Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
Exit, Adversarialism, and the Stubborn Persistence of Tort
-
Nora Freeman Engstrom
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
31. März 2015
Published Online: 2015-3-31
Published in Print: 2013-1-1
©2013 by De Gruyter
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Symposium Issue: “Tort, No-Fault, and Real-World Compensation,” A Volume in Honor of Jeffrey O’Connell
- Articles
- Jeffrey O’Connell and the Compensation Principle in Accident Law: Institutional and Intellectual Perspectives
- Prosser and His Influence
- Exit, Adversarialism, and the Stubborn Persistence of Tort
- Jeffrey O’Connell and the Market in Tort Claims
- Is Personal Injury Law Personal?
- Party Autonomy in Tort Theory and Reform
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
alternative compensation mechanisms;
replacement regimes;
vaccine injury;
auto no-fault;
workers’ compensation;
birth injury
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Symposium Issue: “Tort, No-Fault, and Real-World Compensation,” A Volume in Honor of Jeffrey O’Connell
- Articles
- Jeffrey O’Connell and the Compensation Principle in Accident Law: Institutional and Intellectual Perspectives
- Prosser and His Influence
- Exit, Adversarialism, and the Stubborn Persistence of Tort
- Jeffrey O’Connell and the Market in Tort Claims
- Is Personal Injury Law Personal?
- Party Autonomy in Tort Theory and Reform
