Startseite Expert advice about therapeutic exercise during pregnancy reduces the symptoms of sacroiliac dysfunction
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Expert advice about therapeutic exercise during pregnancy reduces the symptoms of sacroiliac dysfunction

  • Manuela Filipec EMAIL logo und Ratko Matijević
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Juli 2020

Abstract

Objectives

There are growing evidence that exercise improves sacroiliac dysfunction symptoms in pregnant women; but no data about the effect of expert advice regarding this matter. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of expert advice about therapeutic exercise on sacroiliac dysfunction in pregnancy.

Methods

A total of 500 women with sacroiliac dysfunction diagnosed in pregnancy were randomized in study and control group. Study group has conducted expert advice on therapeutic exercise; while control group continued with their normal lifestyle. Pain intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and degree of functional disability by Quebec scale were assessed at enrolment and after 3 and 6 weeks.

Results

Significantly better reduction in pain intensity assessed by VAS (p=0.001) and degree of functional disability assessed by Quebec scale (p=0.001) was noted in study compared to control group. Better results for both outcome measures were obtained if intervention was implemented earlier i.e., in second (p=0.001; p=0.001) compared to third (p=0.005; p=0.001) trimester. Strong positive correlation was found between pain intensity and degree of functional disability in both groups.

Conclusions

Expert advice on therapeutic exercise is effective in reduction of sacroiliac dysfunction symptoms during pregnancy.

Trial registration

ACTRN12617000556347


Corresponding author: Manuela Filipec, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical hospital “Sveti Duh”, Zagreb, Croatia, Tel: +38513712281, Fax: +38513712206, Mobile: +385917316607, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: MF and RM contributed to the conception and design of the study, data analysis, writing and revising the manuscript. MF was responsible for data collection. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and reported no conflicts of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Clinical hospital “Sveti Duh” Ethics Committee.

References

1. Homer, C, Oats, J. Clinical practice guidelines: pregnancy care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2018:355–57 p.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Walters, C, West, S. Nippita, TA. Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2018.10.31128/AJGP-01-18-4467Suche in Google Scholar

3. Obstetric, P, Physiotherapy, G. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PGP)-For health professionals. UK: POGP; 2015:1–10 p.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Berra, K, Rippe, J, Manson, J. Making physical activity counselling a priority in clinical practice: the time for action is now. JAMA 2015;314:2617–28. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.16244.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Writing Group for the Activity Counselling Trial Research Group. Effects of physical activity counselling in primary care. JAMA 2001;286: 677–87. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.6.677.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Lee, IM, Shiroma, EJ, Lobelo, F, Puska, P, Blair, SN, Katzmarzyk, PT, et al. Effect of physical in activity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012;380:219–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Sanchez, A, Bully, P, Martinez, C, Grandes, G. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion interventions in primary care: a review of reviews. Prev Med 2015;76:S56–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.012.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Management of pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy and post-partum. Chartered Physiotherapists Women‟s Health and Continence and Directorate of Strategy and Clinical Programmes. Health Service Executive. Version 1.0. public; 2012; rev. 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Laslett, M. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint. J Man Manip 2008;16:142–52. https://doi.org/10.1179/jmt.2008.16.3.142.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Jensen, MP, Chen, C, Brugger, AM. Interpretation of visual analogue scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative surgery pain. J Pain 2003;4:407–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Davidson, M, Keating, JL. A Comparison of five low back pain disability questionnaires: realiability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2012;82:8–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.1.8.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Kopec, JA, Esdaile, JM, Abrahamowicz, M, Abenhaim, L, Wood-Dauphinee, S, Lamping, DL, et al. The quebec back pain disability scale. Spine 1995;20:341–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199502000-00016.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Davenport, MH, Marchand, A, Mottola, M, Poitras, VJ, Gray, CE, Garcia, AJ, et al. Exercise for the prevention and treatment of low back. pelvic girdle and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta analysis. BR J Sports Med 2019;53:90–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099400.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Van Kampen, M, Devoogdt, N, De Groef, A, Gielen, A,Geraerts, I. The efficacy of physiotherapy for the prevention and treatment of prenatal symptoms: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1575–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2684-y.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Shiri, R, Coggon, D, Falah-Hassani, K. Exercise for the prevention of low back and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pain 2018;22:19–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1096.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Shim, MJ, Lee, YS, Oh, HE, Kim, JS. Effects of a back pain reducing program during pregnancy for Korean women: a non equivalent control group pretest-posttest study. Int J Nurs Stud 2005;44:19–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.016.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Richards, E, van Kessel, G, Virgara, R, Harris, P. Does antenatal physical therapy for pregnant women with low back pain or pelvic pain improve functional outcomes? A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91:1038–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01462.x.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Ozdemir, S, Bebis, H, Ortabag, T, Acikel, C. Evaluation of the efficacy of an exercise program for pregnant women with low back and pelvic pain: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs 2015;71:1926–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12659.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Almousa, S, Lamprianidou, E, Kitsoulis, G. The effectiveness of stabilising exercises in pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy and after delivery: a systematic review. Physiother Res Int 2018;23:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1699.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Bhardwaj, A, Nagandla, K. Musculoskeletal symptoms and orthopaedic complications in pregnancy: pathophysiology. Diagnostic approaches and modern management. Postgrad Med J 2014;90:450–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132377.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Vleeming, A, Albert, HB, Östgaard, HC, Sturesson, B, Stuge, B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 2008;17:794–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Liddle, SD, Pennick, V. Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2015:CD001139. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001139.pub4.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Mens, JM, Pool-Goudzwaard, A, Stam, HJ. Mobility of the pelvic joints in pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64:200–08. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181950f1b.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Vleeming, A, Stoeckart, R, Volkers, AC, Snijders, C. Relation between form and function in the sacroilaic joint. Part I: clinical anatomical aspects.Spine 1990;15:130–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199002000-00016.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Vleeming, A, Volkers, AC, Snijders, C, Stoeckart, R. Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. Part 2.Biomechanical aspects. Spine 1990;15:133–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199002000-00017.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Robinson, HS, Vøllestad, NK,Veierød, MB. Clinical course of pelvic girdle pain postpartum–impact of clinical findings in late pregnancy. Man Ther 2014;19:190–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.01.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-04-02
Accepted: 2020-05-04
Published Online: 2020-07-06
Published in Print: 2020-07-28

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Exercise during pregnancy: a comparative review of guidelines
  4. Corner of Academy
  5. Women’s decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing: an explorative study within Finnish public maternity care
  6. Vascular anastomoses in intrauterine growth in monochorionic twins
  7. Effects of coronavirus 19 pandemic on maternal anxiety during pregnancy: a prospectic observational study
  8. Letter to the Editor
  9. Giving birth and dying alone in hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic – a time for shifting paradigm toward continuity of care
  10. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  11. The yield of chromosomal microarray testing for cases of abnormal fetal head circumference
  12. Expert advice about therapeutic exercise during pregnancy reduces the symptoms of sacroiliac dysfunction
  13. Trends of changes in the specific contribution of selected risk factors for shoulder dystocia over a period of more than two decades
  14. Birth tears after spontaneous and vacuum-assisted births with different vacuum cup systems – a retrospective cohort study
  15. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Egyptian patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension
  16. Antenatal survey of women’s birthing choices in Qatar
  17. Original Article – Fetus
  18. Reference ranges for the fetal mitral, tricuspid, and interventricular septum annular plane systolic excursions (mitral annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and septum annular plane systolic excursion) between 20 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation
  19. Original Articles – Newborns
  20. Prediction of extubation success using the diaphragmatic electromyograph results in ventilated neonates
  21. Use of birth weight- vs. ultrasound-derived fetal weight classification methods: implications for detection of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler
  22. Investigating the preventive effect of vitamins C and E on preeclampsia in nulliparous pregnant women
  23. Monitoring the incidence, duration and distribution of hyperglycaemia in very-low-birth-weight newborns and identifying associated factors
Heruntergeladen am 13.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0143/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen