Abstract
Contemporary investment law is marked by deep fragmentation: a network of thousands of treaties that are not always primarily focused on governing international investment relations, overlapping treatment and protection standards, as well as only partially crystallised customary rules shaped by arbitral practice. Currently this fragmentation is increasingly exacerbated by growing global geopolitical competition and international conflicts, including the ongoing war in Ukraine, thereby intensifying the tension between state security imperatives and the evolutionarily established system of foreign investor protection. The article introduces the concept of the investment standards construct – a holistic methodological model for the systemic analysis of International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and for the design of their modernised content. The proposed legal engineering approach moves beyond conventional element-by-element examination of investment treatment and protection standards (such as fair and equitable treatment, national treatment, prohibition of expropriation, etc.) and instead considers them in their dynamic interplay with procedural and other guarantees as well as legal limitations, including right to regulate and security exceptions. The new model’s applicability is demonstrated through doctrinal analysis and arbitral practice, including the current Ukrainian case cluster and other significant disputes. The study shows how the construct functions as an operational tool for both assessing disputes in contexts of economic development and conflict, as well as for designing more resilient and balanced IIAs capable of aligning investor protection with contemporary regulatory needs.
References
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, “Organized Duplicity: When States Opt Out of the European Union,” in Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen and Rebecca Adler-Nissen (eds.), Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Suche in Google Scholar
Alexeyev, Andriy, and Sergiy Voitovich, Tokios Tokeles Vector: Jurisdictional Issues in ICSID Case Tokios Tokeles v. Ukraine, 9 The Journal of World Investment & Trade, no. 6 (2008).10.1163/221190008X00269Suche in Google Scholar
Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (2014/2017).Suche in Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed., Cambridge: CUP, 1999).Suche in Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, The Conception of Proportionality in International Law, 2 European Journal of International Law (2011).Suche in Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (New York: Anchor Books, 1966).Suche in Google Scholar
Bronfman, M. K., Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Evolving Standard, 10 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (2006).10.1163/138946306783559986Suche in Google Scholar
Brown, Chester, A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford: OUP, 2007).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206506.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (9th ed., Oxford: OUP, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
Cha, Victor, The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and Future (New York: Ecco, 2012).Suche in Google Scholar
Chaisse, Julien, ‘The Black Pit’: Power and Pitfalls of Digital FDI and Cross-Border Data Flows, 22 World Trade Review, no. 1 73, 89, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745622000337(2023).22.Suche in Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf and Christoph Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed., Oxford: OUP, 2012).Suche in Google Scholar
Galisonga, Julius and Ali Kolo Abba, “The Role of Judicial Precedent as a Source of International Investment Law,” in K. Al Marri, et al.. (eds), BDRC 2024, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 587 (Cham: Springer, 2024).10.1007/978-3-031-84371-6_37Suche in Google Scholar
Grierson-, Weiler, Todd, J., and Ian A. Laird, “Standards of Treatment,” in Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, and Christoph Schreuer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: OUP, 2008).Suche in Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec & Grisel, Florian, The Evolution of International Arbitration (Oxford: OUP, 2017).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739722.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Haftel, Y.Z., and T. Broude, “Fiddlers on the Roof? International Organisations in the International Investment Agreement Regime as Traditional Global Governance” in J. Jordana, A. Marx, M. Vandendriessche and J. Wouters (eds), Institutions of Global Governance (Edward Elgar Publishing 2025).10.4337/9781035302581.00015Suche in Google Scholar
Haidamaka, I., Pravovyi rezhym: poniattia ta vydy [Legal Regime: Concept and Types], 15 Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia (2008).Suche in Google Scholar
Honderich, Ted (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed., Oxford: OUP, 2005).Suche in Google Scholar
ICSID Secretariat, Background Papers on Rule Amendments (2018-2022): Working Paper #1 (August 2, 2018).Suche in Google Scholar
ICSID Secretariat, Background Papers on Rule Amendments (2018-2022): Working Paper #4 (February 27, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar
ICSID Secretariat, Background Papers on Rule Amendments (2018-2022): Working Paper #6 (November 12, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar
International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries, UN Doc A/56/10 (2001).Suche in Google Scholar
International Law Commission, Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law, with commentaries, in UN Doc A/73/10 (2018).Suche in Google Scholar
Interview with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Izvestia Multimedia Information Centre (March 28, 2024).Suche in Google Scholar
Kläger, Rudolf, Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law (Cambridge: CUP, 2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Kopiika, V. V., Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu z Yes yak chynnyk zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [The EU Association Agreement as a Factor in Ensuring the National Security of Ukraine], 20 Naukovyi visnyk Dyplomatychnoi akademii Ukrainy, no. 2 (2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: CUP, 2005).10.1017/CBO9780511493713Suche in Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983).Suche in Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Aligning Investment Law with Human Rights,’in Freya Baetens (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge: CUP, 2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T., and Charles Short, A Latin Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879).Suche in Google Scholar
Lukashuk, I. I., Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Obshchaia chast [International Law: General Part] (3rd ed., Moscow: BEK, 1997).Suche in Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, 54 International & Comparative Law Quarterly, no. 2 (2005).10.1093/iclq/lei001Suche in Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, and Paradell, Lluis, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Suche in Google Scholar
OECD, Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law (2004).Suche in Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford: OUP, 2013).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694501.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Poiedynok, V. V., Systema pravovykh rezhymiv inozemnoho investuvannia [The System of Legal Regimes of Foreign Investment], 88 Visnyk KNU. Yurydychni nauky (2011).Suche in Google Scholar
Poiedynok, V. V., Pravove rehuliuvannia investytsiinoi diialnosti: teoretychni problemy. Monohrafiia [Legal Regulation of Investment Activity: Theoretical Problems. Monograph] (Nizhyn: Vydavnytstvo “Aspekt-Polihraf”, 2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Qian, Xu and Fang Gu, Reconceptualizing Counterclaim Assessment in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Discourse on Fairness through Rawlsian Justice Theory, 16 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, no. 2 (2025).10.1093/jnlids/idaf007Suche in Google Scholar
Sabahi, Borzu, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (Oxford: OUP, 2011).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601189.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., The Law of Investment Treaties (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).10.1093/law/9780198703976.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge: CUP, 2009).10.1017/CBO9780511605451Suche in Google Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment (3rd ed., Cambridge: CUP, 2010).10.1017/CBO9780511841439Suche in Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti, Transitional Justice (Oxford: OUP, 2000).10.1093/oso/9780195100648.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2023.Suche in Google Scholar
Tsvik, M. V., and Petryshyn, O. V. (eds.), Zahalna teoriia derzhavy ta prava: pidruchnyk [General Theory of State and Law: Textbook] (Kharkiv: Pravo, 2009).Suche in Google Scholar
UNCTAD, Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development (2015).Suche in Google Scholar
UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2024: Investment facilitation and digital government (Geneva, 2024).Suche in Google Scholar
UNCTAD, Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Sequel (UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, United Nations 2012).Suche in Google Scholar
UNCTAD, Investment Policy Hub, International Investment Agreements Navigator, accessed September 11, 2025.Suche in Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969).Suche in Google Scholar
Yating, Lin, Deciphering China’s Selective Adaptation to Investment Treaty Regime: A “Domestication” of International Investment Law Perspective, 26 The Journal of World Investment & Trade, no. 3 (2025).10.1163/22119000-12340369Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston