Home The Troubling Relationship between Pleasure and Universality in Kant’s Impure Aesthetic Judgements
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Troubling Relationship between Pleasure and Universality in Kant’s Impure Aesthetic Judgements

  • James Phillips ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 3, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Kant calls judgements of adherent beauty impure aesthetic judgements because they presuppose the empirical concept of the object and are thus not determined exclusively by a feeling of pleasure. Glossed over in Kant’s account is what kind of universality these judgements have. This article argues that the subjective universality of pure aesthetic judgements and the objective universality of cognitive judgements do not merge in impure aesthetic judgements and that the tension between them reaches also into Kant’s pure aesthetic judgements with their unstable relations between the pleasure of the a priori harmony of the faculties and the empirical object named beautiful. Pleasure, which for Kant is communicable while nonetheless not being discursive, is always to some extent lost for words.

Published Online: 2022-06-03
Published in Print: 2022-06-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Abhandlungen
  3. Der „erste Satz“ in Grundlegung I
  4. Kant’s Political Justification of Social Welfare
  5. The Troubling Relationship between Pleasure and Universality in Kant’s Impure Aesthetic Judgements
  6. Achtung in Kant and Smith
  7. Does the ontological proof of God’s existence really contain all the probative force of the cosmological argument? The early criticisms of Kant’s thesis by Flatt, Abel and Eberhard
  8. Revelation’s Entrenchment in Pure Reason in Fichte’s Versuch einer Kritik aller Offenbarung
  9. Berichte und Diskussionen
  10. Johann Reinhold Grube’s Opposing Remarks on Kant’s Nova dilucidatio
  11. Buchbesprechungen
  12. Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated with an Introduction and Notes by Christopher Bennett, Joe Saunders and Robert Stern. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 144 pages. ISBN 978-0-19-878619-1.
  13. Luigi Filieri: Sintesi e giudizio. Studio su Kant e Jakob Sigismund Beck. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2020. 342 Seiten. ISBN 978-884675869-9.
  14. Henry Allison: Kant’s Conception of Freedom: A Developmental and Critical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 532 p. ISBN 978-1-107-14511-5
  15. Rudolf Meer: Der transzendentale Grundsatz der Vernunft: Funktion und Struktur des Anhangs zur Transzendentalen Dialektik der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2019 [Kantstudien-Ergänzungshefte 207]. xii + 314 S. ISBN 978-3-11-062316-1.
  16. Dennis Vanden Auweele: Pessimism in Kant’s Ethics and Rational Religion. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2019. 221 Seiten. ISBN 9781498580397
  17. Rainer Enskat: Urteil und Erfahrung. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Tl. 1 u. 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015 u. 2020. 295 u. 466 Seiten. ISBN: 978-3-525-23013-8 u. 978-3-525-30200-2
  18. Mitteilungen
  19. KANT 300
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2022-2011/html
Scroll to top button