The spatial expression of mTORC2-AKT-IP3R signal pathway in mitochondrial combination of endoplasmic reticulum of maternal fetal interface trophoblast in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
Abstract
Objectives
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is complicated by adverse fetal outcomes and even fetal death, the mechanism remains unclear. This study aims at evaluating the differential expression of mTORC2-AKT-IP3R signaling pathway, which accurately regulate Ca2+ transfer across mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) and determine the stress intensity experienced by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria, in patients diagnosed with ICP.
Methods
We combined western blot analysis and placental immunofluorescence co-localization detection to assess the expression and co-localization of the mTORC2-AKT-IP3R signaling pathway in severe (maternal total bile acid (TBA) levels ≥40 μmol/L) and mild (maternal TBA 10–40 μmol/L) ICP.
Results
Compared with the control and mild ICP groups, phosphorylated protein kinase B (p-AKT) levels were significantly upregulated in the severe ICP group. Placental Rictor levels were lower in the mild ICP group than in the control group and were further downregulated in the severe ICP group. IP3R3 and p-IP3R3 levels were lower in placentas in the severe ICP group than in those in the mild ICP and control groups. Moreover, the co-localization of IP3R3 and p-AKT in patients in the mild and severe ICP groups was significantly elevated compared with that in patients in the control group.
Conclusions
In patients with severe ICP, limited expression of Rictor and elevated p-AKT levels would suppress IP3R3/p-IP3R3 levels in MAMs. This inhibition might influence the transportation of Ca2+ from the ER to the mitochondria, thus weaken the stress adaptation associated with MAMs. Our results reveal the possible pathophysiological mechanism of adverse fetal outcomes in ICP.
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 81801485
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81801485].
-
Author contributions: YQ Li: project development, data collection, data analysis; F Zhou: project development, data analysis, manuscript writing; DJ Chen: data collection, manuscript editing; JF Xu: data collection, manuscript editing; XD Wang: project development, data analysis, manuscript editing. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.
-
Ethical approval: Approval from the West China Second University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) was obtained prior to patient enrollment.
References
1. Society for maternal-fetal medicine (SMFM), Lee, RH, Pettker, CM. Society for maternal-fetal medicine (SMFM) consult series #53: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;224:B2–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. MacDorman, MF, Reddy, UM, Silver, RM. Trends in stillbirth by gestational age in the United States, 2006-2012. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:1146–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001152.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Henderson, CE, Shah, RR, Gottimukkala, S, Ferreira, KK, Hamaoui, A, Mercado, R. Primum non nocere: how active management became modus operandi for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:189–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Ovadia, C, Seed, PT, Sklavounos, A, Geenes, V, Di Ilio, C, Chambers, J, et al.. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet 2019;393:899–909. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000569528.40287.d0.Search in Google Scholar
5. Vasavan, T, Deepak, S, Jayawardane, IA, Lucchini, M, Martin, C, Geenes, V, et al.. Fetal cardiac dysfunction in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with elevated serum bile acid concentrations. J Hepatol 2021;74:1087–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.038.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Song, Z, Tian, X, Shi, Q. Fas, Caspase-8, and Caspase-9 pathway-mediated bile acid-induced fetal cardiomyocyte apoptosis in intrahepatic cholestasis pregnant rat models. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021;47:2298–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14765.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Sepúlveda, WH, González, C, Cruz, MA, Rudolph, MI. Vasoconstrictive effect of bile acids on isolated human placental chorionic veins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991;42:211–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(91)90222-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Puljic, A, Kim, E, Page, J, Esakoff, T, Shaffer, B, LaCoursiere, DY, et al.. The risk of infant and fetal death by each additional week of expectant management in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:667.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Williamson, C, Hems, LM, Goulis, DG, Walker, I, Chambers, J, Donaldson, O, et al.. Clinical outcome in a series of cases of obstetric cholestasis identified via a patient support group. BJOG 2004;111:676–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00167.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Zhao, P, Zhang, K, Yao, Q, Yang, X. Uterine contractility in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;34:221–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2013.834878.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Prinz, WA, Toulmay, A, Balla, T. The functional universe of membrane contact sites. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020;21:7–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0180-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Betz, C, Stracka, D, Prescianotto-Baschong, C, Frieden, M, Demaurex, N, Hall, MN. Feature article: mTOR complex 2-Akt signaling at mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAM) regulates mitochondrial physiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:12526–34. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302455110.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Manning, BD, Toker, A. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating the network. Cell 2017;169:381–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Zhou, F, Guan, LB, Yu, P, Wang, XD, Hu, YY. Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, regulated in development and DNA damage response-1 and mammalian target of rapamycin in human placental BeWo cells under hypoxia. Placenta 2016;45:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2016.07.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Obstetric cholestasis; 2011. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_43.pdf [Accessed 1 Jan 2022].Search in Google Scholar
