The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights in South Korea
-
Wonil Cha
Abstract
Socio-economic rights are regarded as an indispensable foundation of substantial freedom. At the same time, the embodiment of socio-economic rights in the Constitution is generally associated with concerns about their quality as a fundamental right and their judicial enforcement. The South Korean Constitution upholds the principle of the welfare state in the preamble, the fundamental social rights of Articles 31 to 36 and Article 119 (2), providing the legal basis for the regulation and coordination of economic affairs by the State. The implementation of these constitutional norms and ideals was left largely to the political process beyond judicial review for many decades. As a result of the rapid economic development, the democratization process and the introduction of constitutional review in the last 30 years, the normative discussion of basic social rights, both on societal and legal level, has taken on a new life. This article examines the South Korean Constitutional Court’s approach to judicial review in the socio-economic field with due regard to this changing reality.
References
Cheon, K. S., Fundamental Social Rights and Constitutional Jurisdiction (in Korean), 19 Constitutional Law Research Collection (2008).Suche in Google Scholar
Cheon, K. S., Rethinking the Horizon of the Social Basic Rights (in Korean), 14 European Constitutional Law Journal (2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Cheon, K. S., On the ‘three Legislation’ about Social Security 1963, 164 The Justice (2018).10.29305/tj.2018.02.164.199Suche in Google Scholar
Cheon, K. S., Korean Constitution (in Korean) (14th ed., Seoul: JypHyunJae, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar
Choe, K. H., Judicial Review Standard on the Right to Humane Livelihood (in Korean), Constitutional Research Institute, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
Chon, J. I., The Effect of Constitutional Review on the Legislature and the Executive Branch for Last 25 Years in Korea, 14 Journal of Korean Law (2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of Korea, 30 Years of the Constitutional Court of Korea, 2018.Suche in Google Scholar
Han, S. H., “Public Interest Litigation for Lawyers,” (in Korean), in MINBYUN – Lawyers for a Democratic Society (ed.), Public Interest Litigation in Korea, vol.II (Paju: Bobmunsa, 2018).Suche in Google Scholar
Han, S. W., The Basic Social Rights as the Constitutional Basis of the Welfare State (in Korean), 18 Constitutional Law, no. 4 (2012).Suche in Google Scholar
Jee, S. S., The Standards and Methods of Judicial Review of the Fundamental Social Rights of the Constitutional Court (in Korean), 24 Constitutional Law Research Collection (2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Kim, B. G., The Legal Nature of Social Basic Rights (in Korean), 3 Social Security Law Review, no. 1 (2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Kim, B. G., Constitutional Guarantee of the Right to Social Security (in Korean), 7 Korean Social Security Law Journal, no. 1 (2018).Suche in Google Scholar
Landau, D., Abusive Constitutionalism, 47 UC Davis Law Review, no. 1 (2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Lim, C. W. and B. S. Kim, “Historical Change and Prospective for a Sustainable Welfare State,” (in Korean), in B. S. Kim et al. (ed.), Korean Welfare State (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Murswiek, D., “Grundrechte als Teilhaberechte,” (in German), in J. Isensee and P. Kirchhof (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, vol.IX (3rd ed., Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2011).Suche in Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L., The Rule of Law and the Frankenstate: Why Governance Checklists Do Not Work, 26 Governance, no. 4 (2013).10.1111/gove.12049Suche in Google Scholar
Shin, W., The Rise and Growth of Constitutionalism in Korea (Goyang: Munu, 2018).Suche in Google Scholar
Umbach, D. and F. W. Dollinger, “Sozialgerichtsbarkeit und Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit,” (in German), in D. Umbach, T. Clemens and F. W. Dollinger (eds.), Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz (2nd ed., Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2005).Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Law and Development Review
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The Constitutionalization of Development
- Articles
- Constitutionalism and Development: A Mismatch or a Dream-Team?
- Economic Constitutions in the Developing World
- Constitutional Judges as Agents for Development
- Political Governance, Law, and Economic Development
- Economic Constitutionalism in the EU and Germany – The German Constitutional Court, the European Court of Justice and the European Central Bank between Law and Politics
- Democratization of Foreign Policy: India’s Experience with Paradiplomacy
- The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights in South Korea
- The Right to Information and Transformative Development Outcomes
- Note
- South Korean Economy at the Crossroads: Structure Issues under External Pressure – An Essay from a Law and Development Perspective
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The Constitutionalization of Development
- Articles
- Constitutionalism and Development: A Mismatch or a Dream-Team?
- Economic Constitutions in the Developing World
- Constitutional Judges as Agents for Development
- Political Governance, Law, and Economic Development
- Economic Constitutionalism in the EU and Germany – The German Constitutional Court, the European Court of Justice and the European Central Bank between Law and Politics
- Democratization of Foreign Policy: India’s Experience with Paradiplomacy
- The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights in South Korea
- The Right to Information and Transformative Development Outcomes
- Note
- South Korean Economy at the Crossroads: Structure Issues under External Pressure – An Essay from a Law and Development Perspective
