Abstract
This paper discusses various types of complex predicates found in Betta Kurumba, a South Dravidian language spoken in southern India. The constructions discussed include causativising and valency-modifying affixes, phrasal compound verbs, and compound verb stems. Compound verb stems are unusual for the language area, as they combine verb roots word-internally rather than as independent words, and have undergone varying degrees of grammaticalization. The origin of the compound verb stem construction is investigated, with the paper demonstrating that this construction was also originally a phrasal structure containing separate verb words. In addition, the history of valency modification and compound verb stem formation is shown to have contributed to the structure of simplex verb words in this language.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my Betta Kurumba consultants for their incredible patience and diligence in working with me to gather data on their language, as well as the Betta Kurumba community in Theppakkadu for the warm welcome they have given me. I gratefully acknowledge the feedback received from the audience at the seminar on complex predicates held in the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, in 2016, where I first presented parts of this paper. I am especially grateful to an anomymous reviewer of my manuscript for the excellent feedback I received, as well as to Nick Nicholas and Leonid Kulikov for their valuable comments and their work on copyediting this paper.
Abbreviations
- Abbreviations used in the text are:
- BK
Betta Kurumba
- CDr
Central Dravidian
- CV
compound verb
- IA
Indo-Aryan
- NDr
North Dravidian
- PDr
Proto-Dravidian
- PhrCV
phrasal compound verb
- PSDr
Proto-South Dravidian
- RVM
root valency modifier
- SCDr
South-Central Dravidian
- SDr
South Dravdian
- StCV
compound verb stem,
- TF
theme formative.
References
Agesthialingom, S. & G. Srinivasa Varma (eds.). 1980. Auxiliaries in Dravidian (Seminar papers). Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Suche in Google Scholar
Amberber, Mengistu, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey. 2010. Introduction. In Mengistu Amberber, B. Baker & M. Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712234Suche in Google Scholar
Annamalai, E. 1979. Aspects of aspect in Tamil. International Journal of Dravidian Languages 11(1). 260–267.Suche in Google Scholar
Annamalai, E. 1982. Dynamics of verbal extension in Tamil. International Journal of Dravidian Languages 8(2). 22–176.Suche in Google Scholar
Annamalai, E. 2016. Expanded verbs in Dravidian. In Hans Henrich Hock & Elena Bashir (eds.), 2016. Language and linguistics of South Asia: A comprehensive guide (The World of Linguistics 7), 550–559. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Burrow, Thomas & Murray B. Emeneau. 1984. A Dravidian etymological dictionary, 2nd revised edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 1995. The structure of complex predicates in Urdu. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Meningistu Amberber, B. Baker & M. Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712234.004Suche in Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri. 2013. Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs. Lingua 135. 7–29.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.11.006Suche in Google Scholar
Cardona, George & Dhanesh Jain. 2003. The Indo-Aryan languages. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203214961-20Suche in Google Scholar
Coelho, Gail. 2003. A grammar of Betta Kurumba. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Coelho, Gail. 2012. The re-emergence of finite serial verbs in South Dravidian. In Rajendra Singh & S. Bhattacharja (eds.), Annual review of South Asian languages and linguistics, 45–78. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110279757.45Suche in Google Scholar
Coelho, Gail. Forthcoming–a. Annotated texts in Betta Kurumba. Leiden: Brill. [Expected publication: 2019].Suche in Google Scholar
Coelho, Gail. Forthcoming–b. Betta Kurumba. In Sanford Steever (ed.), The Dravidian languages, 2nd revised edn. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32(1). 3–16.10.2307/410649Suche in Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Suche in Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2016. Complex verbs: Introduction. In Hans Henrich Hock & Elena Bashir (eds.), Language and linguistics of South Asia: A comprehensive guide (The World of Linguistics 7), 549–550. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110423303Suche in Google Scholar
Hook, Peter. 1974. The compound verb in Hindi. Ann Arbor: Center for South and South-East Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Suche in Google Scholar
Hook, Peter. 1991. The emergence of perfective aspect in Indo-Aryan languages. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammatialization, Volume II: Focus on types of grammatical markers, 59–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.2.05hooSuche in Google Scholar
Hook, Peter. 1993. Aspectogenesis and the compound verb in Indo-Aryan. In Manindra K. Verma (ed.), Complex predicates in South Asian languages, 97–113. New Delhi: Manohar.Suche in Google Scholar
Hook, Peter. 2001. Where do compound verbs come from? (And where are they going). In Peri Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (eds.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics, 102–130. New Delhi: Sage.10.1515/9783110245264.101Suche in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Suche in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda. 1988. The how and why of dichronic morphologization and demorphologization. In Michael Hammond & M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, 193–213. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004454101_014Suche in Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The Dravidian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486876Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Thomas. 1989. A grammar of Modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.Suche in Google Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Meenakshisundaram, T. P. 1965. A historical grammar of Tamil. Poona: Deccan College.Suche in Google Scholar
Paramasivam, K. 1979. Effectivity and causativity in Tamil. Trivandrum: Dravidian Linguistics Association.Suche in Google Scholar
Raina, Achla M. 2011. The co-eventual verb in Hindi. In Omkar N. Koul (ed.), Indo-Aryan linguistics, 135–152. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Suche in Google Scholar
Slade, Benjamin. 2013. The diachrony of light and auxiliary verbs in Indo-Aryan. Diachronica 30(4). 531–578.10.1075/dia.30.4.04slaSuche in Google Scholar
Slade, Benjamin. 2016. Compound verbs in Indo-Aryan. In Hans Henrich Hock & Elena Bashir (eds.), Language and linguistics of South Asia: A comprehensive guide (The World of Linguistics 7), 559–567. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. 1993. Analysis to synthesis: The development of complex verb morphology in the Dravidian languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. (ed.) 1998. The Dravidian languages. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. 2005. The Tamil auxiliary verb system. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Subbārāo, Kārumūri V. 2012. South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139003575Suche in Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, P. S. 1971. Dravidian verb morphology: A comparative study. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Bernd Heine (eds.). 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. (Typological studies in language 19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1Suche in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Complex predicates in South Asian languages: An introduction
- On the formation of complex predicates in Bengali
- Complex predicates in Betta Kurumba
- Multi-verb constructions in Malto
- Book Reviews
- Pritha Chandra Richa Srishti: The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today; 209)
- Eystein Dahl Krzysztof Stroński: Indo-Aryan ergativity in typological and diachronic perspective (Typological studies in language 112)
- Uta Reinöhl: Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 20)
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Complex predicates in South Asian languages: An introduction
- On the formation of complex predicates in Bengali
- Complex predicates in Betta Kurumba
- Multi-verb constructions in Malto
- Book Reviews
- Pritha Chandra Richa Srishti: The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today; 209)
- Eystein Dahl Krzysztof Stroński: Indo-Aryan ergativity in typological and diachronic perspective (Typological studies in language 112)
- Uta Reinöhl: Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 20)