16. Geenes, V, Chappell, LC, Seed, PT, Steer, PJ, Knight, M, Williamson, C. Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology 2014;59:1482–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26617.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Ding, W, Chim, SSC, Wang, CC, Lau, CSL, Leung, TY. Molecular mechanism and pathways of normal human parturition in different gestational tissues: a systematic review of transcriptome studies. Front Physiol 2021;12:730030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.730030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Dunn, KW, Kamocka, MM, McDonald, JH. A practical guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2011;300:C723–42. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. Sarbassov, DD, Guertin, DA, Ali, SM, Sabatini, DM. Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science 2005;307:1098–101. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106148.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Patergnani, S, Suski, JM, Agnoletto, C, Bononi, A, Bonora, M, De Marchi, E, et al.. Calcium signaling around mitochondria associated membranes (MAMs). Cell Commun Signal 2011;9:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811x-9-19.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Yung, HW, Korolchuk, S, Tolkovsky, AM, Charnock-Jones, DS, Burton, GJ. Endoplasmic reticulum stress exacerbates ischemia-reperfusion-induced apoptosis through attenuation of Akt protein synthesis in human choriocarcinoma cells. FASEB J 2007;21:872–84. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.06-6054com.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Ontsouka, E, Epstein, A, Kallol, S, Zaugg, J, Baumann, M, Schneider, H, et al.. Placental expression of bile acid transporters in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:10434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910434.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
23. Laatikainen, TJ, Lehtonen, PJ, Hesso, AE. Fetal sulfated and nonsulfated bile acids in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Lab Clin Med 1978;92:185–93.Search in Google Scholar
24. Zecca, E, De Luca, D, Barbato, G, Marras, M, Tiberi, E, Romagnoli, C. Predicting respiratory distress syndrome in neonates from mothers with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 2008;84:337–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.09.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in the Journal of Perinatal Medicine
- Reviews
- A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction
- An exploration of barriers to access to trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States: a scoping review
- Opinion Paper
- A call for public funding of invasive and non-invasive prenatal testing
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- The AccuFlow sensor: a novel digital health tool to assess intrapartum blood loss at cesarean delivery
- Risk factors associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in singleton vaginal deliveries: a comprehensive United States population analysis 2016–2020
- Changes in use of 17-OHPC after the PROLONG trial: a physician survey
- Retrospective comparison of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies stratified by spontaneous or artificial conception
- Associations of cesarean sections with comorbidities within the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
- The spatial expression of mTORC2-AKT-IP3R signal pathway in mitochondrial combination of endoplasmic reticulum of maternal fetal interface trophoblast in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
- Comprehensive analysis of macrosomia: exploring the association between first-trimester alanine aminotransferase and uric acid measurements in pregnant women
- Use, misuse, and overuse of antenatal corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study
- Classification of normal and abnormal fetal heart ultrasound images and identification of ventricular septal defects based on deep learning
- Virtual touch IQ elastography in the evaluation of fetal liver and placenta in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus
- Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture: a retrospective cohort study
- Original Articles – Fetus
- The assessment of fetal cardiac functions in pregnancies with autoimmune diseases: a prospective case-control study
- The relationship of maternal polymorphisms of genes related to meiosis and DNA damage repair with fetal chromosomal stability
- Original Articles – Neonates
- German obstetrician’s self-reported attitudes and handling in threatening preterm birth at the limits of viability
- Do parents get what they want during bad news delivery in NICU?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in the Journal of Perinatal Medicine
- Reviews
- A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction
- An exploration of barriers to access to trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States: a scoping review
- Opinion Paper
- A call for public funding of invasive and non-invasive prenatal testing
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- The AccuFlow sensor: a novel digital health tool to assess intrapartum blood loss at cesarean delivery
- Risk factors associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in singleton vaginal deliveries: a comprehensive United States population analysis 2016–2020
- Changes in use of 17-OHPC after the PROLONG trial: a physician survey
- Retrospective comparison of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies stratified by spontaneous or artificial conception
- Associations of cesarean sections with comorbidities within the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
- The spatial expression of mTORC2-AKT-IP3R signal pathway in mitochondrial combination of endoplasmic reticulum of maternal fetal interface trophoblast in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
- Comprehensive analysis of macrosomia: exploring the association between first-trimester alanine aminotransferase and uric acid measurements in pregnant women
- Use, misuse, and overuse of antenatal corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study
- Classification of normal and abnormal fetal heart ultrasound images and identification of ventricular septal defects based on deep learning
- Virtual touch IQ elastography in the evaluation of fetal liver and placenta in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus
- Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture: a retrospective cohort study
- Original Articles – Fetus
- The assessment of fetal cardiac functions in pregnancies with autoimmune diseases: a prospective case-control study
- The relationship of maternal polymorphisms of genes related to meiosis and DNA damage repair with fetal chromosomal stability
- Original Articles – Neonates
- German obstetrician’s self-reported attitudes and handling in threatening preterm birth at the limits of viability
- Do parents get what they want during bad news delivery in NICU?