Home Use, misuse, and overuse of antenatal corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Use, misuse, and overuse of antenatal corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study

  • Liviu Cojocaru ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Shruti Chakravarthy , Hooman Tadbiri ORCID logo , Rishika Reddy , James Ducey and Gary Fruhman
Published/Copyright: May 22, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the timing of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration in relation to the delivery timing based on indications and risk factors for preterm delivery.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to understand what factors predict the optimal timing of ACS administration (ACS administration within seven days). We reviewed consecutive charts of adult pregnant women receiving ACS from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. We excluded pregnancies under 23 weeks, incomplete and duplicate records, and patients delivered outside our health system. The timing of ACS administration was categorized as optimal or suboptimal. These groups were analyzed regarding demographics, indications for ACS administration, risk factors for preterm delivery, and signs and symptoms of preterm labor.

Results

We identified 25,776 deliveries. ACS were administered to 531 pregnancies, of which 478 met the inclusion criteria. Of the 478 pregnancies included in the study, 266 (55.6 %) were delivered in the optimal timeframe. There was a higher proportion of patients receiving ACS for the indication of threatened preterm labor in the suboptimal group as compared to the optimal group (85.4 % vs. 63.5 %, p<0.001). In addition, patients who delivered in the suboptimal timeframe had a higher proportion of short cervix (33 % vs. 6.4 %, p<0.001) and positive fetal fibronectin (19.8 % vs. 1.1 %, p<0.001) compared to those who delivered in the optimal timeframe.

Conclusions

More emphasis should be placed on the judicious use of ACS. Emphasis should be placed on clinical assessment rather than relying solely on imaging and laboratory tests. Re-appraisal of institutional practices and thoughtful ACS administration based on the risk-benefit ratio is warranted.


Corresponding author: Liviu Cojocaru, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital of Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA; Current address: Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, Division of Anesthesia Critical Care, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; and Sponsor: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA, E-mail:
Current address: Shruti Chakravarthy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, USA. Current address: Rishika Reddy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northside Hospital Gwinnett, Lawrenceville, GA, USA.
  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: LC and SC drafted the manuscript. HT performed the statistical analysis and ensured its correct interpretation. All authors contributed to the final version’s writing and editing. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The Institutional Review Board at Staten Island University Hospital approved the study under protocols #18–0157 and #20–0361, respectively.

References

1. Liggins, GC, Howie, RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 1972;50:515–25. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.50.4.515.Search in Google Scholar

2. ACOG. Committee opinion No. 713: antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e102–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002237.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK, Drake, P. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67:1–50.Search in Google Scholar

4. Räikkönen, K, Gissler, M, Kajantie, E. Associations between maternal antenatal corticosteroid treatment and mental and behavioral disorders in children. J Am Med Assoc 2020;323:1924–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3937.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. McElwee, ER, Wilkinson, K, Crowe, R, Newman, JC, Alkis, M, Wineland, R, et al.. Indication creep of antenatal late preterm steroids. Am J Perinatol 2022;39:1159–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1785-9290.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Lau, HCQ, Tung, JSZ, Wong, TTC, Tan, PL, Tagore, S. Timing of antenatal steroids exposure and its effects on neonates. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;296:1091–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4543-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Murphy, KE, Willan, AR, Hannah, ME, Ohlsson, A, Kelly, EN, Matthews, SG, et al.. Effect of antenatal corticosteroids on fetal growth and gestational age at birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:917–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825189dc.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Fee, EL, Takahashi, T, Takahashi, Y, Carter, S, Furfaro, L, Clarke, MW, et al.. One percent of the clinical dose used for antenatal steroid therapy is sufficient to induce lung maturation when administered directly to the preterm ovine fetus. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2022;322:L853–65. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00058.2022.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Takahashi, T, Fee, EL, Takahashi, Y, Saito, M, Yaegashi, N, Usuda, H, et al.. Betamethasone phosphate reduces the efficacy of antenatal steroid therapy and is associated with lower birthweights when administered to pregnant sheep in combination with betamethasone acetate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;226:564.e1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Alexander, N, Rosenlöcher, F, Stalder, T, Linke, J, Distler, W, Morgner, J, et al.. Impact of antenatal synthetic glucocorticoid exposure on endocrine stress reactivity in term-born children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:3538–44. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1970.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Melamed, N, Asztalos, E, Murphy, K, Zaltz, A, Redelmeier, D, Shah, BR, et al.. Neurodevelopmental disorders among term infants exposed to antenatal corticosteroids during pregnancy: a population-based study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031197. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031197.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Hodyl, NA, Crawford, TM, McKerracher, L, Lawrence, A, Pitcher, JB, Stark, MJ. Antenatal steroid exposure in the late preterm period is associated with reduced cord blood neurotrophin-3. Early Hum Dev 2016;101:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.03.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Takahashi, T, Saito, M, Schmidt, AF, Usuda, H, Takahashi, Y, Watanabe, S, et al.. Variability in the efficacy of a standardized antenatal steroid treatment was independent of maternal or fetal plasma drug levels: evidence from a sheep model of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:921.e1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Althabe, F, Belizán, JM, McClure, EM, Hemingway-Foday, J, Berrueta, M, Mazzoni, A, et al.. A population-based, multifaceted strategy to implement antenatal corticosteroid treatment versus standard care for the reduction of neonatal mortality due to preterm birth in low-income and middle-income countries: the ACT cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2015;385:629–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61651-2.Search in Google Scholar

