Home Music devices for the fetus? An evaluation of pregnancy music belts
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Music devices for the fetus? An evaluation of pregnancy music belts

  • Michael Jahn EMAIL logo , Jochen Müller-Mazzotta and Birgit Arabin
Published/Copyright: August 13, 2015

Abstract

Background:

The implementation of music during pregnancy is a topic of interest for parents-to-be accompanied by a growing commercial interest. We evaluated acoustic properties of commercially available music devices.

Materials and methods:

Sound characteristics of three different music devices designed for fetal acoustical stimulation were analyzed. A white noise sample was presented at a high volume to produce a standardized acoustic stimulus. Sound emissions were registered for each loudspeaker with a sound level meter in order to document the sound pressure levels (SPLs) and to analyze the long-term averaged spectra (LTAS) with the help of PRAAT-sound-analyzing software. Measurements were conducted in open air and under attenuated conditions with interposition of a pork uterus of 5 mm thickness covered by porcine tissue from the abdominal wall of either 3 or 5 cm thickness.

Results:

Under attenuated conditions, SPLs of all three devices were hardly detectable and interfered with the basal noise of around 50–55 dB (SPL), particularly low and high frequencies ranges were attenuated.

Conclusion:

Pregnancy music belts seem to be a useless tool to support fetal development. The poor sound characteristics of the loudspeakers and the concept of an isolated stimulation appear not promising to effectively support the complex multimodal maturation of the sensory system. Traditional implementation of music appears maternal singing appears more reasonable.


Corresponding author: Michael Jahn, MD, Center for Mother and Child of the Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstr. 1 35033 Marburg, Germany, in cooperation with the Clara Angela Foundation Witten, Germany, Tel.: +4917623455571, Fax: +49 2302189216M, E-mail:

References

[1] Trehub SE, Unyk AM, Trainor LJ. Maternal singing in cross-cultural perspective. Infant Behav Dev. 1993;16:285–95.10.1016/0163-6383(93)80036-8Search in Google Scholar

[2] Perlovsky L, Cabanac A, Bonniot-Cabanac MC, Cabanac M. Mozart effect, cognitive dissonance, and the pleasure of music. Behav Brain Res. 2013;244:9–14.10.1016/j.bbr.2013.01.036Search in Google Scholar

[3] Graven SN. Sound and the developing infant in the NICU: conclusions and recommendations for care. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S88–93.10.1038/sj.jp.7200444Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lullabelly – Frequently Asked Questions? [cited 2015 June 8]; Available at: http://www.lullabelly.com/LullabellyFAQs.html.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Sound Beginnins Product Information. [cited 2015 June 8]; Available at: http://www.sound-beginnings.com/product_information/how_to_use.Search in Google Scholar

[6] bellybuds – About. [cited 2015 June 8]; Available at: http://www.bellybuds.com/faq.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Fringuellino M, Guglielmone C. Progressive impedance method for the classical analysis of acoustic transmission loss in multilayered walls. Appl Acoust. 2000;59:275–85.10.1016/S0003-682X(99)00024-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] Azkorra Z, Pérez G, Coma J, Cabeza LF, Bures S, Álvaro JE, et al. Evaluation of green walls as a passive acoustic insulation system for buildings. Appl Acoust. 2015;89:46–56.10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.09.010Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ophir J, Jaeger P. A ternary solution for independent acoustic impedance and speed of sound matching to biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1982;4:163–70.10.1177/016173468200400205Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gray L. Properties of sound. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S6–11.10.1038/sj.jp.7200442Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hausdorf F. Handbuch der Lautsprechertechnik. 6th ed. Visaton, Haan, Auflage; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Heslehurst N, Rankin J, Wilkinson JR, Summerbell CD. A nationally representative study of maternal obesity in England, UK: trends in incidence and demographic inequalities in 619 323 births, 1989-2007. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010;34:420–8.10.1038/ijo.2009.250Search in Google Scholar

[13] Querleu D, Renard X, Versyp F, Paris-Delrue L, Crepin G. Fetal hearing. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1988;28:191–212.10.1016/0028-2243(88)90030-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] Arabin B. Music during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:425–30.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00844.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM. Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S21–30.10.1038/sj.jp.7200446Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gerhardt KJ, Pierson LL, Huang X, Abrams RM, Rarey KE. Effects of intense noise exposure on fetal sheep auditory brain stem response and inner ear histology. Ear Hear. 1999;20:21–32.10.1097/00003446-199902000-00003Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lalande NM, Hetu R, Lambert J. Is occupational noise exposure during pregnancy a risk factor of damage to the auditory system of the fetus? Am J Ind Med. 1986;10:427–35.10.1002/ajim.4700100410Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lickliter R. The integrated development of sensory organization. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38:591–603.10.1016/j.clp.2011.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kenny PA, Turkewitz G. Effects of unusually early visual stimulation on the development of homing behavior in the rat pup. Dev Psychobiol. 1986;19:57–66.10.1002/dev.420190107Search in Google Scholar

[20] Sleigh MJ, Lickliter R. Augmented prenatal auditory stimulation alters postnatal perception, arousal, and survival in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol. 1997;30:201–12.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199704)30:3<201::AID-DEV3>3.0.CO;2-TSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Brown G. NICU noise and the preterm infant. Neonatal Netw. 2009;28:165–73.10.1891/0730-0832.28.3.165Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lahav A, Skoe E. An acoustic gap between the NICU and womb: a potential risk for compromised neuroplasticity of the auditory system in preterm infants. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:381.10.3389/fnins.2014.00381Search in Google Scholar

[23] Mennes M, Van den Bergh B, Lagae L, Stiers P. Developmental brain alterations in 17 year old boys are related to antenatal maternal anxiety. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1116–22.10.1016/j.clinph.2009.04.003Search in Google Scholar

[24] Weinstock M. The potential influence of maternal stress hormones on development and mental health of the offspring. Brain Behav Immun. 2005;19:296–308.10.1016/j.bbi.2004.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[25] Chang MY, Chen CH, Huang KF. Effects of music therapy on psychological health of women during pregnancy. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:2580–7.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02064.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] DeCasper AJ, Fifer WP. Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science. 1980;208:1174–6.10.1126/science.7375928Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Mehler J, Lambertz G, Jusczyk P, Amiel-Tison C. Discrimination of the mother tongue by newborn infants. C R Acad Sci III. 1986;303:637–40.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Arabin B, Jahn M. Need for interventional studies on the impact of music in the perinatal period: results of a pilot study on women’s preferences and review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:357–62.10.3109/14767058.2012.733763Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Nakata T, Trehub SE. Infants’ responsiveness to maternal speech and singing. Infant Behavior and Development. 2004;27:455–64.10.1016/j.infbeh.2004.03.002Search in Google Scholar

[30] Dehaene-Lambertz G, Montavont A, Jobert A, Allirol L, Dubois J, Hertz-Pannier L, et al. Language or music, mother or Mozart? Structural and environmental influences on infants’ language networks. Brain Lang. 2010;114:53–65.10.1016/j.bandl.2009.09.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed


The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.


Received: 2015-2-19
Accepted: 2015-7-15
Published Online: 2015-8-13
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Prematurity
  4. Original articles - Prematurity
  5. Does progesterone administration in preterm labor influence Treg cells?
  6. Reliability of posterior-left atrium space index measurements during 20–24 weeks of gestation in structurally normal fetuses
  7. Intervention versus a conservative approach in the management of TRAP sequence: a systematic review
  8. Music-induced prolongation of heart rate corrected QT intervals from electrocardiogram recordings of healthy preterm pregnant women
  9. Music devices for the fetus? An evaluation of pregnancy music belts
  10. Communication about maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and congenital diaphragmatic hernia: preliminary findings with implications for informed consent and shared decision-making
  11. Randomized control trial comparing physiologic effects in preterm infants during treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) generated by Bubble NCPAP and Ventilator NCPAP: a pilot study
  12. Clinical characteristics and factors associated with term and late preterm infants that do not respond to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO)
  13. Adipokine, adropin and endothelin-1 levels in intrauterine growth restricted neonates and their mothers
  14. Predicting neonatal respiratory morbidity by lamellar body count and gestational age
  15. Surfactant with and without bronchoalveolar lavage in an experimental model of meconium aspiration syndrome
  16. Academy’s Paper
  17. Neonates of mothers who have had kidney or liver transplantation
  18. Original articles - Obstetrics
  19. Arterio-venous differences in cord levels of catecholamines, glucose, lactate and blood gases
  20. Original articles - Newborn
  21. Genetic low nephron number hypertension is associated with altered expression of key components of the renin-angiotensin system during nephrogenesis
  22. Omega-3 fatty acids modulate neonatal cytokine response to endotoxin
  23. Short communication
  24. Reference values for the single deepest vertical pocket to assess the amniotic fluid volume in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy
  25. Congress Calendar
  26. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 27.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2015-0074/html
Scroll to top button