References

1 Deng, C.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Yang, J.: Research on scaling design and applicability evaluation of integral thermal-hydraulic test facilities: A review. Annals of Nuclear Energy 131 (2019) 273–290, DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2019.03.04210.1016/j.anucene.2019.03.042Suche in Google Scholar

2 Umminger, K.; Mull, T.; Brand, B.: Integral Effect Tests in the PKL Facility with International Participation. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 41 (2009) 765–774, DOI:10.5516/NET.2009.41.6.76510.5516/NET.2009.41.6.765Suche in Google Scholar

3 Umminger, K.; Dennhardt, L.; Schollenberger, S.; Schoen, B.: Integral Test Facility PKL: Experimental PWR Accident Investigation. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations 2012 891056, DOI:10.1155/2012/89105610.1155/2012/891056Suche in Google Scholar

4 Nourbakhsh, H. P.; Apostolakis, G.; Powers, D. A.: The evolution of the US nuclear regulatory process. Progress in Nuclear Energy 102 (2018) 79–89, DOI:10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.02010.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.020Suche in Google Scholar

5 Coryell,W. E.: Summary of important results and SCDAP/RELAP5 analysis for OECD LOFT Experiment LP-FP-2. Nuclear Energy Agency-Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations-R, Washington, DC, Technical Report, NUREG/CR-6160, April 1994, DOI:10.2172/1014796310.2172/10147963Suche in Google Scholar

6 Mandl, R.; Brand, B.;Watzinger, H.: PKL reflood tests including end-of-blowdown. Proceedings of the 13th Water Reactor Safety Research Information Meeting, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, October 1985Suche in Google Scholar

7 Mandl R. M.;Weiss, P. A.: PKL tests on energy transfer mechanisms during small-break LOCAs. Nuclear Safety 23 (1982) 146–158.Suche in Google Scholar

8 OECD/NEA: SESAR Thermal-Hydraulics (SETH) Project. https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_25647/sesar-thermal-hydraulics-seth-projectSuche in Google Scholar

9 Mull, T.; Bernhard, S.; Umminger, K.: Final Report of the PKL Experimental Program within the OECD/SETH Project. Framatome ANP, Technical Report, FANP-NGTT1/04/en/04, December 2004Suche in Google Scholar

10 OECD/NEA: Primary Coolant Loop Test Facility (PKL) Project. https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_25236/primary-coolant-loop-test-facility-pkl-projectSuche in Google Scholar

11 OECD/NEA: Experimental ThermalHydraulics forAnalysis, Research and Innovations in NUclear Safety (ETHARINUS) Project. https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_59465/experimental-thermal-hydraulics-for-analysis-research-and-innovations-in-nuclear-safety-etharinus-projectSuche in Google Scholar

12 Bryk, R.; Dennhardt, L.; Schollenberger, S.: Experimental investigation of PWR accident scenarios at the PKL test facility. E3SWeb of Conference 137 01016 (2019), DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/20191370101610.1051/e3sconf/201913701016Suche in Google Scholar

13 Umminger, K.; Mull, T.; Brand, B.: Integral tests in the PKL facility with international participation. Atw-International Journal For Nuclear Power 55 (2010) 162–16710.5516/NET.2009.41.6.765Suche in Google Scholar

14 Schollenberger, S.; Dennhardt, L.; Umminger K.: PKL III H2.2 SBO w/secondary and primary side depressurization, 4 ACC, SG feed from mobile pump or EFWS. Framatome ANP, Technical Report, PTCTP-G/2016/en/0021, December 2016Suche in Google Scholar

15 Bryk, R.; Schollenberger, S.; Dennhardt, L.; S´wirski, K.: Parameter study at the PKL test facility on heat transfer mechanisms in the steam generator in presence of nitrogen, steam and liquid. Energy 211 (2020) 118612, DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.11861210.1016/j.energy.2020.118612Suche in Google Scholar

16 Bucalossi, A.: Validation of Thermal-Hydraulic Codes for Boron Dilution Transients in the Context of the OECD/SETH Project. Seminar 2 EUROSAFE Brussels, Belgium, November 2005Suche in Google Scholar

17 Munoz-Cobo, J. L.; Chiva, S.; Escrivá, A.: Analysis with TRACE Code of PKL-III Test F 1.2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0423, February 2013, DOI:10.1155/2013/12830510.1155/2013/128305Suche in Google Scholar

18 Umminger, K.; Kastner, W.; Mandi, R.; Weber, P.: Thermal Hydraulics Behavior of a PWR under Beyond-Design-Basis Accident, Conditions: Conclusions form a Experimental Program in a 4-Loop Test Facility (PKL). Proceedings of the 2nd ASME-JSME Nuclear Engineering Joint Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 21–24, 1993Suche in Google Scholar

19 Addabbo C.; Annunziato, A.; Aksan, N.; D'Auria, F.; Galassi, G.,M; Dumont, D.; Umminger, K.; Gaul, H.P.; Nilsson, L.; Hofman, D.; Purhonen, H.; Riikonen, V.; Rigamonti, M.; Steinhoff, F.; Guba, A.; Toth, I.: CERTA-TN: Consolidation of Integral System Experimental Databases for Reactor Thermal-Hydraulic Safety Analysis (European Thematic Network Final Report). University of Pisa, Pisa, EUROPEAN COMMISSION Euratom Framework Programme 5 (1998–2002) FIR1-CT-2000–20052 (2002)Suche in Google Scholar

20 Umminger, K.; Mull, T.; Schoen B.: Experiments on Boron Dilution in the Integral Test Facility PKL. NURETH 10, Seoul, Korea, October 5–9, 2003Suche in Google Scholar

21 Umminger, K.; Schoen, B.; Mull, T.: PKL Experiments on Loss of Residual Heat Removal under Shutdown Conditions in PWRs. International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP06), Reno, USA, June 04–08, 2006Suche in Google Scholar

22 Framatome: PKL III H Final report Beyond-Design-Basis Accidents and Accidents from Cold Shut-Down Condition. Framatome ANP, Garching, Technical Report, PTCTP-G/2016/en/003, December 2016Suche in Google Scholar

23 Gordon, D.: AREVA Technical Center Scientific Thermal Hydraulic Testing Capabilities. NSUF-GAIN Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulics Workshop, Idaho Falls, United States, July 13, 2017 Idaho FallsSuche in Google Scholar

24 Perea, M. S.: Estado Actual y Perspectivas de CAMP-España. Productos y Beneficios. Reunión del Comité Gestor de CEIDEN 23 de Julio de 2020Suche in Google Scholar

25 Xu, H.; Badea, A. F.; Cheng, X.: ATHLET Simulation of PKL IBLOCA I2.2 Benchmark Test and Quantitative Assessment. Proceedings of Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2020 (ATH2020), Palaiseau, France, October 20 –23Suche in Google Scholar

26 Xu, H.: Improvement of PWR (LOCA) safety analysis based on PKL experimental data. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, PhD dissertation (2020)Suche in Google Scholar

27 Araneo, D. A.: Realization of a Methodology for the assessment of “Best Estimate” codes for the analysis of nuclear systems and application to Cathare2 V2. 5 code. University of Pisa, Pisa, PhD dissertation (2008)Suche in Google Scholar

28 Salah, A. B.; Vlassenbroeck, J.: CATHARE Assessment of Natural Circulation in the PKL Test Facility during Asymmetric Cooldown Transients. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations 2012 950389, DOI:10.1155/2012/95038910.1155/2012/950389Suche in Google Scholar

29 Salah, A. B.: CATHARE simulation results of the natural circulation characterisation test of the PKL test facility. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 53 (2021) 1446–1453 (2021), DOI:10.1016/j.net.2020.11.016Suche in Google Scholar

30 Yang, C. K.: Simulation of PKL-III G3.1(MSLB) Experiment for verification of SPACE code. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Gyeongju, Korea, October 25–26 (2012)Suche in Google Scholar

31 Shvetsov, I.; Falkov, A.: PKL-4 benchmark pre-/post-test calculation by codes KORSAR/BR and RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4. PKL4-ATLAS2Workshop (O?CD-NEA) Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain, November 7–9 (2018)Suche in Google Scholar

32 Shvetsov, I.; Falkov, A.: I2.1 run1 and i2.1 run2 PKL-4 posttest calculation by codes KORSAR/BR and RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4. PKL4-ATLAS2 Workshop (O?CD-NEA) Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain, November 7–9 (2018)Suche in Google Scholar

33 Chen, Y. S.; Haigh, W. S.; Sullivan, L. H.; Fischer, S. R.: Test prediction for the German PKL Test K5A using RELAP4/MOD6. ENS/ ANS International Topical Meetirig on Nuclear Power Reactor Safety, Brussels, Belgium, October 16*19 (1978), DOI:10.13182/NT79-A3231710.13182/NT79-A32317Suche in Google Scholar

34 Karner, L.: RELAP5/MOD3.2 Post Test Calculation of the PKL-Experiment PKLIII-B4.3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0170, December 1999Suche in Google Scholar

35 Rizzo, G.; Vella, G.: Analysis, by Relap5 code, of Boron Dilution Phenomena in a Small Break Loca Transient, performed in PKL III E 2.2 Test. Nuclear Energy for New Europe 2007, Portorož, Slovenia, September 10 –13 (2007)Suche in Google Scholar

36 Carlos, S.; Villanueva, J. F.; Martorell, S.; Serradell, V.: Analysis of a loss of residual heat removal system during mid-loop conditions at PKL facility using RELAP5/Mod3.3. Nuclear Engineering and Design 238 (2008) 2561–2567, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.04.01310.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.04.013Suche in Google Scholar

37 Mascari, F.; Vella, G.; Del Nevo, A.; D’Auria, F.: Post Test Analysis and Accuracy Quantification of PKL III E3.1 Test. Nuclear Energy for New Europe 2006, Portorož, Slovenia, September 18–21 (2006)Suche in Google Scholar

38 Mascari, F.; Vella, G.; Del Nevo, A.; D’Auria, F.; Llombart Soriano, O.: Analysis, by RELAP5 code, of Boron Dilution Phenomena in a Mid-Loop Operation Transient, Performed in PKL III F2.1 RUN 1 Test. Nuclear Energy for New Europe 2007, Portorož, Slovenia, September 10–13 (2007)Suche in Google Scholar

39 Villanueva, J. F.; Carlos, S.; Martorell, S.; Sanchez, F.: Effect of steam generator configuration in a loss of the RHR during mid-loop operation at PKL facility. Proceedings of PHYSOR 2012, Knoxville, TN, United States, Apr 15 –20 (2012)Suche in Google Scholar

40 Villanueva, J. F.; Carlos, S.; Sanchez-Saez, F.; Martón, I.; Martorell, S.: RELAP5 Simulation of PKL Facility Experiments under Mid-loop Conditions. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations 2017 6140323, DOI:10.1155/2017/614032310.1155/2017/6140323Suche in Google Scholar

41 Xu, H.; Badea, A. F.; Cheng, X.: Sensitivity analysis of thermal-hydraulic models based on FFTBM-MSM two-layer method for PKL IBLOCA experiment. Annals of Nuclear Energy 147 (2020) 107732, DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2020.10773210.1016/j.anucene.2020.107732Suche in Google Scholar

42 Prosˇek, A.; D’Auria, F.; Richards, D. J.; Mavko, B.: Quantitative assessment of thermal–hydraulic codes used for heavy water reactor calculations. Nuclear Engineering and Design 236 (2006) 295–308, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.07.00410.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.07.004Suche in Google Scholar

43 Zaruba, A.; Krezeminski, K.; Benkert, A.: RELAP5/MOD3.3 Assessment by Comparison with PKL III G3.1 Experiment (small break in the main steam line). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, International Agreement Report, NUREG/ IA-0447 (2014)Suche in Google Scholar

44 Jonnet, J. R.; Stempniewicz, M. M.; de With, A.; Wakker, P. H.: RELAP5 analysis of PKL, main steam line break test. Nuclear Engineering and Design 265 (2013) 755–764, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.01010.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.010Suche in Google Scholar

45 Villanueva, J. F.; Carlos, S.; Martorell, S.; Sánchez, F.: Simulation of the G3.1 Experiment at PKL Facility Using RELAP5/Mod3.3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0486 (2018), DOI:10.1155/2017/614032310.1155/2017/6140323Suche in Google Scholar

46 Martinez-Quiroga, V.; Reventos, F. and Pretel, C.: Post-Test Calculation of the PKL-2 Test G7.1 Using RELAP5/MOD3.3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0499 (2019)Suche in Google Scholar

47 Freixa, J.; Manera, A.; Reventós, F.: TRACE and RELAP5 thermal-hydraulic analysis on boron dilution tests at the PKL facility. Proceedings of 13. international topical meeting on nuclear reactor thermal hydraulics (NURETH-13), Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan, Sep 27 – Oct 2 (2009)Suche in Google Scholar

48 Queral, C.; Expósito, A.; Concejal, A.; Niesutta, P.: Simulation of loss of RHRS sequences in PKL facility with RELAP5 and TRACE codes. Nuclear technology 171 (2010) 53–73, DOI:10.13182/NT10-A1077210.13182/NT10-A10772Suche in Google Scholar

49 Queral, C.; Concejal, A.; Expósito, A.; González, I.: Simulation of PKL Loss of RHRS Experiment E3.1 with RELAP5 and TRACE Codes – Application to a PWR NPP Model. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0256, September 2011, DOI:10.13182/NT10-A1077210.13182/NT10-A10772Suche in Google Scholar

50 Coscarelli, E.; Del Nevo, A. and D’Auria, F.: Numerical Investigation of Natural Circulation During a Small Break LOCA Scenarios in a PWR-System Using the TRACE v5.0 Code. Nuclear Energy for New Europe 2010, Portorož, Slovenia, September 6–9 (2010)Suche in Google Scholar

51 Julbe, A.; Berna, C.; Escrivá A.; Muñoz-Cobo, J. L.: Analysis with TRACE Code of PKL III Tests G1.2. Study on Heat Transfer Mechanisms in the SG in Presence of Nitrogen, Steam and Water as a Function of the Primary Coolant Inventory in Double Loop Operation. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0521, November 2020Suche in Google Scholar

52 Coscarelli, E.; Del Nevo, A.; D’Auria, F.: Qualification of TRACE V5.0 Code against Fast Cooldown Transient in the PKL-III Integral Test Facility. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations 2013 128305, DOI:10.1155/2013/12830510.1155/2013/128305Suche in Google Scholar

53 Belaïd, S.; Freixa, J.; Zerkak, O.: Analysis of the Test OECD-PKL2 G7.1 with the Thermal-Hydraulic System Code TRACE. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0432, September 2013Suche in Google Scholar

54 Carlos, S.; Querol, A.; Gallardo, S.; Sanchez-Saez, F.; Villanueva, J. F.; Martorell, S.; Verdú, G.: Post-test analysis of the ROSA/LSTF and PKL counterpart test. Nuclear Engineering and Design 297 (2016) 81–94, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.10.02810.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.10.028Suche in Google Scholar

55 Sánchez, F.; Carlos, S.; Villanueva, J. F.; Martorell, S.: Simulation of the LSTF-PKL Counterpart G7.1 Test at PKL Facility Using TRACE 5. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, International Agreement Report, NUREG/IA-0488, January 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

56 Sanchez-Saez, F.; Carlos, S.; Villanueva, J. F.; Sanchez, A. I.; Martorell, S.: Uncertainty analysis of PKL SBLOCA G7.1 test simulation using TRACE with Wilks and GAM surrogate methods. Nuclear Engineering and Design 319 (2017) 61–72, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.04.03710.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.04.037Suche in Google Scholar

57 Mukin, R.; Clifford, I.; Zerkak, O.; Ferroukhi, H.: Modelling and Analysis of selected OECD PKL3 Station-Blackout Experiments using TRACE. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 50 (2018) 356–367, DOI:10.1016/j.net.2017.12.00510.1016/j.net.2017.12.005Suche in Google Scholar

58 Querol, A.; Turégano, J.; Lorduy, M.; Gallardo, S.; Verdú, G.: Main considerations for modelling a station blackout scenario with trace. 2017 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference (INAC 2017), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, October 22 –27Suche in Google Scholar

59 Tahvola, I.: Modelling of PKL test facility with TRACE code. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Master’s thesis (2018)Suche in Google Scholar

60 Lerchl,G.;Austregesilo, H.; Ceuca, S.; Glaeser, H.; Luther,W.; Schöffel, P.: ATHLET Mod 3.1A Validation. Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS), Garching, GRS-P-1/Vol.3 Rev.4, March (2016)Suche in Google Scholar

61 Pescador, E. D.; Schäfer, F.; Kliem, S.: Thermal-hydraulic insights during a main steam line break in a generic PWR KONVOI reactor with ATHLET 3.1 A. Kerntechnik 84 (2019) 367–374, DOI:10.3139/124.19000810.3139/124.190008Suche in Google Scholar

62 Liu, X. J.; Schaefer, A.: Improvement of ATHLET modeling capability for asymmetric natural circulation phenomenon using uncertainty and sensitivity measures. Annals of Nuclear Energy 62 (2013) 471–482, DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.07.00910.1016/j.anucene.2013.07.009Suche in Google Scholar

63 Liu, X. J.; Kerner, A.; Schaefer, A.: Using statistical sensitivities for adaptation of a best-estimate thermo-hydraulic simulation model. Nuclear Engineering and Design 240 (2010) 3413–3420, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.06.04410.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.06.044Suche in Google Scholar

64 Xu, H.; Badea, A. F.; Cheng, X.: Optimization of the Nodalization of Nuclear System Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applied On PKL Benchmark. ASME Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science 8 (2021) 021404-1, DOI:10.1115/1.405077010.1115/1.4050770Suche in Google Scholar

65 Xu, H.; Badea, A. F.; Cheng, X.: Analysis of two phase critical flow with a non-equilibrium model. Nuclear Engineering and Design 372 (2021) 110998, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.11099810.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110998Suche in Google Scholar

66 Xu, H.; Badea, A. F.; Cheng, X.: Development of a new full-range critical flow model based on non-homogeneous non-equilibrium model. Annals of Nuclear Energy 158 (2021) 108286, DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2021.10828610.1016/j.anucene.2021.108286Suche in Google Scholar

67 Jiang, N.; Peng, M.; Cong, T.: Simulation analysis of an open natural circulation for the passive residual heat removal in IPWR. Annals of Nuclear Energy 117 (2018) 223–233, DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.03710.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.037Suche in Google Scholar

68 Cho, Y. J.; Yoon, H. Y.: Numerical analysis of the ROCOMboron dilution benchmark experiment using the CUPID code. Nuclear Engineering and Design 341(2019) 167–175., DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.00510.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.005Suche in Google Scholar

69 Kim, Y. I.; Hwang, Y. D.; Park, J. K.; Chung, Y. J.; Sim, S. G.: An analysis on boron dilution events during SBLOCA for the KNGR. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Daejeon, Technical Report, KAERI/TR-1228/99 (1999)Suche in Google Scholar

70 Prasad, G. V. D.; Pandey, M.; Pradhan, S. K.; Gupta, S. K.: Study of flow instabilities in double-channel natural circulation boiling systems. Nuclear Engineering and Design 238 (2008) 1750–1761, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.01.00710.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.01.007Suche in Google Scholar

71 Xu, H.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Y.: New safety strategies for nuclear power plants: a review. International Journal of Energy Research 45 (2021) 11564–11588, DOI:10.1002/er.665710.1002/er.6657Suche in Google Scholar

72 Xu, H.; Zhang, B.: A review on the Defense-in-Depth concept and the FLEX strategies in different countries after Fukushima accident. Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection 36 (2021) 2 1-12, DOI:10.2298/NTRP210128013X10.2298/NTRP210128013XSuche in Google Scholar

73 Xu, H.; Zhang, B.: A review of the FLEX strategy for nuclear safety. Nuclear Engineering and Design 382 (2021) 111396, DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.11139610.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111396Suche in Google Scholar

74 Yang, J. H.;Wang, J. R.; Shih, C.; Huang, C. F.; Chen, S. W.: The simulation and study of ELAP event with URG and FLEX mitigation strategies for PWR by using TRACE code. Kerntechnik 84 (2019) 72–83, DOI:10.3139/124.11099910.3139/124.110999Suche in Google Scholar

75 Chen, Y.: An analysis study of ATWS accident for Guangdong Nuclear Power Plant. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Science and Engineering 15 (1995) 1–°Suche in Google Scholar

76 Aksan, N.: Overview on CSNI Separate Effects Test Facility Matrices for Validation of Best Estimate Thermal-Hydraulic Computer Codes. Proceedings of THICKET 2008 Session III Paper 03, Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Switzerland (2008)Suche in Google Scholar