Agentive and non-agentive light verb constructions in Pahari-Pothwari

References

Ahmed, Tafseer & Miriam Butt. 2011. Discovering semantic classes for Urdu NV complex predicates. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on computational semantics, 305–309.Search in Google Scholar

Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024109008573.10.1023/A:1024109008573Search in Google Scholar

Akhtar, Raja Nasim. 2000. Aspectual complex predicates in Punjabi. University of Essex PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Amberber, Mengistu, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey. 2010. Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712234Search in Google Scholar

Annamalai, Elayaperumal. 1978. The anglicised Indian languages: A case of code-mixing. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 7. 239–247.Search in Google Scholar

Barjasteh, Darab. 1983. Morphology, syntax and semantics of Persian compound verbs: A lexicalist approach. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Bashir, Elena & Thomas J. Conners. 2019. A descriptive grammar of Hindko, Panjabi, and Saraiki. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614512257Search in Google Scholar

Beames, John. 1872–1878. A comparative grammar of the modern Aryan languages of India. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133902.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. 1982. Trinidad Hindi: Three generations of a transplanted variety. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11. 135–161.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Tej K. 1990. The notion of ‘subject’ in Punjabi and Lahanda. In Manindra Verma (ed.), Experiencer subjects in South Asian Languages, 181–194. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Bubenik, Vit. 1998. A historical syntax of late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhramsha). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.165Search in Google Scholar

Bukhari, Nadeem Haider. 2009. Light verbs in Gojri. Language in India 9(8). 449–463.Search in Google Scholar

Butt, Miriam. 1995. The structure of complex predicates in Urdu. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Butt, Miriam. 2003. The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9. 1–49.Search in Google Scholar

Butt, Miriam. 2006. The dative-ergative connection. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6. 69–92.Search in Google Scholar

Butt, Miriam. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 48–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712234.004Search in Google Scholar

Butt, Miriam & Tafseer Ahmed. 2011. The redevelopment of Indo-Aryan case systems from a lexical semantic perspective. Morphology 21(3–4). 545–572.10.1007/s11525-010-9175-0Search in Google Scholar

Cardona, George. 1976. Subject in Sanskrit. In Manindra Verma (ed.), The notion of subject in South Asian Languages, 1–38. Madison: South Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Search in Google Scholar

Casaretto, Antje. 2024. Secondary predicates and motion events: The rise of complex predicates in Vedic Sanskrit. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 11(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2024-2006.Search in Google Scholar

Cattell, Raymond. 1984. Composite predicates in English (Syntax and Semantics 17). Sydney: Academic Press Australia.10.1163/9789004373136Search in Google Scholar

Cruse, D. A. 1973. Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of linguistics 9(1). 11–23.10.1017/S0022226700003509Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Eystein. 2024. Remarks on the diachrony of verbal periphrasis in Vedic Sanskrit. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 11(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2024-2004.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Eystein & Beatrice Grieco. 2024. Complex verb constructions in Indo-Aryan in synchrony and diachrony: An introduction. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 11(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2024-2012.Search in Google Scholar

Dalrymple, M. & I. Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects and information structure, vol. 131. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511993473Search in Google Scholar

Davison, Alice. 2004. Argument licensing and interface conditions: The motivation for complex predicates in Hindi/Urdu. Paper presented at the workshop on argument structure. University of Delhi.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert. 2002. Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486869Search in Google Scholar

Ghomeshi, Jila & Diane Massam. 1994. Lexical/syntactic relations without projection. Linguistic Analysis 24(3–4). 175–217.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane & Armin Mester. 1988. Light verbs and thematic-marking. Linguistic Inquiry 19(2). 205–232.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. Causatives and Transitivity 23. 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.05has.Search in Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110883282Search in Google Scholar

Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik. 2006. From case to adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.280Search in Google Scholar

Hock, Hans Henrich. 2024. Double-finite serial verbs in Sanskrit and later Indo-Aryan. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 11(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2024-2005.Search in Google Scholar

Hook, P. 1990. Experiencers in South Asian languages: A gallery. In M. K. Verma & K. P. Mohanan (eds.), Experiencer subjects in South Asian Languages, 102–130. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Hook, Peter Edwin. 1991. The emergence of perfective aspect in Indo-Aryan languages. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2, 59–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.2.05hooSearch in Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 1973. Conjunction-reduction. Journal of Linguistics 9(2). 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700003820.Search in Google Scholar

Ittzés, Máté. 2024. Action nouns in Vedic support-verb constructions with kṛ. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 11(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2024-2008.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1965. A modern English grammar on historical principles: Part VI, morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Kachru, Yamuna, Braj B. Kachru & Tej K. Bhatia. 1976. The notion ‘subject’: A note on Hindi-Urdu, Kashmiri and Panjabi. In Manindra Verma (ed.), The notion of subject in South Asian languages, 79–109. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Karimi, Simin. 1989. Aspects of Persian syntax, specificity, and the theory of grammar. University of Washington PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Karimi, Simin. 1997. Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional. Lexicology 3. 273–318.Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward. 1976. Towards a universal definition of subject. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward. 1987. Universal grammar: 15 essays. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kellogg, Samuel Henry. 1893. Grammar of the Hindi Language. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Search in Google Scholar

Khanlari, Parviz. 1995. Tarikh-e Zaban-e Farsi [History of the Persian Language]. Tehran: Simorgh Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klaiman, Miriam. 1980. Bengali dative subjects. Lingua 51. 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(80)90096-0.Search in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert. 1984. Actance variations and categories of the object. In Frans Plank (ed.), Objects: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 269–292. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Löbner, Sebastian. 2011. Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 28(3). 279–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq022.Search in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1990. Varied case marking in obligational constructions. In Manindra K. Verma & Karuvannur P. Mohanan (eds.), Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages, 335–342. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Megerdoomian, Karine. 2012. The status of the nominal in Persian complex predicates. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(1). 179–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9146-0.Search in Google Scholar

Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3(1). 1–29.Search in Google Scholar

Mishra, Manindra. 1990. Dative/experiencer subjects in Maithili. In Manindra K. Verma & Karuvannur P. Mohanan (eds.), Experiencer subjects in South Asian Languages, 105–117. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Moag, Roger. 1977. Fiji Hindi. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mohanan, Tara. 1994. Argument structure in Hindi. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Moyne, John. 2007. The structure of verbal constructions in Persian. New York: Global Scholarly Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Nazir, Farah. 2014. Light verb constructions in Potwari. University of Manchester PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Nazir, Farah. 2024. Multilingualism in the British Azad Kashmiri Community. In Karamat Iqbal & Tahir Abbas (eds.), Ethnicity, religion, and muslim education in a changing world, 154–170. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003332237-10Search in Google Scholar

Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1990. Experiencer (dative) NPs in Marathi. In Manindra K. Verma & Karuvannur P. Mohanan (eds.), Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages, 161–180. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Pantcheva, Marina. 2010. First phase syntax of Persian complex predicates: Argument structure and telicity. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 2(1). 51–70.Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2011. Licensing of instrumental case in Hindi/Urdu causatives. Nordlyd 38. 49–71. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2230.Search in Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne. 1986. The syntax and semantics of the code-mixed compound verb in Panjabi/English bilingual discourse. In Deborah Tannen & James E. Alatis (eds.), Languages and linguistics: The interdependence of theory, data, and application, 35–50. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1972. Doubling. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi & Gloria C. Phares (eds.), Proceedings of the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic Society, 316–328. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorization in an Australian language. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2001. Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In Christa Kilian-Hatz & Friedrich Karl Erhard Voeltz (eds.), Ideophones, 355–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.44.27schSearch in Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2003a. Preverbs as an open word class in Northern Australian languages: Synchronic and diachronic correlates. Yearbook of Morphology 2003. 145–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1513-7_7.Search in Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2003b. Towards a typology of complex predicates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the study of the Indigenous languages of the americas, Atlanta, Georgia.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani & Ashwini Deo. 2006. Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages. Linguistic Typology 10(3). 369–418. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty.2006.012.Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1999. Dative subject constructions twenty-two years later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29. 45–76.Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Mona. 1990. The aspectual content of compound verbs. In Young-Se Kim & Marina Libucha (eds.), Proceedings of the seventh Eastern States conference on linguistics, 260–271.Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Mona. 1998. On the semantics of the perfective aspect. Natural Language Semantics 6(2). 171–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008208311200.10.1023/A:1008208311200Search in Google Scholar

Sridhar, Shikaripur N. 1979. Dative subjects and the notion of subject. Lingua 49. 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(79)90018-4.Search in Google Scholar

Vahedi-Langrudi, Mohammad-Mehdi. 1996. The syntax, semantics and argument structure of complex predicates in modern farsi. University of Ottawa PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799Search in Google Scholar

Verbeke, Saartje. 2013. Alignment and ergativity in new Indo-Aryan Languages, vol. 51. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110292671Search in Google Scholar

Verma, Manindra. 1976. The notion of subject in South Asian languages. South Asian studies at University of Wisconsin-Madison: Publications series #2.Search in Google Scholar

Verma, Manindra K. & Karuvannur Puthanveettil Mohanan. 1990. Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar