Home Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture: a retrospective cohort study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture: a retrospective cohort study

  • Makkam S. Madhuri , Nivedita Jha ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Veena Pampapati , Latha Chaturvedula and Ajay Kumar Jha
Published/Copyright: May 2, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

Literature comparing maternal and perinatal outcomes among women with scarred and primary uterine rupture are limited. Therefore, the study aimed to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes and associated risk factors of uterine rupture among scarred and unscarred uterus.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was performed at a large tertiary care of India between July 1, 2011 and June 30, 2020. We analysed all the cases of complete uterine rupture beyond the 20th week of gestation. The outcome measures were live birth rate, perinatal mortality, maternal mortality and morbidity.

Results

A total of 115 complete uterine ruptures were noted in 148,102 pregnancies. Of those 115 uterine ruptures, 89 (77.3 %) uterine ruptures occurred in women with a history of caesarean delivery, and 26 (22.6 %) uterine ruptures occurred in primary uterine rupture. The primary uterine rupture group had a significantly higher incidence of lower parity, breech presentation and mean birth weight. The live birth rate (68.18% vs. 42.85 %; p=0.04) was significantly higher in the scarred group, and the stillbirth rate (57.14% vs. 31.86 %; p=0.009) was significantly higher in the primary uterine rupture group. Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, APGAR score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were comparable. Postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, severe acute maternal morbidity and intensive care unit stay were more frequently reported in the primary uterine rupture group.

Conclusions

The maternal and perinatal outcomes appear less favourable among women with primary uterine rupture than scarred uterine rupture.


Corresponding author: Nivedita Jha, MBBS, MS, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India, Phone: +919487581663, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was approved by Institute Ethics Committee JIPMER, Puducherry, India (JIP/IEC/2020/255 dated 02/11/2020).

References

1. Astatikie, G, Limenih, MA, Kebede, M. Maternal and fetal outcomes of uterine rupture and factors associated with maternal death secondary to uterine rupture. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1302-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Hofmeyr, GJ, Say, L, Gulmezoglu, AM. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:1221–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Justus Hofmeyr, G, Say, L, Metin Gülmezoglu, A. Systematic review: WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:1221–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x.Search in Google Scholar

4. Miller, D, Goodwin, T, Gherman, R, Paul, R. Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:671–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00073-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Chiossi, G, D’Amico, R, Tramontano, AL, Sampogna, V, Laghi, V, Facchinetti, F. Prevalence of uterine rupture among women with one prior low transverse cesarean and women with unscarred uterus undergoing labor induction with PGE2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021;16:e0253957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253957.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Guise, J-M, McDonagh, MS, Osterweil, P, Nygren, P, Chan, BK, Helfand, M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. Br Med J 2004;329:19. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7456.19.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Mukasa, PK, Kabakyenga, J, Senkungu, JK, Ngonzi, J, Kyalimpa, M, Roosmalen, VJ. Uterine rupture in a teaching hospital in Mbarara, western Uganda, unmatched case-control study. Reprod Health 2013;10:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-29.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Rizwan, N, Abbasi, RM, Uddin, SF. Uterine rupture, frequency of cases and fetomaternal outcome. J Pakistan Med Assoc 2011;61:322.Search in Google Scholar

9. Gibbins, KJ, Weber, T, Holmgren, CM, Porter, TF, Varner, MW, Manuck, TA. Maternal and fetal morbidity associated with uterine rupture of the unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:382.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Ofir, K, Sheiner, E, Levy, A, Katz, M, Mazor, M. Uterine rupture: differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:425–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. You, SH, Chang, YL, Yen, CF. Rupture of the scarred and unscarred gravid uterus: outcomes and risk factors analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2018;57:248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.02.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Landon, MB, Hauth, JC, Leveno, KJ, Spong, CY, Leindecker, S, Varner, MW, et al.. National institute of child health and human development maternal-fetal medicine units network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa040405.Search in Google Scholar

13. Turgut, A, Ozler, A, Siddik Evsen, M, Ender Soydinc, H, Yaman Goruk, N, Karacor, T, et al.. Uterine rupture revisited: predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey. Pakistan J Med Sci 2013;29:753–7. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.293.3625.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Abasiattai, AM, Umoiyoho, AJ, Utuk, NM, Inyang-Etoh, EC, Asuquo, E. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital in southern Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 2013;15:1–15. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2013.15.60.1879.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Gessessew, A, Melese, MM. Ruptured uterus-eight year retrospective analysis of causes and management outcome in adigrat hospital, tigray region, ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev 2002;16:241–5. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhd.v16i3.9792.Search in Google Scholar

16. Strand, R, Tumba, P, Niekowal, J, Bergström, S. Audit of cases with uterine rupture: a process indicator of quality of obstetric care in angola. Afr J Reprod Health 2010;14:55–62.Search in Google Scholar

17. Abbas, AM, Shehata, AM, Fathalla, MM. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of uterine rupture in a tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;32:3352–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1463369.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Vandenberghe, G, De Blaere, M, Van Leeuw, V, Roelens, K, Englert, Y, Hanssens, M, et al.. Nationwide population-based cohort study of uterine rupture in Belgium: results from the Belgian Obstetric Surveillance System. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010415. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010415.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Markou, GA, Muray, JM, Poncelet, C. Risk factors and symptoms associated with maternal and neonatal complications in women with uterine rupture. A 16 years multicentric experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;217:126–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0018).


Received: 2023-01-12
Accepted: 2023-04-15
Published Online: 2023-05-02
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in the Journal of Perinatal Medicine
  4. Reviews
  5. A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction
  6. An exploration of barriers to access to trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States: a scoping review
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. A call for public funding of invasive and non-invasive prenatal testing
  9. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  10. The AccuFlow sensor: a novel digital health tool to assess intrapartum blood loss at cesarean delivery
  11. Risk factors associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in singleton vaginal deliveries: a comprehensive United States population analysis 2016–2020
  12. Changes in use of 17-OHPC after the PROLONG trial: a physician survey
  13. Retrospective comparison of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies stratified by spontaneous or artificial conception
  14. Associations of cesarean sections with comorbidities within the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
  15. The spatial expression of mTORC2-AKT-IP3R signal pathway in mitochondrial combination of endoplasmic reticulum of maternal fetal interface trophoblast in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
  16. Comprehensive analysis of macrosomia: exploring the association between first-trimester alanine aminotransferase and uric acid measurements in pregnant women
  17. Use, misuse, and overuse of antenatal corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study
  18. Classification of normal and abnormal fetal heart ultrasound images and identification of ventricular septal defects based on deep learning
  19. Virtual touch IQ elastography in the evaluation of fetal liver and placenta in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus
  20. Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture: a retrospective cohort study
  21. Original Articles – Fetus
  22. The assessment of fetal cardiac functions in pregnancies with autoimmune diseases: a prospective case-control study
  23. The relationship of maternal polymorphisms of genes related to meiosis and DNA damage repair with fetal chromosomal stability
  24. Original Articles – Neonates
  25. German obstetrician’s self-reported attitudes and handling in threatening preterm birth at the limits of viability
  26. Do parents get what they want during bad news delivery in NICU?
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2023-0018/html
Scroll to top button