Home Quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony in growth restricted fetuses and normal controls using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony in growth restricted fetuses and normal controls using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE)

  • Kristina Krause EMAIL logo , Mareike Möllers , Kerstin Hammer , Maria Karina Falkenberg , Ute Möllmann , Dennis Görlich , Walter Klockenbusch and Ralf Schmitz
Published/Copyright: January 7, 2017

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate longitudinal mechanical dyssynchrony in normally grown fetuses by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and to compare longitudinal mechanical dyssynchrony in fetal growth restriction (FGR) with normal controls.

Materials and methods:

A prospective study was performed on 30 FGR and 62 normally grown fetuses, including 30 controls matched by gestational age, using STE and a transversal four-chamber view. Data analysis was carried out with a high frame rate of about 175 frames/s. Dyssynchrony was analyzed offline with QLab 9 (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) as time differences between peaks in strain of both ventricles and the septum. Inter- and intraventricular and intraseptal dyssynchrony were obtained and inter- and intraobserver reliability was analyzed.

Results:

Longitudinal mechanical dyssynchrony was feasible in all cases, with high inter- and intraobserver reliability. Levels of inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony were higher in the FGR than in the control group.

Conclusion:

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a reliable technique for cardiac function assessment in the fetal heart. Interventricular dyssynchrony could be a potential parameter for early detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction before other parameters demand intervention. The future clinical role of longitudinal mechanical dyssynchrony needs to be verified in larger studies and with a technique customized for prenatal echocardiography.

  1. Author Contribution

    K. Krause: Data collection, Data management, Data analysis, Manuscript writing. M. Möllers: Data collection, Manuscript editing. K. Hammer: Data collection, Manuscript editing. M.K. Falkenberg: Data collection, Manuscript editing. U. Möllmann: Data collection, Manuscript editing. D. Görlich: Data analysis, Manuscript editing. W. Klockenbusch: Data collection, Manuscript editing. R. Schmitz: Project development, Data collection, Manuscript editing.

Author’s statement

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  2. Material and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

References

[1] Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, Kennelly MM, McAuliffe FM, O'Donoghue K, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:290.e1–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Cruz-Martinez R, Figueras F, Benavides-Serralde A, Crispi F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Gratacos E. Sequence of changes in myocardial performance index in relation to aortic isthmus and ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:179–84.10.1002/uog.8903Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Cruz-Martinez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Oros D, Gratacos E. Changes in myocardial performance index and aortic isthmus and ductus venosus Doppler in term, small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery pulsatility index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:400–5.10.1002/uog.8976Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Crispi F, Figueras F, Cruz-Lemini M, Bartrons J, Bijnens B, Gratacos E. Cardiovascular programming in children born small for gestational age and relationship with prenatal signs of severity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:121.e1–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Hernandez-Andrade E, Benavides-Serralde JA, Cruz- Martinez R, Welsh A, Mancilla-Ramirez J. Evaluation of conventional Doppler fetal cardiac function parameters: E/A ratios, outflow tracts, and myocardial performance index. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:22–9.10.1159/000330792Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Tutschek B, Schmidt KG. Sonographic assessment of fetal cardiac function: introduction and direct measurement of cardiac function. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:236–44.10.1055/s-0029-1246087Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Godfrey ME, Messing B, Cohen SM, Valsky DV, Yagel S. Functional assessment of the fetal heart: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:131–44.10.1002/uog.9064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Crispi F, Sepulveda-Swatson E, Cruz-Lemini M, Rojas-Benavente J, Garcia-Posada R, Dominguez JM, et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of a standard protocol for 2D speckle tracking and tissue Doppler-based strain and strain rate analysis of the fetal heart. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:96–108.10.1159/000337329Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Bijnens BH, Cikes M, Claus P, Sutherland GR. Velocity and deformation imaging for the assessment of myocardial dysfunction. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:216–26.10.1093/ejechocard/jen323Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Enzensberger C, Tenzer A, Degenhardt J, Kawecki A, Axt-Fliedner R. Assessment of fetal cardiac function – established and novel methods. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2014;218:56–63.10.1055/s-0034-1371849Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Willruth AM, Geipel AK, Berg C, Fimmers R, Gembruch U. Assessment of fetal global and regional ventricular function in congential heart disease using a novel feature tracking technique. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:251–7.10.1055/s-0031-1273413Search in Google Scholar

[12] Willruth AM, Geipel AK, Fimmers R, Gembruch UG. Assessment of right ventricular global and regional longitudinal peak systolic strain, strain rate and velocity in healthy fetuses and impact of gestational age using a novel speckle/feature-tracking based algorithm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:143–9.10.1002/uog.7719Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Fujiwara S. The association between left ventricular twisting motion and mechanical dyssynchrony: a three-dimensional speckle tracking study. Heart Vessels 2016;31:158–64.10.1007/s00380-014-0586-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Kwon BJ, Lee SH, Park CS, Kim DB, Park HJ, Jang SW, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dyssynchrony in patients with treatment-naive hypertension and the effects of antihypertensive therapy. J Hypertens. 2015;33:354–65.10.1097/HJH.0000000000000390Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Chan YH, Wang CL, Kuo CT, Yeh YH, Wu CT, Wu LS. Clinical assessment and implication of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2013;29:505–14.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Allan LD, Joseph MC, Boyd EG, Campbell S, Tynan M. M-mode echocardiography in the developing human fetus. Br Heart J. 1982;47:573–83.10.1136/hrt.47.6.573Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Crispi F, Bijnens B, Figueras F, Bartrons J, Eixarch E, Le Noble F, et al. Fetal growth restriction results in remodeled and less efficient hearts in children. Circulation 2010;121:2427–36.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Makikallio K, Vuolteenaho O, Jouppila P, Rasanen J. Ultrasonographic and biochemical markers of human fetal cardiac dysfunction in placental insufficiency. Circulation 2002;105:2058–63.10.1161/01.CIR.0000015505.24187.FASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Makikallio K, Vuolteenaho O, Jouppila P, Rasanen J. Association of severe placental insufficiency and systemic venous pressure rise in the fetus with increased neonatal cardiac troponin T levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:726–31.10.1067/mob.2000.106753Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Rychik J. Fetal cardiovascular physiology. Pediatr Cardiol. 2004;25:201–9.10.1007/s00246-003-0586-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Tei C, Ling LH, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, Oh JK, Rodeheffer RJ, et al. New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function – a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Cardiol. 1995;26:357–66.10.1016/S0894-7317(05)80111-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Meriki N, Izurieta A, Welsh AW. Fetal left modified myocardial performance index: technical refinements in obtaining pulsed-Doppler waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:421–9.10.1002/uog.9090Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Meriki N, Henry A, Sanderson J, Majajan A, Wu L, Welsh AW. Development of normal gestational ranges for the right myocardial performance index in the Australian population with three alternative caliper placements. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36:272–81.10.1159/000362388Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Stoylen A. Strain rate imaging: cardiac deformation imaging by ultrasound/echocardiography tissue Doppler and speckle tracking. Available at: http://folk.ntnu.no/stoylen/strainrate/; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Mada RO, Duchenne J, Voigt JU. Tissue Doppler, strain and strain rate in ischemic heart disease “How I do it”. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014;12:38.10.1186/1476-7120-12-38Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, Belohlavek M, Cardim NM, Derumeaux G, et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese society of echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:167–205.10.1093/ejechocard/jer021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Seo Y, Ishizu T, Aonuma K. Current status of 3-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a review from our experiences. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014;22:49–57.10.4250/jcu.2014.22.2.49Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2016-8-21
Accepted: 2016-11-30
Published Online: 2017-1-7
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: placental disorders still not fully understood
  4. Review article
  5. Hepar uterinum: a history of ideas on fetal nutrition
  6. Original articles
  7. Twin pregnancy in women above the age of 45 years: maternal and neonatal outcomes
  8. Maternal endothelial damage as a disorder shared by early preeclampsia, late preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction
  9. Maternal venous SHARP1 levels in preeclampsia
  10. Second-trimester maternal serum markers in the prediction of preeclampsia
  11. Pregnancy outcomes regarding maternal serum AFP value in second trimester screening
  12. Quantification of mechanical dyssynchrony in growth restricted fetuses and normal controls using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE)
  13. Serum cholesterol acceptor capacity in intrauterine growth restricted fetuses
  14. Antithrombin improves the maternal and neonatal outcomes but not the angiogenic factors in extremely growth-restricted fetuses at <28 weeks of gestation
  15. Simple approach based on maternal characteristics and mean arterial pressure for the prediction of preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy
  16. Fetal death: an extreme manifestation of maternal anti-fetal rejection
  17. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental gene expression in severe preeclampsia, comparing early-onset and late-onset forms
  18. The relationship between maternal and umbilical cord adropin levels with the presence and severity of preeclampsia
  19. Expression of placental regulatory genes is associated with fetal growth
  20. Circulating soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placental growth factor from 10 to 40 weeks’ pregnancy in normotensive women
  21. A one year review of eclampsia in an Ethiopian Tertiary Care Center (Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, SPHMMC)
  22. Congress Calendar
  23. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2016-0280/html
Scroll to top button