Startseite Kant on Legal Positivism and the Juridical State
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Kant on Legal Positivism and the Juridical State

  • Joel T. Klein EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. September 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Kant’s political and juridical philosophy justifies a type of normative legal positivism that implies specific notions of law and legal freedom which determine and restrict the sphere of action of judges and jurists. Finally, I defend that, according to Kant’s practical philosophy, the normative connection between justice and law is not supposed to be carried out at the juridical level, as a meta-juridical theory, but at the political one, making it a meta-political theory.

This research has received financial support from: CNPq (Bolsa produtividade em pesquisa) and CAPES/Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung (experience research fellowship, code 001). I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Günter Zöller by hosting me at Ludwig Maximilian Universität München, where significant part of this research was developed. Some previous versions of this paper were presented and discussed at Prof. Zöller’s Seminar at LMU and at the 11th Principia International Simposium (2019, at UFSC); I am grateful for previous comments and questions raised by Günter Zöller, Cristina F. Consani, Alessandro Pinzani, Delamar Dutra, Giampiero Basile, Manja Kisner and Thomas Bustamante.

References

All translations are quoted from The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (1992 ff.) and the quotation rules followed are those established by the Akademie Ausgabe. Kant, Immanuel (1900 ff): Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg.: Bd. 1 – 22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin.

Alexy, Robert (2002): The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2008): On the Concept and the Nature of Law, in: Ratio Juris 21 (3), pp. 281 – 99.10.1111/j.1467-9337.2008.00391.xSuche in Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2019): Kant’s Non-Positivistic Concept of Law, in: Kantian Review 24 (4), pp. 497 – 512.10.1017/S1369415419000281Suche in Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah (1976): The Origins of Totalitarianism, Houghton.Suche in Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto (1995): O Positivismo Jurídico. Lições de Filosofia do Direito, São Paulo.Suche in Google Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon; Hruschka, Joaquim (2010): Kant’s Doctrine of Right. A Commentary, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511712050Suche in Google Scholar

Condorcet (2012): On Despotism. Thoughts on Despotism, in: S. Lukes, N. Urbinati, (eds.): Condorcet: Political Writings, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David (2004): The Genealogy of Legal Positivism, in: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (1), pp. 39 – 67.10.1093/ojls/24.1.39Suche in Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (1986): Law’s Empire, Harvard.Suche in Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (1996): Freedom’s Law. The moral reading of the American Constitution, Harvard.Suche in Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (2006): Justice in Robes, Harvard.Suche in Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (2011): Justice for Hedgehogs, Harvard.10.4159/9780674059337Suche in Google Scholar

Gardner, John (2012): Legal Positivism. 5⁄2 Myths, in: J. Gardner (ed.): Law as a leap of faith. Essays on law in general, pp. 44 – 97.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695553.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1994): The Concept of Law, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran (2009): Towards Juristocracy. The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge.10.2307/j.ctv15d81nbSuche in Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas (1985): Leviathan, Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried (1995): Political Justice. Foundations for a critical philosophy of law and the state, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hopton, Terry (1982): Kant’s two theories of law, in: History of Political Thought 3 (1), pp. 51 – 76.Suche in Google Scholar

Horn, Christoph (2014): Nichtideale Normativität. Ein neuer Blick auf Kants politische Philosophie, Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Hruschka, Joaquim (2015): Kant und der Rechtstaat und andere Essays zu Kants Rechtslehre und Ethik, München.10.5771/9783495807989Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans (2005): Pure theory of law, New Jersey.Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans (2017): Das Problem der Gerechtigkeit, in: H. Kelsen (ed.): Reine Rechtslehre, Tübigen.10.1628/978-3-16-156464-2Suche in Google Scholar

Kersting, Wolfgang (1992): Politics, Freedom, and Order. Kant’s Political Philosophy, in: P. Guyer (ed.): The Cambridge companion to Kant, Cambridge, pp. 342 – 366.10.1017/CCOL0521365872.012Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, Joel T. (2018a): Kant versus Constant: sobre um suposto direito de mentir, in: Studia Kantiana 16, pp. 95 – 126.10.5380/sk.v16i3.89814Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, Joel T. (2018b): Kant and Constant. A Reassessment on An alleged Right to Lie from Philanthropy, in: A. Falduto, H. F. Klemme (ed.): Kant und seine Kritiker – Kant and His Critics, Hildesheim, pp. 99 – 112.Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, Joel T. (2021): On Serpents and Doves. The systematical relationship between prudence and morality in Kant’s political philosophy, in: Kant-Studien 112 (1), pp 78 – 104.10.1515/kant-2021-0003Suche in Google Scholar

Maus, Ingeborg (2018): Justiz als gesellschaftliches Über-Ich. Zur Position der Rechtsprechung in der Demokratie, Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Mertens, Thomas (2016): On Kant’s Duty to Speak the Truth, in: Kantian Review 21, pp 27 – 51.10.1017/S1369415415000291Suche in Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles de. (1989): The Spirit of the Laws, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Plato (2000): The Republic, Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas (2002): Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive liberalism’?, in: M. Timmons (ed.): Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, Oxford, pp. 133 – 158.10.1093/oso/9780198250098.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Portalis, Jean Etienne Marie (1855): Discours préliminaire du Premier Projet de Code Civil présenté in l’an IX par MM. Portalis, Tronchet, Bigot-Préameneau et Maleville, in: Recueil complet des discours prononcés lors de la présentation du Code civil par les divers orateurs du Conseil d’Etat et du Tribunat. Paris, Vol.I, pp. 1 – 23.Suche in Google Scholar

Radbruch, Gustav (2006): Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law, in: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1), pp. 1 – 15.10.1093/ojls/gqi041Suche in Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph (2010): Human Rights without Foundations, in: S. Besson, J. Tasioulas (eds.): The Philosophy of International Law, Oxford, pp. 321 – 338.Suche in Google Scholar

Ripstein, Arthur (2009): Force and Freedom. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge.10.4159/9780674054516Suche in Google Scholar

Stone, Martin J. (2017): Kant’s Apparent Positivism, in: S. Kisilevsky, M. J. Stone (eds.): Freedom and Force. Essays on Kant’s Legal Philosophy, Oxford, pp. 165 – 80.Suche in Google Scholar

Villey, Michel (1976): Critique de la pensée juridique modern, Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy (1996): Kant’s legal positivism, in: Harvard Law Review 109 (7), pp. 1535 – 1566.10.2307/1342024Suche in Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy (1999): Law and Disagreement, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy (2001): Normative (or Ethical) Positivism, in: Coleman, Jules (org.): Hart’s Postscript. Essays on the Postscript of ‘The Concept of Law’, Oxford, pp. 410 – 433.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299080.003.0012Suche in Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy (2002): Legal and Political Philosophy, in: J. Coleman, S. Shapiro (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law, Oxford, pp. 353 – 380.Suche in Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy (2006): The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review, in: The Yale Law Journal 115, pp. 1346 – 1406.10.2307/20455656Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-09-06
Published in Print: 2021-09-06

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kantyb-2021-0004/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen