Home Achtung in Kant and Smith
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Achtung in Kant and Smith

  • Michael Walschots ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 3, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper argues that Kant’s concept of ‘respect’ (Achtung) for the moral law has roots in Adam Smith’s concept of ‘regard’ for the general rules of conduct, which was translated as Achtung in the first German translation of the Theory of Moral Sentiments. After illustrating that Kant’s technical understanding of respect appeared relatively late in his intellectual development, I argue that Kant’s concept of respect and Smith’s concept of regard share a basic similarity: they are both a single complex phenomenon with two core aspects, namely an attitude and a feeling. I then suggest that the concept of regard offered Kant a way to deal a problem concerning moral motivation that he was trying to solve at the time he likely first read Smith. I conclude by drawing some implications from the account I have offered for our understanding of Kant’s relation to Smith more generally.

Works Cited

Allison, Henry. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691531.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge 1990.10.1017/CBO9781139172295Search in Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander. Metaphysics. Translated and edited by Courtney D. Fugate and John Hymers. London 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Anastasia. “Kant on Moral Respect.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. Forthcoming.10.1515/agph-2019-0022Search in Google Scholar

Bratu, Christine. “The Source of Moral Motivation and Actions We Owe to Others: Kant’s Theory of Respect.” The Roots of Respect. Edited by Giovanni Giorgini and Elena Irrera. Berlin/Boston 2017, 131–148.10.1515/9783110526288-007Search in Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88 (1), 1997, 36–49.10.1086/292054Search in Google Scholar

DeWitt, Janelle. “Respect for the Moral Law: The Emotional Side of Reason.” Philosophy 89 (1), 31–62.10.1017/S0031819113000648Search in Google Scholar

Eckstein, Walther. “Einleitung” to Theorie der Ethischen Gefühlen, by Adam Smith. New edition. Edited and translated by Walther Eckstein. Leipzig 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. “Adam Smith’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/smith-moral-political/. Last modified 2017. Accessed May 11, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion. Princeton 2004.10.1515/9781400826056Search in Google Scholar

– “Philosophy and Moral Practice: Kant and Smith.” Kant-Studien 82 (3), 1991, 249–269.10.1515/kant.1991.82.3.249Search in Google Scholar

Frierson, Patrick. Kant’s Empirical Psychology. Cambridge 2014.10.1017/CBO9781139507035Search in Google Scholar

– “Kant’s Empirical Account of Human Action.” Philosopher’s Imprint 5 (7), 2005.10.1017/CBO9781139507035.003Search in Google Scholar

Gregor, Mary. Laws of Freedom. Oxford 1963.Search in Google Scholar

Griswold, Charles L. Jr. Adam Smith and the Virtues of the Enlightenment. Cambridge 1999.10.1017/CBO9780511608964Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “Moral feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Edited by Lara Denis. Cambridge 2010, 130–151.10.1017/CBO9780511763250.008Search in Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “Über Kants früheste Ethik.” Kant-Studien 54, 1963, 404–431.10.1515/kant.1963.54.1-4.404Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E., Jr. “Humanity as an End in Itself.” Ethics 80, 1991, 84–99.10.7591/9781501735035-005Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie. Edited by Werner Stark. Berlin/New York 2004.10.1515/9783110204568Search in Google Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline. “Moral consciousness and the ‘fact of reason.’” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Edited by Andrews Reath and Jens Timmermann. Cambridge 2010, 55–72.10.1017/CBO9780511770869.005Search in Google Scholar

Klemme, Heiner. Ed. Reception of the Scottish Enlightenment in Germany: Six Significant Translations, 1755–1782. 7 Volumes. With Introductions by Heiner Klemme. Bristol 2000.Search in Google Scholar

– “Praktische Gründe und moralische Motivation. Eine deontologische Perspektive.” In Moralische Motivation: Kant und die Alternativen. Edited by Heiner Klemme, Manfred Kuehn, and Dieter Schönecker. Hamburg 2006, 113–153.Search in Google Scholar

Klimchuk, Dennis. “Three Accounts of Respect for Persons in Kant’s Ethics.” Kantian Review 8, 2004, 38–61.10.1017/S1369415400001862Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge 1996.10.1017/CBO9781139174503Search in Google Scholar

Kuehn, M and Norton, D.F. “The Foundations of Morality.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy. Vol 2. Ed. K. Haakonsen. Cambridge 2000, 939–986.10.1017/CHOL9780521867436.013Search in Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. “Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: the history and significance of its deferral.” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Edited by Lara Denis. Cambridge 2010, 9–27.10.1017/CBO9780511763250.002Search in Google Scholar

– “The Moral Dimension of Kant’s Great Light of 1769.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress. Volume 1. Edited by H. Robinson. Milwaukee 1995, 373–392.10.5840/kant199519951Part274Search in Google Scholar

McCarty, Richard. Kant’s Theory of Action. Oxford 2009.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567720.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

– “Kantian Moral Motivation and the Feeling of Respect.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 31, 1993, 421–435.10.1353/hph.1993.0050Search in Google Scholar

McHugh, John. “Adam Smith’s Kantian Phenomenology of Moral Motivation.” In Kant and the Scottish Enlightenment. Edited by Chris Surprenant and Elizabeth Robinson. Routledge 2017, 286–303.10.4324/9781315463414-17Search in Google Scholar

Noller, Jörg. “Reason’s feeling: A systematic reconstruction of Kant’s theory of moral respect.” SATS 20 (1), 1–18.10.1515/sats-2019-0012Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora. Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. 2nd Edition. Cambridge 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139565097Search in Google Scholar

Oncken, August. Adam Smith und Immanuel Kant: Der Einklang und das Wechselverhältniss ihrer Lehren über Sitte, Staat und Wirtschaft. Leipzig 1877.Search in Google Scholar

Raphael, D.D. “The Virtue of TMS 1759.” In The Philosophy of Adam Smith. Edited by Vivienne Brown and Samuel Fleischacker. London 2010, 15–24.Search in Google Scholar

The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford 2007.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213337.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Reath, Andrews. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford 2006.10.1093/0199288836.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

– “Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility. Respect for the Moral Law and the Influence of Inclination.” Kant Studien 80, 1989, 284–302.10.1515/kant.1989.80.1-4.284Search in Google Scholar

Rehberg, August Wilhelm. “Rezension der Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.” Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung 188 no. 6.8, 1788, 345–360.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Guy. Adam Smith in Immanuel Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Dissertation, University of Adelaide, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Schliesser, Eric. Adam Smith: Systematic Philosopher and Public Thinker. Oxford 2017.10.1093/oso/9780190690120.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schmucker, Joseph. Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seinen vorkritischen Schriften und Reflexionen. Meisenheim am Glan 1961.Search in Google Scholar

Schneewind, J.B. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge 1998.10.1017/CBO9780511818288Search in Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Clemens. Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785. Stuttgart 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Sensen, Oliver. “Elements of Autonomy in Kant’s Lectures on Ethics (1770–1780).” In The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Edited by Stefano Bacin and Oliver Sensen. Cambridge 2018, 83–101.10.1017/9781316863435.006Search in Google Scholar

Kant on Human Dignity. Berlin/New York 2011.10.1515/9783110267167Search in Google Scholar

Shell, Susan Meld. The Rights of Reason: A Study of Kant’s Philosophy and Politics. Toronto 1980.10.3138/9781487583545Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. 3rd edition. London 1767.Search in Google Scholar

The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie. Oxford 1976.Search in Google Scholar

Theorie der moralischen Empfindungen. 2 volumes. Translated by Christian Günther Rautenberg. Braunschweig 1770.Search in Google Scholar

Stalley, Richard. “Adam Smith and the Theory of Punishment.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1), 2012, 69–89.10.3366/jsp.2012.0028Search in Google Scholar

Sytsma, Sharon. “The Role of Achtung in Kant’s Moral Theory.” Auslegung 19 (2), 1993, 117–122.10.17161/AJP.1808.9381Search in Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge 2007.10.1017/CBO9780511487316Search in Google Scholar

White, Mark. “Adam Smith and Immanuel Kant: On Markets, Duties, and Moral Sentiments.” Forum for Social Economics 39 (1), 2010, 53–60.10.1007/s12143-009-9043-zSearch in Google Scholar

Ware, Owen. “Kant on Moral Sensibility and Moral Motivation.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (4), 2014, 727–746.10.1353/hph.2014.0090Search in Google Scholar

Wood, Allen. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge 1999.10.1017/CBO9781139173254Search in Google Scholar

Wood, Allen and Schönecker, Dieter. Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge, MA, 2015.10.4159/harvard.9780674736214Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-06-03
Published in Print: 2022-06-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Abhandlungen
  3. Der „erste Satz“ in Grundlegung I
  4. Kant’s Political Justification of Social Welfare
  5. The Troubling Relationship between Pleasure and Universality in Kant’s Impure Aesthetic Judgements
  6. Achtung in Kant and Smith
  7. Does the ontological proof of God’s existence really contain all the probative force of the cosmological argument? The early criticisms of Kant’s thesis by Flatt, Abel and Eberhard
  8. Revelation’s Entrenchment in Pure Reason in Fichte’s Versuch einer Kritik aller Offenbarung
  9. Berichte und Diskussionen
  10. Johann Reinhold Grube’s Opposing Remarks on Kant’s Nova dilucidatio
  11. Buchbesprechungen
  12. Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated with an Introduction and Notes by Christopher Bennett, Joe Saunders and Robert Stern. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 144 pages. ISBN 978-0-19-878619-1.
  13. Luigi Filieri: Sintesi e giudizio. Studio su Kant e Jakob Sigismund Beck. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2020. 342 Seiten. ISBN 978-884675869-9.
  14. Henry Allison: Kant’s Conception of Freedom: A Developmental and Critical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 532 p. ISBN 978-1-107-14511-5
  15. Rudolf Meer: Der transzendentale Grundsatz der Vernunft: Funktion und Struktur des Anhangs zur Transzendentalen Dialektik der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2019 [Kantstudien-Ergänzungshefte 207]. xii + 314 S. ISBN 978-3-11-062316-1.
  16. Dennis Vanden Auweele: Pessimism in Kant’s Ethics and Rational Religion. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2019. 221 Seiten. ISBN 9781498580397
  17. Rainer Enskat: Urteil und Erfahrung. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Tl. 1 u. 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015 u. 2020. 295 u. 466 Seiten. ISBN: 978-3-525-23013-8 u. 978-3-525-30200-2
  18. Mitteilungen
  19. KANT 300
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2022-2014/html
Scroll to top button