Home Of Clairvoyants and Mousvoyants: Kierkegaard’s Polemic against Speculative Philosophy in the “Telegraph Messages”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Of Clairvoyants and Mousvoyants: Kierkegaard’s Polemic against Speculative Philosophy in the “Telegraph Messages”

  • Elizabeth Li EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 18, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article explores Kierkegaard’s largely overlooked 1838 paper “Telegraph Messages from a Mousvoyant to a Clairvoyant concerning the Relation between Xnty and Philosophy,” and argues that it can be read as a polemic against the speculative unity of philosophy and Christianity and speculative thought’s epistemological optimism, especially targeting the Danish speculative theologian Hans Lassen Martensen. It will be suggested that the “Telegraph Messages” offer a corrective to this view by separating Christianity and philosophy and underlining the ambiguity of human existence and the paradoxicality of the religious sphere, thus foreshadowing key themes in Kierkegaard’s mature pseudonymous authorship.

An early version of this paper was presented at the Søren Kierkegaard Research Centre Project Seminar in May 2019, and I would like to thank René Rosfort, Ettore Rocca, Brian Söderquist, Joakim Garff, Iben Damgaard, Kristian Bunkenborg, Paulo Lopes, Cæcilie Varslev, and Eleanor Helms for their generous and incisive comments on this occasion and in later conversations. I would also like to thank Joel Rasmussen, Dritëro Demjaha, and Karl Verstrynge for their invaluable insights and suggestions.

Online erschienen: 2020-08-18

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Front matter
  2. Title pages
  3. Preface
  4. Contents
  5. Articles
  6. Section 1: Problems and Perspectives in Kierkegaard’s Authorship
  7. Section 1:   Problems and Perspectives in Kierkegaard’s Authorship
  8. A Christian Art? Søren Kierkegaard’s Views on Music and Musical Performance Reconsidered
  9. Between the Two Ethics: Why Assessor Wilhelm is not a Judge
  10. Narrative Variation and the Mood of Freedom in Fear and Trembling
  11. On Fear and Trembling’s Motif of the Promise: Faith, Ethics and the Politics of Tragedy
  12. The Ambiguity of Mimesis: Kierkegaard between Aesthetic Fantasy and Religious Imitation
  13. Know Yourself in the Mirror of the Word: Kierkegaard on Self-Knowledge
  14. „Mein Bestreben, das Martyrium zu verherrlichen…“ Zur Idee des Martyriums in Kierkegaards Journalen ab 1846
  15. Section 2: Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
  16. Section 2:   Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
  17. The Faust Project in Kierkegaard’s Early Journals
  18. Of Clairvoyants and Mousvoyants: Kierkegaard’s Polemic against Speculative Philosophy in the “Telegraph Messages”
  19. Section 3: Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
  20. Section 3:   Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
  21. Does Kierkegaard’s Rewritten Parable of the Good Samaritan Leave the World to the Devil? Kierkegaard and Adorno on What it Means to Love one’s Neighbor in the Modern World
  22. Kierkegaard and Beauvoir: Existential Ethics as a Humanism
  23. Double Consciousness and Despair: Exploring a Connection Between Søren Kierkegaard and W.E.B. Du Bois
  24. Hitchcock Meets Kierkegaard: Selfhood and Gendered Forms of Despair in Vertigo and The Sickness unto Death
  25. Section 4: Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
  26. Section 4:   Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
  27. The Mutiny of the Pseudonyms in the Kierkegaardian Authorship
  28. Section 5: Primary Texts in Translation
  29. Section 5:   Primary Texts in Translation
  30. Johan Ludvig Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” and Kierkegaard’s Polemic
  31. Back matter
  32. Abbreviations
  33. List of Contributors
Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kierke-2020-0009/html
Scroll to top button