Home Presence of neonatal intensive care services at birth hospital and early intervention enrollment in infants ≤1500 g
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Presence of neonatal intensive care services at birth hospital and early intervention enrollment in infants ≤1500 g

  • Semsa Gogcu , David Aboudi , Jordan Kase , Edmund LaGamma and Heather Lynn Brumberg EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 9, 2020

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether the receipt of therapeutic services of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; ≤1500 g) neonates inadvertently delivered at community Level 2 and 3 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) compared with those born at a well-baby nursery (WBN; Level 1) differed.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of neonates who were born at Level 1 (WBN), 2, 3, and 4 NICUs and discharged from a Level 4 hospital (n = 529). All infants were evaluated at the Regional Neonatal Follow-up Program at 12 ± 1 months corrected gestational age (CA) and assessed for use of therapeutic services including: early intervention (EI), occupational therapy (OT), physical therapy (PT), speech therapy (ST), and special education (SE).

Results

Compared to infants born at community Level 2 and 3 NICU hospitals, those outborn at a community Level 1 WBN had significantly higher utilization of EI (90% vs. 62%) and PT (83% vs. 61%) at 12 months CA. This association persisted when controlling for covariates. Infants who required EI had significantly lower Bayley-III cognitive scores at 3 years of age.

Conclusion

VLBW infants outborn at WBN (Level 1) hospitals required more outpatient therapeutic services than those born at hospitals with NICU facilities. These results suggest that delivering at the appropriate community hospital level of care might be advantageous for long-term outcomes.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

  6. Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

  7. Clinical trials registration: Not Applicable.

References

1. Lasswell SM, Barfield WD, Rochat RW, Blackmon L. Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2010;304:992–1000.10.1001/jama.2010.1226Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Committee on Perinatal Health. Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy: recommendations for the regional Development of maternal and perinatal health services. National Foundation-March of Dimes; 1977.Search in Google Scholar

3. Barfield WD, Papile LA, Baley JE, Benitz W, Cummings J, Carlo WA, et al. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2012;130:587–97.10.1542/peds.2012-1999Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Jensen EA, Lorch SA. Effects of a birth hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit level and annual volume of very low-birth-weight infant deliveries on morbidity and mortality. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:e151906.10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1906Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Phibbs CS, Baker LC, Caughey AB, Danielsen B, Schmitt SK, Phibbs RH. Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2165–75.10.1056/NEJMsa065029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Cifuentes J, Bronstein J, Phibbs CS, Phibbs RH, Schmitt SK, Carlo WA. Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth. Pediatrics. 2002;109:745–51.10.1542/peds.109.5.745Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Verwey RA, Ebeling MC, Brand R, Ruys JH. Mortality in very preterm and very low birth weight infants according to place of birth and level of care: results of a national collaborative survey of preterm and very low birth weight infants in The Netherlands. Pediatrics 1988;81:404–11.10.1542/peds.81.3.404Search in Google Scholar

8. Shlossman PA, Manley JS, Sciscione AC, Colmorgen GH. An analysis of neonatal morbidity and mortality in maternal (in utero) and neonatal transports at 24-34 weeks’ gestation. Am J Perinatol 1997;14:449–56.10.1055/s-2007-994178Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlsson A, Boulton J, Lee DS, Ting S, et al. The benefit of preterm birth at tertiary care centers is related to gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:617–22.10.1067/mob.2003.139Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Towers CV, Bonebrake R, Padilla G, Rumney P. The effect of transport on the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:291–5.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lorch SA, Myers S, Carr B. The regionalization of pediatric health care. Pediatrics 2010;126:1182–90.10.1542/peds.2010-1119Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Aboudi D, Shah SI, La Gamma EF, Brumberg HL. Impact of neonatologist availability on preterm survival without morbidities. J Perinatol 2018;38:1009–16.10.1038/s41372-018-0103-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Ashmeade TL, Haubner L, Collins S, Miladinovic B, Fugate K. Outcomes of a neonatal golden hour implementation project. Am J Med Qual 2016;31:73–80.10.1177/1062860614548888Search in Google Scholar

14. Chien LY, Whyte R, Aziz K, Thiessen P, Matthew D, Lee SK. Improved outcome of preterm infants when delivered in tertiary care centers. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:247–52.Search in Google Scholar

15. Wyckoff MH. Initial resuscitation and stabilization of the periviable neonate: the Golden-Hour approach. Semin Perinatol 2014;38:12–6.10.1053/j.semperi.2013.07.003Search in Google Scholar

16. Amer R, Moddemann D, Seshia M, Alvaro R, Synnes A, Lee KS, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born at <29 weeks of gestation admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units based on location of birth. J Pediatr 2018;196:31–7.10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.038Search in Google Scholar

17. Kitchen W, Ford G, Orgill A, Rickards A, Astbury J, Lissenden J, et al. Outcome of extremely low birth-weight infants in relation to the hospital of birth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 1984;24:1–5.10.1111/j.1479-828X.1984.tb03311.xSearch in Google Scholar

18. Truffert P, Goujard J, Dehan M, Vodovar M, Breart G. Outborn status with a medical neonatal transport service and survival without disability at two years: a population-based cohort survey of newborns of less than 33 weeks of gestation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;79:13–8.10.1016/S0301-2115(97)00243-1Search in Google Scholar

