Startseite The Lost Children: When the Right to Children Conflicts with the Rights of Children
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Lost Children: When the Right to Children Conflicts with the Rights of Children

  • Pamela Laufer-Ukeles EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. Dezember 2014
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this essay, I consider the tension between the drive toward the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and the state’s failure to protect interests of children born of ART. I ask the question whether ART should be regulated for the sake of future children’s interests. Taking a narrow view of rights, this essay argues that despite the considerable obstacles posed by Derek Parfit’s non-identity problem and the ambiguity surrounding how to optimize and identify what is “best” for children under the “best interests” standard, there are still basic civil rights of children born of ART that must be ensured in ART regulation. Therefore, regulation of ART for the sake of children is justifiable and necessary but in a limited manner. To demonstrate how conflict can arise between the use of ART and the basic rights of children born of ART I first turn to the example of Israel where the use of ART can affect the resulting child’s personal status, which can affect a person’s ability to marry. This tension is particularly stark in Israel, where procreative support from the state is extreme, and relatively easy fixes could relieve much of the problem. But, the same tension plays out in other nations in which the use of ART leads to the creation of children whose basic needs are not sufficiently addressed. In particular, I discuss the lack of access to health information from gamete donors in the U.S. and the failure to provide citizenship and legal parenthood to children born of international surrogates in a number of other countries. I argue that while procreation is a valid goal it cannot come at the cost of the social and basic civil rights of children. State policy and laws must ensure that children born of ART will be full citizens upon their birth. In sum, regulating ART can be justified for the sake of future children but I suggest that such regulation be drawn narrowly and only to ensure children’s basic civil rights.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to David Heyd, Gila Stopler, Zvi Triger, Shelly Kreiczer-Levy, Yardenna Kope-Yossef, Martha Ertman, Shlomo Dov-Rosen, Ayelet Blecher-Prigat, Lukas Meyer, James Penner, Lior Barshak, Hezi Margalit and all the participants in the Eighth Annual International Human Rights Workshop on Intergenerational Justice for their comments on previous drafts of this article and for their help in making this such a successful conference. I would also like to thank Michele Manspeizer and the student editors of the Law and Ethics of Human Rights journal for their hard work in preparing this article for publication. In particular, I dedicate this article to the memory of Barak Rafael Degorker, a student editor who worked on this article who lost his life protecting Israel in Operation Protective Edge.

Published Online: 2014-12-2
Published in Print: 2014-11-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lehr-2014-0008/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen