Startseite New obstetric systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for early identification of high-risk of sepsis in obstetric patients
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

New obstetric systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for early identification of high-risk of sepsis in obstetric patients

  • Jose Rojas-Suarez ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Angel Paternina-Caicedo , Jezid Miranda , María Cuello , María Piñerez , José Santacruz , Walter Anichiarico , Camilo Bello-Muñoz , Jeniffer Gonzalez-Hernandez , Jennifer Tymon , Jorge Coronado , Jorge Tolosa , Camila Meza , Nicole Iriarte , Alfonso Ramos , Oscar Soto , Fabian Maza , Mariam Viloria und Carmelo Dueñas-Castell
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Juli 2021

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to establish new cut-off values for SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) variables in the obstetric population.

Methods

A prospective cohort study in pregnant and postpartum women admitted with systemic infections between December 2017 and January 2019. Patients were divided into three cohorts: Group A, patients with infection but without severe maternal outcomes (SMO); Group B, patients with infection and SMO or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU); and Group C, a control group. Outcome measures were ICU admission and SMO. The relationship between SIRS criteria and SMO was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), selecting the best cut-off for each SIRS criterion.

Results

A total of 541 obstetric patients were enrolled, including 341 with infections and 200 enrolled as the reference group (Group C). The patients with infections included 313 (91.7%) in Group A and 28 (8.2%) in Group B. There were significant differences for all SIRS variables in Group B, compared with Groups A and C, but there were no significant differences between Groups A and C. The best cut-off values were the following: temperature 38.2 °C, OR 4.1 (1.8–9.0); heart rate 120 bpm, OR 2.9 (1.2–7.4); respiratory rate 22 bpm, OR 4.1 (1.6–10.1); and leukocyte count 16,100 per mcl, OR 3.5 (1.6–7.6).

Conclusions

The cut-off values for SIRS variables did not differ between healthy and infected obstetric patients. However, a higher cut-off may help predict the population with a higher risk of severe maternal outcomes.


Corresponding author: Jose Rojas-Suarez, Grupo de Investigación en Cuidado Intensivo y Obstetricia (GRICIO), Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia; Fundacion Grupo de Investigación en Cuidado Intensivo y Obstetricia, Cartagena, Colombia; Corporación Universitaria Rafael Núñez, Cartagena, Colombia; and Clínica Gestión Salud, Cartagena, Colombia, E-mail:

Funding source: Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovación (MINCIENCIAS) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007637

Award Identifier / Grant number: grant #815/2017

Funding source: Universidad de Cartagena

Award Identifier / Grant number: grant #02565/2017

Acknowledgments

A preliminary report of this data was presented at the North American Society of Obstetric Medicine Annual meeting on March 29th and 30th, 2019, in Vancouver, Canada.

  1. Research funding: This research was funded by the Universidad de Cartagena [grant #02565/2017] and Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovación (MINCIENCIAS) [grant #815/2017].

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The Ethics Committee of Universidad de Cartagena and the Institutional Review Board of CMRC approved this study.

  6. Data availability: The patient data used to support the findings of this study are restricted by the Institutional Review Board of CMRC in order to protect patient privacy. Data are available from [Jose Rojas-Suarez, ] for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

References

1. Say, L, Chou, D, Gemmill, A, Tunçalp, Ö, Beth Moller, A, Daniels, J, et al.. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal 2014;2:e323–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70227-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Rudd, KE, Johnson, SC, Agesa, KM, Shackelford, K, Tsoi, D, Rhodes, D, et al.. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395:200–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32989-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. The WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) Research Group. Frequency and management of maternal infection in health facilities in 52 countries (GLOSS): a 1-week inception cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2020;8:e661–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30109-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. De La Torre, A, Nikoloski, Z, Mossialos, E. Equity of access to maternal health interventions in Brazil and Colombia: a retrospective study. Int J Equity Health 2018;17:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0752-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Brizuela, V, Bonet, M, Trigo Romero, CL, Abalos, E, Baguiya, A, Fawole, B, et al.. Early evaluation of the “STOP SEPSIS!” WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Awareness Campaign implemented for healthcare providers in 46 low, middle and high-income countries. BMJ Open 2020;10:e036338. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036338.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Maguire, PJ, Power, KA, Downey, AF, O’Higgins, AC, Sheehan, SR, Turner, MJ. Evaluation of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis due to maternal bacteremia. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2016;133:116–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.017.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Singer, M, Deutschman, CS, Seymour, C, Shankar-Har, M, Annane, D, Bauer, M, et al.. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). J Am Med Assoc 2016;8:801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Vincent, JL, Martin, GS, Levy, MM. qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis. Crit Care 2016;20:210. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Franchini, S, Scarallo, L, Carlucci, M, Cabrini, L, Tresoldi, M. SIRS or qSOFA? Is that the question? clinical and methodological observations from a meta-analysis and critical review on the prognostication of patients with suspected sepsis outside the ICU. Intern Emerg Med 2019;14:593–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1965-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Goulden, R, Hoyle, MC, Monis, J, Railton, D, Riley, V, Martin, P, et al.. QSOFA, SIRS and NEWS for predicting inhospital mortality and ICU admission in emergency admissions treated as sepsis. Emerg Med J 2018;35:345–9. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207120.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Bauer, ME, Bauer, ST, Rajala, B, MacEachern, M, Polley, L, Childers, D, et al.. Maternal physiologic parameters in relationship to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:535–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000423.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Woodd, SL, Montoya, A, Barreix, M, Pi, L, Calvert, C, Rehman, A, et al.. Incidence of maternal peripartum infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2019;12:e1002984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002984.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Escobar, MF, Nasner, D, Hurtado, CF, Fernández, PA, Echavarria, MP. Characterization of obstetric patients with sepsis identified by two diagnostic scales at a fourth-level clinic in Colombia. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;143:71–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12580.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Green, LJ, Mackillop, LH, Salvi, D, Pullon, R, Loerup, L, Tarassenko, L, et al.. Gestation-specific vital sign reference ranges in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:653–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003721.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Sohn, CH, Kim, Y-J, Seo, DW, Won, HS, Shim, JY, Lim, KS, et al.. Blood lactate concentration and shock index associated with massive transfusion in emergency department patients with primary postpartum haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth 2018;121:378–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.039.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Luo, J, Jiang, W, Weng, L, Peng, J, Hu, X, Wang, C, et al.. Usefulness of qSOFA and SIRS scores for detection of incipient sepsis in general ward patients: a prospective cohort study. J Crit Care 2019;51:13–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Albright, CM, Ali, TN, Lopes, V, Rouse, DJ, Anderson, BL. The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:39.E1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Albright, CM, Has, P, Rouse, DJ, Hughes, BL. Internal validation of the sepsis in obstetrics score to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:747–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002260.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Agarwal, R, Yadav, RK, Mohta, M, Sikka, M, Radhakrishnan, G. Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) utility and validation for triaging patients with obstetric sepsis in the emergency department: evidence from a low income health care setting. Obstet Med 2019;12:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495x18761522.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2021-0135).


Received: 2021-03-17
Accepted: 2021-04-14
Published Online: 2021-07-16
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Global incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage among extremely preterm infants: a systematic literature review
  4. Commentary
  5. Professional integrity in maternal – fetal innovation and research: an essential component of perinatal medicine
  6. WAPM Recommendations
  7. WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine Practice Guidelines: Fetal central nervous system examination
  8. Corner of Academy
  9. Education in developing countries and reducing maternal mortality: a forgotten piece of the puzzle?
  10. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  11. The contemporary value of dedicated preterm birth clinics for high-risk singleton pregnancies: 15-year outcomes from a leading maternal centre
  12. Chorioamnionitis after premature rupture of membranes in nulliparas undergoing labor induction: prostaglandin E2 vs. oxytocin
  13. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with obstructive sleep apnea
  14. Assessing the involvement of the placental microbiome and virome in preeclampsia using non coding RNA sequencing
  15. Risk of metformin failure in the treatment of women with gestational diabetes
  16. Can we improve our ability to interpret category II fetal heart rate tracings using additional clinical parameters?
  17. New obstetric systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for early identification of high-risk of sepsis in obstetric patients
  18. Bacteria in the amniotic fluid without inflammation: early colonization vs. contamination
  19. Intertwin differences in umbilical artery pulsatility index are associated with infant survival in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
  20. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with disorders of lipid metabolism
  21. The use of PAMG-1 testing in patients with preterm labor, intact membranes and a short sonographic cervix reduces the rate of unnecessary antenatal glucocorticoid administration
  22. Original Articles – Neonates
  23. The effect of postnatal corticosteroids on growth parameters in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  24. Are neonatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies different from those of singletons according to gestational age?
  25. Impact of paternal presence and parental social-demographic characteristics on birth outcomes
  26. Letter to the Editor
  27. Comment on: “amniotic fluid embolism – implementation of international diagnosis criteria and subsequent pregnancy recurrence risk”
Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2021-0135/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen