Home Fuzzy reliability algorithm for the shutdown system of research reactor
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fuzzy reliability algorithm for the shutdown system of research reactor

  • Hala K. G. Selim EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 24, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) has been applied to evaluate the safety of nuclear reactor systems. The results of PSA are used by designers, utilities and regulatory body to confirm the reactor design, to change operation procedures, to enhance the reliability of safety systems, or to modify regulation. Fault tree analysis (FTA) has been used as a deductive means for PSA. System components are assumed to always have defined failure probabilities; however, in reality this assumption is questionable and sometimes there is insufficient data about the failure probability of some components. To solve this problem, fuzzy approaches have been proposed and implemented. The aim of this study is to apply a fuzzy reliability algorithm to estimate basic events failure probabilities for the shutdown system of a research reactor. The reactor is a 22 MW light water open pool type material test reactor and the shutdown system is responsible for the fast shutdown of the reactor whenever safety limits are exceeded. Then, to illustrate the ability of the algorithm, the results are compared with real basic event failure probabilities. The results verify the competence of the algorithm and confirm that it can be applied as an alternative method when quantitative data are not available. Also, a risk importance measure is done on the fault tree of the shutdown system to illustrate which components need to be focused for improvements to achieve the safe operation of shutdown system.


Corresponding author: Hala K. G. Selim, Department of Nuclear Safety Engineering, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: There are no conflicts of interest associated with this work.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: Data available on request.

References

Cai, K.Y., Wen, C.Y., and Zhang, M.L. (1991). Fuzzy variables as a basis for a theory of fuzzy reliability in the possibility context. Fuzzy Sets Syst 42: 145–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(91)90143-E.Search in Google Scholar

Center for Chemical Process Safety (1999). Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, 2nd ed. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY.Search in Google Scholar

Center for Chemical Process Safety (2008). Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York, NY.Search in Google Scholar

Coletti, G. and Scozzafava, R. (2004). Conditional probability, fuzzy sets, and possibility: a unifying view. Fuzzy Sets Syst 144: 227–249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2003.10.022.Search in Google Scholar

Committee for Human Medicinal Products (2006). ICH guideline Q9 on quality risk management.Search in Google Scholar

EAEA (1997). Safety analysis report of ETRR-2 research reactor. Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, B.E., Everhart, K., Stevens, R., Babbitt, N., Clemens, P., and Stout, L. (1994). System engineering toolbox for design-oriented engineers. Marshall Space Flight Center.Search in Google Scholar

Hermansyah, H., Kumaraningrum, A.R., Purba, J.H., Edison, and Yohda, M. (2020). Safety analysis technique for system with limited data: case study of the multipurpose research reactor in Indonesia. Energies 13: 1975, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081975.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, D., Chen, T., and Wang, M.J.J. (2001). A fuzzy set approach for event tree analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 118: 153–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00288-7.Search in Google Scholar

IAEA (1993). Defining initiating events for purposes of probabilistic safety assessment. IAEA-TECDOC-719. International Atomic Energy Authority.Search in Google Scholar

IAEA (1997). Generic component reliability data for research reactor PSA. IAEA TECDOC-930. International Atomic Energy Authority.Search in Google Scholar

IAEA (2001). Applications of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for nuclear power plants. IAEA-TECDOC-1200. International Atomic Energy Authority.Search in Google Scholar

Klir, J.G. and Yuan, B. (2001). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, K.H. (2005). First course on fuzzy theory and applications. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Misra, K.B. and Weber, G.G. (1990). Use of fuzzy set theory for level-I studies in probabilistic risk assessment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 37: 139–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(90)90038-8.Search in Google Scholar

Mohsendokht, M. and Tilehnoeeb, M.H. (2020). Overcoming the uncertainty in a research reactor LOCA in Level-1 PSA; Fuzzy based fault-tree/event-tree analysis. J. Optim. Ind. Eng. 13: 249–266, https://doi.org/10.22094/joie.2020.576631.1593.Search in Google Scholar

Onisawa, T. (1988). An Approach to Human reliability in Man-Machine systems using error possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 27: 87–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(88)90140-6.Search in Google Scholar

Onisawa, T. (1989). Fuzzy theory in reliability analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 30: 361–363, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(89)90031-6.Search in Google Scholar

Purba, J.H. (2014). A fuzzy-based reliability approach to evaluate basic events of fault tree analysis for nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment. Ann. Nucl. Energy 70: 21–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.02.022.Search in Google Scholar

Purba, J.H., Lu, J., Ruan, D., and Zhang, G. (2012). An area defuzzification technique to assess nuclear event reliability data from failure possibilities. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl. 4: 1250022, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1469026812500228.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, T.J. (2004). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.Search in Google Scholar

Shaat, M.K. (2010). Products and services of research reactor ETRR-2. In: Proceedings of a Technical meeting on products and services of research reactors. IAEA-TECDOC-1715 IAEA.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1994). Process safety management guidelines for compliance, OSHA 3133.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. NRC (1981). Fault tree handbook. NUREG-0492, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D. C., USA.Search in Google Scholar

Verma, A.K., Srividya, A., and Karanki, D.R. (2010). System reliability modeling. In: Reliability and safety engineering. Springer-Verlag, London.10.1007/978-1-84996-232-2Search in Google Scholar

Vesely, W.E., Davis, T.C., Denning, R.S., and Saltos, N. (1986). Measures of risk importance and their applications. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory. NUREG/CR-3385.Search in Google Scholar

Vrbanic, I., Samanta, P., and Basic, I. (2017). Risk importance measures in the design and operation of nuclear power plants. ASME, New York, NY.10.1115/1.861394Search in Google Scholar

Wolkenhauer, O. (2004). Data engineering: fuzzy mathematics in systems theory and data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY.Search in Google Scholar

Xoubi, N. and Soliman, A.Y. (2017). Neutronic modeling and calculations of the ETRR-2 MTR reactor using COMSOL multiphysics code. Ann. Nucl. Energy 109: 667–674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.06.007.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-02-19
Accepted: 2024-06-17
Published Online: 2024-07-24
Published in Print: 2024-08-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kern-2024-0017/html
Scroll to top button