Startseite Incidence and first trimester risk factors of stillbirth in Indonesia
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Incidence and first trimester risk factors of stillbirth in Indonesia

  • Mirani Ulfa Yusrika ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Adly Nanda Al Fattah ORCID logo , Raden Aditya Kusuma ORCID logo , Felix Firyanto Widjaja ORCID logo , Shinda Marizni ORCID logo und Vania Permata Putri
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. Februar 2024

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the incidence and the risk factors of stillbirth from maternal biophysical, ultrasound, and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks of gestation in the Indonesian population.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women for first-trimester preeclampsia screening at 11–13 weeks of gestation in some clinics and hospital in Jakarta. Maternal characteristics and history, mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) ultrasound, maternal ophthalmic peak ratio (Oph-PR) Doppler, and placental growth factor (PlGF) serum were collected during the visit. Stillbirth was classified into placental dysfunction-related when it occurred with preeclampsia or birth weight <10th percentile and non-placental dysfunction-related. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to determine the risk factors associated with stillbirth.

Results

Of 1,643 eligible participants, 13 (0.79 %) stillbirth cases were reported. More than half of the stillbirths (7) were placental dysfunction-related. After adjusted with maternal age, body mass index (BMI), and parity status, chronic hypertension (aOR (adjusted odds ratio)) 24.41, 95 % CI {confidence interval} 5.93–100.43), previous pregnancy with preeclampsia (aOR 15.79, 95 % CI 4.42–56.41), MAP >101.85 (aOR 26.67, 95 % CI 8.26–86.06), UtA-PI >1.90 (aOR 10.68, 95 % CI 2.34–48.58, and PlGF <28.77 pg/mL (aOR 18.60, 95 % CI 5.59–61.92) were associated with stillbirth.

Conclusions

The incidence of stillbirth in the population is comparable to studies conducted in developed countries. Most routine variables assessed at the 11–13 weeks combined screening for preeclampsia are associated with the risk of stillbirth.


Corresponding author: Mirani Ulfa Yusrika, MD, 633485 Indonesian Prenatal Institute , Pondok Pinang Center C-34, Jalan Ciputat Raya, Kebayoran Lama, South Jakarta, 12310, Jakarta, Indonesia, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: This study has obtained ethical approval from the local Institutional Review Board, The Ethics Committee of Harapan Kita National Women and Children Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, with the reference number IRB/40/07/ETIK/2023.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Lawn, JE, Blencowe, H, Waiswa, P, Amouzou, A, Mathers, C, Hogan, D, et al.. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet 2016;387:587–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00837-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME), You, D, Hug, L, Mishra, A, Blencowe, H, Moran, A. A neglected tragedy : the global burden of stillbirths. New York: UNICEF; 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

3. World Health Organization (WHO). Making Every baby count: audit and review of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Geneva: WHO; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Sun, CC, Chou, HH, Chuang, LL. Trends and risk factors of stillbirth in Taiwan 2006–2013: a population-based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299:961–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05090-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Ashoor, G, Syngelaki, A, Papastefanou, I, Nicolaides, KH, Akolekar, R. Development and validation of model for prediction of placental dysfunction-related stillbirth from maternal factors, fetal weight and uterine artery Doppler at mid-gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;59:61–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24795.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Noël, L, Coutinho, CM, Thilaganathan, B. Preventing stillbirth: a review of screening and prevention strategies. Matern – Fetal Med 2022;4:218–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000160.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Li, Z, Kong, Y, Chen, S, Subramanian, M, Lu, C, Kim, R, et al.. Independent and cumulative effects of risk factors associated with stillbirths in 50 low- and middle-income countries: a multi-country cross-sectional study. eClinicalMedicine 2022;54:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101706.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Poon, LCY, Zymeri, NA, Zamprakou, A, Syngelaki, A, Nicolaides, KH. Protocol for measurement of mean arterial pressure at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:42–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335366.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Plasencia, W, Maiz, N, Bonino, S, Kaihura, C, Nicolaides, KH. Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:742–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5157.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Kusuma, RA, Nurdiati, DS, Al Fattah, AN, Danukusumo, D, Abdullah, S, Sini, I. Ophthalmic artery Doppler for pre-eclampsia prediction at the first trimester: a Bayesian survival-time model. J Ultrasound 2023;26:155–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00697-w.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Pandya, P, Wright, D, Syngelaki, A, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal serum placental growth factor in prospective screening for aneuploidies at 8-13 weeks’ gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335684.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Jassir, FB, Say, L, Chou, D, Mathers, C, et al.. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2016;4:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00275-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. World Health Organization (WHO). Stillbirth Rate (per 1000 total births) [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/stillbirth-rate (per-1000-total-births).Suche in Google Scholar

14. World Health Organization (WHO). Every Newborn : an action plan to end preventable deaths. Geneva: WHO; 2014:53 p.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Haruyama, R, Gilmour, S, Ota, E, Abe, SK, Rahman, MM, Nomura, S, et al.. Causes and risk factors for singleton stillbirth in Japan: analysis of a nationwide perinatal database, 2013-2014. Sci Rep 2018;8:4117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22546-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Neogi, SB, Sharma, J, Negandhi, P, Chauhan, M, Reddy, S, Sethy, G. Risk factors for stillbirths: how much can a responsive health system prevent? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1660-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Zile, I, Ebela, I, Rumba-Rozenfelde, I. Maternal risk factors for stillbirth: a registry-based study. Medicina 2019;55:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55070326.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Shanker, O, Saini, V, Gupta, M. Stillbirths: incidence, causes and surrogate markers of intrapartum and antepartum fetal deaths. Int J Innov Res Med Sci 2020;5:289–95. https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol05-i08/927.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Awor, S, Byanyima, R, Abola, B, Kiondo, P, Orach, CG, Ogwal-Okeng, J, et al.. Prediction of stillbirth low resource setting in Northern Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05198-6.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Gibbins, KJ, Pinar, H, Reddy, UM, Saade, GR, Goldenberg, RL, Dudley, DJ, et al.. Findings in stillbirths associated with placental disease. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:708–15. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688472.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Rolnik, DL, Wright, D, Poon, LC, O’Gorman, N, Syngelaki, A, de Paco Matallana, C, et al.. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2017;377:613–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1704559.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Page, EW, Christianson, R. The impact of mean arterial pressure in the middle trimester upon the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;125:740–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(76)90839-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Warland, J, McCutcheon, H, Baghurst, P. Maternal blood pressure in pregnancy and stillbirth: a case-control study of third-trimester stillbirth. Am J Perinatol 2008;25:311–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1075031.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Wu, JN, Ren, YY, Zhu, C, Peng, T, Zhang, B, Li, MQ. Abnormal placental perfusion and the risk of stillbirth: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03776-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Smith, GCS, Yu, CKH, Papageorghiou, AT, Cacho, AM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry and the risk of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:144–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000248536.94919.e3.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Tian, Y, Yang, X. A review of roles of uterine artery Doppler in pregnancy complications. Front Med 2022;9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.813343.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Conde-Agudelo, A, Bird, S, Kennedy, SH, Villar, J, Papageorghiouc, AT. First- and second-trimester tests to predict stillbirth in unselected pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2015;122:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13096.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. McLaughlin, K, Snelgrove, JW, Audette, MC, Syed, A, Hobson, SR, Windrim, RC, et al.. PlGF (placental growth factor) testing in clinical practice: evidence from a Canadian tertiary maternity referral center. Hypertension 2021;77:2057–65. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17047.Suche in Google Scholar

29. MacDonald, TM, Tran, C, Kaitu’u-Lino, TJ, Brennecke, SP, Hiscock, RJ, Hui, L, et al.. Assessing the sensitivity of placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 at 36 weeks’ gestation to predict small-for-gestational-age infants or late-onset preeclampsia: a prospective nested case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1992-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Manriquez Rocha, B, Mbofana, F, Loquiha, O, Mudenyanga, C, Ukah, UV, Magee, LA, et al.. Early diagnosis of preeclampsia using placental growth factor: an operational pilot study in Maputo, Mozambique. Pregnancy Hypertens 2018;11:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2017.12.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Chaiworapongsa, T, Romero, R, Korzeniewski, SJ, Kusanovic, JP, Soto, E, Lam, J, et al.. Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors in the third trimester of pregnancy to identify the patient at risk for stillbirth at or near term and severe late preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:287.e1–287.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Agrawal, S, Shinar, S, Cerdeira, AS, Redman, C, Vatish, M. Predictive performance of PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) for screening preeclampsia in asymptomatic women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 2019;74:1124–35. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.13360.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Giardini, V, Rovelli, R, Algeri, P, Giunti, L, Lazzarin, S, Callegari, C, et al.. Placental growth factor as a predictive marker of preeclampsia–PREBIO study–PREeclampsia BIOchemical study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020;35:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1792878.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Gardosi, J, Madurasinghe, V, Williams, M, Malik, A, Francis, A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ 2013;346:f108. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f108.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Warshak, CR, Wolfe, KB, Russell, KA, Habli, M, Lewis, DF, Defranco, EA. Influence of adolescence and obesity on the rate of stillbirth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013;27:346–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12059.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Sarmon, KG, Eliasen, T, Knudsen, UB, Bay, B. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of stillbirth in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2021;116:784–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Waldenström, U, Cnattingius, S, Norman, M, Schytt, E. Advanced maternal age and stillbirth risk in nulliparous and parous women. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:355–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000947.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-23
Accepted: 2024-01-28
Published Online: 2024-02-27
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Corner of Academy
  3. The outcome of reduced and non-reduced triplet pregnancies managed in a tertiary hospital during a 15-year-period – a retrospective cohort study
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Parental refusal of prenatal screening for aneuploidies
  6. Analysis of maternal mortality in Berlin, Germany – discrepancy between reported maternal mortality and comprehensive death certificate exploration
  7. Second twin outcome at birth: retrospective analysis in a single tertiary centre in Malaysia
  8. Incidence and first trimester risk factors of stillbirth in Indonesia
  9. Correlation of fetal heart rate dynamics to inflammatory markers and brain-derived neurotrophic factor during pregnancy
  10. Preliminary assessment of the Healthy Early Life Moments (HELMS) webinars in empowering Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) concept among healthcare professionals – a pragmatic serial cross-sectional study
  11. Original Articles – Fetus
  12. The changing Doppler patterns and perinatal outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic twins with selective fetal growth restriction
  13. Effects of umbilical vein flow on midbrain growth and cortical development in late onset fetal growth restricted fetuses: a prospective cross-sectional study
  14. Original Articles – Neonates
  15. Prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia by the chest radiographic thoracic area on day one in infants with exomphalos
  16. Impact of birth weight to placental weight ratio and other perinatal risk factors on left ventricular dimensions in newborns: a prospective cohort analysis
  17. Changes in regional tissue oxygen saturation values during the first week of life in stable preterm infants
  18. Letters to the Editor
  19. Optimal closure of the uterus during cesarean section: beyond the two layers
  20. Reply to: “Optimal closure of the uterus during cesarean section: beyond the two layers” commenting on “The effect of uterine closure technique on cesarean scar niche development after multiple cesarean deliveries”
Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2023-0348/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen