the future development of our libraries and are willing to share their ideas on the issues of consortia. I highly appreciate sincere cooperation of colleagues in academic libraries throughout/across the country and value their thoughts as important contributions to my research.

GENERAL INFORMATION

  1. What type of institution does your library belong to?

    1. Public

    2. Private

    3. Regional

  2. In which department do you work at your library?

    1. Public Services

    2. Technical Services

    3. Information Technology

    4. Administration

    5. Other, please describe:

  3. What level of appointment do you hold in your library?

    1. Director or Deputy Director of Library

    2. Head of department or equivalent

    3. Qualified librarian (Master’s degree orhigher)

    4. Other, please specify:

NETWORKING

  1. In the last five years, how often have you attended professional workshops or conferences organized in Vietnam?

    1. Never

    2. Once a year

    3. 2–5 times a year

    4. Over 5 times a year

    5. Unspecified (ad hoc)

  1. In the last five years, how often have you attended international workshops or conferences?

    1. Never

    2. Once a year

    3. 2–5 times a year

    4. Over 5 times a year

    5. Unspecified (ad hoc)

  2. If you have attended events like those described in Q.4 & Q.5, where did you get the funds to attend the workshops and conferences you just mentioned above?

    1. Parent institution

    2. Government

    3. International sponsors

    4. Library suppliers

    5. Personal (self-cover)

    6. Free of charge

  3. Please rank by level of importance to you (from least important to most important) your reasons for attending a workshop or conference.

    12345678910
    Least importantMost important

    □ Improving knowledge/profession

       

    □ Improving practical skills

       

    □ Networking

       

    □ Other(s), please name and rank:

CURRENT STATE OF COOPERATIVE ARRANGEMENTS IN VIETNAM

Library cooperation refers to arrangements at a loose or general level of partnership such as joining societies, associations or clubs, etc.

  1. Is your library currently a member of a library association/society/federation or did it used to hold a membership in any other organizations?

    1. No (Please go to Q.11)

    2. Yes

  2. In what year did your library commence its membership in the following organizations?

    1. Vietnamese Library Association (VLA)

      1. 2006 (founding member)

      2. 2007 forward, please specify the year:

    2. Northern Academic Library Association (NALA)

      1. 1999 (founding member)

      2. 2007 forward, please specify the year: From To

    3. Federation of Southern Academic Libraries (FESAL)

      1. 2001 (founding member)

      2. 2002 forward, please specify the year: From To

    4. Northern Academic Library Association (NALA)

      1. 1998 (founding member)

      2. 1999 forward, please specify the year: From □   To □

    5. Other similar associations, please provide the name of organizations and the year your library commenced its membership:

      □ Year:

      □ Year:

      □ Year:

  3. If your library has engaged in any organizations as described in Q.9, please:

    1. List the main networking or/and cooperative activities your library has undertaken.

    2. Tick the appropriate boxes to describe the reasons for your library to participate in cooperative arrangements?

      1. Follow other libraries

      2. Meet with other colleagues

      3. Visit libraries in other parts of the country

      4. Other reasons:

    3. Describe the benefits your library has obtained from joining these activities.

    4. List any disadvantages.

  4. Does your library participate in any of these cooperative activities? You may choose more than one.

    1. Online catalogues

    2. Interlibrary loan

    3. Group purchasing of electronic resources

    4. Group purchasing of print materials

      Other activities, please describe:

    5. None

  5. Does your library have any official view towards cooperative practices like these? Please describe.

CONSORTIAL PRACTICE AND POSSIBILITIES FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA IN VIETNAM

Consortia are organizations formed by libraries that collaborate on specific programmes to share common benefits. Consortial arrangements are formally involved in legal agreements signed by member libraries.

  1. Have you ever heard of /learned about the concept of “library consortium”?

    1. Yes

    2. No (Please go to Q.15)

  2. Where did you find the information on library consortium/consortia from? (Select all that apply.)

    1. The literature /In the media

    2. On the Internet /Library websites

    3. Conference/Workshop

    4. Colleagues, friends

    5. Other (please specify):

  3. Are there any official or unofficial documents regarding library cooperation or consortia that have been issued by or received by your library?

    1. Yes. Please state how many:

    2. No

    3. Not sure.

  4. Is your library currently a member of a consortium or consortia?

    1. No, please go to Q.18

    2. Consortium for Purchasing Electronic Resources (CPER)

      1. 2003 (initial member)

      2. Other, please specify the year

    1. Other consortia

    2. Please name:

      When did your library join?

    3. Please name:

      When did your library join?

  5. The literature describes benefits that library consortia have brought to academic libraries. Which of the following benefits would your library value the most? (You may choose more than one.)

