Startseite The cumulative impact of parity on the body mass index (BMI) in a non-selected Lower Saxony population
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The cumulative impact of parity on the body mass index (BMI) in a non-selected Lower Saxony population

  • Lars Brodowski EMAIL logo , Niels Rochow , Efrah I. Yousuf , Fabian Kohls , Constantin S. von Kaisenberg , Ralf L. Schild , Silvia Berlage , Hans Peter Hagenah und Manfred Voigt
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Dezember 2020

Abstract

Objectives

During the last decade obesity has been continuously rising in adults in industrial countries. The increased occurrence of perinatal complications caused by maternal obesity poses a major challenge for obstetricians during pregnancy and childbirth. This study aims to examine the association between parity, pregnancy, birth risks, and body mass index (BMI) of women from Lower Saxony, Germany.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study examined pseudonymized data of a non-selected singleton cohort from Lower Saxony’s statewide quality assurance initiative. Mothers were categorized according to BMI as normal weight (18.5 to <25 kg/m2) or obese (≥30 kg/m2).

Results

Most of the mothers in this study population were either in their first (33.9%) or second pregnancy (43.4%). The mean age of women giving birth for the first time was 28.3 years. Maternal age increased with increasing parity. The proportion of pregnant women with a BMI over 30 was 11% in primiparous women, 14.3% in second para, 17.3% in third para and 24.1% in fourth para or more women. Increasing parity was positively correlated with the incidence of classical diseases related to obesity, namely diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes, hypertension, pregnancy-related hypertension and urinary protein excretion. An increased risk of primary or secondary cesarean section was observed in the obese women, particularly during the first deliveries.

Conclusions

There is a positive and significant correlation between parity and increased maternal BMI. The highest weight gain happens during the first pregnancy. The rate of operative deliveries and complications during delivery is increased in obese pregnant women.


Corresponding author: Lars Brodowski, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625Hannover, Germany, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate the support of the obstetric hospitals in Lower Saxony and the Ärztekammer Niedersachsen in recruiting participants and providing data.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This is a retrospective analysis of birth data from the Lower Saxony Perinatal Survey under the Ethical Approval of the Ethics Committee of the Lower Saxony Medical Association.

References

1. Schienkiewitz, A, Kuhnert, R, Lange, C. Uebergewicht und Adipositas bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland. J Health Monit 2017;2:21–8. https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-025.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Martinez, JA, Kearney, JM, Kafatos, A, Paquet, S, Martinez-Gonzalez, MA. Variables independently associated with self-reported obesity in the European Union. Publ Health Nutr 1999;2:125–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980099000178.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Cnattingius, S, Bergstrom, R, Lipworth, L, Kramer, MS. Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 1998;338:147–52. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199801153380302.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Athukorala, C, Rumbold, AR, Willson, KJ, Crowther, CA. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-56.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Bodnar, LM, Siega-Riz, AM, Simhan, HN, Himes, KP, Abrams, B. Severe obesity, gestational weight gain, and adverse birth outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:1642–8. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.29008.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Rasmussen, KM, Yaktine, AL. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009. https://doi.org/10.17226/12584.Suche in Google Scholar

7. McKinley, MC, Allen-Walker, V, McGirr, C, Rooney, C, Woodside, JV. Weight loss after pregnancy: challenges and opportunities. Nutr Res Rev 2018;31:225–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422418000070.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Ha, V, Bonner, AJ, Jadoo, JK, Beyene, J, Anand, SS, de Souza, RJ. The effects of various diets on glycemic outcomes during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PloS One 2017;12:e0182095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182095.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Brantsaeter, AL, Haugen, M, Samuelsen, SO, Torjusen, H, Trogstad, L, Alexander, J, et al.. A dietary pattern characterized by high intake of vegetables, fruits, and vegetable oils is associated with reduced risk of preeclampsia in nulliparous pregnant Norwegian women. J Nutr 2009;139:1162–8. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.104968.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Linne, Y, Dye, L, Barkeling, B, Rossner, S. Long-term weight development in women: a 15-year follow-up of the effects of pregnancy. Obes Res 2004;12:1166–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.146.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Sheykhi, M, Paknahad, Z, Hasanzadeh, A. Dietary nutrient intake and antioxidant status in preeclamptic women. Adv Biomed Res 2015;4:183. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.164003.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Martinez Garcia, RM. Supplements in pregnancy: the latest recommendations. Nutr Hosp 2016;33:336. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.336.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Bianco, AT, Smilen, SW, Davis, Y, Lopez, S, Lapinski, R, Lockwood, CJ. Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese woman. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00578-4.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Rohatgi, KW, Tinius, RA, Cade, WT, Steele, EM, Cahill, AG, Parra, DC. Relationships between consumption of ultra-processed foods, gestational weight gain and neonatal outcomes in a sample of US pregnant women. PeerJ 2017;5:e4091. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4091.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Miles, EA, Calder, PC. Can early omega-3 fatty acid exposure reduce risk of childhood allergic disease? Nutrients 2017;9:784. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9070784.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Melchor, I, Burgos, J, Del Campo, A, Aiartzaguena, A, Gutierrez, J, Melchor, JC. Effect of maternal obesity on pregnancy outcomes in women delivering singleton babies: a historical cohort study. J Perinat Med 2019;47:625–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2019-0103.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Manzanares, GS, Santalla, HA, Vico, ZI, Criado, MSL, Pineda, LA, Gallo, VJL. Abnormal maternal body mass index and obstetric and neonatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:308–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.575905.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Oteng-Ntim, E, Varma, R, Croker, H, Poston, L, Doyle, P. Lifestyle interventions for overweight and obese pregnant women to improve pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2012;10:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-47.Suche in Google Scholar

19. WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:1–253.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Wolfe, H. High prepregnancy body-mass index--a maternal-fetal risk factor. N Engl J Med 1998;338:191–2. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199801153380310.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Devlieger, R, Benhalima, K, Damm, P, Van Assche, A, Mathieu, C, Mahmood, T, et al.. Maternal obesity in Europe: where do we stand and how to move forward?: a scientific paper commissioned by the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;201:203–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar

22. WHO. International Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. J Hypertens 1999;17:151–83.10.1097/00004872-199917020-00001Suche in Google Scholar

23. ACOG. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;77:67–75.10.1016/S0020-7292(02)80002-9Suche in Google Scholar

24. Harreiter, J, Roden, M. Diabetes mellitus-definition, classification, diagnosis, screening and prevention (Update 2019). Wien Klin Wochenschr 2019;131:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-1450-4.Suche in Google Scholar

25. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. https://www.R-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Odibo, AO, Nelson, D, Stamilio, DM, Sehdev, HM, Macones, GA. Advanced maternal age is an independent risk factor for intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Perinatol 2006;23:325–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-947164.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Straube, S, Voigt, M, Briese, V, Schneider, KT, Voigt, M. Weight gain in pregnancy according to maternal height and weight. J Perinat Med 2008;36:405–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2008.073.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Iversen, DS, Kesmodel, US, Ovesen, PG. Associations between parity and maternal BMI in a population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:694–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13321.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Knight-Agarwal, CR, Williams, LT, Davis, D, Davey, R, Cochrane, T, Zhang, H, et al.. Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010667. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010667.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Ugwuja, EI, Nnabu, RC, Ezeonu, PO, Uro-Chukwu, H. The effect of parity on maternal body mass index, plasma mineral element status and new-born anthropometrics. Afr Health Sci 2015;15:986–92. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v15i3.37.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Voerman, E, Santos, S, Inskip, H, Amiano, P, Barros, H, Charles, MA, et al.. Association of gestational weight gain with adverse maternal and infant outcomes. J Am Med Assoc 2019;321:1702–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3820.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Robinson, HE, O’Connell, CM, Joseph, KS, McLeod, NL. Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1357–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000188387.88032.41.Suche in Google Scholar

