Abstract
This article focuses on the recent international agreement now known as Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Land, Fisheries and Forests. The drafting process for this international agreement, achieved through a transparent consultation activity, started by FAO and finalized through intergovernmental negotiations led by CFS (Committee on World Food Security, a body of the U.N.), also including the participation of civil society organizations, international organizations, private sector representatives, academics and researchers. The engagement of rural social movements and other Civil Society Organizations in the negotiation process is an unprecedented effort in influencing governments to establish guidelines to gain greater access to land resources at the global scale. The Guidelines aim to promote food security and sustainable development by improving secure access to land, fisheries and forests, especially for small food producers, and protecting the legitimate tenure rights of millions of people against forms of grabbing, concentration, commodification and privatization of land which are shaping agrarian systems. They have been elaborated on the basis of human rights and in respect of local communities rights. From a strictly legal point of view, the Guidelines are not mandatory and hence they are not a source of legally binding effects for every single State. They do not derive from a formal legislative proceeding, and they are the result of a consultation and negotiation process coming from the bottom. Every State and international organization is called on to guarantee the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the Guidelines. The authors contend, with critical arguments, that the process of consultation and negotiation that led to the endorsement of the Guidelines is quite relevant – in the current context of the large-scale land acquisitions – and very significant because it involved civil society and social movements, giving rise to an innovative instrument of soft law.
References
Adornato, F., I diritti della terra, Agricoltura, Istituzioni, Mercati, no. 2 [2011] [Adornato, F., Land Rights].Suche in Google Scholar
Alden Wily, L., Whose Land Is It? Commons and Conflict States (2008), available at: <http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/files/doc_853.pdf>Suche in Google Scholar
APRODEV, Policy Brief: The Role of European Development Finance Institutions in Land Grabs (May 2013), available at: <www.aprodev.eu>Suche in Google Scholar
Borchardt, G., and K.Wellens, Soft Law in European Community Law, 14European Law Review, no. 5 (1989).Suche in Google Scholar
Borras, Jr. S., La Vía Campesina and its Global Campaign for Agrarian Reform, 8Journal of Agrarian Change (2008).10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00170.xSuche in Google Scholar
Borras, Jr. S., R.Hall, I.Scoones, B.White, and W.Wolford, Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction, 38The Journal of Peasant Studies, no. 2 (2011).Suche in Google Scholar
Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ), Foreign Land Deals and Human Rights. Case Studies on Agricultural and Biofuel Investment (New York: NYU School of Law, 2010).Suche in Google Scholar
Coleman, A.M., The Great Land Rush, available at: <http://farmlandgrab.org>, accessed 13 September 2012.Suche in Google Scholar
Colombo, L., and A.Onorati, Food. Riots and Rights (London: IIED, 2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Committee on World Food Security, Fortieth Session (Rome, Italy 7–11 October 2013), Following Progress on Decisions and Recommendations of the Committee on World Food Security, CFS 2013/40/Inf., available at: <http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/029/mi051e.pdf>, accessed 13 September 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
De Schutter, O., Large-scale land acquisitions and leases: A set of core principles and measures to address the human rights challenge (2009), available at: <http://vorige.nrc.nl/multimedia/archive>Suche in Google Scholar
De Schutter, O., How not to think of land-grabbing: three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland, 38The Journal of Peasant Studies, no. 2 (2011).Suche in Google Scholar
De Schutter, O., The Green Rush: The Global Race for Farmland and the Rights of Land Users, 52Harvard International Law Journal, no. 2 (2011).Suche in Google Scholar
European Commission (EC), EU Land Policy Guidelines (Brussels, 2004), available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/EU_Land_ Guidelines_Final_12_2004_en.pdf>Suche in Google Scholar
European Coordination via Campesina and Handsoff the Land Network, Land Concentration, Land Grabbing and People’s Struggles in Europe (April 2013), available at: <http://www.eurovia.org/IMG/pdf/Land_ in_Europe.pdf>Suche in Google Scholar
FIAN, Civil Society Organizations’ Proposals for the FAO Guidelines on Responsible Governance of Land and Natural Resources Tenure (Heidelberg, 2011) available at: <http://www.foodsovereignty.org/CoreIssues/AgrarianReformandTerritory/VGforLandandNaturalResourceTenure.aspx>Suche in Google Scholar
Glopolis, Why Does Responsible Investment in Agriculture Matter? (2013), available at: <www.glopolis.org>Suche in Google Scholar
GRAIN, Seized! The 2008 Landgrab for Food and Financial Security, available at: <http://www.grain.org/article/entries/93-seized-the-2008-landgrab-for-food-and-financial-security>Suche in Google Scholar
GRAIN, The G8 and Land Grabs in Africa (2013), available at: <http://www.grain.org>Suche in Google Scholar
HLPE, Land Tenure and International in Agriculture. A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security (Rome, 2011), available at: <http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE-Land-tenure-and-international-investments-in-agriculture-2011.pdf>Suche in Google Scholar
HLPE, Biofuels and Food Security. A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security (Rome, 2013), available at: <http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/HLPE-Report5_Biofuels_and_food_security.pdf>Suche in Google Scholar
Hillgenberg, H., A Fresh Look at Soft Law, 10European Journal of International Law, no. 3 (1999).10.1093/ejil/10.3.499Suche in Google Scholar
Holt-Giménez, E., Land Grabs vs. Land Sovereignty (2013), available at: <http://www.foodfirst.org>Suche in Google Scholar
ILC, Tirana Declaration: Securing Land Access for the Poor in Times of Intensified Natural Resources Competition (Rome, 2011), available at: <http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/aom11/Tirana_Declaration_ILC_2011_ENG.pdf>Suche in Google Scholar
Kugelman, M., “The Global Farmland Rush”, New York Times, Washington, 5 February 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
Margulis, M.E., N.McKeon, and S.M.Borras Jr., Land Grabbing and Global Governance: Critical Perspectives, 10Globalizations, no. 1 (2013).Suche in Google Scholar
McMichael, P., Interpreting the Land Grab, Transnational Institute TNI (2011), available at: <http://www.tni.org>Suche in Google Scholar
Mulleta, F.F., A Critical Review of the World Bank, FAO and Rights-Based Guidelines on Large-Scale Land Transfer (2012), available at: <http://farmlandgrab.org/uploads/attachment/farris_fantu_agter_2012.pdf>Suche in Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Governing the Commons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).10.1017/CBO9780511807763Suche in Google Scholar
OXFAM, “Our Land, Our Lives”. Time Out on the Global Land Rush (2012), available at: <http://www.oxfam.org>Suche in Google Scholar
Paoloni, L., Diritti degli agricoltori e tutela della biodiversità (Torino: Giappichelli, 2005) [Paoloni, L., Farmers’ Rights and Protection of Biodiversity].Suche in Google Scholar
Paoloni, L., La “sottrazione” delle terre coltivabili ed il fenomeno del land grabbing, Rivista Diritto Agrario, no. 2 (2012) [Paoloni, L., The “Subtraction” of Arable Land and the Phenomenon of Land Grabbing].Suche in Google Scholar
Peluso, N.L., and C.Lund, New Frontiers of Land Control: Introduction, 38The Journal of Peasant Studies, no. 4 (2011).Suche in Google Scholar
Ricoveri, G., Nature for Sale. The Commons Versus Commodities (London: Plutopress, 2013).Suche in Google Scholar
Senden, L., Soft Law in European Community Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004).Suche in Google Scholar
Seufert, P., and S.Monsalve Suárez(FIAN International), Monitoring the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests. A civil society perspective (Land Tenure Working Paper 22, FAO, 2012).Suche in Google Scholar
Tal, A., and J.A.Cohen, Bringing “Top-Down” to “Bottom-Up”: A New Role for Environmental Legislation in Combating Desertification, 31Harvard Environmental Law Review, no. 1 (2007).Suche in Google Scholar
The Intergovernmental Working Group, Information Paper on Implications of the Voluntary Guidelines for Parties and Non-Parties to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Right (Rome, 2003), available at: <http://www.fao.org>Suche in Google Scholar
UN, General Assembly, Agriculture Development and Food Security. Report of the Second Committee, A/67/443, 17 December2012.Suche in Google Scholar
UN-REDD PROGRAMME, Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent (2011), available at: <www.un-redd.org>Suche in Google Scholar
von Bernstorff, J., The Problem of “Land Grabbing”, extract from J. von Bernstorff, Das Problem des “Land Grabbing” und die UN-Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (2012), available at: <http://www.jura.unituebingen.de/professoren_und_dozenten/vonbernstorff/projekte/das-problem-des-201cland-grabbing201d-und-die-un-voluntary-guidelines-on-the-responsible-governance-of-tenure-of-land-fisheries-and-forests-in-the-context-of-national-food-security>Suche in Google Scholar
World Bank, Rising Global Interest in Farmland. Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? (Washington, DC, 2011).Suche in Google Scholar
©2014 Law and Development Review
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Law and Development Implications of Transnational Land Acquisitions: Introduction
- Articles
- The Law and Land Grabbing: Friend or Foe?
- Arab Acquisitions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Partners in Development?
- The Media Discourse of Land Grabbing and Resistance During Myanmar’s Legal Reformation: The Monywa Copper Mine
- International Adjudication of Land Disputes: For Development and Transnationalism
- Managing Foreign Investment in Agricultural Land in Africa: The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties and International Investment Contracts
- Regulations of Large-Scale Acquisitions of Land: The Case of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Land, Fisheries and Forests
- Questioning the “Regulatory Approach” to Large-Scale Agricultural Land Transfers in Ethiopia: A Legal Pluralistic Perspective
- What Can Be Expected from International Frameworks to Regulate Large-Scale Land and Water Acquisitions in Sub-Saharan Africa?
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Law and Development Implications of Transnational Land Acquisitions: Introduction
- Articles
- The Law and Land Grabbing: Friend or Foe?
- Arab Acquisitions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Partners in Development?
- The Media Discourse of Land Grabbing and Resistance During Myanmar’s Legal Reformation: The Monywa Copper Mine
- International Adjudication of Land Disputes: For Development and Transnationalism
- Managing Foreign Investment in Agricultural Land in Africa: The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties and International Investment Contracts
- Regulations of Large-Scale Acquisitions of Land: The Case of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Land, Fisheries and Forests
- Questioning the “Regulatory Approach” to Large-Scale Agricultural Land Transfers in Ethiopia: A Legal Pluralistic Perspective
- What Can Be Expected from International Frameworks to Regulate Large-Scale Land and Water Acquisitions in Sub-Saharan Africa?