Communication about maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and congenital diaphragmatic hernia: preliminary findings with implications for informed consent and shared decision-making

References

[1] Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:993–1004.10.1056/NEJMoa1014379Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Belfort M. Fetal Endotracheal Occlusion (FETO) in severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=congenital+diaphragmatic+hernia&Search=Search. Accessed on November 7, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ruano R, Yoshisaki CT, da Silva MM, Ceccon ME, Grasi MS, Tannuri U, et al. A randomized controlled trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion versus postnatal management of severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:20–7.10.1002/uog.10142Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Estes JM, Howell LJ. A prospective study of the outcome for fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;271:382.10.1001/jama.1994.03510290064038Search in Google Scholar

[5] Stege G, Fenton A, Jaffray B. Nihilism in the 1990s: the true mortality of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2003;112:532–5.10.1542/peds.112.3.532Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Jani JC, Nicolaides KH, Gratacós E, Valencia CM, Doné E, Martinez JM, et al. Severe diaphragmatic hernia treated by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:304–10.10.1002/uog.6450Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Deprest J, Gratacos E, Nicolaides KH, FETO Task Group. Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:121–6.10.1002/uog.1711Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] American Medical Association. Informed Consent. AMA Code of Medical Ethics. 2006. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org//ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion808.page. Accessed on March 24, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[9] McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Informed consent. Clin Perinatol. 2007;34:275–85.10.1016/j.clp.2007.03.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Strauss A, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1990;85–105.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59.10.1177/1525822X05279903Search in Google Scholar

[12] Bazeley P. Analysing qualitative data: more than “identifying themes”. Malay J Qual Res. 2009;2:6–22.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, Dimitry S, Tattersall MHN. Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:1005.10.1093/annonc/mdi211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1998;76:149–88.10.1006/obhd.1998.2804Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Trevena LJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Edwards A, Gaissmaier W, Galesic M, Han PKJ, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2013;13:S7.10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Butow P, Dillard AJ, Feldman-Stewart D, Fowler FJ, et al. Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2013;13:S9.10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D. Understanding patients’ decisions: cognitive and emotional perspectives. J Am Med Assoc. 1993;270:72.10.1001/jama.1993.03510010078034Search in Google Scholar

[18] Banks, SM, Salovey P, Greener S, Rothman AJ, Moyer A, Beauvais J, et al. The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psycho. 1995;14:178.10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.178Search in Google Scholar

[19] Peters E, Hart PS, Fraenkel L. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Med Dec Making. 2010;31:432.10.1177/0272989X10391672Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Lyerly AD, Gates EA, Cefalo RC, Sugarman J. Toward the ethical evaluation and use of maternal-fetal surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:689–97.10.1097/00006250-200110000-00029Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kon AA. The shared decision-making continuum. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;304:903.10.1001/jama.2010.1208Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision-making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD001431.10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD001431.10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Coulter A, Kryworuchko J, Mullen P, Ng CJ, Stilwell D, van der Weijden T. 2012 updated chapter A: using a systematic development process. Available at: http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS-Chapter-A.pdf. Accessed on March 24, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[26] GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Brit Med J. 2004; 328:1490.10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics. Committee opinion: maternal decision-making, ethics, and the law. 2005;Number 321.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Coulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J, Mullen PD, Ng CJ, van der Weijden T. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2013;13:S2.10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Ville Y. Fetal therapy: practical ethical considerations. Prenat Diagn. 2011;21:621–7.10.1002/pd.2808Search in Google Scholar PubMed