Mid-pregnancy cervical length as a risk factor for cesarean section in women with twin pregnancies
-
Su Jin Sung
, Seung Mi Lee, Sohee Oh
, Joo Hee Choi , Jee Yoon Park , Byoung Jae Kim , Joon Ho Lee , Chan-Wook Park , Joong Shin Park and Jong Kwan Jun
Abstract
Objective:
It is well known that a short cervix at mid-pregnancy is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth in both singleton and twin gestations. Recent evidence also suggests that a long cervix at mid-pregnancy is a predictor of the risk of cesarean section (C/S) in singleton gestation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a long cervix at mid-pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of C/S in women with twin pregnancies.
Methods:
We enrolled 746 women pregnant with twins whose cervical length was measured by trans-vaginal ultrasonography at a mean of 22 weeks of gestation and who delivered in our institution. Cases with a short cervix [cervical length (CL) <15 mm] were excluded. Cases were divided into four groups according to the quartile of CL.
Results:
The rate of C/S increased according to the quartile of CL (47% in the 1st quartile, 51% in the 2nd quartile, 56% in the 3rd quartile and 62% in the 4th quartile, P<0.005, χ2 for trend). CL was an independent risk factor for C/S even after adjustment for confounding variables. When confining analysis to women who delivered after a trial of labor (n=418), to nulliparous women (n=633) or to those who delivered at late preterm or full term (n=666), the rate of C/S also increased according to the quartile of CL, and the relationship between CL and the risk of C/S remained significant after adjustment in each group.
Conclusion:
In women pregnant with twins, long CL at mid-pregnancy was a risk factor for C/S.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by a multidisciplinary research grant-in-aid from the Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University (SMG-SNU) Boramae Medical Center (02-2015-4).
Author’s statement
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.
References
[1] Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:567–73.10.1056/NEJM199602293340904Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Leung TN, Pang MW, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK. Cervical length at 18–22 weeks of gestation for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in Hong Kong Chinese women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:713–7.10.1002/uog.2617Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Heath VCF, Southall TR, Souka AP, Novakov A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:304–11.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050304.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Skentou C, Souka AP, To MS, Liao AW, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of preterm delivery in twins by cervical assessment at 23 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17:7–10.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00357.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Larma JD, Iams JD. Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:324–35.10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182487e96Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[6] Facchinetti F, Paganelli S, Comitini G, Dante G, Volpe A. Cervical length changes during preterm cervical ripening: effects of 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:453.e1–.e4.10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:462–9.10.1056/NEJMoa067815Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Rode L, Klein K, Nicolaides KH, Krampl-Bettelheim E, Tabor A, for the PG. Prevention of preterm delivery in twin gestations (PREDICT): a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the effect of vaginal micronized progesterone. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:272–80.10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182439e97Search in Google Scholar
[9] Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:964–73.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b1bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Smith GCS, Celik E, To M, Khouri O, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1346–53.10.1056/NEJMoa0706834Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] van der Ven AJ, van Os MA, Kleinrouweler CE, Verhoeven CJM, de Miranda E, Bossuyt PM, et al. Midpregnancy cervical length in nulliparous women and its association with postterm delivery and intrapartum cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33:40–6.10.1055/s-0035-1556067Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Miller ES, Sakowicz A, Grobman WA. Association between second-trimester cervical length and primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:863–7.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a4ddadSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] van de Mheen L, Schuit E, Liem SMS, Lim AC, Bekedam DJ, Goossens SMTA, et al. Second-trimester cervical length as risk indicator for cesarean delivery in women with twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:579–84.10.1002/uog.14727Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 49, December 2003: (Replaces Technical Bulletin Number 218, December 1995): Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor: Withdrawn. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1445–54.10.1097/00006250-200312000-00048Search in Google Scholar
[15] Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80:27–38.10.1093/biomet/80.1.27Search in Google Scholar
[16] Chung SH, Kong MK, Kim EH, Han SW. Sonographically accessed funneling of the uterine cervix as a predictor of successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58:188–95.10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.188Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] Lim AC, Schuit E, Bloemenkamp K, Bernardus RE, Duvekot JJ, Erwich JJHM, et al. 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of adverse neonatal outcome in multiple pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:513–20.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ad6aaSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] Liem S, Schuit E, Hegeman M, Bais J, de Boer K, Bloemenkamp K, et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1341–9.10.1097/01.ogx.0000444676.81634.4aSearch in Google Scholar
[19] Fox NS, Gupta S, Melka S, Silverstein M, Bender S, Saltzman DH, et al. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:106.e1–.e5.10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.056Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Grobman WA, Dooley SL, Peaceman AM. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in twin gestations near term. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:940–4.Search in Google Scholar
[21] Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:598–603.10.1002/uog.913Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Ware V, Raynor BD. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1030–2.10.1067/mob.2000.105399Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:254–7.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:623–8.10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Garfield R, Yallampalli C. Control of myometrial contractility and labor. In: Chwalisz K, Garfield RE, editors. Basic mechanisms controlling term and preterm birth. Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop. 7: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1994. p. 1–28.10.1007/978-3-662-21660-6_1Search in Google Scholar
[26] Chwalisz K, Garfield RE. Antiprogestins in the induction of labor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;734:387–413.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb21770.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] Garfield R, Saade G, Buhimschi C, Buhimschi I, Shi L, Shi S, et al. Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:673–95.10.1093/humupd/4.5.673Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] Myers K, Socrate S, Tzeranis D, House M. Changes in the biochemical constituents and morphologic appearance of the human cervical stroma during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144(Suppl. 1):S82–9.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Antenatal and prepregnancy care – prevention of perinatal morbidity and mortality
- Review article
- Fetal interventional procedures and surgeries: a practical approach
- Opinion paper
- Inverted pyramid of prenatal care – is it enough? Should it be – extended inverted pyramid of prenatal care?
- Research articles
- Expectant management in di-chorionic pregnancies complicated by discordant anomalous twin
- Pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and uterine anatomic abnormalities
- Early postnatal echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary blood flow in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia
- Sonographic prediction of small and large for gestational age in breech-presenting fetuses
- Comparison of fetal weight distribution improved by paternal height by Spanish standard versus Intergrowth 21st standard
- Can early ultrasonography explain the lower miscarriage rates in twin as compared to singleton pregnancies following assisted reproduction?
- Pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and chromosomal aberration (CA) without PGD
- Regular research articles
- Induction of labor in twin gestation: can we predict success?
- Low dose aspirin for preventing fetal growth restriction: a randomised trial
- Mid-pregnancy cervical length as a risk factor for cesarean section in women with twin pregnancies
- Efficacy of three different regimens in recovery of bowel function following elective cesarean section: a randomized trial
- Obstetrical, maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies affected by muscular dystrophy
- Fetal brain development in diabetic pregnancies and normal controls
- Body composition in preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction: a cohort study
- Commentary
- Professionally responsible management of gynecologic cancer in pregnancy when clinical resources are unavoidably limited
- Letters to the Editor
- Erroneous conclusion due to mis-calculation of data: reply to Rai SE, Sidhu AK, Krishnan RJ. Transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis re-evaluated: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinat Med 2017
- Reply to: Letter to the Editor by Stritzke A and Shah PS. Transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis re-evaluated: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Congenital Zika syndrome in non-endemic regions
- Reply to: Congenital Zika syndrome in non-endemic regions: A neuroimaging pattern-based approach
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Antenatal and prepregnancy care – prevention of perinatal morbidity and mortality
- Review article
- Fetal interventional procedures and surgeries: a practical approach
- Opinion paper
- Inverted pyramid of prenatal care – is it enough? Should it be – extended inverted pyramid of prenatal care?
- Research articles
- Expectant management in di-chorionic pregnancies complicated by discordant anomalous twin
- Pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and uterine anatomic abnormalities
- Early postnatal echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary blood flow in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia
- Sonographic prediction of small and large for gestational age in breech-presenting fetuses
- Comparison of fetal weight distribution improved by paternal height by Spanish standard versus Intergrowth 21st standard
- Can early ultrasonography explain the lower miscarriage rates in twin as compared to singleton pregnancies following assisted reproduction?
- Pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and chromosomal aberration (CA) without PGD
- Regular research articles
- Induction of labor in twin gestation: can we predict success?
- Low dose aspirin for preventing fetal growth restriction: a randomised trial
- Mid-pregnancy cervical length as a risk factor for cesarean section in women with twin pregnancies
- Efficacy of three different regimens in recovery of bowel function following elective cesarean section: a randomized trial
- Obstetrical, maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies affected by muscular dystrophy
- Fetal brain development in diabetic pregnancies and normal controls
- Body composition in preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction: a cohort study
- Commentary
- Professionally responsible management of gynecologic cancer in pregnancy when clinical resources are unavoidably limited
- Letters to the Editor
- Erroneous conclusion due to mis-calculation of data: reply to Rai SE, Sidhu AK, Krishnan RJ. Transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis re-evaluated: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinat Med 2017
- Reply to: Letter to the Editor by Stritzke A and Shah PS. Transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis re-evaluated: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Congenital Zika syndrome in non-endemic regions
- Reply to: Congenital Zika syndrome in non-endemic regions: A neuroimaging pattern-based approach