    1. Saving costs in purchasing materials

    2. Solving technological issues

    3. Saving costs and time in cataloguing

    4. Spirit of cooperation and sharing

    5. Other(s) (your own thoughts)

  6. For each of the following statements, please tick the appropriate box to indicate your level of agreement on possible reasons for a perceived lack of engagement in library consortia in Vietnam.

    Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly Agree
    1. There is a lack of information about consortia.
    2. Cooperation culture has not been popular among academic libraries in Vietnam.
    3. Joining consortia is not beneficial to my library.
    4. My library has difficulties in terms of in-house legislation and administrative requirements.
    5. There is a belief of unequal sharing of responsibilities or interests.
    Others, please describe:
    6.     
    7.     

  7. Do you support the initiation of consortia for Vietnamese academic libraries?

    1. Yes

    2. No

  8. Would your library join consortia if they were established in Vietnam?

    1. Yes

    2. No

  9. How would you rate the level of activity that your library might have in these potential arrangements?

    1. Very active

    2. Active

    3. Just participate

    4. No participation

  10. What benefits would you expect if your library joined consortia?

  11. Please rank, in order of importance from least important to most important, the following reasons for becoming a member of future consortia:

    12345678910
    Least importantMost important
    1. Saving costs in purchasing electronic resources

    2. Saving costs in purchasing print materials

    3. Saving costs and efforts in cataloguing

    4. Improving library services to users

    5. Improving staff skills

    6. Networking

    7. Other(s). Please name and rank:

  12. Is your library able to decide to join a certain consortium or do you need to ask for permission from your parent institution?

    1. Yes, we can decide

    2. No, we need to seek permission

  13. Who would decide whether or not to join a consortium?

    1. The Rector/President

    2. A direct superior of the library

    3. The library director

    4. Other, please describe:

  14. Would your library be seeking support from the Vietnamese Government, parent institution, international organizations and others if it was to engage in consortia?

    1. Yes

    2. No (please go to Q.29)

  15. If you answered yes to Q.26, what kinds of support would your library seek?

    1. Financial

    2. Professional

    3. Legal

    4. Encouragement for cooperation and sharing

    5. Other(s), please describe:

  16. In the event that you could not get any support, would your library still be willing to join consortia?

    1. Yes

    2. No

  17. Which of the following do you think would play a key role in organizing consortia for academic libraries in Vietnam? Please rank from the least relevant to the most relevant using this scale.

    12345678910
    Least importantMost important
    1. The Ministry of Education and Training

    2. The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism

    3. The Vietnamese Library Society

    4. please name and rank

    5. The National Library of Vietnam

    6. Large universities and regional universities

    7. Groups of libraries by themselves

    8. Other(s), please name and range:

  18. What services could your library actually provide to consortia members or what do you think your library would do to contribute to consortia agreement/s?

    1. Reference and/or virtual reference

    2. Cataloguing

    3. Interlibrary loan

    4. Collection development

    5. Staff training programmes

    6. Sharing digitized institutional repository collections

    7. Other(s), please describe

  19. Concerning the position/role and future development of Vietnamese academic libraries, would you have any additional suggestions for the development of academic library consortia as a contributing factor to library development?

Thank you for your cooperation.

References

Ary, D., L. Cheser Jacobs, and A. Razavieh. 1990. Introduction to Research in Education. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo [MOET]. 2015. “Số Liệu Thống Kê Giáo Dục [Statistics of Education].” Accessed January 20, 2015. http://www.moet.gov.vn/?page=11.11&view=5251.Suche in Google Scholar

Brooks, S., and T.J. Dorst. 2002. “Issues Facing Academic Library Consortia and Perceptions of Members of the Illinois Digital Academic Library.” Portal: Libraries & the Academy 2 (1):43–57. Accessed January 16, 2012. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct.10.1353/pla.2002.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, J.D. 2011. “Likert Items and Scales of Measurement?” JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 15 (1):5. Accessed December 9, 2013. http://jalt.org/test/PDF/Brown34.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, D.M. 2007. Library Networks, Cooperatives and Consortia: A National Survey. Chicago: American Library Association’s Office for Research & Statistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Farrow, E. 2011. “We’re All in This Together: Library Consortia Cost Sharing Models.” Accessed February 18, 2013. http://www.inasp.info/uploads/filer_public/2013/04/08/we_are_all_in_this_together.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoang, T. 2015. “Cần Khẩn Trương Hiện Đại Hóa Giáo Dục [Urgent Needs for Modernisation of Education].” In Cải Cách & Chấn Hưng Giáo Dục [Reform and Renovation of Education], edited by H. Tuy, 320–326. Ho Chi Minh City: Ho Chi Minh City General Publisher.Suche in Google Scholar

