Home The Ambiguity of Mimesis: Kierkegaard between Aesthetic Fantasy and Religious Imitation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Ambiguity of Mimesis: Kierkegaard between Aesthetic Fantasy and Religious Imitation

  • Nicola Ramazzotto EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 18, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper attempts to investigate Kierkegaard’s thought through the category of mimesis. First, two meanings of the word are distinguished and analyzed: the archaic meaning that links it to the concept of re-enactment, and the traditional meaning that links it to the aesthetic field of art. These two meanings are then considered in relation to Kierkegaard’s opus, showing the oscillation of mimesis as corresponding to that between the aesthetic, which lives in fantasy and in the unfulfilled possibility, and the religious, which finds its identity in the imitation of Christ and in the transparent relationship to God.

The author would like to thank Leonardo Amoroso and Ettore Rocca for their support and guidance.

Online erschienen: 2020-08-18

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Front matter
  2. Title pages
  3. Preface
  4. Contents
  5. Articles
  6. Section 1: Problems and Perspectives in Kierkegaard’s Authorship
  7. Section 1:   Problems and Perspectives in Kierkegaard’s Authorship
  8. A Christian Art? Søren Kierkegaard’s Views on Music and Musical Performance Reconsidered
  9. Between the Two Ethics: Why Assessor Wilhelm is not a Judge
  10. Narrative Variation and the Mood of Freedom in Fear and Trembling
  11. On Fear and Trembling’s Motif of the Promise: Faith, Ethics and the Politics of Tragedy
  12. The Ambiguity of Mimesis: Kierkegaard between Aesthetic Fantasy and Religious Imitation
  13. Know Yourself in the Mirror of the Word: Kierkegaard on Self-Knowledge
  14. „Mein Bestreben, das Martyrium zu verherrlichen…“ Zur Idee des Martyriums in Kierkegaards Journalen ab 1846
  15. Section 2: Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
  16. Section 2:   Kierkegaard’s Sources and Historical Context
  17. The Faust Project in Kierkegaard’s Early Journals
  18. Of Clairvoyants and Mousvoyants: Kierkegaard’s Polemic against Speculative Philosophy in the “Telegraph Messages”
  19. Section 3: Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
  20. Section 3:   Receptions and Reflections of Kierkegaard’s Thought
  21. Does Kierkegaard’s Rewritten Parable of the Good Samaritan Leave the World to the Devil? Kierkegaard and Adorno on What it Means to Love one’s Neighbor in the Modern World
  22. Kierkegaard and Beauvoir: Existential Ethics as a Humanism
  23. Double Consciousness and Despair: Exploring a Connection Between Søren Kierkegaard and W.E.B. Du Bois
  24. Hitchcock Meets Kierkegaard: Selfhood and Gendered Forms of Despair in Vertigo and The Sickness unto Death
  25. Section 4: Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
  26. Section 4:   Kierkegaard’s Authorial Strategies
  27. The Mutiny of the Pseudonyms in the Kierkegaardian Authorship
  28. Section 5: Primary Texts in Translation
  29. Section 5:   Primary Texts in Translation
  30. Johan Ludvig Heiberg’s “Literary Winter Crops” and Kierkegaard’s Polemic
  31. Back matter
  32. Abbreviations
  33. List of Contributors
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kierke-2020-0005/html
Scroll to top button