Home Psychological reactions related to fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a follow-up study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Psychological reactions related to fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a follow-up study

  • Katharina Leithner EMAIL logo , Daniela Prayer , Eva Porstner , Nestor D. Kapusta , Maria Stammler-Safar , Elisabeth Krampl-Bettelheim and Eva Hilger
Published/Copyright: December 3, 2012

Abstract

Aims: To assess the women’s retrospective perception of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: Thirty-six women were investigated 1 year after fetal MRI. Data was acquired by telephone interviews and standardised rating scales (i.e., Postscan Imaging Distress Questionnaire, mood and anxiety scales).

Results: In retrospect, most women felt that fetal MRI was associated with marked psychological distress, notably with significant greater distress than at the time of the actual investigation. In total, 55.6% of the women rated at least one aspect of fetal MRI as “not tolerable” at follow-up. These findings were irrespective of the affective status and of the outcome of the pregnancy. Yet, MRI was rated as “the most important” investigation during the prenatal period by 69.4% of subjects, and 80.6% felt that they had sufficiently been informed about the MRI findings.

Conclusions: The acceptance of fetal MRI was found to be very high; however, fetal MRI is linked with marked psychological distress, which was still present – and in many cases even stronger – 1 year after the investigation. These data highlight the importance of sufficient information about fetal MRI and the necessity of adequate emotional support in this emotional vulnerable patient sample.


Corresponding author: Prof. Katharina Leithner, MD, Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Tel.: +43 01 40 400 3061, Fax: +43 01 40 668 03

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

[1] Adamsbaum C, Garel C, Legros JP. Fetal MR: evaluation of patient’s experiences and practical implications. J Radiol. 2008;89:791–6.10.1016/S0221-0363(08)73785-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] Alkazaleh F, Thomas M, Grebenyuk J, Glaude L, Savage D, Johannesen J, et al. What women want: women’s preferences of caregiver behaviour when prenatal sonography findings are abnormal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:56–62.10.1002/uog.906Search in Google Scholar

[3] Beck AT, Rial WY, Rickets K. Short form of depression inventory: cross-validation. Psychol Rep. 1974;34:1184–6.10.1177/003329417403403s01Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dantendorfer K, Amering M, Bankier A, Helbich T, Prayer D, Youssefzadeh S, et al. A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15:301–6.10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00385-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), administration, scoring and procedure manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Services; 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin MA, Mugford M, Nielson J, et al. Women’s views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth. 2002;29:225–50.10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00198.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Garel C. Fetal MRI: what is the future? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:123–8.10.1002/uog.5249Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Kowalcek I. Stress and anxiety associated with prenatal diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21:221–8.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Kowalcek I, Mühlhoff A, Bachmann S, Gembruch U. Depressive reactions and stress related to prenatal medicine procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:18–23.10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00551.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Leithner K, Hilger E, Fischer-Kern M, Löffler-Stastka H, Thien R, Ponocny-Seliger E. Prenatal care: the patient’s perspective. A qualitative study. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:931–7.10.1002/pd.1529Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Leithner K, Pörnbacher S, Assem-Hilger E, Krampl E, Ponocny-Seliger E, Prayer D. Psychological reactions in women undergoing fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:396–402.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181610281Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Leithner K, Pörnbacher S, Assem-Hilger E, Krampl-Bettelheim E, Prayer D. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: towards optimized patient information. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:182–7.10.1002/uog.6391Search in Google Scholar

[13] Nikcevic AV, Tunkel SA, Nicolaides KH. Psychological outcomes following missed abortions and provision of follow-up care. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11:123–8.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11020123.xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Öhmann SG, Saltvedt S, Grunewald C, Waldenström U. Does fetal screening affect women’s worries about the health of their baby? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:634–40.10.1080/j.0001-6349.2004.00462.xSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Press N, Browner CH. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:979–89.10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00011-7Search in Google Scholar

[16] Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-9-6
Accepted: 2012-11-5
Published Online: 2012-12-03
Published in Print: 2013-05-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Review
  4. The diagnosis of rupture of fetal membranes (ROM): a meta-analysis
  5. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  6. Differential proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) in pregnancy
  7. Hyperoxic resuscitation after hypoxia-ischemia induces cerebral inflammation that is attenuated by tempol in a reporter mouse model with very young mice
  8. Prenatal maternal stress predicts cord-blood ferritin concentration
  9. Puerperal curettage after cesarean section delivery
  10. Psychological reactions related to fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a follow-up study
  11. Ethnic disparity in amniotic fluid levels of hyaluronan, histone H2B and superoxide dismutase in spontaneous preterm birth
  12. Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery
  13. Original Articles – Fetus
  14. Pregnancy and neonatal outcome following an antenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate
  15. Genetic low nephron number hypertension is associated with altered expression of osteopontin and CD44 during nephrogenesis*
  16. Pharmacovigilance in pregnancy: adverse drug reactions associated with fetal disorders
  17. Expectant management in type II selective intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal chord insertion in monochorionic twins
  18. Can prenatal detection of Down syndrome be improved by enhancing obstetricians’ skills of performing adequate foetal cardiac examination at the primary level?a
  19. Original Articles – Newborn
  20. The national perinatal mortality rate in the State of Qatar during 2011; trends since 1990 and comparative analysis with selected high-income countries: The PEARL Study Project*
  21. Determinants of successful breastfeeding initiation in healthy term singletons: a Swiss university hospital observational study
  22. Congress Calendar
  23. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2012-0218/html
Scroll to top button