Abstract
This study is dedicated to exploring the ways in which Kierkegaard provides a criterion for thinking about the principles of plurality when, in the context of distinguishing between Socrates and Christ, between different conceptions of difference—between those that support the difference of the other and those that do not—he writes that, just as no one must separate what God has joined, so no one must join what God has separated. When Kierkegaard then makes central to faith the incommensurability of single individuals, he indicates that the inviolable singularity of self and other is the one principle that can be true for all—that can be plural—since it is the one principle that is inclusive of all. In my paper I argue through Kierkegaard that the relationship between the singular and the plural embraces the paradox of absolute difference, the paradox of difference as absolute: the single individual exists only by standing in absolute relation to all others as absolute; the plural exists only insofar as it involves the commitment to the singular standard that, as absolute, preserves the difference of all.
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Title pages
- Preface
- Contents
- Articles
- Abbreviations
- Section 1: Interpreting Kierkegaard’s Authorship
- Section 1: Interpreting Kierkegaard’s Authorship
- In Search of “That Archimedean Point”: The Development of Selfhood in Kierkegaard’s Journal of Gilleleje
- Philosophy Lost and Found: Irony and Renewal in Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments
- Between Deception and Authority: Kierkegaard’s Use of Scripture in the Discourses, “Thoughts That Wound from Behind—for Upbuilding”
- “Your Existence is a Delight to Us.” An Investigation into the Identity of the Neighbour in Kierkegaard’s Works of Love
- The Concept of State in Kierkegaard’s Papers
- Section 2: Selected Concepts and Problems in Kierkegaard
- Section 2: Selected Concepts and Problems in Kierkegaard
- Human Striving and Absolute Reliance upon God: A Kierkegaardian Paradox
- The Hidden Divine Experimenter: Kierkegaard on Providence
- Towards the Socratic Mission: Imitatio Socratis
- Between Singularity and Plurality: Kierkegaard and the Paradox of Absolute Difference
- The Liberating Cacophony of Feelings: Kierkegaard on Emotions
- The (Im)proper Community: On the Concept of Eiendommelighed in Kierkegaard
- Without Authority: Kierkegaard’s Resistance to Patriarchy
- Ecophilosophy and the Ambivalence of Nature: Kierkegaard and Knausgård on Lilies, Birds and Being
- Section 3: Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
- Section 3: Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
- Sibbern’s Anticipations of Kierkegaard’s Polemic against the Hegelians: The Critique of Abstraction
- Hans L. Martensen on Self-Consciousness, Mysticism, and Freedom
- “The Greatest Sculptor”: Bertel Thorvaldsen According to Kierkegaard
- Section 4: Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
- Section 4: Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
- The Tale of Two Seducers: Existential Entrapment in the Works of Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky
- What is Worldly Logic and Why Might it Lead to Suicide? Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and the Critique of Logic
- Lukács and Kierkegaard: Decadence or Despair
- Is Hell the Other? Kierkegaard and Sartre on the Dialectic of Recognition
- On the Limitations of Lao Sze Kwang’s “Trichotomy of the Self” in His Interpretation of Kierkegaard
- Section 5: Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
- Section 5: Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
- Kierkegaard and the Publisher’s Peritext
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Title pages
- Preface
- Contents
- Articles
- Abbreviations
- Section 1: Interpreting Kierkegaard’s Authorship
- Section 1: Interpreting Kierkegaard’s Authorship
- In Search of “That Archimedean Point”: The Development of Selfhood in Kierkegaard’s Journal of Gilleleje
- Philosophy Lost and Found: Irony and Renewal in Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments
- Between Deception and Authority: Kierkegaard’s Use of Scripture in the Discourses, “Thoughts That Wound from Behind—for Upbuilding”
- “Your Existence is a Delight to Us.” An Investigation into the Identity of the Neighbour in Kierkegaard’s Works of Love
- The Concept of State in Kierkegaard’s Papers
- Section 2: Selected Concepts and Problems in Kierkegaard
- Section 2: Selected Concepts and Problems in Kierkegaard
- Human Striving and Absolute Reliance upon God: A Kierkegaardian Paradox
- The Hidden Divine Experimenter: Kierkegaard on Providence
- Towards the Socratic Mission: Imitatio Socratis
- Between Singularity and Plurality: Kierkegaard and the Paradox of Absolute Difference
- The Liberating Cacophony of Feelings: Kierkegaard on Emotions
- The (Im)proper Community: On the Concept of Eiendommelighed in Kierkegaard
- Without Authority: Kierkegaard’s Resistance to Patriarchy
- Ecophilosophy and the Ambivalence of Nature: Kierkegaard and Knausgård on Lilies, Birds and Being
- Section 3: Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
- Section 3: Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
- Sibbern’s Anticipations of Kierkegaard’s Polemic against the Hegelians: The Critique of Abstraction
- Hans L. Martensen on Self-Consciousness, Mysticism, and Freedom
- “The Greatest Sculptor”: Bertel Thorvaldsen According to Kierkegaard
- Section 4: Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
- Section 4: Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
- The Tale of Two Seducers: Existential Entrapment in the Works of Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky
- What is Worldly Logic and Why Might it Lead to Suicide? Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and the Critique of Logic
- Lukács and Kierkegaard: Decadence or Despair
- Is Hell the Other? Kierkegaard and Sartre on the Dialectic of Recognition
- On the Limitations of Lao Sze Kwang’s “Trichotomy of the Self” in His Interpretation of Kierkegaard
- Section 5: Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
- Section 5: Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
- Kierkegaard and the Publisher’s Peritext