Home Technology Methodology for analyzing dose consequence using atmospheric dispersion code A2CDOSE
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Methodology for analyzing dose consequence using atmospheric dispersion code A2CDOSE

  • Yu Chiang ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Chung-hsin Lu , Jen-hsin Teng , Jong-Rong Wang , Shao-Shuan Chen and Shao-Wen Chen
Published/Copyright: July 30, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The experience of Fukushima brings out the importance of the emergency response plan during or after a severe nuclear power plant (NPP) accident. To deal with the accident emergency response situation, the National Atomic Research Institute (NARI) in Taiwan developed an emergent radiological dose evaluation system with the Central Weather Administration (CWA) called “A2CDOSE”. A2CDOSE can evaluate the eight-day projected dose after a nuclear accident and provide the predicted dose consequences for decision-making. Nevertheless, a source term generation method was still needed during the accident. This study chose MELCOR as the comparison target for the source term simulation issue with RASCAL. A MELCOR calculation of Maanshan NPP was built and a 5 % containment leakage was set for both MELCOR and RASCAL source term calculations. It seems the calculations of noble gases were consistent between MELCOR and RASCAL. However, the Cs-137 and I-131 calculated by MELCOR were twice compared to the RASCAL results, which may have a chance to cause different calculations of public protective actions during an accident. After the source term analysis, several atmospheric dispersion cases were simulated by A2CDOSE and RASCAL for further comparison.


Corresponding author: Yu Chiang, Department of Radiation Protection, National Atomic Research Institute, No. 1000, Wun hua Rd., Jiaan Village, Long tan dist., Taoyuan City 32546, Taiwan (R.O.C), E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors states no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

Chen, S.H., Wang, J.R., Shih, C., Ku, Y., Chiang, Y., Chen, S.W., and Hsu, W. (2017). The assessments and comparisons of RASCAL and EPZDose on atmospheric dispersion and dose consequences in radioactive material release accidents. In: 6th East Asia Forum on Radwaste Management Conference, November 27–29, Osaka, Japan.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, W. (2022). Analysis of creep rupture with MELCOR and discussion on international severe accident management guidelines. Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City.Search in Google Scholar

Chiang, Y., Chen, S.W., Wang, J.R., Wang, T.Y., Chen, H.C., Hsu, W.S., Chiang, S.C., and Shih, C. (2017a). Code crosswalk of Fukushima-like simulations for Chinshan BWR/4 NPP using MELCOR2.1/SNAP, TRACE/SNAP, PCTRAN and MAAP5.03. Nucl. Eng. Des. 325: 12–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.09.023.Search in Google Scholar

Chiang, Y., Sheu, R.J., Chen, S.W., Chen, S.S., and Ku, Y.T. (2017b). Severe accident consequence Assessment for Chinshan NPP in Taiwan using MELCOR2.1 and winMACCS. topsafe-2017, Vienna.Search in Google Scholar

Gauntt, R., Kalinich, D., Cardoni, J., Phillips, J., Goldmann, A., Pickering, S., Francis, M., Robb, K., Ott, L., Wang, D., et al.. (2012). Fukushima Daiichi accident study (Status as of April 2012). SAND2012-6173 Sandia National Lab.10.2172/1055601Search in Google Scholar

Hsu, W.S., Chiang, Y., Wang, J.R., Wang, T.Y., Wang, T.C., Teng, J.T., Chen, S.W., and Shih, C. (2017). The establishment of MELCOR/SNAP model of Chinshan nuclear power plant for ultimate response guideline. Nucl. Eng. Des. 311: 120–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.11.025.Search in Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2011). Criteria for use in preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-2. IAEA.Search in Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2013). Actions to protect the public in an emergency due to severe conditions at a light water reactor. Emergency preparedness and response EPR-NPP-PPA. IAEA.Search in Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2017). Operational intervention levels for reactor emergencies and methodology for their derivation. Emergency preparedness and response EPR-NPP-OILs. IAEA.Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, H. and Kuhlman, M.R. (1985). TRAP-MELT2 user’s manual. BMI-2124, NUREG/CR-4205. Battelle Columbus Labs., Ohio, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, C.H., Teng, J.H., Yang, Y.M., and Chang, B.J. (2010). Avertable dose intervention applied in emergency response dose evaluation system for nuclear emergency preparedness in Taiwan. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 618: 323–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.02.087.Search in Google Scholar

Ohba, T., Tanigawa, K., and Liutsko, L. (2021). Evacuation after a nuclear accident: critical reviews of past nuclear accidents and proposal for future planning. Environ. Int. 148: 106379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106379.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ramsdell, J.V.Jr., Athey, G.F., McGuire, S.A., and Brandon, L.K. (2012). RASCAL 4: description of models and methods, NUREG-1940. USNRC.Search in Google Scholar

Sandia National Laboratories (2017). MELCOR computer code manual. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque.Search in Google Scholar

Taiwan Power Company (1994). FSAR for Maanshan NPP. US NRC, Maryland, USA.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1990). Severe accident risks: an assessment for five U.S. Nuclear power plants. Final summary report. NUREG- 150 1.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J.R., Chiang, Y., Hsu, W., Chen, H.C., Chen, S.H., Yang, J.H., Chen, S.W., and Shih, C. (2018). Using RASCAL and ALOHA codes to establish an analysis methodology for hydrogen fluoride evaluation. Int. J. Chem. Mater. Biomol. Sci. 12, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1474427.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-12
Accepted: 2024-06-13
Published Online: 2024-07-30
Published in Print: 2024-08-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kern-2024-0026/pdf
Scroll to top button