19. Mahoney K, Bajuk B, Oei J, Lui K, Abdel-Latif ME. NICUS Network. Risk of neurodevelopmental impairment for outborn extremely preterm infants in an Australian regional network. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:96–102.10.3109/14767058.2016.1163675Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Kalia JL, Visintainer P, Brumberg HL, Pici M, Kase J. Comparison of enrollment in interventional therapies between late-preterm and very preterm infants at 12 months’ corrected age. Pediatrics 2009;123:804–9.10.1542/peds.2008-0928Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Vital Statistics of New York State. http://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/. Accessed April 9, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

22. Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant development, 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment Inc; 2005. New York State Department of Health. Early Intervention Program. Available at: www.health.state.ny.us/community/infantschildren/earlyintervention. Accessed March 30, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

23. NY State Perinatal Regulations. Section 721.4 – Patient care and patient transfers. New York State: NY State Department of Health; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

24. Simhan HN, Canavan TP. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:32–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00582.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr 2013;13:59.10.1186/1471-2431-13-59Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Kidokoro H, Anderson PJ, Doyle LW, Woodward LJ, Neil JJ, Inder TE. Brain injury and altered brain growth in preterm infants: predictors and prognosis. Pediatrics 2014;134:e444–53.10.1542/peds.2013-2336Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Newborn AA. of PC on FA, Practice AC of O and GC on O. The Apgar Score. Pediatrics 2015;1:819–22.Search in Google Scholar

28. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1723–9.10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060Search in Google Scholar

29. Walsh MC, Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am 1986;33:179–201.10.1016/S0031-3955(16)34975-6Search in Google Scholar

30. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr 1978;92:529–34.10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80282-0Search in Google Scholar

31. Schulman J, Stricof RL, Stevens TP, Holzman IR, Shields EP, Angert RM, et al. Development of a statewide collaborative to decrease NICU central line-associated bloodstream infections. J Perinatol 2009;29:591–9.10.1038/jp.2009.18Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Fierson WM. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Association of Certified Orthoptists. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2013;131:189–95.10.1542/peds.2012-2996Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Schell S, Kase JS, Parvez B, Shah SI, Meng H, Grzybowski M, et al. Maturational, comorbid, maternal and discharge domain impact on preterm rehospitalizations: a comparison of planned and unplanned rehospitalizations. J Perinatol 2016;36:317–24.10.1038/jp.2015.194Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Synnes AR, MacNab YC, Qiu Z, Ohlsson A, Gustafson P, Dean CB, et al. Neonatal intensive care unit characteristics affect the incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Med Care 2006;1:754–9.10.1097/01.mlr.0000218780.16064.dfSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

35. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 667: Hospital-Based Triage of Obstetric Patients. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e16.10.1097/AOG.0000000000001524Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. McCarthy M, McDonald S, Pollock W. Triage of pregnant women in the emergency department: evaluation of a triage decision aid. Emerg Med J 2013;30:117–22.10.1136/emermed-2011-200752Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Sotiriadis A, Tsiami A, Papatheodorou S, Baschat AA, Sarafidis K, Makrydimas G. Neurodevelopmental outcome after a single course of antenatal steroids in children born preterm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:1385–96.10.1097/AOG.0000000000000748Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Srinivas SK, Small DS, Macheras M, Hsu JY, Caldwell D, Lorch S. Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:770–e1.10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Rouse DJ, Hirtz DG, Thom E, Varner MW, Spong CY, Mercer BM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 2008;359:895–905.10.1056/NEJMoa0801187Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Butler AS, Behrman RE, editors. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2007 May 23.Search in Google Scholar

41. Clements KM, Barfield WD, Ayadi MF, Wilber N. Preterm birth–associated cost of early intervention services: an analysis by gestational age. Pediatrics 2007;119:e866–74.10.1542/peds.2006-1729Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-10-23
Accepted: 2020-03-09
Published Online: 2020-04-09
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Women and children first: the need for ringfencing during the COVID-19 pandemic
  4. Review
  5. The decline of amniocentesis and the increase of chorionic villus sampling in modern perinatal medicine
  6. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  7. Fetal renal artery impedance in pregnancies affected by preeclampsia
  8. The effect of maternal position on fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler indices and its association with adverse perinatal outcomes: a pilot study
  9. Interpregnancy interval and the risk for recurrence of placental mediated pregnancy complications
  10. Short- and long-term outcomes of preterm spontaneous twin anemia-polycythemia sequence
  11. How do sustained birth tears after vaginal birth affect birth tear patterns in a subsequent birth?
  12. Disorders of placental villous maturation in fetal death
  13. Atrial septal aneurysm in pregnancy: echocardiography and obstetric outcomes
  14. Appropriate delivery method for cardiac disease pregnancy based on noninvasive cardiac monitoring
  15. Original Articles – Fetus
  16. Success rate of five fetal cardiac views using HDlive Flow with spatiotemporal image correlation at 18–21 and 28–31 weeks of gestation
  17. Fetal brain development in small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses and normal controls
  18. Can fetal fractions in the cell-free DNA test predict the onset of fetal growth restriction?
  19. Original Articles – Newborns
  20. Presence of neonatal intensive care services at birth hospital and early intervention enrollment in infants ≤1500 g
  21. The contribution of twins conceived by in vitro fertilization to preterm birth rate: observations from a quarter of century
  22. Burnout in neonatal intensive care unit nurses: relationships with moral distress, adult attachment insecurities, and proneness to guilt and shame
Downloaded on 31.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2019-0393/pdf
Scroll to top button