Home On the Limitations of Lao Sze Kwang’s “Trichotomy of the Self” in His Interpretation of Kierkegaard
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On the Limitations of Lao Sze Kwang’s “Trichotomy of the Self” in His Interpretation of Kierkegaard

  • Andrew Ka-Pok-Tam EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 11, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In 1959, Lao Sze-Kwang (1927 – 2012), a well-known Chinese Kantian philosopher and author of the New Edition of the History of Chinese Philosophy, published On Existentialist Philosophy introducing existential philosophers to Chinese readers. This paper argues that Lao misinterpreted Kierkegaard’s ultimate philosophical quest of “how to become a Christian” as a question of ‘virtue completion,’ because he failed to recognize and acknowledge Kierkegaard’s distinction between aesthetic, moral and religious passion. By describing and clarifying Lao’s misinterpretation, the paper then argues that Lao’s trichotomy of the self fails to give due credit to the independence of religiousness from morality and aesthetics in Kierkegaard’s thought.

The present article is based on a paper presented at an international conference (Understanding and Misunderstanding between East Asia and the West: In Remembrance of the 210th Anniversary of Dr. Robert Morrison’s Arrival in China), held at the University of Glasgow in November 2017. The author would like to express his gratitude to several sponsors and advisors to the conference, including Bishop Emeritus Thomas Soo (Hong Kong Anglican Church), Fr. Alan Cameron (St. Gregory Barbarigo Catholic Church, Glasgow), the Glasgow Chinese Catholic Community and others.

Published Online: 2021-08-11
Published in Print: 2021-08-11

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Title pages
  3. Preface
  4. Contents
  5. Articles
  6. Abbreviations
  7. Section 1: Interpreting Kierkegaard’s Authorship
  8. Section 1:   Interpreting Kierkegaard’s Authorship
  9. In Search of “That Archimedean Point”: The Development of Selfhood in Kierkegaard’s Journal of Gilleleje
  10. Philosophy Lost and Found: Irony and Renewal in Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments
  11. Between Deception and Authority: Kierkegaard’s Use of Scripture in the Discourses, “Thoughts That Wound from Behind—for Upbuilding”
  12. “Your Existence is a Delight to Us.” An Investigation into the Identity of the Neighbour in Kierkegaard’s Works of Love
  13. The Concept of State in Kierkegaard’s Papers
  14. Section 2: Selected Concepts and Problems in Kierkegaard
  15. Section 2:   Selected Concepts and Problems in Kierkegaard
  16. Human Striving and Absolute Reliance upon God: A Kierkegaardian Paradox
  17. The Hidden Divine Experimenter: Kierkegaard on Providence
  18. Towards the Socratic Mission: Imitatio Socratis
  19. Between Singularity and Plurality: Kierkegaard and the Paradox of Absolute Difference
  20. The Liberating Cacophony of Feelings: Kierkegaard on Emotions
  21. The (Im)proper Community: On the Concept of Eiendommelighed in Kierkegaard
  22. Without Authority: Kierkegaard’s Resistance to Patriarchy
  23. Ecophilosophy and the Ambivalence of Nature: Kierkegaard and Knausgård on Lilies, Birds and Being
  24. Section 3: Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
  25. Section 3:   Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
  26. Sibbern’s Anticipations of Kierkegaard’s Polemic against the Hegelians: The Critique of Abstraction
  27. Hans L. Martensen on Self-Consciousness, Mysticism, and Freedom
  28. “The Greatest Sculptor”: Bertel Thorvaldsen According to Kierkegaard
  29. Section 4: Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
  30. Section 4:   Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
  31. The Tale of Two Seducers: Existential Entrapment in the Works of Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky
  32. What is Worldly Logic and Why Might it Lead to Suicide? Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and the Critique of Logic
  33. Lukács and Kierkegaard: Decadence or Despair
  34. Is Hell the Other? Kierkegaard and Sartre on the Dialectic of Recognition
  35. On the Limitations of Lao Sze Kwang’s “Trichotomy of the Self” in His Interpretation of Kierkegaard
  36. Section 5: Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
  37. Section 5:   Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
  38. Kierkegaard and the Publisher’s Peritext
Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kierke-2021-0022/pdf
Scroll to top button