Islam, M.M.R. 2013. “Present Status of Library Cooperation, Networking, and Resource Sharing in Bangladesh: Web-Based Library Cooperation for Access to World-Wide Information.” Library Philosophy and Practice: 1–13. Accessed December 31, 2013. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1350919028?accountid=10382.Suche in Google Scholar

Liên hiệp Thư viện Việt Nam [Vietnam Library Consortium]. 2014. “Thành Viên [Members].” Accessed December 24, 2014. http://vlc.vista.vn/thanh-vien/.Suche in Google Scholar

Liên hiệp Thư viện Việt Nam [VLC]. 2015. “Giới Thiệu [About].” Accessed January 25, 2015. http://vlc.vista.vn/gioi-thieu/.Suche in Google Scholar

Macmillen, S. 1990. “Libraries and Information Services in Vietnam.” Information Development 6 (2):89–96. Accessed April 18, 2011. doi:10.1177/026666699000600204.Suche in Google Scholar

Moghaddam, G.G., and V.G. Talawar. 2009. “Library Consortia in Developing Countries: An Overview.” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 43 (1):94–104. Accessed April 25, 2011. doi:10.1108/00330330910934138.Suche in Google Scholar

Perushek, D.E., and A. Douglas. 2014. “Culture, Politics and University Library Consortia in China and the US: A Comparative Introduction to CALIS, GWLA and JULAC.” Library Management 35 (8/9):594–606.10.1108/LM-03-2014-0039Suche in Google Scholar

Pham, T.K., and V.V. Le. 2006. “Tăng Cường Phối Hợp Hoạt Động Giữa Các Cơ Quan TT-TV [Improving Cooperation Activities among Library and Information Organisations].” Tạp Chí Thư Viện Việt Nam [Vietnamese Library Journal] 3. Accessed June 9, 2011. http://www.nlv.gov.vn/nlv/index.php/2008060356/Nghiep-vu-chung/.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, L. 2004. “Fact Sheet: Establishing a Consortium of Health Libraries.” Accessed July 10, 2013. http://www.chla-absc.ca/system/files/fs22_0.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Shachaf, P. 2003. “Nationwide Library Consortia Life Cycle.” Libri 53 (2):94. doi:10.1515/libr.2003.94.Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson, D.B. 1990. “Library Consortia and Access to Information.” Journal of Library Administration 12 (3):83–97. doi:10.1300/J111v12n03_07.Suche in Google Scholar

Ta, B.H. 2008. “Open Access in Conflict with Copyright and Technical Barriers.” 2nd International IFLA Presidential Meeting, Berlin. Accessed May 9, 2011. http://www.bibliotheksportal.de/fileadmin/user_upload/content/bibliotheken/international/IFLA-NK/08_dr_ta_ba_hung_vietnam.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Tanner, K. 2013. “Survey Designs.” In Research Methods: Information, Systems and Contexts, edited by K. Williamson and G. Johanson, 141–171. Prahran Victoria, Australia: Tilde Publishing and Distribution.Suche in Google Scholar

Vu, B.N. 2009. “Hướng Đến Một Mô Hình Thư Viện Đại Học Hiện Đại Phục Vụ Chiến Lược Nâng Cao Chất Lượng Giáo Dục Đại Học [Towards a Modern Academic Library Model Supporting Quality Improvement of Higher Education].” Tạp Chí Thư Viện Việt Nam [Vietnamese Library Journal] 17 (1):13–18. Accessed May 3, 2016. http://vjol.info.vn/index.php/TCTVV/article/view/6416/6080.Suche in Google Scholar

Wade, R. 1999. “The Very Model of a Modern Library Consortium.” Library Consortium Management: An International Journal 1 (1):5–18.10.1108/14662769910284230Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, D.E. 2000. “Living in a Cooperative World.” Technical Services Quarterly 17 (4):13–32. doi:10.1300/J124v17n04_02.Suche in Google Scholar

Wiser, J. 2012. “‘Playing Well with Others’: New Opportunities for Library Consortia.” Theological Librarianship 5 (2):5. Accessed November 24, 2014. https://journal.atla.com/ojs/index.php/theolib/.10.31046/tl.v5i2.237Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, D.A. 2005. “Library Consortia – Do the Models Always Work?” Resource Sharing & Information Networks 18 (1):49–60.10.1300/J121v18n01_05Suche in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article (DOI:10.1515/libri-2016-0050) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2016-5-19
Accepted: 2016-12-4
Published Online: 2017-3-14
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/libri-2016-0050/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen