Home Kant on Empirical Knowledge and Induction in the Two Introductions to the Critique of the Power of Judgment
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Kant on Empirical Knowledge and Induction in the Two Introductions to the Critique of the Power of Judgment

  • Ansgar Seide
Published/Copyright: December 18, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In their interpretations of the two introductions to the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Juliet Floyd and Henry Allison argue that Kant’s account of the reflecting power of judgment can be read as his vindication of inductive inference and as an answer to Hume’s worries concerning induction. Paul Guyer, on the other hand, argues that Kant’s account in these passages falls short of providing an adequate answer to Hume’s arguments. In this paper, I want to show that the strongest account of Kant’s vindication of inductive inference appears when we combine a reading of Kant’s account of the reflecting power of judgment in the first introduction along the lines suggested by Floyd and Allison with Guyer’s interpretation of Kant’s account in the second introduction. As we will see, Kant’s vindication of inductive inference is stronger than Guyer suspects, although it does not amount to a straightforward refutation of Hume’s worries concerning the uniformity of nature.

Published Online: 2013-12-18
Published in Print: 2013-08

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kantyb.2013.5.1.79/html
Scroll to top button