33. de Groot, LC. High maternal body weight and pregnancy outcome. Nutr Rev 1999;57:62–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1999.tb01780.x.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Lindsay, KL, Brennan, L, Kennelly, MA, Curran, S, Coffey, M, Smith, TP, et al.. Maternal metabolic response to dietary treatment for impaired glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus. Ir J Med Sci 2018;187:701–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1744-y.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Catalano, PM. The impact of gestational diabetes and maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2010;1:208–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2040174410000115.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Catalano, PM. Obesity, insulin resistance, and pregnancy outcome. Reproduction 2010;140:365–71. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-10-0088.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Freedman, MA, Wilds, PL, George, WM. Grotesque obesity: a serious complication of labor and delivery. South Med J 1972;65:732–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-197206000-00020.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Kaiser, PS, Kirby, RS. Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200101000-00008.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Jensen, H, Agger, AO, Rasmussen, KL. The influence of prepregnancy body mass index on labor complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:799–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.1999.780911.x.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Sutan, R, Campbell, D, Prescott, GJ, Smith, WC. The risk factors for unexplained antepartum stillbirths in Scotland, 1994–2003. J Perinatol 2010;30:311–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.158.Suche in Google Scholar

41. Lamminpaa, R, Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K, Gissler, M, Heinonen, S. Preeclampsia complicated by advanced maternal age: a registry-based study on primiparous women in Finland 1997–2008. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-47.Suche in Google Scholar

42. Lean, SC, Heazell, AEP, Dilworth, MR, Mills, TA, Jones, RL. Placental dysfunction underlies increased risk of fetal growth restriction and stillbirth in advanced maternal age women. Sci Rep 2017;7:9677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09814-w.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Fieril, DP, Olsen, PF, Glantz, D, Premberg, DA. Experiences of a lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women – a qualitative study. Midwifery 2017;44:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0261).

Received: 2020-06-09
Accepted: 2020-10-23
Published Online: 2020-12-01
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In Memorian
  3. Robert L. Brent, MD, PhD (1927–2021)
  4. Review
  5. Implications of the vaginal microbiome and potential restorative strategies on maternal health: a narrative review
  6. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  7. Disorders of placental villous maturation are present in one-third of cases with spontaneous preterm labor
  8. Gestational iron deficiency anemia is associated with preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and postpartum infections
  9. Women with high plasma levels of PBDE-47 are at increased risk of preterm birth
  10. Racial disparities in recurrent preterm delivery risk: mediation analysis of prenatal care timing
  11. Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery in correlation with KANET
  12. The cumulative impact of parity on the body mass index (BMI) in a non-selected Lower Saxony population
  13. The relation between second-trimester placental elasticity and poor obstetric outcomes in low-risk pregnancies
  14. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after second trimester amniocentesis between procedures performed by experts and non-experts
  15. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation during pregnancy on high risk factors — a randomized controlled trial
  16. Educating future professionals in perinatal medicine: the attitude of medical and nursing students towards childbirth
  17. Original Articles – Fetus
  18. Normal values of cardiac axis (CA) measurements in healthy fetuses during the first trimester screening ultrasound
  19. Original Articles – Neonates
  20. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on breastfeeding rates in a neonatal intensive care unit
  21. Factors associated with extubation failure in very low birth weight infants: a cohort study in the northeast Brazil
  22. Perinatal outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies in women with polycystic ovary syndrome by pregravid BMI
  23. Evaluation of audio-voice guided application for neonatal resuscitation: a prospective, randomized, pilot study
  24. Letter to the Editor
  25. Systematic screening for SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women admitted for delivery: not as easy as it sounds
Heruntergeladen am 12.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0261/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen