Startseite Reference values of nuchal translucency thickness in a Brazilian population sample: experience from a single center
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Reference values of nuchal translucency thickness in a Brazilian population sample: experience from a single center

  • Edward Araujo Júnior EMAIL logo , Claudio Rodrigues Pires , Wellington P. Martins , Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza und Sebastião Marques Zanforlin Filho
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. November 2013

Abstract

Objective: To determine the reference values of nuchal translucency (NT) thickness at 11–14 weeks of gestation in a sample of the Brazilian population.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out with singleton gestations and fetuses with a crown-rump length (CRL) of 45–84 mm. NT thickness was performed according to the guidelines of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), London, UK. To evaluate the correlation between NT thickness and gestational age (GA), polynomial equations were calculated, with determination coefficient (R2) adjustments, as proposed by Altman-Chitty.

Results: A total of 1420 pregnancies were assessed. The mean of the gestational age was 12.69±0.78 weeks. The mean maternal age was 28.78±6.81 years. The mean NT thickness (mm) for the CRL intervals of 45├50; 50├55; 55├60; 60├65; 65├70; 70├75; 75├80; 80├85 was 1.30±0.74; 1.34±0.60; 1.48±0.48; 1.56±0.68; 1.71±0.67; 1.78±0.69; 1.67±0.43; 1.67±0.58; respectively. The following second-order equation best represented the correlation between NT thickness and GA: NT=–1.2570+0.0765×GA–0.0005×GA2 (R2=0.05).

Conclusion: The reference values for NT thickness were determined for a sample of the Brazilian population. Further studies are required to evaluate the real need for including these values in first-trimester screening for chromosomal defects in Brazil.


Corresponding author: Edward Araujo Júnior, Referral Center for Teaching of Diagnostic Imaging; and Department of Obstetrics, São Paulo Federal University, Rua Carlos Weber, 956, apto. 113 Visage, Alto da Lapa, São Paulo-SP, Brazil, CEP 05303-000, Tel./Fax: +55-11-37965944, E-mail:

References

[1] Altman DG, Chitty LS. Charts of fetal size I: methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:29–34.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13006.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Brizot ML, Carvalho MH, Liao AW, Reis NS, Armbruster-Moraes E, Zugaib M. First-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities by fetal nuchal translucency in a Brazilian population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;8:652–5.10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00588.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Chen M, Lam YH, Tang MH, Lee CP, Sin SY, Tang R, et al. The effect of ethnic origin on nuchal translucency at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:576–8.10.1002/pd.363Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Hasegawa J, Nakamura M, Hamada S, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K, Sekizawa A, et al. Distribution of nuchal translucency thickness in Japanese fetuses. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2013;39:766–9.10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.02037.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Histórico da investivação sobre cor ou raça nas pesquisas domiciliares do IBGE. Information website: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/caracteristicas_raciais/notas_tecnicas.pdf. Accessed May 03, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Informações Socioambientais e Geoprocessamento. Information website: http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/saude/epidemiologia_e_informacao/informacoes_socioambientais/index.php?p=8452. Accessed November 04, 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Kor-Anantakul TH, Suntharasaj T, Suwanrath C, Chanprapaph P, Sirichotiyakul S, Ratanasiri T, et al. Distribution of normal nuchal translucency thickness: a multicenter study in Thailand. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71:124–8.10.1159/000320754Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Kublickas M, Saltvedt S, Almström H, Grunewald C, Crossley J. Uncertainty in nuchal translucency reference ranges at 11–14 weeks of gestation – comparison to Swedish centiles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:654–8.10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01116.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Merz E, Thode C, Alkier A, Eiben B, Hackelöer BJ, Hansmann M, et al. A new approach to calculating the risk of chromosomal abnormalities with first-trimester screening data. Ultrashall Med. 2008;29:639–45.10.1055/s-2008-1027958Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Miscigenação reduz percentual de brancos e pretos. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Information website: http://www.ibge.com.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=892&id_pagina=1. Accessed May 25, 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Nicolaides KH. Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:45–67.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, Mansur C, Marks K. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J. 1992;304:867–9.10.1136/bmj.304.6831.867Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Nicolaides KH, Brizot ML, Snijders RJ. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for fetal trisomy in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101: 782–6.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11946.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Sahota DS, Leung TY, Fung TY, Chan LW, Law LW, Lau TK. Medians and correction factors for biochemical and ultrasound markers in Chinese women undergoing first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:387–93.10.1002/uog.6340Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Salomon LJ, Chalouhi GE, Bernard JP, Ville Y; Société française pour l’amélioration des pratiques échographiques (SFAPE). [Nuchal translucency thickness at 11–14 weeks of gestation: French charts and equations]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009;38:635–41.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Wøjdemann KR, Christiansen M, Sundberg K, Larsen SO, Shalmi A, Tabor A. Quality assessment in prospective nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:641–4.10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00592.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2013-6-14
Accepted: 2013-10-9
Published Online: 2013-11-5
Published in Print: 2014-3-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. frontmatter
  2. Review articles
  3. Evaluation of the role of first-trimester obstetric ultrasound in the detection of major anomalies: a systematic review
  4. Austrian Newborn Screening Program: a perspective of five decades
  5. Original articles – Obstetrics
  6. Cervical strain determined by ultrasound elastography and its association with spontaneous preterm delivery
  7. Risk factors for unfavorable pregnancy outcome in women with adverse childhood experiences
  8. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) is down regulated in trophoblast cells of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and in trophoblast tumour cells BeWo in vitro after stimulation with PPARγ agonists
  9. Premature rupture of membranes at term in low risk women: how long should we wait in the “latent phase”?
  10. Ferrous bisglycinate 25 mg iron is as effective as ferrous sulfate 50 mg iron in the prophylaxis of iron deficiency and anemia during pregnancy in a randomized trial
  11. Neonatal serum magnesium concentrations are determined by total maternal dose of magnesium sulfate administered for neuroprotection
  12. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone
  13. Peripartum thromboprophylaxis before and after implementation of a uniform heparin protocol
  14. Original articles – Fetus
  15. Impact of sex on perinatal mortality and morbidity in twins
  16. Opinion paper
  17. Preeclampsia is caused by continuous sympathetic center excitation due to an enlarged pregnant uterus
  18. Original articles – Newborn
  19. Practical application of kangaroo mother care in preterm infants: clinical characteristics and safety of kangaroo mother care
  20. Survival and neonatal morbidity among extremely preterm born infants in relation to gestational age based on the last menstrual period or ultrasonographic examination
  21. Short communication
  22. Reference values of nuchal translucency thickness in a Brazilian population sample: experience from a single center
  23. Letters to the Editor
  24. Hepatic rupture: a rare but serious complication of HELLP syndrome
  25. Reply
  26. Reply to: hepatic rupture – a rare but serious complication of HELLP syndrome
  27. Congress Calendar
  28. Congress Calendar
Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2013-0141/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen