Comparison of fetal cardiac functions between small-for-gestational age fetuses and late-onset growth-restricted fetuses
-
Başak Kaya
,
Ahmet Tayyar
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to investigate fetal cardiac functions by spectral tissue Doppler imaging (s-TDI) in pregnancies complicated with late-onset fetal growth restriction (LO-FGR) and small-for-gestational age (SGA).
Methods
Forty pregnancies complicated with late-onset FGR and 40 pregnancies complicated with SGA between the 34th and 37th weeks of gestation were enrolled in this study. Forty gestational age-matched pregnant women with no obstetrics complication were randomly selected as a control group. Small fetuses were classified as fetal growth restriction or SGA according to estimated fetal weight (EFW), umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and uterine artery PI. s-TDI measurements were obtained at the right atrioventricular valve annulus.
Results
SGA and LO-FGR fetuses had significantly lower A′ and S′ values, and higher E′/A′ ratio than the control group (P < 0.001). In comparison to controls, significantly prolonged isovolumetric contraction time (ICT′) and isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT′) and, significantly shortened ejection time (ET′) were observed in fetuses with SGA and LO-FGR. Increased myocardial performance index (MPI′) values were also found in fetuses with SGA and LO-FGR compared to controls.
Conclusion
The signs of cardiac dysfunction were observed both in fetuses with SGA and LO-FGR. The fetal cardiac function assessment with s-TDI could be a valuable method in the diagnosis of true growth restricted fetuses and in the management of these fetuses.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Mendez-Figueroa H, Truong VT, Pedroza C, Khan AM, Chauhan SP. Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:628.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.043Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Hochberg Z, Feil R, Constancia M, Fraga M, Junien C, Carel JC, et al. Child health, developmental plasticity, and epigenetic programming. Endocr Rev 2011;32:159–224.10.1210/er.2009-0039Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Figueras F, Gratacos E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014;36:86–98.10.1159/000357592Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Oros D, Figueras F, Cruz-Martinez R, Meler E, Munmany M, Gratacos E. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:191–5.10.1002/uog.7738Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Soothill PW, Bobrow CS, Holmes R. Small for gestational age is not a diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13: 225–8.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13040225.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Crispi F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Pelsers MM, Plasencia W, Benavides-Serralde JA, Eixarch E, et al. Cardiac dysfunction and cell damage across clinical stages of severity in growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:254.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.056Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Comas M, Crispi F. Assessment of fetal cardiac function using tissue Doppler techniques. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:30–8.10.1159/000335028Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Watanabe S, Hashimoto I, Saito K, Watanabe K, Hirono K, Uese K, et al. Characterization of ventricular myocardial performance in fetus by tissue Doppler imaging. Circ J 2009;73:943–7.10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0529Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Harada K, Tsuda A, Orino T, Tanaka T, Takada G. Tissue Doppler imaging in the normal fetus. Int J Cardiol 1999;71: 227–34.10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00152-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Chan LY, Fok WY, Wong JT, Yu CM, Leung TN, Lau TK. Reference charts of gestation-specific tissue Doppler imaging indices of systolic and diastolic functions in the normal fetal heart. Am Heart J 2005;150:750–5.10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Gardiner HM, Pasquini L, Wolfenden J, Barlow A, Li W, Kulinskaya E, et al. Myocardial tissue Doppler and long axis function in the fetal heart. Int J Cardiol 2006;113:39–47.10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.10.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Comas M, Crispi F, Gomez O, Puerto B, Figueras F, Gratacos E. Gestational age- and estimated fetal weight-adjusted reference ranges for myocardial tissue Doppler indices at 24–41 weeks’ of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:57–64.10.1002/uog.8870Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Sohn DW, Chai IH, Lee DJ, Kim HC, Kim HS, Oh BH, et al. Assessment of mitral annulus velocity by Doppler tissue imaging in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:474–80.10.1016/S0735-1097(97)88335-0Search in Google Scholar
14. Tsyvian P, Malkin K, Artemieva O, Wladimiroff JW. Assessment of left ventricular filling in normally grown fetuses, growth-restricted fetuses and fetuses of diabetic mothers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:33–8.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12010033.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Sağol S, Sağol O, Ozdemir N. Stereological quantification of placental villus vascularization and its relation to umbilical artery Doppler flow in intrauterine growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:398–403.10.1002/pd.323Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. M Kady S, Gardosi J. Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004;18: 397–410.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Figueras F, Eixarch E, Meler E, Iraola A, Figueras J, Peurto B, et al. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:34–8.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Figueras F, Peurto B, Martinez JM, Cararach V, Vanrell JA. Cardiac function monitoring of fetuses with growth restriction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;110:159–63.10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00123-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Hecher K, Snijders R, Campbell S, Nicolaides K. Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: relationship with fetal blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:10–5.10.1016/0002-9378(95)90161-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Naujorks AA, Zielinsky P, Beltrame PA, Castagna RC, Petracco R, Busato A, et al. Myocardial tissue Doppler assessment of diastolic function in the growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:68–73.10.1002/uog.6427Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Comas M, Crispi F, Cruz-Martinez R, Martinez JM, Figueras F, Gratacos E. Usefulness of myocardial tissue Doppler vs. conventional echocardiography in the evaluation of cardiac dysfunction in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:45.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Yu CM, Sanderson JE, Marwick TH, Oh JK. Tissue Doppler imaging a new prognosticator for cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1903–14.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.078Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Ganame J, Claus P, Uyttebroeck A, Renard M, D’hooge J, Bijnens B, et al. Myocardial dysfunction late after low-dose anthracycline treatment in asymptomatic pediatric patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:1351–8.10.1016/j.echo.2007.04.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Comas M, Crispi F, Cruz-Martinez R, Figueras F, Gratacos E. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic markers of cardiac dysfunction in small-for-gestational age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:57.e1–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Perez-Cruz M, Cruz-Lemini M, Fernandez MT, Parra JA, Bartrons J, Gomez-Roig MD, et al. Fetal cardiac function in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction vs. small-for-gestational age, as defined by estimated fetal weight, cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:465–71.10.1002/uog.14930Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- The role of complement in preterm birth and prematurity
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Variation in C-reactive protein at 1 month post-partum by etiology of preterm birth: selective identification of those at risk for both poor pregnancy outcome and future health complications
- Procedure related risk of premature delivery and fetal growth reduction following amniocentesis, transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling: a retrospective study
- Cervical length at 31–34 weeks of gestation: transvaginal vs. transperineal ultrasonographic approach
- The origin of amniotic fluid monocytes/macrophages in women with intra-amniotic inflammation or infection
- Placental elasticity assessment by point shear wave elastography in pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction
- A 17-years analysis of terminations of pregnancy ≥14 weeks of gestation in a German level 1 perinatal center
- Simulation of an impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean section: description of the creation and evaluation of a new training program
- Academic tweeting in #ObGyn. Where do we stand?
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Fetal heart examination at the time of 13 weeks scan: a 5 years’ prospective study
- Comparison of fetal cardiac functions between small-for-gestational age fetuses and late-onset growth-restricted fetuses
- Original Article – Newborn
- Protocols for early discharging of premature infants: an empirical assessment on safety and savings
- Letter to the Editor
- Maternal blood pressure levels prepartum correlate with neonatal birth weight in preeclampsia
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- The role of complement in preterm birth and prematurity
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Variation in C-reactive protein at 1 month post-partum by etiology of preterm birth: selective identification of those at risk for both poor pregnancy outcome and future health complications
- Procedure related risk of premature delivery and fetal growth reduction following amniocentesis, transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling: a retrospective study
- Cervical length at 31–34 weeks of gestation: transvaginal vs. transperineal ultrasonographic approach
- The origin of amniotic fluid monocytes/macrophages in women with intra-amniotic inflammation or infection
- Placental elasticity assessment by point shear wave elastography in pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction
- A 17-years analysis of terminations of pregnancy ≥14 weeks of gestation in a German level 1 perinatal center
- Simulation of an impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean section: description of the creation and evaluation of a new training program
- Academic tweeting in #ObGyn. Where do we stand?
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Fetal heart examination at the time of 13 weeks scan: a 5 years’ prospective study
- Comparison of fetal cardiac functions between small-for-gestational age fetuses and late-onset growth-restricted fetuses
- Original Article – Newborn
- Protocols for early discharging of premature infants: an empirical assessment on safety and savings
- Letter to the Editor
- Maternal blood pressure levels prepartum correlate with neonatal birth weight in preeclampsia