15. Vandenbroucke, JP, von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Gøtzsche, PC, Mulrow, CD, Pocock, SJ, et al.. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007;4:e297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Minor, BL, Elliott, V, Fernandez, M, O’Neal, L, et al.. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inf 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Thielke, R, Payne, J, Gonzalez, N, Conde, JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf 2009;42:377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, Mercer, BM, Moawad, A, Das, A, et al.. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199602293340904.Search in Google Scholar

19. Saccone, G, Berghella, V. Antenatal corticosteroids for maturity of term or near term fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Brit Med J 2016;355:i5044. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5044.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Schäffer, L, Luzi, F, Burkhardt, T, Rauh, M, Beinder, E. Antenatal betamethasone administration alters stress physiology in healthy neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1082–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1f0e6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Carson, R, Monaghan-Nichols, AP, DeFranco, DB, Rudine, AC. Effects of antenatal glucocorticoids on the developing brain. Steroids 2016;114:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2016.05.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Kelly, BA, Lewandowski, AJ, Worton, SA, Davis, EF, Lazdam, M, Francis, J, et al.. Antenatal glucocorticoid exposure and long-term alterations in aortic function and glucose metabolism. Pediatrics 2012;129:e1282–90. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3175.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Ilg, L, Kirschbaum, C, Li, S-C, Rosenlöcher, F, Miller, R, Alexander, N. Persistent effects of antenatal synthetic glucocorticoids on endocrine stress reactivity from childhood to adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018;104:827–34. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01566.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Davidson, C, Monga, M, Ellison, D, Vidaeff, A. Continuation of pregnancy after antenatal corticosteroid administration: opportunity for rescue? J Reprod Med 2010;55:14–8.Search in Google Scholar

25. Sanya, R, Al Naggar, E, Gasim, M, Ahmed, BI. Use or overuse of antenatal corticosteroids for suspected preterm birth. J Matern Fetal N 2014;27:1454–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.860523.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Mahony, R, McKeating, A, Murphy, T, McAuliffe, F, O’Herlihy, C, Foley, M. Appropriate antenatal corticosteroid use in women at risk for preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;117:963–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02590.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0074).


Received: 2023-02-20
Accepted: 2023-04-19
Published Online: 2023-05-22
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in the Journal of Perinatal Medicine
  4. Reviews
  5. A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction
  6. An exploration of barriers to access to trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States: a scoping review
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. A call for public funding of invasive and non-invasive prenatal testing
  9. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  10. The AccuFlow sensor: a novel digital health tool to assess intrapartum blood loss at cesarean delivery
  11. Risk factors associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in singleton vaginal deliveries: a comprehensive United States population analysis 2016–2020
  12. Changes in use of 17-OHPC after the PROLONG trial: a physician survey
  13. Retrospective comparison of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies stratified by spontaneous or artificial conception
  14. Associations of cesarean sections with comorbidities within the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
  15. The spatial expression of mTORC2-AKT-IP3R signal pathway in mitochondrial combination of endoplasmic reticulum of maternal fetal interface trophoblast in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
  16. Comprehensive analysis of macrosomia: exploring the association between first-trimester alanine aminotransferase and uric acid measurements in pregnant women
  17. Use, misuse, and overuse of antenatal corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study
  18. Classification of normal and abnormal fetal heart ultrasound images and identification of ventricular septal defects based on deep learning
  19. Virtual touch IQ elastography in the evaluation of fetal liver and placenta in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus
  20. Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture: a retrospective cohort study
  21. Original Articles – Fetus
  22. The assessment of fetal cardiac functions in pregnancies with autoimmune diseases: a prospective case-control study
  23. The relationship of maternal polymorphisms of genes related to meiosis and DNA damage repair with fetal chromosomal stability
  24. Original Articles – Neonates
  25. German obstetrician’s self-reported attitudes and handling in threatening preterm birth at the limits of viability
  26. Do parents get what they want during bad news delivery in NICU?
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2023-0074/html
Scroll to top button