Abstract
A Bayesian model is used to evaluate the probability that a given skill performed in a specified area of the field will lead to a predetermined outcome by using discrete absorbing Markov chains. The transient states of the Markov process are defined by unique skill-area combinations. The absorbing states of the Markov process are defined by a shot, turnover, or bad turnover. Defining the states in this manner allows the probability of a transient state leading to an absorbing state to be derived. A non-informative prior specification of transition counts is used to permit the data to define the posterior distribution. A web application was created to collect play-by-play data from 34 Division 1 NCAA Women’s soccer matches for the 2013–2014 seasons. A prudent construction of updated transition probabilities facilitates a transformation through Monte Carlo simulation to obtain marginal probability estimates of each unique skill-area combination leading to an absorbing state. For each season, marginal probability estimates for given skills are compared both across and within areas to determine which skills and areas of the field are most advantageous.
References
Bellman, R. 1976. Dynamic Programming and Markovian Decision Processes: With Application to Baseball. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.Search in Google Scholar
Bukiet, B., E. R. Harold, and J. L. Palacios. 1997. “A Markov Chain Approach to Baseball.” Operations Research 45:14–23.10.1287/opre.45.1.14Search in Google Scholar
Dyte, D. and S. R. Clarke. 2000. “A Ratings Based Poisson Model for World Cup Soccer Simulation.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 51:993–998.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600997Search in Google Scholar
Fellingham, G. and C. Reese. 2004. “Rating Skills in International Men’s Volleyball.” Brigham Young University. Unpublished report to the USA National Men’s Volleyball Team.Search in Google Scholar
FIFA. 2014. “FIFA World Cup Group Stages Break New Ground in TV Viewing.” Retrieved from http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/news/y=2014/m=6/news=fifa-world-cuptm-group-stages-break-new-ground-in-tv-viewing-2388418.html.Search in Google Scholar
Goldblatt, D. 2008. The Ball is Round: A Global History of Soccer. Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Goldner, K. 2012. “A Markov Model of Football: Using Stochastic Processes to Model a Football Drive.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 8.10.1515/1559-0410.1400Search in Google Scholar
Heiner, M., G. W. Fellingham, and C. Thomas. 2014. “Skill Importance in Women’s Soccer.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 10:287–302.10.1515/jqas-2013-0119Search in Google Scholar
Hirotsu, N. and M. Wright. 2002. “Using a Markov Process Model of an Association Football Match to Determine the Optimal Timing of Substitution and Tactical Decisions.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 53:88–96.10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601254Search in Google Scholar
Keller, J. B. 1994. “A Characterization of the Poisson Distribution and the Probability of Winning a Game.” The American Statistician 48:294–298.10.1080/00031305.1994.10476084Search in Google Scholar
Kunz, M. 2007. “265 Million Playing Football.” FIFA Magazine 10–15.10.1080/13673882.2007.9680857Search in Google Scholar
Kvam, P. and J. S. Sokol. 2006. “A Logistic Regression/Markov Chain Model for NCAA Basketball.” Naval Research Logistics 53:788–803.10.1002/nav.20170Search in Google Scholar
Lawler, G. F. 1995. Introduction to Stochastic Processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, A. J. 2005. “Modeling Scores in the Premier League: Is Manchester United Really the Best?” Anthology of Statistics in Sports 16:293.10.1137/1.9780898718386.ch40Search in Google Scholar
Miskin, M. A., G. W. Fellingham, and L. W. Florence. 2010. “Skill Importance in Women’s Volleyball.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 6.10.2202/1559-0410.1234Search in Google Scholar
Newton, P. K. and J. B. Keller. 2005. “Probability of Winning at Tennis I. Theory and Data.” Studies in Applied Mathematics 114:241–269.10.1111/j.0022-2526.2005.01547.xSearch in Google Scholar
Newton, P. K. and K. Aslam. 2009. “Monte Carlo Tennis: A Stochastic Markov Chain Model.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 5.10.2202/1559-0410.1169Search in Google Scholar
Pavitt, C. 1985. “Percentage Baseball Reconsidered: Model and Method.” Baseball Analyst 11–16. Retrieved from http://sabr.org/research/baseball-analyst-archives.Search in Google Scholar
Reep, C. and B. Benjamin. 1968. “Skill and Chance in Association Football.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 581–585.10.2307/2343726Search in Google Scholar
Rudd, S. 2011. “A Framework for Tactical Analysis and Individual Offensive Production Assessment in Soccer Using Markov Chains.” New England Symposium on Statistics in Sports. http://www.nessis.org/nessis11/rudd.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, C., G. Fellingham, and P. Vehrs. 2009. “Development of a Notational Analysis System for Selected Soccer Skills of a Women’s College Team.” Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 13:108–121.10.1080/10913670902812770Search in Google Scholar
Trueman, R. E. 1977. “Analysis of Baseball as a Markov Process.” Optimal Strategies in Sports 5:68–76.Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- A network diffusion ranking family that includes the methods of Markov, Massey, and Colley
- Quantifying the probability of a shot in women’s collegiate soccer through absorbing Markov chains
- Modelling the dynamic pattern of surface area in basketball and its effects on team performance
- A Bayesian regression approach to handicapping tennis players based on a rating system
- Bayesian hierarchical models for predicting individual performance in soccer
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- A network diffusion ranking family that includes the methods of Markov, Massey, and Colley
- Quantifying the probability of a shot in women’s collegiate soccer through absorbing Markov chains
- Modelling the dynamic pattern of surface area in basketball and its effects on team performance
- A Bayesian regression approach to handicapping tennis players based on a rating system
- Bayesian hierarchical models for predicting individual performance in soccer