Home Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery

  • Samuel Lurie EMAIL logo , Netanel Steinberg , Samer Tannus , Abraham Golan and Oscar Sadan
Published/Copyright: December 8, 2012

Abstract

Objective: To assess mode of subsequent delivery in women with previous instrumental vaginal delivery.

Study design: In this retrospective longitudinal study we followed women who underwent instrumental delivery. The study group included all consecutive parturient women who underwent an instrumental vaginal delivery during a 24-month period (1996–1999). We then identified women who had a subsequent delivery in our center until the end of the year 2010. The control group included women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery from the same time.

Results: During the index period we had 349 consecutive successful instrumental vaginal deliveries. Of those, 125 women had a subsequent delivery in our center (35.8%). In subsequent pregnancies, the spontaneous vaginal delivery rate was 76.8% and 90.4%; the instrumental delivery rate was 8.8% and 1.6%; and the cesarean rate was 14.4% and 8.0%, in the instrumental delivery, and spontaneous vaginal delivery groups, respectively (P<0.05). The odds ratio for a woman to undergo either an instrumental delivery or a cesarean after having an instrumental delivery in a previous pregnancy was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.4–5.9, P<0.05).

Conclusion: Women with a previous instrumental delivery are at an increased risk of requiring either an instrumental delivery or a cesarean section in a subsequent pregnancy compared with women with a previous spontaneous vaginal delivery.


Corresponding author: Prof Samuel Lurie MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel, Tel.: +972-3-5028329, Fax: +972-8-9366259

References

[1] Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. Br Med J. 2004;328:311.10.1136/bmj.37942.546076.44Search in Google Scholar

[2] Greenhill JP. Obstetrics. 11th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.; 1955; p. 190, pp. 193–214.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:227–32.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08235.xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Kadar N, Romero R. Prognosis for future childbearing after midcavity instrumental deliveries in primigravidas. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62:166–70.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lurie S, Boaz M, Sadan O. Using anovaginal distance at the beginning of labor to predict the likelihood of instrumental delivery. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:759–63.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Lurie S, Feinstein M, Blickstein I, Caspi B, Matzkel A. Safe epidural anesthesia performed during labor by an obstetrician Int J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;34:229–33.10.1016/0020-7292(91)90354-8Search in Google Scholar

[7] Lurie S, Sadan O, Golan A. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134:184–7.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.017Search in Google Scholar

[8] Melamed N, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Pardo J, Hod M, Yogev Y. Pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery after a previous operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114: 757–63.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b6f611Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sadan O, Ginath S, Gomel A, Abramov D, Rotmensch S, Boaz M, et al. What to do after a failed attempt of vacuum delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;107:151–5.10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00344-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Steer CM. Effect of type of delivery on future childbearing. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950;60:395–400.10.1016/0002-9378(50)90481-9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-5-12
Accepted: 2012-11-5
Published Online: 2012-12-08
Published in Print: 2013-05-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Review
  4. The diagnosis of rupture of fetal membranes (ROM): a meta-analysis
  5. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  6. Differential proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) in pregnancy
  7. Hyperoxic resuscitation after hypoxia-ischemia induces cerebral inflammation that is attenuated by tempol in a reporter mouse model with very young mice
  8. Prenatal maternal stress predicts cord-blood ferritin concentration
  9. Puerperal curettage after cesarean section delivery
  10. Psychological reactions related to fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a follow-up study
  11. Ethnic disparity in amniotic fluid levels of hyaluronan, histone H2B and superoxide dismutase in spontaneous preterm birth
  12. Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery
  13. Original Articles – Fetus
  14. Pregnancy and neonatal outcome following an antenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate
  15. Genetic low nephron number hypertension is associated with altered expression of osteopontin and CD44 during nephrogenesis*
  16. Pharmacovigilance in pregnancy: adverse drug reactions associated with fetal disorders
  17. Expectant management in type II selective intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal chord insertion in monochorionic twins
  18. Can prenatal detection of Down syndrome be improved by enhancing obstetricians’ skills of performing adequate foetal cardiac examination at the primary level?a
  19. Original Articles – Newborn
  20. The national perinatal mortality rate in the State of Qatar during 2011; trends since 1990 and comparative analysis with selected high-income countries: The PEARL Study Project*
  21. Determinants of successful breastfeeding initiation in healthy term singletons: a Swiss university hospital observational study
  22. Congress Calendar
  23. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 13.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2012-0104/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button